Veterans' perspectives on two transdiagnostic group workshops to improve military to civilian reintegration: A comparative thematic analysis.

Abstract

Veterans deployed in the post-9/11 wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn) face a multitude of challenges reintegrating into civilian life after military service. There is a need for evidence-based support programs to address the wide-reaching cognitive, psychological, and physical symptoms that can impede civilian reintegration. The present study incorporates quantitative and qualitative methods to assess veterans' experiences with two reintegration treatments (Short-Term Executive Plus-Home [SH] and Present Centered Group Therapy for Reintegration [PCGT-R]) within the context of a larger randomized clinical trial. A total of 131 veterans ages 24-65 years, drawn from the SH (n = 66) and PCGT-R (n = 65) treatment arms, completed quantitative feedback forms and qualitative interviews. Quantitative surveys indicated SH was more highly rated than PCGT-R in terms of program satisfaction (p < .01), helpfulness (p = .03), and connection to other Veterans Affairs (VA) services (ps < .05). Thematic qualitative analysis indicated that both interventions provided beneficial social support and that both groups appreciated online implementation. They also revealed that SH veterans acquired more emotion regulation and impulse control skills and reported greater willingness to engage in further VA treatments, than PCGT-R veterans. Dropout did not differ significantly between groups, and the most highly cited reasons for dropout among both groups were scheduling conflict and dislike of group formats. Findings emphasize the opportunity for group and skills-based interventions focused on reintegration to increase support and access to VA care among veterans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).