New Testament Studies最新文献_第5页

Überlegungen zur Rezeptionsgeschichte des Neuen Testaments im Gespräch mit Régis Burnet 经过深思熟虑Rezeptionsgeschichte《新约》的谈话中,萝卜Burnetég

IF 0.4 2区哲学

New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0028688523000048

Christina Hoegen-Rohls

引用次数: 0

Rezeptionskritik und Rezeptionsgeschichte des Neuen Testaments: Eine methodologische Skizze 期中道上的期中期中期中

IF 0.4 2区哲学

New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0028688523000036

Christina Hoegen-Rohls

引用次数: 0

Why ‘Reception History’ Is Not Just Another Exegetical Method: The Case Of Mark's Ending 为什么“接受史”不只是另一种解经方法:以马可的结局为例

IF 0.4 2区哲学

New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0028688522000406

R. Burnet

{"title":"Why ‘Reception History’ Is Not Just Another Exegetical Method: The Case Of Mark's Ending","authors":"R. Burnet","doi":"10.1017/S0028688522000406","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688522000406","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The history of reception is suffering from a fundamental misunderstanding. Since the publication of Truth and Method, everyone has had the impression that reception history is just another exegetical technique. However, the heart of Gadamer's argument is not the history of the effects of the text, but the historicity of understanding: a text is seized only within the limits of the historical situation of its interpreter. To demonstrate this point, this paper takes the example of the Markan ending. Surprisingly, a 16th-century Thomistic theologian, Cajetan, and a contemporary commentary are so close that one might think they are defending the same view of the text. Both intend to maintain the canonicity of verses 9–20, but both point out that it may be adventurous to build any doctrine or practice on these verses alone. But the context is different, obviously. The first one tries to justify a conception of faith that does not depend directly on miracles; the second one affirms a hermeneutic centred on the interpreter's response, being wary of its ecclesiological drifts. This confirms that theological considerations rather than philological ones have prevailed in challenging Mark's ending.","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82152274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

What Does It Mean to Read New Testament Texts ‘within Judaism’? “在犹太教中”阅读新约经文意味着什么?

IF 0.4 2区哲学

New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0028688522000431

A. Runesson

{"title":"What Does It Mean to Read New Testament Texts ‘within Judaism’?","authors":"A. Runesson","doi":"10.1017/S0028688522000431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688522000431","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract For centuries, Christians have understood some of the texts included in the New Testament as ‘Jewish,’ in the sense of them being written by (converted) Jews for other Jews. From a historical perspective, a new development in the academy suggests that such approaches do not do justice to the nature of these texts. Indeed, even more recent attempts at understanding the New Testament against the background of Judaism are also found wanting. Instead, placing these texts within the broader context of the diverse ways of embodying Jewish ancestral customs in the pre-rabbinic Second Temple period, this interpretive trajectory, involving scholars from a wide array of backgrounds, insists that Paul, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Revelation etc., should be understood as expressions of Judaism. This article highlights key issues involved in such re-readings of New Testament texts, including ways in which they may or may not relate to normative-theological positions among Christians and Jews today. First, the study looks at how the question is asked in our contemporary setting. Then, moving down historical layers, issues related to history and categorisation are addressed before we, finally, return to the present to consider possible implications of our findings.","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89243727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

NTS volume 69 issue 3 Cover and Front matter NTS第69卷第3期封面和正面问题

IF 0.4 2区哲学

New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0028688523000152

引用次数: 0

Is λιβανωτός a censer/brazier in Revelation 8.3, 5? How in the lexicon is this possible? λιβανωτ ο ς是启示录8.3,5中的香炉/火盆吗?这怎么可能呢?

IF 0.4 2区哲学

New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0028688523000097

L. Moț

引用次数: 0

Numismatic Insights into Pauline Ethics: ΕΥΕΡΓ- on Roman Provincial, Parthian and Seleucid Coinage 钱币洞察保罗伦理:ΕΥΕΡΓ-关于罗马省，帕提亚和塞琉古铸币

IF 0.4 2区哲学