随意对话中的埃及建议:深入了解基于语料库的见解

IF 1.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Rania Al-Sabbagh
{"title":"随意对话中的埃及建议:深入了解基于语料库的见解","authors":"Rania Al-Sabbagh","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent studies suggest that Egyptians perceive advice-giving as social cooperation and solidarity, deeply rooted in their collectivist culture. These studies indicate that Egyptians tend to employ direct advice more frequently than individuals in individualistic cultures, where advice-giving is often regarded as face-threatening. However, these conclusions have primarily been drawn from role-play scenarios and multiple-choice questionnaires, which may not fully capture the cultural and linguistic nuances of Egyptian Arabic. This study builds on previous research by analyzing the CALLHOME Egyptian Arabic corpus, a collection of unscripted phone conversations among friends and family, to provide a more nuanced understanding. The findings confirm previous conclusions, revealing that direct advice constitutes 58.3 % of cases, with no significant influence from interlocutors' social status or advice level of imposition. Notably, 15.5 % of this direct advice consists of emotionally supportive phrases such as “don't worry” and “take care” rather than practical guidance. A distinctive form of hedged advice also emerged, marked by hedging imperatives, such as “try” (e.g., “try to find reasons” instead of “find reasons”). Additionally, the corpus highlights how indirect advice is embedded within other speech acts, including requests, prayers, opinions, questions, and wishes. The results, which align with prior conversation analysis research on advice in British and American cultures, suggest that Egyptians exhibit similar behaviors when giving advice. This indicates that conversational expectations, beyond the collectivist-individualist cultural dichotomy, play a critical role in shaping advice-giving strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"241 ","pages":"Pages 116-129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Egyptian advice in casual conversations: A deep dive with corpus-based insights\",\"authors\":\"Rania Al-Sabbagh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent studies suggest that Egyptians perceive advice-giving as social cooperation and solidarity, deeply rooted in their collectivist culture. These studies indicate that Egyptians tend to employ direct advice more frequently than individuals in individualistic cultures, where advice-giving is often regarded as face-threatening. However, these conclusions have primarily been drawn from role-play scenarios and multiple-choice questionnaires, which may not fully capture the cultural and linguistic nuances of Egyptian Arabic. This study builds on previous research by analyzing the CALLHOME Egyptian Arabic corpus, a collection of unscripted phone conversations among friends and family, to provide a more nuanced understanding. The findings confirm previous conclusions, revealing that direct advice constitutes 58.3 % of cases, with no significant influence from interlocutors' social status or advice level of imposition. Notably, 15.5 % of this direct advice consists of emotionally supportive phrases such as “don't worry” and “take care” rather than practical guidance. A distinctive form of hedged advice also emerged, marked by hedging imperatives, such as “try” (e.g., “try to find reasons” instead of “find reasons”). Additionally, the corpus highlights how indirect advice is embedded within other speech acts, including requests, prayers, opinions, questions, and wishes. The results, which align with prior conversation analysis research on advice in British and American cultures, suggest that Egyptians exhibit similar behaviors when giving advice. This indicates that conversational expectations, beyond the collectivist-individualist cultural dichotomy, play a critical role in shaping advice-giving strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"241 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 116-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000852\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000852","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的研究表明,埃及人认为提供建议是一种社会合作和团结,深深植根于他们的集体主义文化。这些研究表明,埃及人倾向于比个人主义文化中的个人更频繁地采用直接建议,在个人主义文化中,提供建议通常被视为有损颜面。然而,这些结论主要是从角色扮演场景和多项选择问卷中得出的,这可能无法完全捕捉埃及阿拉伯语的文化和语言细微差别。这项研究建立在以前的研究基础上,通过分析CALLHOME埃及阿拉伯语语料库,收集朋友和家人之间的无脚本电话对话,提供更细致入微的理解。研究结果证实了先前的结论,表明直接建议占58.3%的案例,对话者的社会地位或建议的强加程度没有显著影响。值得注意的是,15.5%的直接建议是情感上的支持短语,如“别担心”和“保重”,而不是实际的指导。一种独特形式的对冲建议也出现了,其特点是对冲要求,如“尝试”(例如,“尝试找到理由”而不是“找到理由”)。此外,该语料库还强调了间接建议如何嵌入到其他言语行为中,包括请求、祈祷、意见、问题和愿望。研究结果与之前对英美文化中建议的谈话分析研究一致,表明埃及人在给出建议时表现出类似的行为。这表明,会话期望超越了集体主义-个人主义的文化二分法,在形成建议策略方面发挥着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Egyptian advice in casual conversations: A deep dive with corpus-based insights
Recent studies suggest that Egyptians perceive advice-giving as social cooperation and solidarity, deeply rooted in their collectivist culture. These studies indicate that Egyptians tend to employ direct advice more frequently than individuals in individualistic cultures, where advice-giving is often regarded as face-threatening. However, these conclusions have primarily been drawn from role-play scenarios and multiple-choice questionnaires, which may not fully capture the cultural and linguistic nuances of Egyptian Arabic. This study builds on previous research by analyzing the CALLHOME Egyptian Arabic corpus, a collection of unscripted phone conversations among friends and family, to provide a more nuanced understanding. The findings confirm previous conclusions, revealing that direct advice constitutes 58.3 % of cases, with no significant influence from interlocutors' social status or advice level of imposition. Notably, 15.5 % of this direct advice consists of emotionally supportive phrases such as “don't worry” and “take care” rather than practical guidance. A distinctive form of hedged advice also emerged, marked by hedging imperatives, such as “try” (e.g., “try to find reasons” instead of “find reasons”). Additionally, the corpus highlights how indirect advice is embedded within other speech acts, including requests, prayers, opinions, questions, and wishes. The results, which align with prior conversation analysis research on advice in British and American cultures, suggest that Egyptians exhibit similar behaviors when giving advice. This indicates that conversational expectations, beyond the collectivist-individualist cultural dichotomy, play a critical role in shaping advice-giving strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信