Epoch Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/EPOCHE201015236

Jeffrey D. Gower

引用次数: 2

How Dynamic Is Aristotle’s Efficient Cause? 亚里士多德的有效原因有多动态?

Epoch Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/EPOCHE201015238

Thomas M. Tuozzo

引用次数: 6

The Playful and the Serious: A Reading of Xenophon’s Symposium 游戏与严肃:色诺芬《会饮篇》解读

Epoch Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/EPOCHE201015228

Mark J. Thomas

引用次数: 0

Whither and Whence We Go, Where We Stop Nobody Knows: Prophecy, Ἔρως, and Self-Knowledge in the Phaedrus 我们到哪里去，到哪里停，无人知道:《费德鲁斯篇》中的预言，Ἔρως与自我认识

Epoch Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/EPOCHE201015230

Benjamin Frazer-Simser

引用次数: 0

On the Question Concerning the Determination of the Matter for Thinking 论思维物的确定问题

Epoch Pub Date : 2010-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/EPOCHE20101422

M. Heidegger, Richard M. Capobianco, M. Göbel

{"title":"On the Question Concerning the Determination of the Matter for Thinking","authors":"M. Heidegger, Richard M. Capobianco, M. Göbel","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE20101422","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE20101422","url":null,"abstract":"Translators’ note: On October 30, 1965, in Amriswil, on the occasion of a celebration for the Swiss psychiatrist Ludwig Binswanger, Heidegger gave a talk titled “Das Ende des Denkens in der Gestalt der Philosophie” (“The End of Thinking in the Form of Philosophy”). In a somewhat expanded version, this address was fi rst published in Japan (translated into Japanese by Kōichi Tsujimura) in December 1968 by Chikumashobō Press, Tokyo, with a new title “Zur Frage nach der Bestimmung der Sache des Denkens” (“On the Question Concerning the Determination of the Matter for Thinking”). For the 1968 Japanese edition, Heidegger added a brief foreword that was not published in Germany until 1989 in Japan und Heidegger, ed. Hartmut Buch ner (Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke Verlag), 230–1. The German text of the expanded version of the talk, excluding the foreword, was edited by Hermann Heidegger and fi rst published in Europe in 1984 as Zur Frage nach der Bestimmung der Sache des Denkens by Erker-Verlag, St. Gallen, Switzerland. In 2000, this same text appeared in the Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 16, edited by Hermann Heidegger (Vittorio Klostermann Verlag), 620–33. Our translation follows the original Erker-Verlag edition (© Erker-Verlag, Franz Larese und Jürg Janett, Gallusstrasse 32, CH-9000 St. Gallen/Schweiz). We are most grateful to Erker-Verlag for granting us the translation rights. The present text, hitherto untranslated into English, is an important statement of Heidegger’s thinking in the 1960s and is closely related to his 1964 lecture “Das Ende der Philosophie und die Aufgabe des Denkens” (“The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking”), which appears in English translation in Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings, ed. David Farrell Krell (San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1993).","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128511167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The Structure of Praxis and the Time of Eudaimonia 实践的结构与快乐的时代

Epoch Pub Date : 2010-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/EPOCHE20101425

David Webb

引用次数: 4

The Abyss of Repetition 重复的深渊

Epoch Pub Date : 2010-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/EPOCHE20101429

J. Powell

引用次数: 0

Static vs. Dynamic Paradoxes: In the End there Can Be Only One 静态vs.动态悖论:最终只能有一个

Epoch Pub Date : 2010-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/EPOCHE20101424

C. Antonopoulos

{"title":"Static vs. Dynamic Paradoxes: In the End there Can Be Only One","authors":"C. Antonopoulos","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE20101424","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE20101424","url":null,"abstract":"There are two antithetical classes of Paradoxes, The Runner and the Stadium, impregnated with infinite divisibility, which show that motion conflicts with the world, and which I call Static. And the Arrow, impregnated with nothing, which shows that motion conflicts with itself, and which I call Dynamic. The Arrow is stationary, because it cannot move at a point; or move, and be at more points than one at the same time, so being where it is not. Despite their contrast, however, both groups can be evaded, if motion is conducted over discrete points: (a) If no two points touch, there will be a step ahead, for there will now be nextness. And (b) if they do not touch,\"here\" and \"there\" (=not-here) will no longer be sufficiently proximal to have the body be where it is not. They will be separate. So the body is only where it is. Hence, both groups, despite their contrast, presuppose, each in its own way, the infinite proximity of any point with any next. But the Dynamic group cannot survive what it needs. Suppose that \"here\" and \"not-here\" (i.e., \"there\"), are not discrete but infinitely proximal. Then Rest also would be self-contradictory. And it gets worse. For it takes two to make a contradiction, in this case, \"here,\" \"not-here,\" and their proximity. But, with regard to conditions of infinite proximity, \"in the end there can be only one\" (point), and hence no contradiction in the first place. The Dynamic paradoxes rest on a premise with which they are inconsistent. They need two of this, of which, in a different but just as equally vital connection, there can be only one. On the force of this remark, the Dynamic paradoxes, initially the stronger of the lot, actually turn out to be the weaker.","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124841211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Luther and Modernity: Reiner Schürmann’s Topology of the Modern in Broken Hegemonies 路德与现代性:赖纳·施<e:1>尔曼在破碎霸权中的现代拓扑图

Epoch Pub Date : 2010-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/EPOCHE201014213

David J. Kangas

引用次数: 0

Marcuse, Aesthetics, and the Logic of Modernity 马尔库塞:美学与现代性逻辑

Epoch Pub Date : 2010-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/EPOCHE201014210

G. Rae

引用次数: 1

Epoch最新文献