Journal of PragmaticsPub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-08-14DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.018
Guangyuan Yao , Zhaoxia Liu
{"title":"Can AI simulate or emulate human stance? Using metadiscourse to compare GPT-generated and human-authored academic book reviews","authors":"Guangyuan Yao , Zhaoxia Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.018","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates whether generative AI (represented by ChatGPT) can simulate or even emulate the stance expressed by human authors in the specific genre of academic book reviews. Through a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-generated reviews and human-authored reviews, this study focuses on the use of interactional metadiscourse markers (e.g., hedges, boosters, attitude markers, and self-mention) to reveal current AI's capabilities and limitations in handling complex evaluative discourse and interpersonal interaction. The findings indicate that ChatGPT overall employs interactional metadiscourse markers more frequently than human authors, due to its significant overuse of attitude markers. However, it underuses hedges and self-mention significantly, suggesting a reliance on explicit evaluative language while lacking nuanced caution and authorial presence. These results highlight that current AI's simulation of human writing is genre-sensitive but incomplete, particularly in achieving the balance of caution, conviction, and authorial presence, which is typical of human reviewers. The distinct metadiscoursal patterns identified may serve as linguistic fingerprints for distinguishing AI-generated reviews from human-authored ones. The study also offers pedagogical implications, emphasizing the need for educators and students to recognize current AI's limitations in modeling nuanced stance and fostering authentic authorial voice in evaluative genres.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"247 ","pages":"Pages 103-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144829866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of PragmaticsPub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-09-02DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.009
Costanza Lucchini , Andrea Rocci , Johanna Miecznikowski
{"title":"Managers see, analysts hear. Epistemic divide in financial dialogues","authors":"Costanza Lucchini , Andrea Rocci , Johanna Miecznikowski","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the epistemic asymmetry between managers and analysts in earnings conference calls (ECCs) through the lens of evidentiality and epistemicity. ECCs are dialogical exchanges where corporate managers present financial results and analysts pose questions on behalf of investors. These interactions highlight a significant epistemic divide: managers are insiders with direct access to proprietary knowledge, while analysts depend on the managers’ disclosures to inform investment decisions. This work explores how this asymmetry is reflected in the use of evidentials – linguistic markers that indicate the source of knowledge – and examines the strategic use of these markers in displaying and managing knowledge during ECCs.</div><div>Our primary hypothesis is that managers, leveraging their privileged access to information, will predominantly use <em>direct evidentials,</em> whereas analysts, positioned as outsiders, will favor <em>hearsay evidentials</em> to attribute knowledge to others. By analyzing a corpus of ECCs, we observe the distribution and function of evidentials to capture the participants' strategic behavior and the influence of institutional roles on knowledge negotiation.</div><div>This paper also contributes methodologically by demonstrating how evidential analysis can illuminate role dynamics in institutionalized activity types and highlighting the broader applicability of this approach to other dialogical contexts. After presenting our framework and taxonomy for evidentiality, we offer a quantitative and qualitative analysis of evidential markers to verify our hypothesis, shedding light on how participants’ roles and goals shape their linguistic strategies in managing epistemic asymmetry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"248 ","pages":"Pages 37-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144926747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of PragmaticsPub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-08-06DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.009
Giovanna Alfonzetti, Giulio Scivoletto
{"title":"How gender affects compliments in Italian","authors":"Giovanna Alfonzetti, Giulio Scivoletto","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents findings from a long-term study on compliments in Italian, employing different theoretical and methodological approaches. This study adopts variational pragmatics to investigate the impact of gender on compliments. We examine whether Italian compliments exhibit gender-specific patterns that transcend cultural variations, as suggested in prior research. After revisiting in a variational perspective the wide collection of spontaneous speech analyzed in an earlier phase of the research, new data are drawn from a questionnaire submitted to a sample of 576 young speakers in the University of Catania (Italy). This questionnaire explores various facets of complimenting, including frequency, object, modulation, and function. This analysis reveals a distinct gender pattern, highlighting a pragmatic role of compliments that is salient in women's interaction. Among them, compliments are much more common and intensified, they concern mostly appearance, and they are a positive politeness strategy as they serve an important interpersonal function: linked to the concept of phatic communion, compliments are acts aimed at creating, maintaining, and strengthening mutual solidarity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"247 ","pages":"Pages 4-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144781828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of PragmaticsPub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-09-02DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.017
Luisa Fernanda Acosta Córdoba , Raphaël Py
{"title":"Syntactic study of self-repair and self-reformulation in French and Spanish: Effects of utterance length","authors":"Luisa Fernanda Acosta Córdoba , Raphaël Py","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this article we propose a study of self-repair and self-reformulation based on the analysis of a corpus of nearly 19,000 tokens, fully segmented into utterances. This corpus includes two languages, French and Spanish, which are equally represented, and five different communicative contexts (sociolinguistic interview, public interview, work meeting, meeting between friends and service interaction) for each of these two languages. This corpus architecture, as well as the segmentation of the entire corpus into utterances, allows us to point out some general trends, not previously described, regarding the effect of unit length on self-repair. Indeed, the average length in tokens of the utterance not only predicts the proportion of units with at least one self-repair, but also models the site of initiation of self-repair and type: if less than 10 % of utterances with 5 tokens or less have self-repair, almost 40 % of utterances with between 11 and 20 tokens have self-repair, and about 70 % of utterances with more than 31 tokens have self-repair. Moreover, in utterances with 5 tokens or less, self-repair is most likely to be without reformulation and to occur in a unit without a predicate, whereas in utterances with more than 11 tokens self-repair is likely to be with or without reformulation and to be initiated after the predicate, towards the middle of the unit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"248 ","pages":"Pages 17-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144926746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of PragmaticsPub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.002
Giancarla Unser-Schutz
{"title":"“Wha, what is this?”: Interactive elements in the representation of thoughts in Japanese manga (comics)","authors":"Giancarla Unser-Schutz","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Language is commonly assumed to be inherently dialogic, but there are many situations where people use language primarily to address themselves, as in verbal thoughts and when speakers talk to themselves. While pragmatics focuses on language use in interactive situations, examining non-interactive language use can offer insight into how interaction shapes language. Given that verbal thoughts in comics are primarily indicated visually and not by linguistic markers, they provide unique examples of free direct thoughts. This study investigates interactive language use in comics by examining a corpus of popular Japanese comics, focusing on 1) parts of speech distribution and 2) the use of interjections and sentence final particles compared in represented thoughts and speech. Although interjections were more frequent in represented speech, within interjections, disfluency and fillers were significantly more frequent in represented thoughts. Similarly, although sentence final particles were more frequent in represented speech, the self-directed <em>na</em> and question <em>ka</em> more frequent in represented thoughts. Unlike previous findings on self-talk, other-directed <em>yo</em>, while more frequent in represented speech overall, represented a larger relative proportion than <em>ne</em> in thoughts. These interactive elements were often used in suspended interaction, functioning as fictive devices to move readers through the text and deepen characters. This also suggests that the concept of interaction itself should be reconsidered, to better encompass one-sided interaction such as that observed in represented thoughts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"248 ","pages":"Pages 1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144926745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of PragmaticsPub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-16DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.009
Aino Koivisto
{"title":"Finnish [verb repeat + vai]: Its use as a newsmark and a challenge","authors":"Aino Koivisto","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article relates to the research on discourse particles in the field of pragmatics. More specifically, it discusses the different uses of a Finnish construction that consists of a verb repeat of the previous turn and the questioning discourse particle <em>vai</em> (e.g. <em>on vai</em> be-3 PRT). Although syntactically a question, previous studies have repeatedly characterized [verb repeat + <em>vai</em>] as a responsive action, that is, a newsmark or an assertion of ritualized disbelief. This study shows that [verb repeat + <em>vai</em>] is involved in a variety of related actions that differ with respect to whether they treat the prior talk as delivering (unexpected) news or whether they foreshadow problems of acceptability and thus function as initiations of repair. The important parameters are the action [verb repeat <em>+ vai</em>] responds to (whether it is a piece of news or something else) and the speakers’ epistemic positionings with respect to the matter at hand. The data are in Finnish with English translations. The method is Conversation Analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 90-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144657119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of PragmaticsPub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.005
Lieven Buysse
{"title":"The discourse marker allee in colloquial Belgian Dutch: A case of pragmatic borrowing","authors":"Lieven Buysse","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The relatively few studies on discourse markers in Dutch that have appeared in recent decades have devoted preciously little attention to colloquial language and have mostly ignored potential differences between the two main varieties of Dutch. The discourse marker <em>allee</em> is a pragmatic borrowing from the French imperative form <em>allez</em> (‘go’), which has anecdotally been attributed mainly to Belgian Dutch. This study investigates the functions of <em>allee</em> in spontaneous face-to-face conversations in the <em>Corpus of Spoken Dutch</em> (“Corpus Gesproken Nederlands”), totalling 1 million tokens of speech, and provides an account of how these functions relate to each other in view of the marker's multifunctionality. The results confirm that <em>allee</em> is highly frequent in colloquial Belgian Dutch, whereas it is virtually absent from Netherlandic Dutch. An analysis of a sample of 500 tokens of <em>allee</em> has yielded seven functions, which contribute to the discourse either on an interactional level (expressing exhortation or surprise) or on a textual level (signalling nuance, word search, conclusion, elaboration and topic resumption). Its core function is that of ‘exhortation’, which manifests itself in various ways depending on the level on which <em>allee</em> operates and how it positions itself on a spectrum of speaker- versus addressee-oriented uses and one of signals of continuity versus change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 188-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144750332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of PragmaticsPub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-18DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.012
Wyke Stommel , Lynn de Rijk , Mieke Breukelman , Evi Dalmaijer , Marie Rickert
{"title":"Gender attribution trouble in interaction about a gender ambiguous robot","authors":"Wyke Stommel , Lynn de Rijk , Mieke Breukelman , Evi Dalmaijer , Marie Rickert","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gender attribution is related to the linguistic system of many languages, for instance in person reference. However, gender may also become relevant to what the participants are doing socially (action relevance). This article examines practices related to gender attribution in the context of a gender ambiguous robot. We examine how gender attribution to the robot emerges, unfolds and thus impacts the course of interaction. Our data consist of videorecorded Dutch interactions of two participants in the presence of a Pepper robot. We use Conversation Analysis as a method. Our analysis shows that gender attribution may involve interactional trouble. Sometimes, this is minimal (“or he or it”), marking uncertainty regarding the robot’s gender. But gender may surface more explicitly and even extensively in the case of gender negotiation and accounts that include gender assumptions (“in terms of figure I think it is more of a woman”). Such extended sequences are characterized by tensions: gender is constructed as an opinion versus a knowable; robot gender is deflected as irrelevant while gender relevance persists in the conversation. Overall, gender is treated as problematic and/or delicate, warranting a diversion from the ongoing activity. The recurrence of gender attribution talk in our data is striking in light of reported difficulty of capturing gender categorisation work in naturally-occurring interactions. Overall, deeply ingrained gender norms and their constitution in language and social interaction seem to surpass progressive robot design and may even create a context for the articulation of questionable gender assumptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 108-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144657118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal of PragmaticsPub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-02DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.003
Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu , John Heritage
{"title":"Concordant assertoric nods: Embodiment of epistemic insistence","authors":"Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu , John Heritage","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building on the notion that the functional significance of nods may vary with their physical form and execution, this conversation-analytic report builds on and extends our exploration of what we have termed “assertoric nods” to contexts in which they co-occur with utterances of positive polarity—referred to here as “concordant assertoric nods”—in naturally occurring, multi-party English conversation. We focus on two primary contexts in which these nods arise: (1) when accompanying a claim or assertion, and (2) when accompanying a question. In the cases examined here, utterances accompanied by an assertoric nod—whether a claim, assertion, or question—typically emerge during moments of epistemic struggle between participants. For the most part, these struggles involve contests for epistemic primacy over the issue at hand, either through the implicit adoption of a knowledgeable K+ stance when making a claim or assertion, or by challenging another's assumed K+ position through questioning. What holds across these cases is that the nodding speaker marks a moment of heightened epistemic engagement—demonstrating commitment and steadfastness toward their position—within the unfolding interactional negotiation. Our findings contribute to research on epistemics and embodied conduct in social interaction and challenge the common-sense association of head nodding with positively valenced actions, revealing that what is commonly referred to as “head nodding” is far from a single, undifferentiated action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 203-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144756677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}