{"title":"The discourse marker allee in colloquial Belgian Dutch: A case of pragmatic borrowing","authors":"Lieven Buysse","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The relatively few studies on discourse markers in Dutch that have appeared in recent decades have devoted preciously little attention to colloquial language and have mostly ignored potential differences between the two main varieties of Dutch. The discourse marker <em>allee</em> is a pragmatic borrowing from the French imperative form <em>allez</em> (‘go’), which has anecdotally been attributed mainly to Belgian Dutch. This study investigates the functions of <em>allee</em> in spontaneous face-to-face conversations in the <em>Corpus of Spoken Dutch</em> (“Corpus Gesproken Nederlands”), totalling 1 million tokens of speech, and provides an account of how these functions relate to each other in view of the marker's multifunctionality. The results confirm that <em>allee</em> is highly frequent in colloquial Belgian Dutch, whereas it is virtually absent from Netherlandic Dutch. An analysis of a sample of 500 tokens of <em>allee</em> has yielded seven functions, which contribute to the discourse either on an interactional level (expressing exhortation or surprise) or on a textual level (signalling nuance, word search, conclusion, elaboration and topic resumption). Its core function is that of ‘exhortation’, which manifests itself in various ways depending on the level on which <em>allee</em> operates and how it positions itself on a spectrum of speaker- versus addressee-oriented uses and one of signals of continuity versus change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 188-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144750332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Frames are for talking: Modeling interactants’ co-constructed semantic and pragmatic structures","authors":"Oliver Spiess","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the rich potential for collaboration between conversation analysis and frame semantics. It illustrates this potential by repeatedly analyzing a conversation fragment and the meaning co-constructed by its two participants. The investigation begins with a conventional sequential conversation analysis and gradually expands to include the taxonomies, categories, and frames that are established and made relevant within the interaction. This leads to the development of a framework termed <em>interactional frame semantics</em>. The paper argues that frame semantics and conversation analysis are highly compatible because they share central methodological concerns. Their integration addresses two major research gaps in both fields: the often implicit yet necessary reliance on semantic knowledge and cognitive processes in conversation analysis, and the neglect of interactional data and phenomena in frame semantics. Sequential analysis benefits from a rigorous frame-semantic formalization of the meanings co-constructed in conversation in at least three ways: first, it helps identify the specific semantic cues that both participants and analysts rely on to interpret interaction. Second, it reveals the local pragmatic affordances through which participants can renegotiate meaning. Third, it enables a quantitative reconstruction of the knowledge, both shared and contested, that emerges through conversational negotiation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 170-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144750331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Social identity and implicature: Exploring the pragmatics of transgender coming out narratives in videogames","authors":"Frazer Heritage","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite being one of the most popular forms of media, videogames are an under-researched text type within linguistics. This paper examines the language used within videogames, specifically in relation to how videogame writers index the identities of transgender characters. Utilising data from the LGBTQ Video Game Archive (Shaw, 2017), which documents the history of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer content in games, I identify 22 videogames which contain references to transgender characters. A close qualitative reading of instances where transgender characters occur reveals two broad trends: i) there are multiple instances where such representation is unclear and ii) transgender identities are rarely overtly indexed. Within this second trend, I specifically focus on the role of implicature and inferencing in how transgender identities are constructed. That is, how these characters implicitly “come out” to the player and the shared knowledge needed to understand these implicatures. I argue that such shared knowledge is influenced by the social identities and lived experiences of the interpreter, which should be considered in the degree to which meaning<sub>NN</sub> is considered relevant. The research presented has implications for analysing more coming-out narratives and creating more connections between pragmatics, language, gender, and sexuality studies, as well as videogame/media studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 158-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144739423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A pragmatic analysis of discourse marker 넵 neyp ‘yep’ in Korean computer-mediated communication","authors":"Mikyung Ahn , Foong Ha Yap","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the diverse functions and contextual use of the Korean discourse marker 넵 <em>neyp</em> ‘yep’ in online conversations, highlighting its adaptation within digital communication contexts. Using data from the National Institute of Korean Language (NIKL) Online Conversation Corpus, the study identifies eight primary functions of 넵 <em>neyp</em>, namely, affirmation, acceptance, agreement, confirmation, acknowledgment, continuer, response to summons, and other-initiated repair. The findings reveal that 넵 <em>neyp</em> is not just a simple substitute for “yes,” but a versatile tool for managing conversational flow, building social rapport, and compensating for the absence of non-verbal cues in text-based interactions. By examining these functions, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how linguistic practices evolve to meet the communicative demands of digital environments, shedding light on the interplay between technology, language, and social interaction. Additionally, the analysis shows that 넵 <em>neyp</em> is more frequently used in online conversations, in large part due to the consonant ㅂ (<em>p</em>), which conveys emphasis and engagement, fostering camaraderie and encouragement among participants. Furthermore, 넵 <em>neyp</em> maintains a polite and approachable tone, making it ideal for casual, professional, and semi-formal interactions, especially with strangers. This study offers insights into how digital environments shape language practices and highlights their role in bridging social distances in online contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 134-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144679913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How we are versus how we are feeling: The role of emotional intelligence and mood in reactions to impoliteness in L1 and L2","authors":"Nicola Claire McNab , Irini Mavrou","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous (im)politeness research has tended to focus on socio-cultural influences, thus largely neglecting the role of individual differences. This study takes a socio-cognitive approach to investigate how personality––measured through emotional intelligence (EI)––, mood, and language (first versus second language) influence responses to impoliteness. The study was pre-registered prior to data collection and analysis. One hundred and four Spanish-English bilinguals completed an EI questionnaire and underwent mood induction, before responding to a Discourse Completion Task (DCT) involving ten impolite workplace scenarios. A mixed-methods approach was used, and data were analysed by means of mixed-effects regression models, Chi-squared tests, and content analysis. Sociability, a facet of EI, appeared to influence responses to impoliteness, possibly indicating individual levels of assertiveness played a role. Mood had an impact on response types, with participants in a negative mood responding with more offensive counter-attacks and those in a positive mood responding with more acceptance. However, offensive responses within the positive mood group were also found to utilise more bald on record impoliteness, thus suggesting cognitive processes do vary depending on mood. Language did not have an effect, perhaps signalling similarities between Spanish and English or lending support to the role of pragmatic transfer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 121-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144665934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Wyke Stommel , Lynn de Rijk , Mieke Breukelman , Evi Dalmaijer , Marie Rickert
{"title":"Gender attribution trouble in interaction about a gender ambiguous robot","authors":"Wyke Stommel , Lynn de Rijk , Mieke Breukelman , Evi Dalmaijer , Marie Rickert","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gender attribution is related to the linguistic system of many languages, for instance in person reference. However, gender may also become relevant to what the participants are doing socially (action relevance). This article examines practices related to gender attribution in the context of a gender ambiguous robot. We examine how gender attribution to the robot emerges, unfolds and thus impacts the course of interaction. Our data consist of videorecorded Dutch interactions of two participants in the presence of a Pepper robot. We use Conversation Analysis as a method. Our analysis shows that gender attribution may involve interactional trouble. Sometimes, this is minimal (“or he or it”), marking uncertainty regarding the robot’s gender. But gender may surface more explicitly and even extensively in the case of gender negotiation and accounts that include gender assumptions (“in terms of figure I think it is more of a woman”). Such extended sequences are characterized by tensions: gender is constructed as an opinion versus a knowable; robot gender is deflected as irrelevant while gender relevance persists in the conversation. Overall, gender is treated as problematic and/or delicate, warranting a diversion from the ongoing activity. The recurrence of gender attribution talk in our data is striking in light of reported difficulty of capturing gender categorisation work in naturally-occurring interactions. Overall, deeply ingrained gender norms and their constitution in language and social interaction seem to surpass progressive robot design and may even create a context for the articulation of questionable gender assumptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 108-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144657118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Finnish [verb repeat + vai]: Its use as a newsmark and a challenge","authors":"Aino Koivisto","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article relates to the research on discourse particles in the field of pragmatics. More specifically, it discusses the different uses of a Finnish construction that consists of a verb repeat of the previous turn and the questioning discourse particle <em>vai</em> (e.g. <em>on vai</em> be-3 PRT). Although syntactically a question, previous studies have repeatedly characterized [verb repeat + <em>vai</em>] as a responsive action, that is, a newsmark or an assertion of ritualized disbelief. This study shows that [verb repeat + <em>vai</em>] is involved in a variety of related actions that differ with respect to whether they treat the prior talk as delivering (unexpected) news or whether they foreshadow problems of acceptability and thus function as initiations of repair. The important parameters are the action [verb repeat <em>+ vai</em>] responds to (whether it is a piece of news or something else) and the speakers’ epistemic positionings with respect to the matter at hand. The data are in Finnish with English translations. The method is Conversation Analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 90-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144657119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The pragmatics of online healthcare communication: Politeness strategies in an anxiety and depression support community","authors":"Annalisa Federici","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article investigates the use of politeness strategies in online peer communication within a support group focused on anxiety and depression. Although health communication has been widely studied across various platforms, the application of (im)politeness theory to health-related Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) remains relatively unexplored. Using Brown and Levinson's framework alongside the relational work model, the study shows that potentially face-threatening acts such as seeking and offering support or advice are frequently softened through politeness strategies like hedging, indirectness, and claiming common ground. Self-disclosure emerges as a key discursive practice that allows individuals to express vulnerability and request help/advice without overt imposition, while those offering responses often convey empathy and guidance through personal storytelling. Advice is commonly delivered indirectly – using declaratives or interrogatives – even when no explicit request is made, reflecting the importance of relational work in these interactions. Through close analysis of selected forum threads, the study illustrates how participants use brief personal narratives to foster solidarity, express emotional and informational support, and navigate the complexities of advice-giving/seeking in ways that minimise threat to self and others. These findings contribute to ongoing discussions on CMC in healthcare by showing how politeness strategies underpin interactional norms in online mental health communities. By combining linguistic and discourse-pragmatic perspectives, the study highlights the role of language in shaping supportive environments and managing relational dynamics in non-clinical, peer-driven settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"246 ","pages":"Pages 74-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144632041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}