发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

New Testament Studies最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Gedächtnis trifft Einleitung. Ein neuer Blick auf alte Fragen 记忆与介绍相遇。旧题新解
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1017/s002868852300036x
Sandra Huebenthal
{"title":"Gedächtnis trifft Einleitung. Ein neuer Blick auf alte Fragen","authors":"Sandra Huebenthal","doi":"10.1017/s002868852300036x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s002868852300036x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ausgehend von der kulturwissenschaftlichen Forschung zu Familienalben und deren Gemeinsamkeiten mit dem Neuen Testament lädt dieser Beitrag dazu ein, darüber nachzudenken, was sich verändert, wenn wir die Fragen der Einführung in das Neue Testament durch die Brille der Theorie des sozialen Gedächtnisses betrachten. Aufbauend auf Forschungsergebnissen der Oral History und kulturwissenschaftlichen Gedächtnistheorie wird argumentiert, dass die allgemeine Einleitung in den Bereich des kulturellen Gedächtnisses und die spezielle Einleitung in den Bereich des sozialen/kollektiven Gedächtnisses fällt. Beide sind durch den <span>Floating Gap</span> getrennt, was die vielfach wahrgenommenen Veränderungen in der ersten Hälfte des zweiten Jahrhunderts erklärt. Im nächsten Schritt wird ein Modell, das auf dem Dreigenerationengedächtnis, der <span>Generational Gap</span> (nach einer Generation), der <span>Floating Gap</span> (nach 3-4 Generationen) und den ersten Generationen von Jesus-Anhängern aufbaut, mit Vorschlägen zur Datierung neutestamentlicher Bücher aus der Einleitungswissenschaft ins Gespräch gebracht. Es zeigt sich, dass die vor und nach dem <span>Generational Gap</span> verwendeten Genres je unterschiedliche Eigenschaften haben, die den Erwartungen an Medien des <span>sozialen</span> und <span>kollektiven</span> Gedächtnisses entsprechen. Der Beitrag schließt mit allgemeinen Fragen zu Medien und Medienwandel im Neuen Testament, d.h. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit, identische Texte und Textkritik, dem Kanon als primärem Kontext, der Ausweitung des Geltungsbereichs sowie fluiden Gattungen, und kommt zu dem Schluss, dass kulturwissenschaftliche Gedächtnistheorie in der Tat neue Perspektiven für die Einleitungswissenschaft bietet.</p>","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141255867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Origen's Sources of Exegetical Authority: The Construction of an Inspired Exegete in the Pauline Lineage 奥利的注释权威之源：保罗世系中灵感注释者的构建
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1017/s0028688523000395
Miriam DeCock
{"title":"Origen's Sources of Exegetical Authority: The Construction of an Inspired Exegete in the Pauline Lineage","authors":"Miriam DeCock","doi":"10.1017/s0028688523000395","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688523000395","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, I examine several sources of authority to which Origen laid claim as he set about the task of interpreting scripture. On occasion, in both his commentaries and his homilies, Origen provided accounts of his access to three different, though connected sources of authority that contributed to his self-presentation as an expert interpreter. These sources are as follows: 1) participation in the lineage of the apostles, particularly his exegetical role model, Paul. The second source of authority is a result of the first: 2) direct communication from the Logos, whom he understands to be Christ himself, and 3) angelic assistance and engagement with his pastoral exegetical project. In some instances, Origen even claimed to be on par with two of these sources of authority; he can be found claiming to have exegetical abilities similar to Paul's and, on some rare occasions, to have reached the same epistemological level as the angels. This analysis provides us not only with a case study of the kind of self-fashioning and authorising strategies used by elite scriptural exegetes in the first few centuries of the common era, but it also allows us to shift our focus away from exegetical methods towards the figure, personality and social position of the exegete him or herself. From this shift of focus we gain a better appreciation of a topic to which exegetical authors themselves dedicated considerable energy: just who it was that could occupy the office of authoritative Christian exegete and why.</p>","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141255928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deeds of Will on Papyrus and the Use of the Term διαθήκη in the Letters of Paul 纸莎草上的遗嘱以及保罗书信中 διαθήκη 一词的使用
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1017/s0028688523000437
Romeo Popa
{"title":"Deeds of Will on Papyrus and the Use of the Term διαθήκη in the Letters of Paul","authors":"Romeo Popa","doi":"10.1017/s0028688523000437","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688523000437","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The numerous testaments on papyrus provide a valuable basis for an investigation of legal language around διαθήκη in the Pauline letters. Of particular importance is the ancient practice of revoking wills, which I consider to be the legal frame of reference for the recipients of the Pauline letters to grasp expressions like καινὴ/παλαιὰ διαθήκη. In the Corinthian correspondence the conformity to the current legal practice is evident, but in Galatians Paul turns the whole procedure upside down, manipulating in the construction of his argument not only the practice of testamentary cancellation, but also the traditional connection of Abraham with circumcision. We are compelled to a text-internal solution of the problem in Gal 3.15–17 by the fact that the papyrological evidence shows clearly that no other type of document than the ordinary revocable διαθήκαι can be taken into consideration. This approach is not compilatory, as it is often the case when dealing with documentary papyri applied to New Testament texts, but heuristic, with the purpose of elaborating new exegetical insights in old controversies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141255959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
D’Édesse à Antioche en passant par Jérusalem et Alexandrie. Où situer l’Évangile selon Thomas? Quelques considérations critiques 从埃德萨到安提阿，途经耶路撒冷和亚历山大。多马福音》的定位是什么？一些关键性的考虑
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1017/s0028688523000449
Paul-Hubert Poirier
{"title":"D’Édesse à Antioche en passant par Jérusalem et Alexandrie. Où situer l’Évangile selon Thomas? Quelques considérations critiques","authors":"Paul-Hubert Poirier","doi":"10.1017/s0028688523000449","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688523000449","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dans la perspective de la préparation d'une nouvelle édition annotée de <span>l'Évangile selon Thomas</span>, à paraître dans la collection « Bibliothèque copte de Nag Hammadi » (Leuven, Peeters), cet article revient sur quelques-unes des questions qui ont été débattues à propos de cet écrit, à savoir son lieu et sa date de composition, ainsi que sa langue d'origine.</p>","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141255780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Greetings of Romans 16 and the Audience of Romans 罗马书》第 16 章的问候和《罗马书》的听众
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1017/s0028688523000413
Peter M. Head
{"title":"The Greetings of Romans 16 and the Audience of Romans","authors":"Peter M. Head","doi":"10.1017/s0028688523000413","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688523000413","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This short paper considers and critiques the view that the named people greeted in Romans 16.3–16 are not also among the recipients of the letter to ‘all God's beloved in Rome’ (Rom 1.7). Variants of this view spring from the work of Mullins (1968): that the second-person greeting involves the greeting of ‘a third party who is not intended to be among the immediate readership of the letter’ (Mullins, 1968: 420) and are found in Thorsteinsson (2003), Stowers (2015) and Campbell (2023). A series of arguments are made against this view. In particular, the plural form of the imperative (ἀσπάσασθɛ) and the open nature of the addressees mean that Mullins' simple principle does not apply. In addition, Paul's usage elsewhere (including in Romans 16.16) contradicts Mullins' principle.</p>","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141255786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Christianos in CIL iv, 679: The Possibility of an Image 克里斯提安诺斯（Christianos），载于 CIL iv, 679：图像的可能性
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1017/s0028688523000383
John Granger Cook
{"title":"Christianos in CIL iv, 679: The Possibility of an Image","authors":"John Granger Cook","doi":"10.1017/s0028688523000383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688523000383","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are good warrants for believing that either the word <span>Christianos</span> or the word <span>Christiani</span>, a reference to the Christians, was probably in a graffito on the wall of the atrium of the house now identified as <span>vii.</span>11.11 in Pompeii when Giuseppe Fiorelli excavated it in 1862. Karl Zangemeister edited it in 1871 as CIL <span>iv</span>, 679 and included two divergent transcriptions. In 1995, Paul Berry published a book in which he claimed that he had made an image of the word <span>Christianos</span> using an industrial microscope and high-intensity light. A research project to investigate that claim could be potentially useful for verifying or falsifying Berry's results.</p>","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141255796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ja und Nein? Ja und Amen! Zur Wahrnehmung des paulinischen Apostolats nach 2 Kor 1.15–2.2 是与否？根据林后 1.15-2.2 对保罗使徒行传的认识
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1017/s0028688523000401
Florian Wilk
{"title":"Ja und Nein? Ja und Amen! Zur Wahrnehmung des paulinischen Apostolats nach 2 Kor 1.15–2.2","authors":"Florian Wilk","doi":"10.1017/s0028688523000401","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688523000401","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Der 2. Korintherbrief sucht in seinem ersten Hauptteil (1.15–7.16) die Anstöße aufzuarbeiten, die die Gemeinde im Vorfeld des Briefs an der Ausübung des apostolischen Dienstes durch Paulus genommen hat. Wie die Eröffnung dieses Hauptteils in 1.15–2.2 zu verstehen ist, ist aber in der Forschung umstritten.</p><p>Der Aufsatz untersucht die literarische Verortung, den formalen Aufbau und die sprachliche Ausgestaltung des Gedankengangs, um dessen Sinngehalt und Funktion zu klären. Es wird aufgezeigt, wie der Abschnitt einerseits die Modifikation der paulinischen Besuchsabsichten, andererseits das Unterlassen eines angekündigten weiteren Aufenthalts verteidigt. Vor dem Horizont einer grundsätzlichen Reflexion der Basis, Eigenart und Aufgabe des paulinischen Apostolats korrigiert er die negative Wahrnehmung des Paulus auf Seiten der Adressaten und zeigt in drei Schritten auf, dass dieser gerade mit seinen die Gemeinde enttäuschenden Entscheidungen den ihm und seiner Mitarbeiterschaft gegebenen apostolischen Auftrag sachgerecht wahrgenommen hat.</p>","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141255800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Codex Augiensis is a Copy of the Greek Text of Codex Boernerianus 奥吉尼森法典》是《波纳里阿努斯法典》希腊文本的副本
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1017/s0028688523000371
Alec Fisher
{"title":"Codex Augiensis is a Copy of the Greek Text of Codex Boernerianus","authors":"Alec Fisher","doi":"10.1017/s0028688523000371","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688523000371","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scholars have long been aware of the close relationship between two ninth-century Greek-Latin bilingual manuscripts, Codex Boernerianus (GA 012, VL 77) and Codex Augiensis (GA 010, VL 78). However, assessments of the nature of this relationship differ. The present article seeks to resolve this question by comparing full electronic transcriptions of the Greek texts of these manuscripts in Romans, Galatians, Ephesians, and First Timothy. An examination of the points of divergence, including unique readings, word division, corrections and lacunae confirm that their Greek text was either copied from the same exemplar, or that one served as exemplar for the other. Close analysis of the types of errors and the way in which corrections in Codex Boernerianus are handled in Codex Augiensis proves that the latter was copied from the former. These findings indicate that, as a copy of an existing manuscript, Codex Augiensis should no longer be cited in the apparatus of the Greek New Testament.</p>","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141255871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Τhe Meaning of ἀλληγορέω in Galatians 4.24 Revisited 加拉太书》4.24 中ἀλληγορέω 的含义再探讨
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1017/s0028688523000358
J. Jarrett Ford
{"title":"Τhe Meaning of ἀλληγορέω in Galatians 4.24 Revisited","authors":"J. Jarrett Ford","doi":"10.1017/s0028688523000358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688523000358","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The meaning of the verb ἀλληγορέω stands at the heart of the debate concerning Paul's hermeneutic in Galatians 4.21–31. If by using the term Paul means ‘I am interpreting these things allegorically’, then the question of Paul's interpretive procedure would be all but answered – he would likely be allegorising as the Greeks did before him and the early church fathers did after. However, if he does not mean this, then the question remains open. This article argues that the phrase ἅτινά ἐστιν ἀλληγορούμɛνα means ‘these things are symbolic’, which would indeed leave this question open. This rendering is best for two reasons: First, the majority of the uses of ἀλληγορέω available in the two hundred or so years surrounding the writing of Galatians mean ‘to speak symbolically’. Second, the contextual clues surrounding Paul's use of the term in Galatians itself, such as his call to hear the law in verse 21, strongly suggest such a reading. To prove this thesis, this article provides detailed exposition of the texts in which ἀλληγορέω occurred around the time Paul wrote Galatians before turning to Paul's own use of the term in Galatians 4.24.</p>","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141255869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
First Corinthians 6.1–6: Roman Court or Private Arbitration? 哥林多前书》6.1-6：罗马法庭还是私人仲裁？
IF 0.4 2区 哲学
New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1017/s0028688523000280
Roi Ziv
{"title":"First Corinthians 6.1–6: Roman Court or Private Arbitration?","authors":"Roi Ziv","doi":"10.1017/s0028688523000280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688523000280","url":null,"abstract":"<p>First Corinthians 6.1–6 is consistently read as a Pauline criticism directed against members of the Pauline <span>ekklēsia</span> in Corinth, taking each other to Roman courts. I argue that this understanding of 1 Cor 6.1–6 is implausible in light of practices of Roman law in the provinces and in the colonies. Within a formal court procedure, the Corinthians would not have had the freedom to appoint their own judges, as Paul's language implies. I suggest instead that it is private arbitration which Paul criticises. Papyri dealing with private arbitration and mediation support this reading. Much of Paul's legal terminology in the passage is found in these papyri, making private arbitration a highly plausible suggestion. The suggested reading points to the community's good social ties with the pagan population in the city. It also depicts Paul as working within the framework of Roman law rather than against it. The article exemplifies the benefits of integrating up-to-date studies of Roman law in New Testament Studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141255726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信