Psychological Services最新文献

{"title":"Examining the factor structure of the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale (ACSS) in a military population: Initial development and validation of a four-factor version of the ACSS.","authors":"Kathryn A Thomas, William T Hoyt, Simon Goldberg, Maleeha Abbas, Megan Schultz, Michele Hiserodt, Mary Wyman","doi":"10.1037/ser0000917","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000917","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicide occurs at high rates in both military and veteran populations. The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide is a widely applied framework incorporating the requisite construct of acquired capability for suicide, which is the ability to engage in suicidal behaviors developed through painful and provocative life experiences. The Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale (ACSS) was developed to assess this construct. Despite substantial literature examining Interpersonal Theory of Suicide in military samples, many versions of ACSS have been used without adequate validation. The goal of this study was to examine the factor structure of the ACSS and derive a version of the ACSS with initial validity for use in military populations. We also examined the stability of acquired capability over time. Data were collected among Wisconsin Army National Guard service members, who were deployed to the Middle East from 2008 to 2010, at three assessment points: before deployment (<i>n</i> = 714), immediately after return from deployment (<i>n</i> = 2,553), and 6-9 months postdeployment (<i>n</i> = 646). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of postdeployment data suggest adoption of a novel, abbreviated 15-item, four-factor version of the ACSS. Analyses provided preliminary support for discriminant and predictive validity. Results also revealed that acquired capability for suicide increases after deployment and remains stable for at least 6-9 months after return from the combat. The four-factor version of the ACSS shows promise as a theory-relevant and empirically supported instrument for research and clinical applications in the military population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142786757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Client preferences for and perceptions of psychotherapy modality and delivery in a university counseling setting.","authors":"David M Erekson, Isaac Hamm, Benjamin Jackson, Colby Schramel, Joseph Rees, Heidi A Vogeler, Katherine D Howe","doi":"10.1037/ser0000923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000923","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rise in demand for mental health services and the changed landscape of post-COVID-19 therapy delivery, examining both therapy modality (e.g., individual, group) and delivery methods (e.g., in-person, remote) has become increasingly important. While empirical evidence generally supports equivalency of outcomes across modalities and delivery methods, there is less evidence regarding comparative preferences and perceptions of these variables. To begin to answer these questions, we surveyed a random sample of 777 university students at a large, western university. Congruent with the previous literature, results suggest that there is a strong preference for in-person individual therapy, in spite of the increased experience with teletherapy. We also found a strong reluctance to engage with group therapy. Demographic factors predicting modality and delivery preferences indicated that being older and a woman were associated with increased likelihood to prefer individual therapy (both in-person and teletherapy), and lower class standing was associated with a stronger preference for group therapy. The only symptoms predictor for preferences included higher levels of social anxiety being associated with a higher preference for online self-help. While those who had previously engaged in a particular type of therapy were typically two to three times more likely to prefer it in the future, those who had attended in-person group therapy were over five times more likely to prefer it in the future. Finally, perceptions of past experiences with in-person therapy were significantly more positive than experiences with teletherapy. We discuss the implications of these findings for future research and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Was training enough? Examining the implementation of evidence-based psychotherapies for depression in Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Princess E Ackland, Andrea Cutting, Michele R Spoont, Sean Nugent, Barbara A Clothier, Emily M Hudson, Hope Salameh, Hanna M Lefchak, Rose Degerstrom, Brent C Taylor","doi":"10.1037/ser0000910","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000910","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three evidence-based psychotherapies for depression (D-EBPs)-cognitive behavioral therapy for depression, acceptance and commitment therapy for depression, and interpersonal psychotherapy-are available in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) through its training initiative. However, training initiatives are not sufficient to move effective treatments into routine practice. Patient and clinic factors can impact evidence-based psychotherapies use. As part of a larger explanatory sequential mixed methods study, we assessed D-EBP use across VHA's outpatient general mental health (GMH) clinics and examined associations between patient- and clinic-level factors and D-EBP use. We identified all patients with a depression diagnosis seen in a VHA GMH clinic in fiscal year 2022. Patient-level variables included demographics, psychiatric medication for depression, and comorbid mental health diagnoses. Clinic-level variables included patient volume, D-EBP clinician capacity, and location. 635,653 patients with a diagnosis of depression were seen in a GMH clinic. 2.8% of those patients had a D-EBP session identified in their medical record, and 77.4% received a depression medication. Being male, older, having certain comorbidities, and using depression medication was associated with lower D-EBP use. Clinics with lower psychotherapy patient volume and in the Continental and Midwest districts had higher D-EBP use. D-EBP use was strikingly lower than depression medication use. Findings suggest clinicians may be challenged by patient comorbidities and high patient volume in practice. Further research on how these factors play out in clinical practice can shed light on whether there is a need for additional implementation strategies to increase D-EBP use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142648728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"It gives you a really great feeling, knowing that what you are doing is making somebody's day: Provider perspectives on implementing the individualized positive psychosocial interaction.","authors":"Cassandra Keiser, Molly Noble, Kimberly VanHaitsma, Katherine M Abbott","doi":"10.1037/ser0000920","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000920","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction (IPPI) is an evidence-based program that supports engaging people living with dementia and their care partners in the nursing home (NH). IPPIs are brief, one-to-one, preference-based activities to improve well-being and decrease behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. The purpose of this study was to understand barriers and facilitators to implementing the IPPI program from the perspective of NH provider champions. Semistructured interviews (<i>n</i> = 62) were completed with implementation champions (<i>n</i> = 20) who led a quality improvement project to implement the IPPI with three to five residents per NH. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded using the Innovation Domain of the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Constructs coded included cost, design, complexity, adaptability, relative advantage, trialability, and evidence base. Implementation champions spoke about the IPPI program's relative advantage of effectively reducing resident's behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia based on meaningful, personalized content. Champions voiced that the IPPI program was cost-effective, adaptable to their local contexts, and provided training to staff to support residents experiencing distress. Champions acknowledged the complexity of identifying implementation team members and completing initial education and training. In addition, they appreciated the chance to build capacity by trialing IPPIs with a small number of residents for initial efforts (e.g., trialability). Utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research allowed for the systematic identification of facilitators and barriers to IPPI implementation. Overall, the IPPI program goals are aligned with nursing home organization goals, supporting staff in providing comfort to residents communicating distress, and can be feasibly implemented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142648723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Implementation of peer specialists in Veterans Health Administration primary care: Improving program fidelity through enhanced preimplementation support.","authors":"Christina B Shook, Laura O Wray, Katherine M Dollar, Monica M Matthieu, Amanda D Peeples, Matthew Chinman, Richard W Goldberg, Andrew S Pomerantz","doi":"10.1037/ser0000911","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000911","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peer specialists (PS) in the Veterans Health Administration are veteran employees with lived mental health experience supporting others in recovery. While PS worked in traditional mental health settings for many years and demonstrated benefits to veteran engagement and satisfaction with health care, little is known about the best strategies to support implementation in novel, complex settings like primary care (PC). Implementation facilitation, which combined external facilitation plus national resources, was chosen to promote uptake when the VA MISSION Act of 2018 required the Veterans Health Administration to implement PS into PC. Using a mixed-methods, formative program evaluation approach, we examined the effects of implementation facilitation across two cohorts of 15 sites. Due to startup timing, Cohort 1 received minimal implementation facilitation during preimplementation compared with Cohort 2. Outcome measures included qualitative evaluation of facilitator notes, time to attain implementation milestones, and PS productivity and program fidelity (percent of total PS encounters in PC). Results suggested that overall productivity was similar across cohorts, but Cohort 2 demonstrated high program fidelity in Month 1 of implementation, while Cohort 1 required 12 months to attain similar fidelity. Qualitative findings indicated implementation facilitation that fostered team cohesion, clarified roles, supported supervisor training, and encouraged sites to guard against competing demands smoothed transitions for PS into PC. During preimplementation, implementation facilitation that focused on these findings resulted in the rapid attainment of program fidelity. Policymakers should consider the value of investing in preimplementation support for speeding the attainment of high-fidelity implementation of novel and complex practices such as PS in PC. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142626771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"International expert perspectives on access, engagement, and implementation of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: A Delphi study.","authors":"Rosalie Ariane Eva Altman, Eric Josiah Tan, Susan Lee Rossell","doi":"10.1037/ser0000922","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000922","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive remediation (CR) for schizophrenia has been extensively studied and has proven effective in improving both cognition and functioning. Yet, implementation into mental health services is poor, with implementation and engagement barriers and facilitators not understood. The present study aimed to assess expert opinions on CR barriers and facilitators that pertain to staff, mental health services, and consumers. Thirty-seven international CR experts (clinicians/researchers) responded to Likert-scale questions on implementation and engagement facilitators, essential CR components, barriers in mental health facilities, barriers for clinicians, and barriers for consumer access and engagement across three rounds of a Delphi survey. The main barriers to CR implementation were (a) lack of staff training, (b) lack of perceived relevance/lack of knowledge about cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and CR usefulness in both clinicians and consumers, as well as (c) lack of staff employed in cognitive rehabilitation roles. The presence of defeatist beliefs and difficulty in accessing the place of delivery were both barriers to consumer engagement and access. The most important facilitators for CR were a good therapeutic alliance, CR delivered as part of integrated rehabilitation services, psychoeducation provided to families and stakeholders, and CR focusing on generalization of learning to everyday life. This study highlights the barriers to CR implementation from experts. A multitude of factors were identified that need attention. It is also apparent that CR cost-effectiveness studies are needed to facilitate organizational change and national guideline recommendations for improving mental health services policy around serious mental illness/schizophrenia health care provisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142626775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Veterans' perspectives on two transdiagnostic group workshops to improve military to civilian reintegration: A comparative thematic analysis.","authors":"Michelle M Pebole, Caroline A Sablone, Alexandra Kenna, Dylan Katz, Colleen B Hursh, Arielle R Knight, Catherine B Fortier","doi":"10.1037/ser0000918","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ser0000918","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Veterans deployed in the post-9/11 wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn) face a multitude of challenges reintegrating into civilian life after military service. There is a need for evidence-based support programs to address the wide-reaching cognitive, psychological, and physical symptoms that can impede civilian reintegration. The present study incorporates quantitative and qualitative methods to assess veterans' experiences with two reintegration treatments (Short-Term Executive Plus-Home [SH] and Present Centered Group Therapy for Reintegration [PCGT-R]) within the context of a larger randomized clinical trial. A total of 131 veterans ages 24-65 years, drawn from the SH (<i>n</i> = 66) and PCGT-R (<i>n</i> = 65) treatment arms, completed quantitative feedback forms and qualitative interviews. Quantitative surveys indicated SH was more highly rated than PCGT-R in terms of program satisfaction (<i>p</i> < .01), helpfulness (<i>p</i> = .03), and connection to other Veterans Affairs (VA) services (<i>p</i>s < .05). Thematic qualitative analysis indicated that both interventions provided beneficial social support and that both groups appreciated online implementation. They also revealed that SH veterans acquired more emotion regulation and impulse control skills and reported greater willingness to engage in further VA treatments, than PCGT-R veterans. Dropout did not differ significantly between groups, and the most highly cited reasons for dropout among both groups were scheduling conflict and dislike of group formats. Findings emphasize the opportunity for group and skills-based interventions focused on reintegration to increase support and access to VA care among veterans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142626782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patterns of psychosocial functioning of treatment-seeking veterans following military sexual trauma: The differential association of functioning and identity.","authors":"Makenzie Irrgang, Meredith R Boyd, Michelle Fernando, Lisa Valentine, Diana C Bennett, Minden B Sexton","doi":"10.1037/ser0000919","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000919","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Veterans with a history of military sexual trauma (MST) often experience poorer social, psychological, and physical outcomes compared with civilians and veterans who have experienced sexual assault outside of the military. Studies suggest some differences in endorsement of MST and its symptoms based on ethnoracial, age, sexuality, and gender-related factors. However, investigations into potential diversity-related patterns of functioning are sparse. This study examined the associations between identity factors and psychosocial functioning among veterans seeking mental health treatment following MST. During intake assessments, veterans (<i>n</i> = 144) completed semistructured clinical interviews and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 as part of routine clinical care at a Midwestern Veterans Healthcare Administration hospital. Psychosocial functioning domains (cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation in society) were analyzed across veterans' race, age, sex, and sexual identity. Results revealed differences in participation in society based on sex and race and in mobility based on race and age. No significant differences were observed in functional domains for sexual identity. These findings highlight the importance of assessing salient identity factors and delivering culturally sensitive trauma-focused care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142626778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cultural Spanish adaptation, factor structure, and reliability of implementation science instruments for suicide prevention.","authors":"Sonia Pérez-Matus, Raúl Ulises Hernández-Ramírez, Catalina González-Forteza, Corina Benjet, Luis Villalobos-Gallegos","doi":"10.1037/ser0000914","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000914","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on the implementation of community gatekeeper training interventions for suicide prevention in Spanish-speaking countries is limited. Gatekeepers identify warning signs of suicidal behavior in at-risk population and refer them to specialized mental health care. To identify factors that influence the implementation of evidence-based practices, standardized measures are needed in Spanish. We culturally adapted and evaluated the factor structure and reliability of two measures for use in the Mexican population: the final version of Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility of the Intervention (Weiner et al., 2017), and the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC; Shea et al., 2014). Our study consisted of two consecutive phases. The first addressed the cross-cultural adaptation. In the second phase, we administered an online survey to a nonrandom sample of 453 middle school personnel and performed a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Participants were 73.95% female, 25.17% male, and 0.88% nonbinary/other and came from the 32 Mexican states. CFA indices for the Mexican Spanish version of the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility measure yielded values of comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.96, Tucker-Lewis fit index (TLI) = 0.94, root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.05, and standardized root-mean-square residual (SRMR) = 0.03. Internal consistency was Ω = 0.95. CFA indices of the Mexican Spanish version of the ORIC were CFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.08, and SRMR = 0.03, and internal consistency was Ω = 0.94. We conclude that both instruments show preliminary psychometric properties that support their validity and reliability in the Mexican Spanish-speaking context. These findings promise to drive research on the implementation of gatekeeper interventions and other evidence-based practices in Spanish-speaking school settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142626766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Rethinking stigma: Prejudicial beliefs impact psychiatric treatment in U.S. soldiers.","authors":"Deane E Aikins, Julie Wargo Aikins, Tara Consolino, Joseph C Geraci, Paul Morrissey","doi":"10.1037/ser0000912","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000912","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two thirds of military personnel diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) do not engage in treatment. We examined the degree that prejudicial beliefs about people with PTSD negatively affected psychiatric medication acceptance. Public stigma is best defined as negative stereotypes regarding individuals being judged as inferior or weak for having PTSD. In comparison, self-stigma includes internalized negative prejudices about illness control and stability. An important preliminary stage in developing self-stigma is first developing prejudicial beliefs about those with an illness. Active duty soldiers on a U.S. Army post completed surveys of prejudicial beliefs, public stigma, negative beliefs about psychiatric medications, and PTSD symptoms. Soldiers' Post Deployment Health Reassessment and medical records were accessed to determine the relation between their survey answers and responses to a later offer of psychiatric medication. Importantly, increased prejudicial beliefs (but not public stigma) that oneself is to blame for having PTSD were associated with a reduced likelihood of accepting psychiatric medication. Increased age was also associated with increased likelihood of accepting medication. Antistigma efforts to date may have limited effectiveness by targeting public-stigma rather than self-stigma prejudicial beliefs about personal responsibility in the development of PTSD. The relevance of this finding is vital to developing public health campaigns that maximize treatment acceptance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}