{"title":"The Abyss of Repetition","authors":"J. Powell","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE20101429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay concerns various difficulties encountered in the attempt to assess the relation between Heidegger and Nietzsche. More specifically, those difficulties are due to the notion and function of repetition in the texts of both Heidegger and Nietzsche. I attempt to provide an analysis of repetition in the Heidegger of Being and Time and surrounding texts (e.g.,Plato's Sophist and Gruitdbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie). Following this attempt, I then examine the transformed notion of repetition operative in the now famous text written at the time of the Nietzsche lectures, Beitrage zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis), a repetition that goes by the name of crossing (Ubergang). In my presentation of crossing, I attempt to draw Heidegger and Nietzsche together through the repetition of crossing and that of eternal recurrence of the same. Finally, I argue that what draws Heidegger and Nietzsche together is also what prevents us from distinguishing them in any traditional way, a distinction that could then be followed by any number of judgments regarding historical influence. That is, that what draws the two to thinking is what both draws them together, which is abyssal repetition, and problematizes any attempt to distinguish them.","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epoch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE20101429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This essay concerns various difficulties encountered in the attempt to assess the relation between Heidegger and Nietzsche. More specifically, those difficulties are due to the notion and function of repetition in the texts of both Heidegger and Nietzsche. I attempt to provide an analysis of repetition in the Heidegger of Being and Time and surrounding texts (e.g.,Plato's Sophist and Gruitdbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie). Following this attempt, I then examine the transformed notion of repetition operative in the now famous text written at the time of the Nietzsche lectures, Beitrage zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis), a repetition that goes by the name of crossing (Ubergang). In my presentation of crossing, I attempt to draw Heidegger and Nietzsche together through the repetition of crossing and that of eternal recurrence of the same. Finally, I argue that what draws Heidegger and Nietzsche together is also what prevents us from distinguishing them in any traditional way, a distinction that could then be followed by any number of judgments regarding historical influence. That is, that what draws the two to thinking is what both draws them together, which is abyssal repetition, and problematizes any attempt to distinguish them.
本文关注在试图评估海德格尔和尼采之间的关系时遇到的各种困难。更具体地说,这些困难是由于海德格尔和尼采文本中重复的概念和功能。我试图在海德格尔的《存在与时间》和周围的文本(如柏拉图的《诡辩家》和《亚里士多德哲学》)中对重复进行分析。在这一尝试之后,我接着研究了重复的概念在尼采演讲时所写的著名文本中所起的作用,Beitrage zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis),一种以交叉(Ubergang)的名字命名的重复。在我对交叉的呈现中,我试图通过交叉的重复和同一的永恒再现将海德格尔和尼采拉到一起。最后,我认为,将海德格尔和尼采联系在一起的,也是阻止我们以任何传统方式区分他们的原因,这种区分之后,可以对历史影响进行任何数量的判断。也就是说,吸引这两个人思考的是把他们拉到一起的东西,这是一种深奥的重复,任何区分他们的尝试都是有问题的。