宇宙之王:亚里士多德《形而上学》中的潜能、现实性和主权逻辑Λ

Epoch Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI:10.5840/EPOCHE201015236
Jeffrey D. Gower
{"title":"宇宙之王:亚里士多德《形而上学》中的潜能、现实性和主权逻辑Λ","authors":"Jeffrey D. Gower","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE201015236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers a deconstructive reading of the pure actuality of the un- moved mover of Aristotle's Metaphysics Lambda.Aristotle describes this first, unmoved principle of movement as a divine sovereign-the king of the cosmos-and maintains that the good governance of the cosmos depends on its unmitigated unity and pure actuality. It is striking, then, when Giorgio Agamben claims that Aristotle bequeathed the paradigm of sovereignty to Western philosophy not through his arguments for the pure actuality of the unmoved mover but rather through his description of the essence of potentiality. An interpretation of Aristotle's account of potentiality in Metaphysics Theta therefore prepares the way for a deconstruction of the unity and pure actuality of the divine sovereign. I argue that the repetition of nous in Aristotle's description of the divine thinking of thinking betrays traces of division and difference at the heart of divine sovereignty. If this is the case, then actuality and potentiality become indiscernible at the level of the absolute and the sovereign corresponds to the bifurcated site of this indiscernibility.","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The King of the Cosmos : Potentiality, Actuality, and the Logic of Sovereignty in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Λ\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey D. Gower\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/EPOCHE201015236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper offers a deconstructive reading of the pure actuality of the un- moved mover of Aristotle's Metaphysics Lambda.Aristotle describes this first, unmoved principle of movement as a divine sovereign-the king of the cosmos-and maintains that the good governance of the cosmos depends on its unmitigated unity and pure actuality. It is striking, then, when Giorgio Agamben claims that Aristotle bequeathed the paradigm of sovereignty to Western philosophy not through his arguments for the pure actuality of the unmoved mover but rather through his description of the essence of potentiality. An interpretation of Aristotle's account of potentiality in Metaphysics Theta therefore prepares the way for a deconstruction of the unity and pure actuality of the divine sovereign. I argue that the repetition of nous in Aristotle's description of the divine thinking of thinking betrays traces of division and difference at the heart of divine sovereignty. If this is the case, then actuality and potentiality become indiscernible at the level of the absolute and the sovereign corresponds to the bifurcated site of this indiscernibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epoch\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epoch\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE201015236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epoch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE201015236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文对亚里士多德《形而上学》中“不动的行动者”的纯粹现实性进行解构解读。亚里士多德将这第一种不动的运动原理描述为神圣的主权——宇宙之王——并坚持认为,宇宙的良好治理取决于它的绝对统一和纯粹的现实性。令人震惊的是,当Giorgio Agamben声称亚里士多德将主权范式传给西方哲学时,不是通过他对不动者的纯粹现实性的论证,而是通过他对潜在本质的描述。因此,对亚里士多德在《形而上学·西塔》中关于潜能的解释,为神圣主权的统一性和纯粹现实性的解构铺平了道路。我认为,在亚里士多德对神性思维的描述中,nous的重复,暴露了神性主权核心的分裂和差异的痕迹。如果是这样的话,那么现实性和潜在性在绝对的层面上变得不可分辨,主权者对应于这种不可分辨的分岔位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The King of the Cosmos : Potentiality, Actuality, and the Logic of Sovereignty in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Λ
This paper offers a deconstructive reading of the pure actuality of the un- moved mover of Aristotle's Metaphysics Lambda.Aristotle describes this first, unmoved principle of movement as a divine sovereign-the king of the cosmos-and maintains that the good governance of the cosmos depends on its unmitigated unity and pure actuality. It is striking, then, when Giorgio Agamben claims that Aristotle bequeathed the paradigm of sovereignty to Western philosophy not through his arguments for the pure actuality of the unmoved mover but rather through his description of the essence of potentiality. An interpretation of Aristotle's account of potentiality in Metaphysics Theta therefore prepares the way for a deconstruction of the unity and pure actuality of the divine sovereign. I argue that the repetition of nous in Aristotle's description of the divine thinking of thinking betrays traces of division and difference at the heart of divine sovereignty. If this is the case, then actuality and potentiality become indiscernible at the level of the absolute and the sovereign corresponds to the bifurcated site of this indiscernibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信