It gives you a really great feeling, knowing that what you are doing is making somebody's day: Provider perspectives on implementing the individualized positive psychosocial interaction.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Cassandra Keiser, Molly Noble, Kimberly VanHaitsma, Katherine M Abbott
{"title":"It gives you a really great feeling, knowing that what you are doing is making somebody's day: Provider perspectives on implementing the individualized positive psychosocial interaction.","authors":"Cassandra Keiser, Molly Noble, Kimberly VanHaitsma, Katherine M Abbott","doi":"10.1037/ser0000920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction (IPPI) is an evidence-based program that supports engaging people living with dementia and their care partners in the nursing home (NH). IPPIs are brief, one-to-one, preference-based activities to improve well-being and decrease behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. The purpose of this study was to understand barriers and facilitators to implementing the IPPI program from the perspective of NH provider champions. Semistructured interviews (<i>n</i> = 62) were completed with implementation champions (<i>n</i> = 20) who led a quality improvement project to implement the IPPI with three to five residents per NH. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded using the Innovation Domain of the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Constructs coded included cost, design, complexity, adaptability, relative advantage, trialability, and evidence base. Implementation champions spoke about the IPPI program's relative advantage of effectively reducing resident's behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia based on meaningful, personalized content. Champions voiced that the IPPI program was cost-effective, adaptable to their local contexts, and provided training to staff to support residents experiencing distress. Champions acknowledged the complexity of identifying implementation team members and completing initial education and training. In addition, they appreciated the chance to build capacity by trialing IPPIs with a small number of residents for initial efforts (e.g., trialability). Utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research allowed for the systematic identification of facilitators and barriers to IPPI implementation. Overall, the IPPI program goals are aligned with nursing home organization goals, supporting staff in providing comfort to residents communicating distress, and can be feasibly implemented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000920","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction (IPPI) is an evidence-based program that supports engaging people living with dementia and their care partners in the nursing home (NH). IPPIs are brief, one-to-one, preference-based activities to improve well-being and decrease behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. The purpose of this study was to understand barriers and facilitators to implementing the IPPI program from the perspective of NH provider champions. Semistructured interviews (n = 62) were completed with implementation champions (n = 20) who led a quality improvement project to implement the IPPI with three to five residents per NH. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded using the Innovation Domain of the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Constructs coded included cost, design, complexity, adaptability, relative advantage, trialability, and evidence base. Implementation champions spoke about the IPPI program's relative advantage of effectively reducing resident's behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia based on meaningful, personalized content. Champions voiced that the IPPI program was cost-effective, adaptable to their local contexts, and provided training to staff to support residents experiencing distress. Champions acknowledged the complexity of identifying implementation team members and completing initial education and training. In addition, they appreciated the chance to build capacity by trialing IPPIs with a small number of residents for initial efforts (e.g., trialability). Utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research allowed for the systematic identification of facilitators and barriers to IPPI implementation. Overall, the IPPI program goals are aligned with nursing home organization goals, supporting staff in providing comfort to residents communicating distress, and can be feasibly implemented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

知道自己的所作所为会让别人的生活变得美好,这种感觉真的很棒:服务提供者对实施个性化积极社会心理互动的看法。
个性化积极社会心理互动(IPPI)是一项以证据为基础的计划,它支持养老院(NH)中的痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴参与其中。IPPIs 是以偏好为基础的一对一简短活动,旨在改善痴呆症患者的福祉并减轻其行为和心理症状。本研究旨在从养老院服务提供者的角度了解实施 IPPI 计划的障碍和促进因素。研究人员与实施倡导者(20 人)进行了半结构式访谈(62 人),他们领导了一个质量改进项目,在每家 NH 实施了三到五名居民的 IPPI。对访谈进行了录音、逐字转录,并使用最新的实施研究综合框架的创新领域进行编码。编码的结构包括成本、设计、复杂性、适应性、相对优势、可试用性和证据基础。实施倡导者谈到了 IPPI 计划的相对优势,即通过有意义的个性化内容,有效减少居民痴呆症的行为和心理症状。拥护者们表示,IPPI 计划具有成本效益,可根据当地情况进行调整,并为员工提供培训,以支持遇到困难的住院患者。支持者们承认,确定实施团队成员并完成初始教育和培训的工作非常复杂。此外,他们也很高兴有机会通过在少数居民中试用 IPPI 计划来进行初期能力建设(例如,可试用性)。利用 "实施研究综合框架 "可以系统地识别 IPPI 实施的促进因素和障碍。总体而言,IPPI 计划的目标与疗养院的组织目标相一致,支持员工为遇到困难的住院者提供安慰,并且可以实施。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,版权所有。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信