Jurnal Hukum Adigama最新文献_第10页

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PARA PIHAK DALAM PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI AKIBAT PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM (CONTOH KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 523 K/PDT/2017) 《撤销非法贸易协定》缔约方的法律保护(最高法院判例案件523 K/PDT/2017)

Jurnal Hukum Adigama Pub Date : 2018-12-17 DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2743

Angelica Natalie, S. Atalim

{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PARA PIHAK DALAM PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI AKIBAT PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM (CONTOH KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 523 K/PDT/2017)","authors":"Angelica Natalie, S. Atalim","doi":"10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2743","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2743","url":null,"abstract":"There are differences between contract and tort laws, which lies in the issue of consent. Because in a contract, the parties need to enter an agreement knowingly and without being coerced for the contract to be valid, that means the parties are aware of the risk entailed and the outcome of the contract. Damages in contract claim usually happened because of mistakes or misunderstandings between the parties. On the other hand, the interaction in a tort is never based on consent. Torts generally involve an intrusion by one party into the privacy, health, profit and safety of the victim. In fact, if the victim consents to the tortious conduct, it can serve as a defense that will prevent them from recovering damages. However in Indonesia court of law, the judges accept to restore damages and even the cancellation of the agreement or contract between the parties due to tort, the judges in many cases have shown that they accepted tort as a reason for cancellation of an agreement, this provides legal protection for the parties in cancellation of the sale and purchase agreement due to tort, even if it’s not ensured that all contract cases can be solved this way or if it’s even lawfully right, as there is an important differences between tort and breach in contract, the case example can be seen on Supreme Court Verdict Number 523 K/PDT/2017 which verdicted undue influence causing a tort and cancelled the sale and purchase agreement between the parties.","PeriodicalId":206816,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129895357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

AKIBAT HUKUM PEMBATALAN PERKAWINAN KARENA WALI NIKAH YANG TIDAK BERHAK TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN ANAK DAN HARTA BERSAMA MENURUT HUKUM ISLAM 根据伊斯兰法律，婚姻无效的一方无权获得子女和财产

Jurnal Hukum Adigama Pub Date : 2018-12-17 DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2736

Yulianti Maulidya, Imelda Martinelli

引用次数: 0

ANALISIS PENERAPAN TEORI OBJEKTIVITAS DALAM ASURANASI KAPAL ANTARA PT. BRINGIN SEJAHTERA ARTAMAKMUR DAN PT. DJAKARTA LLOYD (STUDI PUTUSAN NO.423/PDT.G/2011/ PN.JKT.PST.) 分析了PT. BRINGIN的繁荣与PT. DJAKARTA LLOYD之间客客性理论的应用(判决研究423/PDT)。2011年G - PN - PST JKT。)

Jurnal Hukum Adigama Pub Date : 2018-12-17 DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2742

Gibran Budi Nugroho, S. Atalim

{"title":"ANALISIS PENERAPAN TEORI OBJEKTIVITAS DALAM ASURANASI KAPAL ANTARA PT. BRINGIN SEJAHTERA ARTAMAKMUR DAN PT. DJAKARTA LLOYD (STUDI PUTUSAN NO.423/PDT.G/2011/ PN.JKT.PST.)","authors":"Gibran Budi Nugroho, S. Atalim","doi":"10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2742","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2742","url":null,"abstract":"In the insurance agreement, of course, there is an insurance object where the insurance object must be notified in detail by the insured to the insurer if it will not be threatened by the cancellation of the agreement. This is supported by one of the theories developed in insurance business, namely the theory of objectivity supported by article 251 KUHD This research is a study of the application of the theory of objectivity to Decree Number 423 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN.Jkt.Pst because of the claim from PT. Djakarta Lloyd from the insurance object in the form of MV Jatiwangi PB 400 vessel that has been insured to PT Asuransi Bringin Sejahtra Artamakmur (PT BSAM), but the insurance company rejects the claim on the grounds that the ship was damaged at the time of signing the insurance policy. So that the problem arises how to apply the theory of objectivity to the rejection of insurance claims made by (PT BSAM)? is the application of the theory of objectivity in Indonesian insurance law correct? The research method used is a normative juridical research method. Data from the study shows that based on Article 251 KUHD and the theory of objectivity is a description of the honesty of insurance participants with the threat of cancellation of insurance if the insured party is proven not to have good intentions. Based on the definition of objectivity theory and Article 251 KUHD the author wants to discuss how it applies to ship insurance","PeriodicalId":206816,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128845358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

AKIBAT HUKUM PEMBATALAN AKTA JUAL BELI (AJB) ATAS TANAH OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH (PPAT) DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 888/K/PDT/2016

Jurnal Hukum Adigama Pub Date : 2018-12-17 DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2745

Livia Clarista, Endang Pandamdari

{"title":"AKIBAT HUKUM PEMBATALAN AKTA JUAL BELI (AJB) ATAS TANAH OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH (PPAT) DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 888/K/PDT/2016","authors":"Livia Clarista, Endang Pandamdari","doi":"10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2745","url":null,"abstract":"Buying and selling is a process of transferring rights of land carried out by making a sale and purchase deed by a land deed official. Therefore, the procedure must be in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations to produce a valid deed and can be used to transfer the land rights. In this case, there was a mismatch in the procedure for making land sale and purchase deeds carried out by land deed official. This caused a legal defect in the deed which was then supported by a statement from the District Court Verdict Number 381/Pdt.G/2014/PN/Bdg. and the Bandung High Court with Decision Verdict 451/PDT/2015/ PT BDG., where both of them grant the plaintiff's claim, namely land deed official itself. However, the Supreme Court Judges considered that land deed official did not have a legal standing in filing a claim because it was deemed not to have legal interests in the sale and purchase deed. The Supreme Court Judges in Verdict Number 888 / PDT / 2016 canceled the previous court decision. This resulted in the deed returning to its original state. However, the deed can then only be canceled by the parties in it, but the cancellation also can only be done if both parties agree. While the legal consequences of the land deed official issuing the sale and purchase deed are the acceptance of sanctions in the form of temporary and permanent dismissals.","PeriodicalId":206816,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130037431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

KEABSAHAN PENGGUNAAN KUASA MUTLAK DALAM PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI (PPJB) TANAH YANG DIBUAT OLEH NOTARIS

Jurnal Hukum Adigama Pub Date : 2018-12-17 DOI: 10.24912/ADIGAMA.V1I2.2747

Clara Vania, Gunawan Djajaputra

{"title":"KEABSAHAN PENGGUNAAN KUASA MUTLAK DALAM PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI (PPJB) TANAH YANG DIBUAT OLEH NOTARIS","authors":"Clara Vania, Gunawan Djajaputra","doi":"10.24912/ADIGAMA.V1I2.2747","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24912/ADIGAMA.V1I2.2747","url":null,"abstract":"Absolute power of attorney is a power of attorney containing an irrevocable element by the authorizing party. Since the Instructions of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 14 Year 1982 concerning the Prohibition of Absolute Power of Attorney as the Transfer of Land Rights took effect on 6 March 1982 and Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 concerning Land Registration took effect on 8 July 1997, the use of absolute power of attorney has been banned. But in the practice, the use of absolute power of attorney in the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land is still found. This is what often causes conflict because the use of absolute power of attorney is considered contrary to the laws and regulations in Indonesia. The formulation of the problem in this thesis is how the validity of the use of absolute power of attorney in the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land made by a public notary and how the legal consequences of the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land that use absolute power of attorney. The results of the study showed that regarding the use of absolute power of attorney in the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land is legal and does not violate the laws and regulations. In addition, the legal consequences arising from the use of this absolute power of attorney in the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land are still recognized and remain valid and binding for the parties who have made them.","PeriodicalId":206816,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131411943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

TANGGUNG JAWAB RUMAH SAKIT MITRA KELUARGA KALI DERES ATAS TINDAKAN PENOLAKAN PASIEN YANG BERUJUNG PADA KEMATIAN DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NO.8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN 1999年第8号消费者保护法案列举了家庭合作伙伴医院对导致死亡的病人拒绝行为的责任

Jurnal Hukum Adigama Pub Date : 2018-12-17 DOI: 10.24912/ADIGAMA.V1I2.2738

Andre Scondery, Ermanto Fahamsyah

引用次数: 0

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS DALAM MEBUAT PPJB NOMOR 32 (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR ; 28/PDT.G/2015/PN.BGR) 关于公证责任的法律审查在第32题的mejb(裁决研究;2015年G - PN - 28 -哈特利牧师。垂直)

Jurnal Hukum Adigama Pub Date : 2018-12-17 DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2746

Ling Fransiska, Endang Pandamdari

引用次数: 0

KEABSAHAN PENJAMINAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH YANG DIDASARKAN PADA AKTA DI BAWAH TANGAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 53/PDT.G/2017/PN.SGN) 基于手持式契约的土地所有权保证(案例研究编号53/PDT.G/2017/PN SGN)

Jurnal Hukum Adigama Pub Date : 2018-11-17 DOI: 10.24912/ADIGAMA.V1I2.2739

Akbar Rahadianto, Endang Pandamdari

{"title":"KEABSAHAN PENJAMINAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH YANG DIDASARKAN PADA AKTA DI BAWAH TANGAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 53/PDT.G/2017/PN.SGN)","authors":"Akbar Rahadianto, Endang Pandamdari","doi":"10.24912/ADIGAMA.V1I2.2739","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24912/ADIGAMA.V1I2.2739","url":null,"abstract":"Land rights guarantee is a guarantee made by the debtor to the creditor which generally aims to obtain a loan in the form of money for the debtor and repayment of debt to the creditor. In the case of guaranteeing land rights, the procedure has been regulated in the Underwriting Rights on land along with land-related objects act. In this act, it is explained that in the case of guaranteeing land rights, it must be made in an authentic deed named deed of mortgage. But in this case the debtor guarantees ownership rights of the land to the creditor with only deed under hand, not with the deed of mortgage. Is the guarantee still valid? and how about the executorial power? In this study the author uses a case approach and legislative approach. It can be concluded that the guarantee of ownership rights on land based on the deed under the hand is valid because it has fulfilled the elements of Article 1320 of the Civil Code concerning the legal requirements of the agreement. Then for the execution strength, it can be done, but it will be very difficult because it requires a court order to execute the collateral object. The suggestion from the author is that in guaranteeing the rights to the land, it must be charged the Deed of mortgage, so that if there is a default, the execution of the guarantee object is easy and does not take a long time.","PeriodicalId":206816,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","volume":"147 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116085527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

KENDALA DALAM PELAKSANAAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PRAKTIK PARANORMAL SEBAGAI TINDAK PIDANA 阻碍超自然行为的执法障碍

Jurnal Hukum Adigama Pub Date : 2018-08-06 DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2282

Yusi Permatasi, Yuwono Prianto

引用次数: 1

PERLINDUNGAN LUMBA-LUMBA SEBAGAI SATWA LANGKA YANG DILINDUNGI DARI TINDAKAN PENEMPATAN DAN ATRAKSI HIBURAN YANG TIDAK SESUAI 保护海豚作为一种稀有动物，不受不适当的安置和娱乐活动的影响

Jurnal Hukum Adigama Pub Date : 2018-08-03 DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2274

Vivian Fanny, A. Redi

引用次数: 1