{"title":"Peirce et Saussure : regards croisés et lectures en boucles","authors":"J. Fisette","doi":"10.7202/1037155AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1037155AR","url":null,"abstract":"L’auteur trace un parcours circulant alternativement entre les deux oeuvres de pensee du signe, celles de Peirce et de Saussure, cherchant des points de superposition et des points de decrochage. Il evite la simple opposition affichee dans l’esprit d’une confrontation tout autant que les similarites simplificatrices. Son objectif est de reconnaitre les conditions de la construction d’une science des signes, qu’elle soit semiologie ou semiotique. Pour ce, il appuie sa reflexion sur quelques themes theoriques : la question de la convention; la relation du signe a l’objet mondain ou a “la chose designee”; l’espace conceptuel et l’elaboration des tableaux theoriques; la question centrale de la temporalite; puis, un fragment terminal qui fera office de conclusion, touchant l’affiliation de la pensee de Saussure chez Roland Barthes, concernant notamment le projet d’une semiologie. Il marque sa volonte de maintenir le discours a un certain niveau de generalite, cherchant moins a saisir les conceptions abstraites que l’imaginaire de la theorie, la sensibilite aux choses, aux signes et aux mots.","PeriodicalId":191586,"journal":{"name":"RSSI. Recherches sémiotiques. Semiotic inquiry","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114907229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"L’ombre du Cours (1960-1980)","authors":"Pierre-Yves Testenoire","doi":"10.7202/1037154AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1037154AR","url":null,"abstract":"Cet article etudie le moment particulier de la reception saussurienne ou la lecture du Cours de linguistique generale rencontre celle des anagrammes. Entre 1960 et 1980, la decouverte des recherches poetiques de Saussure suscite des debats passionnes. On etudie les caracteristiques, les enjeux et les implicites de cette premiere reception des anagrammes. On montre comment, a cette periode, les anagrammes modifient la lecture du Cours de linguistique generale sur trois points majeurs : la linearite, la conception du signe et le role du sujet dans la theorie saussurienne.","PeriodicalId":191586,"journal":{"name":"RSSI. Recherches sémiotiques. Semiotic inquiry","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122597236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Saussure en toutes lettres","authors":"A. Henault","doi":"10.7202/1037157AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1037157AR","url":null,"abstract":"Alors que, jusqu’au debut de ce siecle, la biographie de Ferdinand de Saussure comportait nombre de mysteres et d’enigmes, les annees recentes ont vu la mise en circulation d’innombrables documents authentiques, concernant la vie du fondateur de la Linguistique generale. On observe que le siecle qui vient de s’ecouler n’a pas vu decroitre l’interet que les chercheurs et meme le public cultive, portent a la personne et a l’oeuvre de F. de Saussure. Bien au contraire. L’ouvrage posthume qu’est le CLG se voit eclaire et constamment enrichi par les publications du Cercle F. de Saussure, a Geneve, qui traitent cette abondante documentation. Comment, de son cote, la semiotique generale va-t-elle exploiter ces nouveaux documents, de maniere a faire progresser ses propres recherches?","PeriodicalId":191586,"journal":{"name":"RSSI. Recherches sémiotiques. Semiotic inquiry","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115017253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Mallarmé selon Saussure","authors":"Jean-Claude Milner","doi":"10.7202/1037158AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1037158AR","url":null,"abstract":"Le mot ptyx se lit chez Mallarme dans un poeme publie en 1887. Pour en etablir la signification, il faut reexaminer de pres la distinction saussurienne entre signifie et chose signifiee. Quant au signifiant, il depend de la linguistique indo-europeenne, dans la version qu’en avait donnee Franz Bopp. Mallarme l’a pratiquee ; on en a la preuve par Les Mots anglais. L’article tente de montrer que la sequence /ptyks/ permet d’obtenir par permutations et modifications l’integralite de l’ossature consonantique de tous les mots indo-europeens possibles. Le ptyx est donc le Mot par excellence, sauf qu’il est prive de la voyelle /a/, que Bopp tenait pour fondamentale. C’est cet /a/ que le poete ira chercher au Styx. A partir de la, on peut eclairer la fonction poetique du ptyx au sein du poeme et le poeme lui-meme; sur tous ces points, l’hypothese des anagrammes se revelera feconde.","PeriodicalId":191586,"journal":{"name":"RSSI. Recherches sémiotiques. Semiotic inquiry","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115487399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Esthétique du signe et interprétation des oeuvres d’art","authors":"M. Lefebvre","doi":"10.7202/1035287AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1035287AR","url":null,"abstract":"Y a-t-il un usage en art pour la theorie esthetique de Peirce? A premiere vue, l’esthetique peirceenne semble assez peu concernee par le probleme de l’art. Or, un examen plus pousse montre que ce n’est pas tout a fait le cas. Aussi, plutot que de plaquer les conceptions de Peirce sur un aspect ou un autre de la pratique ou de la theorie de l’art (par exemple, la creativite, l’histoire de l’art, le style, le genre), ou encore a une oeuvre en particulier, il s’agira ici d’examiner de quelle maniere l’art s’insere dans la conception peirceenne de l’esthetique. L’argument est divise en deux partie. La premiere section presente la conception peirceenne de l’esthetique dans le contexte des sciences normatives. J’y montre comment l’esthetique entretient des liens avec plusieurs themes de la pensee de Peirce, dont sa cosmologie et son agapisme, et le role joue par l’abduction et la notion d’insight. La deuxieme section considere de quelle maniere l’art peut etre “admirable” et contribuer au summum bonum. L’esthetique peirceenne suggere que ce qui nous attire vers l’art est une qualite semiotique entendue comme qualite de l’esprit ou qualite de la Troisiemete.","PeriodicalId":191586,"journal":{"name":"RSSI. Recherches sémiotiques. Semiotic inquiry","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126869655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La pensée iconique","authors":"N. Everaert-Desmedt","doi":"10.7202/1035290AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1035290AR","url":null,"abstract":"Nous partons de la distinction que Peirce (C.P. 2.276) etablit entre les signes iconiques ou hypoicones et l’icone pure. Cette distinction nous est apparue fondamentale pour rendre compte du fonctionnement des oeuvres d’art. Dans des travaux anterieurs, nous avons elabore, a la lumiere de Peirce, un modele de la communication artistique qui met en rapport la production et la reception d’une oeuvre. Nous considerons que l’objectif d’une oeuvre d’art est de capter ce que Peirce appelle des “qualites de sentiments” (de l’ordre du possible, de la primeite), qui, au depart, sont vagues et confuses. L’artiste les rend intelligibles sous la forme de signes iconiques ou hypoicones. Cependant, les signes ne parviennent jamais a materialiser completement la primeite : l’icone pure demeure irrepresentable. Ce que fait essentiellement une oeuvre d’art - sa specificite, a notre avis -, c’est, par un agencement de signes iconiques, conduire le recepteur au-dela de la limite du representable, a un niveau de pensee iconique, c’est-a-dire une pensee capable d’envisager une qualite totale et infinie.","PeriodicalId":191586,"journal":{"name":"RSSI. Recherches sémiotiques. Semiotic inquiry","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124241691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"« Ceci est de l’art ». Analyse peircienne de l’image de l’art","authors":"D. Château","doi":"10.7202/1035288AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1035288AR","url":null,"abstract":"Je prends la phrase “Ceci est de l’art” comme une proposition singuliere visant explicitement un objet precis – par exemple une toile de Manet ou l’urinoir de Duchamp. En m’appuyant sur la theorie peircienne de l’icone, et plus particulierement du diagramme, je reflechis sur “l’image de l’art” qui habite l’esprit de quelqu’un qui prononce cette phrase a l’endroit d’une chose determine, une oeuvre d’art ou ce qui en tient lieu. C’est aussi l’occasion de reflechir sur cette idee d’une certaine image qui, habitant l’esprit de quelqu’un, actualise une relation semiotique a visee symbolique.","PeriodicalId":191586,"journal":{"name":"RSSI. Recherches sémiotiques. Semiotic inquiry","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131662750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Peirce and the Logic of Diagrams","authors":"P. Forster","doi":"10.7202/1035285AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1035285AR","url":null,"abstract":"Peirce’s insistence that logic and mathematics are prior to, and independent of, the natural sciences faces serious objections. First, his claim that all knowledge is scientific seems to imply that any justification of the principles of scientific method presupposes the legitimacy of those principles and thus is circular. Second, his claim that truths of logic and mathematics hold independently of facts about the actual world seems hard to square with his insistence that they are established by observation using the experimental method. Finally, his view that logic and mathematics are sciences on the same epistemological footing as any other science seems at odds with his view that results in mathematics and logic are more secure than those of the natural sciences. I argue that Peirce’s answers to these objections rest on his theory of icons. If this is right, his theory of icons is central to his epistemology and issues in a view of mathematics and logic that is original and has been largely overlooked.","PeriodicalId":191586,"journal":{"name":"RSSI. Recherches sémiotiques. Semiotic inquiry","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121122730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Le point : un argument en faveur de l’iconicité sémiotique","authors":"Francesca Caruana","doi":"10.7202/1035292AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1035292AR","url":null,"abstract":"La semiotique de Peirce presente le signe sous une forme pragmatiste et non formelle c’est–a-dire dans sa dimension realiste. Quel que soit le domaine, aucun element ne peut faire signe sans la specificite d’un contexte duquel il emerge, si bien qu’il n’y a pas de signe en soi, et dans cet ordre d’idee, l’imbrication des champs de reference du signe rend complexe son interpretation. Les significations multiples d’un signe n’ont de validite qu’en tant qu’elles sont l’objet d’experience hic et nunc, et que la variabilite du signe n’en represente qu’une interpretation possible. Le point, element fondamental de representation scientifique, litteraire ou artistique est considere ici comme objet-meme de l’iconicite.","PeriodicalId":191586,"journal":{"name":"RSSI. Recherches sémiotiques. Semiotic inquiry","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116969458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Peirce: Re-Staging the Sign in the Work of Art","authors":"S. Morris","doi":"10.7202/1035291AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1035291AR","url":null,"abstract":"In the tradition of Rosalind Krauss’ essay “Notes on the Index” (1986) I want to re-posit the importance of the indexical status of the work of art and look at how Peirce’s views of aesthetics, his theory of the sign, and his version of phenomenology, can be useful to our understanding of contemporary works of art. The work of art that emerges from reading Peirce is not a representation of an object in the world but a mode of presentation of experience and in particular feeling. Defined as a complex form of icon, a hypoicon, the work of art is not constrained to mimetic representation but engaged in actively re-interpreting our world and our sense of self, cutting through preconceptions by returning us to the present : presentness, and the possibilities of firstness. Peirce’s late discussion on the study of phenomena, phaneroscopy, allows us to understand the work of art both as a part of our experience, and also as giving meaning to our experience : the work of art as a re-staging of the sign on the cusp between possibility and existence.","PeriodicalId":191586,"journal":{"name":"RSSI. Recherches sémiotiques. Semiotic inquiry","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121054781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：