{"title":"Toward a granular analysis of the discourse marker ti: in Tunisian Arabic","authors":"Mohamed Jlassi","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study offers a granular analysis of procedural relevance by challenging the traditional view of discourse markers as performing a fixed procedural function. The analysis draws on a corpus of Tunisian Arabic supported by a speaker survey to examine the pragmatic effects of <em>ti:</em> across diverse communicative contexts. Focusing on the understudied yet pervasive discourse marker <em>ti:</em> in Tunisian Arabic, the paper relies on corpus data and speaker insights to disambiguate its complex functional load. The findings reveal that the frequency of <em>ti:</em> stems from its high degree of multifunctionality: it serves diverse conversational roles, influences the trajectory of interaction, and reflects the dynamics between discourse participants. The paper argues that this multifunctionality is rooted in <em>ti:</em>’s multicategorial status, enabling it to perform multiple communicative tasks across different discourse domains. As such, <em>ti:</em> exemplifies a “multiperformative” discourse marker—an element that simultaneously encodes various pragmatic functions with minimal speech effort. This efficiency points to broader implications for the typology of discourse markers, both in Arabic and crosslinguistically. Ultimately, the study underscores the need for a more nuanced, crosslinguistically grounded model of procedural meaning—one that accounts for multifunctionality, categorical flexibility, and interactional economy. Such an approach, situated within pragmatics, opens the door to productive interfaces with other linguistic fields.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"249 ","pages":"Pages 139-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625002346","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study offers a granular analysis of procedural relevance by challenging the traditional view of discourse markers as performing a fixed procedural function. The analysis draws on a corpus of Tunisian Arabic supported by a speaker survey to examine the pragmatic effects of ti: across diverse communicative contexts. Focusing on the understudied yet pervasive discourse marker ti: in Tunisian Arabic, the paper relies on corpus data and speaker insights to disambiguate its complex functional load. The findings reveal that the frequency of ti: stems from its high degree of multifunctionality: it serves diverse conversational roles, influences the trajectory of interaction, and reflects the dynamics between discourse participants. The paper argues that this multifunctionality is rooted in ti:’s multicategorial status, enabling it to perform multiple communicative tasks across different discourse domains. As such, ti: exemplifies a “multiperformative” discourse marker—an element that simultaneously encodes various pragmatic functions with minimal speech effort. This efficiency points to broader implications for the typology of discourse markers, both in Arabic and crosslinguistically. Ultimately, the study underscores the need for a more nuanced, crosslinguistically grounded model of procedural meaning—one that accounts for multifunctionality, categorical flexibility, and interactional economy. Such an approach, situated within pragmatics, opens the door to productive interfaces with other linguistic fields.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.