Implementation of peer specialists in Veterans Health Administration primary care: Improving program fidelity through enhanced preimplementation support.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Christina B Shook, Laura O Wray, Katherine M Dollar, Monica M Matthieu, Amanda D Peeples, Matthew Chinman, Richard W Goldberg, Andrew S Pomerantz
{"title":"Implementation of peer specialists in Veterans Health Administration primary care: Improving program fidelity through enhanced preimplementation support.","authors":"Christina B Shook, Laura O Wray, Katherine M Dollar, Monica M Matthieu, Amanda D Peeples, Matthew Chinman, Richard W Goldberg, Andrew S Pomerantz","doi":"10.1037/ser0000911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peer specialists (PS) in the Veterans Health Administration are veteran employees with lived mental health experience supporting others in recovery. While PS worked in traditional mental health settings for many years and demonstrated benefits to veteran engagement and satisfaction with health care, little is known about the best strategies to support implementation in novel, complex settings like primary care (PC). Implementation facilitation, which combined external facilitation plus national resources, was chosen to promote uptake when the VA MISSION Act of 2018 required the Veterans Health Administration to implement PS into PC. Using a mixed-methods, formative program evaluation approach, we examined the effects of implementation facilitation across two cohorts of 15 sites. Due to startup timing, Cohort 1 received minimal implementation facilitation during preimplementation compared with Cohort 2. Outcome measures included qualitative evaluation of facilitator notes, time to attain implementation milestones, and PS productivity and program fidelity (percent of total PS encounters in PC). Results suggested that overall productivity was similar across cohorts, but Cohort 2 demonstrated high program fidelity in Month 1 of implementation, while Cohort 1 required 12 months to attain similar fidelity. Qualitative findings indicated implementation facilitation that fostered team cohesion, clarified roles, supported supervisor training, and encouraged sites to guard against competing demands smoothed transitions for PS into PC. During preimplementation, implementation facilitation that focused on these findings resulted in the rapid attainment of program fidelity. Policymakers should consider the value of investing in preimplementation support for speeding the attainment of high-fidelity implementation of novel and complex practices such as PS in PC. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peer specialists (PS) in the Veterans Health Administration are veteran employees with lived mental health experience supporting others in recovery. While PS worked in traditional mental health settings for many years and demonstrated benefits to veteran engagement and satisfaction with health care, little is known about the best strategies to support implementation in novel, complex settings like primary care (PC). Implementation facilitation, which combined external facilitation plus national resources, was chosen to promote uptake when the VA MISSION Act of 2018 required the Veterans Health Administration to implement PS into PC. Using a mixed-methods, formative program evaluation approach, we examined the effects of implementation facilitation across two cohorts of 15 sites. Due to startup timing, Cohort 1 received minimal implementation facilitation during preimplementation compared with Cohort 2. Outcome measures included qualitative evaluation of facilitator notes, time to attain implementation milestones, and PS productivity and program fidelity (percent of total PS encounters in PC). Results suggested that overall productivity was similar across cohorts, but Cohort 2 demonstrated high program fidelity in Month 1 of implementation, while Cohort 1 required 12 months to attain similar fidelity. Qualitative findings indicated implementation facilitation that fostered team cohesion, clarified roles, supported supervisor training, and encouraged sites to guard against competing demands smoothed transitions for PS into PC. During preimplementation, implementation facilitation that focused on these findings resulted in the rapid attainment of program fidelity. Policymakers should consider the value of investing in preimplementation support for speeding the attainment of high-fidelity implementation of novel and complex practices such as PS in PC. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在退伍军人健康管理局初级保健中实施同伴专家计划:通过加强实施前支持来提高计划的忠实度。
退伍军人健康管理局中的同伴专家(PS)是退伍军人的雇员,他们拥有支持他人康复的心理健康生活经验。尽管同伴专家在传统的心理健康环境中工作了多年,并证明了其对退伍军人参与医疗保健和对医疗保健满意度的益处,但对于在初级医疗保健(PC)等新颖、复杂的环境中支持实施的最佳策略却知之甚少。当 2018 年退伍军人健康管理局 MISSION 法案要求退伍军人健康管理局在 PC 中实施 PS 时,我们选择了将外部促进与国家资源相结合的实施促进来推动其吸收。我们采用混合方法、形成性项目评估方法,在 15 个地点的两个队列中考察了实施促进的效果。由于启动时间的原因,与第二组相比,第一组在实施前接受的实施促进最少。结果测量包括对促进者笔记的定性评估、实现实施里程碑所需的时间、PS 生产率和计划忠实度(PC 中总 PS 次数的百分比)。结果表明,各组群的总体生产率相似,但第二组群在实施的第 1 个月就表现出了很高的计划忠实度,而第一组群需要 12 个月才能达到类似的忠实度。定性研究结果表明,促进团队凝聚力、明确职责、支持主管培训以及鼓励项目点防范竞争性需求的实施推动工作,使 PS 向 PC 的过渡更加顺畅。在实施前,以这些发现为重点的实施促进工作使计划的忠实性得以迅速实现。政策制定者应考虑投资于实施前支持的价值,以加快在 PC 中高保真地实施新颖而复杂的实践(如 PS)。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信