Two hits or two misses? A critical comment on a combined psychological and biological origin of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Henry Otgaar, Mark L. Howe, Lawrence Patihis, Ivan Mangiulli, Olivier Dodier, Rafaële Huntjens, Elisa Krackow, Marko Jelicic, Steven Jay Lynn
{"title":"Two hits or two misses? A critical comment on a combined psychological and biological origin of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory","authors":"Henry Otgaar,&nbsp;Mark L. Howe,&nbsp;Lawrence Patihis,&nbsp;Ivan Mangiulli,&nbsp;Olivier Dodier,&nbsp;Rafaële Huntjens,&nbsp;Elisa Krackow,&nbsp;Marko Jelicic,&nbsp;Steven Jay Lynn","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.4_12272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Convertino et al. (<span>2025</span>) and Nachson (<span>2025</span>) both stated that biological substrates can be correlated to behaviour. Additionally, Convertino et al. noted that correlation does not imply causation. This issue concerning causation is imperative. Neuroscientific research cannot conclude whether detected neurological substrates have a causal link with dissociative amnesia/repressed memory (e.g. Taïb et al., <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Nonetheless, Markowitsch and Staniloiu (<span>2025</span>) claimed that organic brain damage is not in opposition to dissociative amnesia. They proposed the two-hit hypothesis referring to ‘an additive or synergistic interaction between psychological and physical incidents’ (Staniloiu &amp; Markowitsch, <span>2014</span>, p. 231) to explain certain dissociative amnesia cases. According to them, ‘physical incidents provide psychological or biological grounds for the development and maintenance of dissociative amnesia’ (Staniloiu &amp; Markowitsch, <span>2014</span>, p. 232). By this view, being hit on the head during a robbery (biological cause) could lead to psychological trauma and combined produce dissociative amnesia.</p><p>We are sceptical that the two-hit hypothesis is a sound hypothesis. First, this hypothesis means that whatever the antecedent (physical, psychological), traumatic memory loss can almost always be labelled dissociative amnesia. This renders the concept of dissociative amnesia/repressed memory overgeneral and unfalsifiable. Second, the two-hit hypothesis does not delineate under which conditions such interactions can occur nor what mechanism is involved. Thus, it is not a hypothesis but merely a description of factors potentially underlying traumatic memory loss (Roberts et al., <span>2013</span>). Proposing that two hits cause traumatic memory loss, while there is no causation, is a miss in this field.</p><p><b>Henry Otgaar:</b> Conceptualization; formal analysis; methodology; project administration; visualization; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Mark L. Howe:</b> Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Lawrence Patihis:</b> Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Ivan Mangiulli:</b> Formal analysis; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Olivier Dodier:</b> Writing – review and editing. <b>Rafaële Huntjens:</b> Formal analysis; writing – review and editing. <b>Elisa Krackow:</b> Formal analysis; writing – review and editing. <b>Marko Jelicic:</b> Writing – review and editing. <b>Steven Jay Lynn:</b> Writing – review and editing.</p>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"30 S1","pages":"52-53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lcrp.4_12272","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.4_12272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Convertino et al. (2025) and Nachson (2025) both stated that biological substrates can be correlated to behaviour. Additionally, Convertino et al. noted that correlation does not imply causation. This issue concerning causation is imperative. Neuroscientific research cannot conclude whether detected neurological substrates have a causal link with dissociative amnesia/repressed memory (e.g. Taïb et al., 2023).

Nonetheless, Markowitsch and Staniloiu (2025) claimed that organic brain damage is not in opposition to dissociative amnesia. They proposed the two-hit hypothesis referring to ‘an additive or synergistic interaction between psychological and physical incidents’ (Staniloiu & Markowitsch, 2014, p. 231) to explain certain dissociative amnesia cases. According to them, ‘physical incidents provide psychological or biological grounds for the development and maintenance of dissociative amnesia’ (Staniloiu & Markowitsch, 2014, p. 232). By this view, being hit on the head during a robbery (biological cause) could lead to psychological trauma and combined produce dissociative amnesia.

We are sceptical that the two-hit hypothesis is a sound hypothesis. First, this hypothesis means that whatever the antecedent (physical, psychological), traumatic memory loss can almost always be labelled dissociative amnesia. This renders the concept of dissociative amnesia/repressed memory overgeneral and unfalsifiable. Second, the two-hit hypothesis does not delineate under which conditions such interactions can occur nor what mechanism is involved. Thus, it is not a hypothesis but merely a description of factors potentially underlying traumatic memory loss (Roberts et al., 2013). Proposing that two hits cause traumatic memory loss, while there is no causation, is a miss in this field.

Henry Otgaar: Conceptualization; formal analysis; methodology; project administration; visualization; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Mark L. Howe: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Lawrence Patihis: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Ivan Mangiulli: Formal analysis; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Olivier Dodier: Writing – review and editing. Rafaële Huntjens: Formal analysis; writing – review and editing. Elisa Krackow: Formal analysis; writing – review and editing. Marko Jelicic: Writing – review and editing. Steven Jay Lynn: Writing – review and editing.

两次命中还是两次未命中?对分离性健忘症和压抑记忆的综合心理和生物学起源的批判性评论
Convertino 等人(2025 年)和 Nachson(2025 年)都指出,生物基质可能与行为相关。此外,Convertino 等人还指出,相关性并不意味着因果关系。关于因果关系的问题势在必行。神经科学研究无法断定检测到的神经基质是否与分离性遗忘症/压抑记忆有因果关系(例如,Taïb 等人,2023 年)。然而,Markowitsch 和 Staniloiu(2025 年)声称,有机脑损伤与分离性遗忘症并不对立。他们提出了 "双击假说"(two-hit hypothesis),即 "心理和生理事件之间的叠加或协同互动"(Staniloiu & Markowitsch, 2014, p.231)来解释某些解离性遗忘症病例。根据他们的观点,"物理事件为解离性遗忘症的发展和维持提供了心理或生物学依据"(Staniloiu & Markowitsch, 2014, p.232)。根据这一观点,在抢劫过程中头部受到撞击(生物原因)可能导致心理创伤,并结合产生解离性遗忘症。首先,这一假说意味着,无论前因是什么(生理的、心理的),创伤性失忆几乎都可以被称为分离性失忆症。这使得解离性遗忘症/压抑记忆的概念过于笼统,无法证伪。其次,两击假说并没有说明在什么条件下会发生这种相互作用,也没有说明其中涉及的机制是什么。因此,它不是一个假说,而只是对创伤性失忆潜在因素的描述(Roberts et al.)在没有因果关系的情况下,提出两次打击会导致创伤性失忆,是这一领域的一个失误:构思;形式分析;方法论;项目管理;可视化;写作-原稿;写作-审阅和编辑。马克-L-豪写作--原稿;写作--审阅和编辑。Lawrence Patihis:写作--原稿;写作--审阅和编辑。Ivan Mangiulli:形式分析;写作--原稿;写作--审阅和编辑。奥利维尔-多迪埃写作--审阅和编辑Rafaële Huntjens:形式分析;写作--审阅和编辑。Elisa Krackow:形式分析;写作 - 审阅和编辑。Marko Jelicic:写作--审阅和编辑。Steven Jay Lynn:写作--审阅和编辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信