TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS DALAM MEBUAT PPJB NOMOR 32 (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR ; 28/PDT.G/2015/PN.BGR)

Ling Fransiska, Endang Pandamdari
{"title":"TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS DALAM MEBUAT PPJB NOMOR 32 (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR ; 28/PDT.G/2015/PN.BGR)","authors":"Ling Fransiska, Endang Pandamdari","doi":"10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notary is a public official who makes an authentic Deed. In the implementation of the PPJB notary has fulfilled the legally binding of an agreement. However in the practice of making a PPJB Deed by a Notary List which is not based on existing facts, there has been no payment paid by the buyer but in PPJB the payment has been paid in full. The problem of this thesis is how the notary accountability in the making of PPJB no 32 (study decision number: 28 / PDT.G / 2015 / PN.BGR). The research method used is normative law research by using secondary data then analyzed qualitatively. The results of the investigation indicate that the Notary is negligent in making the deed so that the deed is degraded into a deed under the hand because the deed is assessed as having juridical defect and disadvantage one of the parties concerned. The notary may be liable for materially and materially in accordance with the law, UUJN and Code of Ethics.","PeriodicalId":206816,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Notary is a public official who makes an authentic Deed. In the implementation of the PPJB notary has fulfilled the legally binding of an agreement. However in the practice of making a PPJB Deed by a Notary List which is not based on existing facts, there has been no payment paid by the buyer but in PPJB the payment has been paid in full. The problem of this thesis is how the notary accountability in the making of PPJB no 32 (study decision number: 28 / PDT.G / 2015 / PN.BGR). The research method used is normative law research by using secondary data then analyzed qualitatively. The results of the investigation indicate that the Notary is negligent in making the deed so that the deed is degraded into a deed under the hand because the deed is assessed as having juridical defect and disadvantage one of the parties concerned. The notary may be liable for materially and materially in accordance with the law, UUJN and Code of Ethics.
关于公证责任的法律审查在第32题的mejb(裁决研究;2015年G - PN - 28 -哈特利牧师。垂直)
公证人是制作真实契约的公职人员。在PPJB的执行中公证已经履行了具有法律约束力的协议。然而,在没有基于现有事实的公证清单制作PPJB契据的实践中,买方没有支付任何款项,但在PPJB中,款项已全额支付。本文的问题是如何在PPJB第32号(研究决定号:28 / PDT)的制定中体现公证责任。G / 2015 / pn.bgr)。本文采用的研究方法是利用二手资料进行规范法研究,然后进行定性分析。调查结果表明,公证人在制作契约时存在疏忽,致使该契约因被评估为具有法律缺陷和对当事一方不利而被降级为契约。公证员可能根据法律、ujn和道德准则承担重大和重大责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信