Costanza Lucchini , Andrea Rocci , Johanna Miecznikowski
{"title":"Managers see, analysts hear. Epistemic divide in financial dialogues","authors":"Costanza Lucchini , Andrea Rocci , Johanna Miecznikowski","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the epistemic asymmetry between managers and analysts in earnings conference calls (ECCs) through the lens of evidentiality and epistemicity. ECCs are dialogical exchanges where corporate managers present financial results and analysts pose questions on behalf of investors. These interactions highlight a significant epistemic divide: managers are insiders with direct access to proprietary knowledge, while analysts depend on the managers’ disclosures to inform investment decisions. This work explores how this asymmetry is reflected in the use of evidentials – linguistic markers that indicate the source of knowledge – and examines the strategic use of these markers in displaying and managing knowledge during ECCs.</div><div>Our primary hypothesis is that managers, leveraging their privileged access to information, will predominantly use <em>direct evidentials,</em> whereas analysts, positioned as outsiders, will favor <em>hearsay evidentials</em> to attribute knowledge to others. By analyzing a corpus of ECCs, we observe the distribution and function of evidentials to capture the participants' strategic behavior and the influence of institutional roles on knowledge negotiation.</div><div>This paper also contributes methodologically by demonstrating how evidential analysis can illuminate role dynamics in institutionalized activity types and highlighting the broader applicability of this approach to other dialogical contexts. After presenting our framework and taxonomy for evidentiality, we offer a quantitative and qualitative analysis of evidential markers to verify our hypothesis, shedding light on how participants’ roles and goals shape their linguistic strategies in managing epistemic asymmetry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"248 ","pages":"Pages 37-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144926747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Syntactic study of self-repair and self-reformulation in French and Spanish: Effects of utterance length","authors":"Luisa Fernanda Acosta Córdoba , Raphaël Py","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this article we propose a study of self-repair and self-reformulation based on the analysis of a corpus of nearly 19,000 tokens, fully segmented into utterances. This corpus includes two languages, French and Spanish, which are equally represented, and five different communicative contexts (sociolinguistic interview, public interview, work meeting, meeting between friends and service interaction) for each of these two languages. This corpus architecture, as well as the segmentation of the entire corpus into utterances, allows us to point out some general trends, not previously described, regarding the effect of unit length on self-repair. Indeed, the average length in tokens of the utterance not only predicts the proportion of units with at least one self-repair, but also models the site of initiation of self-repair and type: if less than 10 % of utterances with 5 tokens or less have self-repair, almost 40 % of utterances with between 11 and 20 tokens have self-repair, and about 70 % of utterances with more than 31 tokens have self-repair. Moreover, in utterances with 5 tokens or less, self-repair is most likely to be without reformulation and to occur in a unit without a predicate, whereas in utterances with more than 11 tokens self-repair is likely to be with or without reformulation and to be initiated after the predicate, towards the middle of the unit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"248 ","pages":"Pages 17-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144926746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Corrigendum to ““#HaveYouNoShame”: Unraveling the pragmatics of impolite political hashtags” [J. Pragmatics 235 (2025) 238–253/12]","authors":"Seyed Mohammadreza Mortazavi , Hamed Zandi","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"247 ","pages":"Page 179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144925554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Wha, what is this?”: Interactive elements in the representation of thoughts in Japanese manga (comics)","authors":"Giancarla Unser-Schutz","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Language is commonly assumed to be inherently dialogic, but there are many situations where people use language primarily to address themselves, as in verbal thoughts and when speakers talk to themselves. While pragmatics focuses on language use in interactive situations, examining non-interactive language use can offer insight into how interaction shapes language. Given that verbal thoughts in comics are primarily indicated visually and not by linguistic markers, they provide unique examples of free direct thoughts. This study investigates interactive language use in comics by examining a corpus of popular Japanese comics, focusing on 1) parts of speech distribution and 2) the use of interjections and sentence final particles compared in represented thoughts and speech. Although interjections were more frequent in represented speech, within interjections, disfluency and fillers were significantly more frequent in represented thoughts. Similarly, although sentence final particles were more frequent in represented speech, the self-directed <em>na</em> and question <em>ka</em> more frequent in represented thoughts. Unlike previous findings on self-talk, other-directed <em>yo</em>, while more frequent in represented speech overall, represented a larger relative proportion than <em>ne</em> in thoughts. These interactive elements were often used in suspended interaction, functioning as fictive devices to move readers through the text and deepen characters. This also suggests that the concept of interaction itself should be reconsidered, to better encompass one-sided interaction such as that observed in represented thoughts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"248 ","pages":"Pages 1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144926745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A critical pragmatic study of stance in peter Obi's world press conference speeches","authors":"Felicia Oamen","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The All Progressives Congress (APC) has dominated Nigeria's political space since 2015. However, Peter Obi's emergence as the Labour Party (LP) presidential candidate in 2022 challenged the hegemony of APC. This study, therefore, critically examined the pragmatic features of Obi's world press conference speeches, which were produced to contest Bola Ahmed Tinubu's (the APC presidential candidate) victory in the 2023 presidential election. Specifically, the paper analysed the pragmatics of stance-taking to examine the ideological framing of resistance in Nigeria's political discourse. Data comprised three media speeches delivered by Obi after Tinubu's victory. The study adopted Mey's (2001) critical pragmatics, notions from van Dijk's approach to critical discourse analysis, and Hyland's (2005) stance theory, with focus on the metaphorical characteristics, speech acts, implicatures, presupposition and politeness norms deployed to represent self as the ideal leader. The representations were achieved through strategies of victimisation, delegitimisation, blame allocation, subtle criminalization of others, and self-glorification. The study concluded that stance taking by Nigerian politicians is moderated by speaker's background knowledge of the country's restive democratic environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"247 ","pages":"Pages 168-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144913539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Then journeys are like life itself, rarely straight”: Towards a meta-metaphorical perspective on life–journey interactions","authors":"Ming-Yu Tseng","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reversal of the deep-rooted <span>life is a journey</span> metaphor is not commonly heard in everyday language, and as a result has received little attention. This study addresses the phenomenon in which <span>a journey is life</span> appears to be embedded within, or co-exists with, <span>life is a journey</span> in text. This study argues that this phenomenon constitutes a meta-metaphor – a metaphor about a metaphor – which can set free and extend familiar metaphorical thought and instigate <span>life–journey</span> interactions in ways that the familiar metaphor alone cannot achieve. This paper proposes a multilevel view of the literal-metonymic-metaphorical continuum, which considers the possibility that literalness, metonymy and metaphor are located at different levels involving language, experience (physical action) and belief systems (faith and knowledge). This multilevel lens, underpinned by cognitive and socio-pragmatic forces, further explains why <span>life–journey</span> interactions can occur.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"247 ","pages":"Pages 152-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144913538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"‘If they say “there's a photo ban and any clothes you can forget about taking them”’: Interactional functions of hypothetical direct reported speech in adoption assessment interviews","authors":"Madeleine Wirzén","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines the interactional functions of hypothetical direct reported speech (HDRS) in Swedish adoption assessment interviews. Drawing on 36 h of recorded conversations between social workers and prospective adoptive parents, the study uses conversation analysis to explore how HDRS is employed to accomplish institutional tasks. The analysis shows that both social workers and applicants use HDRS to navigate the moral, emotional, and relational complexities of the assessment process. Social workers use HDRS to challenge assumptions, introduce alternative perspectives, and mitigate the face-threatening nature of advice-giving. Applicants, in turn, use HDRS to construct parenting identities, demonstrate child-centered reasoning, and express emotional commitment. Rather than functioning merely as a rhetorical device, HDRS emerges as an interactional practice that enacts institutional expectations, facilitates perspective-taking, and renders parenting approaches evaluable. By performing rather than simply describing future actions, participants make their positions more vivid and credible. This study contributes to research on institutional interaction and reported speech by demonstrating how HDRS supports both evaluative and pedagogical goals in adoption interviews, thereby highlighting the hybrid nature of the activity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"247 ","pages":"Pages 139-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144908531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Off-the-shelf” features and pragmatic trajectories: The years of cioè in Italian","authors":"Chiara Ghezzi","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Linguistic variants have a ‘social’ value if alternants are “easily parsed, extracted, and recombined-taken off the shelf” (Eckert, 2019: 755). In this process indexicality is central as it connects (linguistic) signs to social occasions, anchoring language use into social patterns. Discourse markers, central elements within pragmatics, display formal and functional properties which make them ideal for identity construction and negotiation of social meaning. This contribution considers how social meaning aligns with the prototypically pragmatic meaning of discourse markers through the exemplar development of Italian <em>cioè</em> ‘that is’ from 1976 to today. Basing the analysis on spoken corpora and questionnaires on speakers' attitudes, the study shows that the social meaning of <em>cioè</em> is anchored in linguistic practices of social groups, which entail uses in different structural contexts, positions, and with different scopes. It also links the pragmatic development of <em>cioè</em> to the evolution of its social indexicalities. Lastly, it discusses the role of discourse markers, and of pragmatic variables, in the development of social personae and in the relationship of social meaning with indexicality. If the latter is the use of linguistic correlations to do social work, the former is its outcome in particular instances.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"247 ","pages":"Pages 120-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144896666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Can AI simulate or emulate human stance? Using metadiscourse to compare GPT-generated and human-authored academic book reviews","authors":"Guangyuan Yao , Zhaoxia Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.018","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates whether generative AI (represented by ChatGPT) can simulate or even emulate the stance expressed by human authors in the specific genre of academic book reviews. Through a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-generated reviews and human-authored reviews, this study focuses on the use of interactional metadiscourse markers (e.g., hedges, boosters, attitude markers, and self-mention) to reveal current AI's capabilities and limitations in handling complex evaluative discourse and interpersonal interaction. The findings indicate that ChatGPT overall employs interactional metadiscourse markers more frequently than human authors, due to its significant overuse of attitude markers. However, it underuses hedges and self-mention significantly, suggesting a reliance on explicit evaluative language while lacking nuanced caution and authorial presence. These results highlight that current AI's simulation of human writing is genre-sensitive but incomplete, particularly in achieving the balance of caution, conviction, and authorial presence, which is typical of human reviewers. The distinct metadiscoursal patterns identified may serve as linguistic fingerprints for distinguishing AI-generated reviews from human-authored ones. The study also offers pedagogical implications, emphasizing the need for educators and students to recognize current AI's limitations in modeling nuanced stance and fostering authentic authorial voice in evaluative genres.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"247 ","pages":"Pages 103-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144829866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}