Legal and Criminological Psychology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Editorial acknowledgement 社论承认
IF 1.9 2区 社会学
Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.70015
{"title":"Editorial acknowledgement","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"31 1","pages":"244-246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laypersons' perceptions of sex trafficking victimisation and attribution of blame 外行人对性交易受害者的看法及责任归属
IF 1.9 2区 社会学
Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-10-21 DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.70011
Sarah C. Kim, Rachel E. Dianiska, Emma Simpson, Jodi A. Quas
{"title":"Laypersons' perceptions of sex trafficking victimisation and attribution of blame","authors":"Sarah C. Kim,&nbsp;Rachel E. Dianiska,&nbsp;Emma Simpson,&nbsp;Jodi A. Quas","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A recurring challenge to combatting the significant problem of commercial sex trafficking, especially of minors, lies in identifying actual victims. Public campaigns have increased awareness of the occurrence of trafficking, but the depiction of victims often invokes stereotypes that fail to match characteristics known to be associated with experiences of trafficking, such as high levels of mistrust of authorities, prior victimisation, delinquent histories and uncooperativeness. We examined the extent to which the latter characteristics (i.e., delinquency and uncooperativeness) impact the general public's ability to identify minor victims of trafficking and to whom the public attributes responsibility when such characteristics are present.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 425 adults read vignettes alluding to trafficking that varied in references to delinquency (present vs. absent) and cooperation (high vs. low) of a minor victim and rendered decisions about what happened and who is to blame.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>When minors were described as delinquent, participants saw the minor as more likely to have committed a crime and as responsible for their situation. When minors were described as cooperative, participants viewed the adult as more likely to have committed a crime and as more responsible. Delinquency and cooperation did not interact to influence perceptions, but women placed more responsibility on the adult and held more pro-victim attitudes than men.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Overall, lack of knowledge among the public regarding common victim characteristics seems to undermine the public's ability to identify some victims, highlighting the need for greater accuracy in awareness campaigns.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"31 1","pages":"229-243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Distinct patterns in the accuracy of child testimonies: Evidence from a cluster-based comparison with case records 儿童证词准确性的独特模式:基于案例记录的聚类比较的证据
IF 1.9 2区 社会学
Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.70010
Jaekyung Ahn, Seonhee Choi
{"title":"Distinct patterns in the accuracy of child testimonies: Evidence from a cluster-based comparison with case records","authors":"Jaekyung Ahn,&nbsp;Seonhee Choi","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Child victim testimonies are often used as critical evidence in forensic contexts, yet their accuracy can vary considerably depending on age and crime type. Understanding distinct patterns in testimonial accuracy is therefore essential for improving legal assessments.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to identify distinct accuracy profiles in children's testimonies and examine how demographic and detail-specific variables influence memory performance.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Transcripts from 50 forensic interviews conducted at a Sunflower Centre were analyzed. K-means clustering was used to classify testimonies based on accuracy patterns. Group differences were assessed, and logistic regression was attempted to predict cluster membership.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Two clusters emerged: Cluster 1 (older children, higher accuracy) and Cluster 2 (younger children, lower accuracy). Cluster 1 recalled a significantly greater proportion of correct details (<i>M</i> = 92.6% vs. 82.8%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and was older on average (<i>M</i> = 14.5 vs. 9.6 years, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). At the item level, both clusters showed high accuracy for identity-related details (e.g., perpetrator gender and category). However, significant group differences were found for relationship to perpetrator, incident date and time, and perpetrator age, all more accurately recalled by Cluster 1. Cluster 2 demonstrated lower accuracy for contextual and temporally sensitive details, though they retained some concrete items (e.g., occurrences, school age) comparably. Logistic regression did not identify significant predictors of cluster membership, largely due to sample size and distributional limitations.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Findings highlight heterogeneity in children's testimonies and support the utility of cluster-based approaches in forensic evaluations. Accuracy-based profiles provide a more nuanced understanding of testimonial variability, beyond single demographic variables or abuse type, and emphasize the importance of content-specific assessment of memory performance in child victims.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"31 1","pages":"217-228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145915982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of model statements on verbal differences between truth and lies when using a comparable truthful baseline 当使用可比较的真实基线时,模型陈述对真实和谎言之间语言差异的影响
IF 1.9 2区 社会学
Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.70009
Glynis Bogaard, Nick J. Broers, Ewout H. Meijer
{"title":"The impact of model statements on verbal differences between truth and lies when using a comparable truthful baseline","authors":"Glynis Bogaard,&nbsp;Nick J. Broers,&nbsp;Ewout H. Meijer","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70009","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Baselining is a deception detection technique that compares a statement of interest to a baseline. This study focused on verbal baselining: it examined differences in detailedness between the baseline and the statement of interest as a cue to deception.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Across two experiments, participants watched two crime videos and provided two statements: one truthful baseline and one statement of interest, which was either truthful or deceptive depending on the condition. To manipulate expectations for detail, half of the participants were shown a model statement (i.e., an example of a richly detailed statement) before giving their responses.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In Experiment 1 (using written statements), both the model statement and the baseline independently improved truth/lie discrimination. In Experiment 2 (using spoken statements), however, these effects were not replicated. Importantly, combining a model statement with baselining did not further improve truth/lie discrimination in either experiment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These findings underscore the complexity of verbal lie detection and highlight the need to better understand when and how baselining techniques are most effective.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"31 1","pages":"202-216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lcrp.70009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does the setting matter? Characterizing and classifying rural and urban arsonists 背景重要吗?农村和城市纵火犯的特征和分类
IF 1.9 2区 社会学
Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.70007
Rita Ribeiro, Cristina Neves, Daniel Rijo, Cristina Soeiro
{"title":"Does the setting matter? Characterizing and classifying rural and urban arsonists","authors":"Rita Ribeiro,&nbsp;Cristina Neves,&nbsp;Daniel Rijo,&nbsp;Cristina Soeiro","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70007","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Thousands of fires are deliberately ignited around the world each year. The setting where it happens—rural versus urban areas—can lead to different crime opportunities. Rural arsonists set fires in vegetated areas, whereas urban arsonists target residences and other properties. Although urban and rural arsonists share similar features, some studies suggest that they differ in psychosocial and behavioural characteristics (e.g., age and motivation to set fires).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aims</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study analyses the psychosocial, behavioural and criminal characteristics of arsonists and distinguishes rural from urban arsonists through the development of a typology.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials &amp; Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The criminal records of 330 rural and urban arsonists (221 rural, 103 urban and six mixed rural/urban arsonists) were analysed and Latent Class Analysis was used to identify different subclasses within this sample. Results: Although rural and urban arsonists share some similar characteristics (e.g., no accomplices), differences in other variables were found, with higher effect sizes regarding motivation, relationship to victim, ignition devices and professional status. Furthermore, three different classes emerged to characterize this population: Rural Arsonists—Consumption Problems and Boredom (43%), Rural Arsonists—Mental Health Problems (36%) and Urban Arsonists—Consumption Problems and Revenge (21%).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In rural areas, criminal behaviour patterns were influenced by psychological and social integration problems, while in urban settings, family relationships/intimate partner problems had a greater impact.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>How parole and probation officers interact with their clients impacts attitudes towards the law and, ultimately, clients' likelihood of recidivism.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"31 1","pages":"158-184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lcrp.70007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145915858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors of fraud victimization among the older adults in China: A machine learning analysis 中国老年人欺诈受害的预测因素:机器学习分析
IF 1.9 2区 社会学
Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-08-31 DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.70008
Liang Xu, Jiantao Xu, Yulong Tang, Hongting Li, Xiangming Wu
{"title":"Predictors of fraud victimization among the older adults in China: A machine learning analysis","authors":"Liang Xu,&nbsp;Jiantao Xu,&nbsp;Yulong Tang,&nbsp;Hongting Li,&nbsp;Xiangming Wu","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Fraud victimization among older adults is a growing concern, yet the factors influencing susceptibility remain underexplored. This study examines the predictive role of individual factors in fraud victimization among 5499 older adults in China using machine learning (ML) techniques.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data were drawn from a 2015 dataset, including 22 demographic, financial, and psychological variables. Random forest models were applied to identify key risk factors contributing to fraud susceptibility.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Random forest models showed that demographic characteristics, particularly income, consumption, education, and age, are the most significant predictors of fraud victimization. Additionally, factors, such as chronic illness, lack of pension benefits, financial knowledge, and psychological traits like risk appetite and generalized trust also influence victimization risk. Moreover, psychological traits, although predictive, exhibit weaker explanatory power than demographic variables in this study. Additional ML analyses showed that fraud type influences victimization, with telephone and SMS fraud associated with lower risk, while fraud by acquaintances in person increases susceptibility.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These results suggest the necessity of multifaceted prevention strategies, including financial education programmes, targeted policy interventions, and social support mechanisms to mitigate fraud risks among older adults.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"31 1","pages":"185-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Employability perceptions and the disclosure of a violent offence 就业认知和暴力犯罪的披露
IF 1.9 2区 社会学
Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-08-14 DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.70005
Cody Normitta Porter, Mircea Zloteanu
{"title":"Employability perceptions and the disclosure of a violent offence","authors":"Cody Normitta Porter,&nbsp;Mircea Zloteanu","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Employment is a key factor in reducing reoffending, yet violent offenders face substantial challenges in the job market. This study examined perceptions of employability after the disclosure of a violent offence.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We measured perceptions of employability before and after a Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check for a public-facing role. The DBS check revealed either (i) Actual Bodily Harm (ABH), (ii) robbery with a threat of violence, (iii) robbery with force, or (iv) no criminal conviction. Participants rated candidates on trustworthiness, company value, and role suitability both before and after the disclosure, and were then invited to keep or reject the candidate.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>As hypothesised, candidates with prior violent offences were perceived as less trustworthy, valuable, and suitable for employment. Those with robbery convictions, particularly with a threat of violence (52%) or use of force (42%), faced higher rejection rates compared with those with ABH convictions (26%). Qualitative data revealed concerns about workplace safety, trust, and the relevance of the offence to the job role.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study offers insights into employer decision-making and highlights areas for future research aimed at improving employment opportunities for individuals with violent offences on their criminal record.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"31 1","pages":"138-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lcrp.70005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145930933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Procedural justice, legal cynicism and recidivism: A longitudinal test among people on community supervision 程序正义、法律犬儒主义与累犯:社区监督人群的纵向检验
IF 1.9 2区 社会学
Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.70006
Matthias van Hall, Thomas Baker, Lucas Alward, Michael Caudy
{"title":"Procedural justice, legal cynicism and recidivism: A longitudinal test among people on community supervision","authors":"Matthias van Hall,&nbsp;Thomas Baker,&nbsp;Lucas Alward,&nbsp;Michael Caudy","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Procedural justice literature argues that when people perceive criminal justice authorities as procedurally just, they are more likely to comply with the law. Although procedural justice in community supervision has received some empirical attention, few previous studies have examined factors that might explain the relationship between procedural justice and recidivism.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Employing structural equation modelling, the current longitudinal study tests relationships between procedural justice in encounters with community supervision officers, legal cynicism and recidivism among a sample of 1011 adults on community supervision.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Controlling for demographics and criminal history, procedural justice is negatively related to legal cynicism, which is positively related to recidivism. The findings demonstrate an indirect negative effect from officer procedural justice – via legal cynicism – to recidivism, suggesting the relationship between procedural justice and recidivism is explained by attitudes towards the law.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>How parole and probation officers interact with their clients impacts attitudes towards the law and, ultimately, clients' likelihood of recidivism.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"31 1","pages":"121-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145930876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fore! Does forewarning inoculate people against the false balance effect? 前!预警能让人们预防虚假平衡效应吗?
IF 1.9 2区 社会学
Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.70004
Tianshuang Han, Brent Snook, Martin V. Day
{"title":"Fore! Does forewarning inoculate people against the false balance effect?","authors":"Tianshuang Han,&nbsp;Brent Snook,&nbsp;Martin V. Day","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background &amp; Aims</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We examined the effect of falsely balanced messages on perceptions of expert consensus about non-verbal lie detection and whether forewarning inoculates people against the fake debate strategy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials &amp; Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Participants (<i>N</i> = 307) read a media report that revealed high consensus among experts (nearly 90%) that non-verbal cues are unreliable indicators of deception and were randomly exposed to (1) no comments from experts, (2) balanced comments (three comments from each expert on opposing sides), (3) evidentiary balanced comments (five comments from a deception detection expert and one comment from a contrarian expert), (4) balanced comments along with a forewarning about the ‘fake debate’ strategy, or (5) evidentiary balanced comments along with a forewarning about the ‘fake debate’ strategy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Results showed that participants intuitively believe that non-verbal cues are reliable indicators of deceit. Although participants were made aware that the consensus from scientists is that non-verbal lie detection is futile, the inclusion of balanced comments alongside the data still decreased perceived scientific consensus. Balanced comments also reduced people's policy support in favour of scientific consensus, and forewarning had minimal effect.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We discuss the implications of our findings for efforts to mitigate the fake debate strategy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"31 1","pages":"102-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of parental attachment and early maladaptive schemas in juvenile boy offenders in Turkiye; A case–control study 土耳其少年犯父母依恋与早期适应不良图式的评估病例对照研究
IF 1.9 2区 社会学
Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-07-20 DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.70003
Serdar Karatoprak, Abdulbaki Akyildiz, Gulsum Ozturk Emiral, Emrah Emiral, Yunus Emre Dönmez
{"title":"Assessment of parental attachment and early maladaptive schemas in juvenile boy offenders in Turkiye; A case–control study","authors":"Serdar Karatoprak,&nbsp;Abdulbaki Akyildiz,&nbsp;Gulsum Ozturk Emiral,&nbsp;Emrah Emiral,&nbsp;Yunus Emre Dönmez","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70003","DOIUrl":"10.1111/lcrp.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Early maladaptive schemas (EMS) and parental attachment may play a role in juvenile offending. Identifying these factors could contribute to both the prevention of juvenile offending and the rehabilitation of juvenile offenders. The current study aimed to evaluate the associations between juvenile offending, EMS and parental attachment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sixty-nine adolescents convicted of various offences, and 73 non-offending adolescents were assessed using a sociodemographic data form, the Young Schema Questionnaire and the Short Form of the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Juvenile offenders scored significantly higher in the schema domains of enmeshment/dependence, abandonment, failure, vulnerability to harm, defectiveness and self-sacrifice compared with controls. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding parental attachment. However, a negative correlation was found between parental attachment and early maladaptive schema domains.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The findings suggest that EMS may play an important role in juvenile offending. Schema-focused therapy and family-based interventions may represent promising approaches for the assessment and prevention of juvenile delinquency.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"30 2","pages":"349-363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144833286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书