{"title":"Automatic behaviour analysis reveals links between facial expression and speech acts’ illocutionary point, strength, and valence","authors":"Marc Mehu, Savannah Sweeting","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is abundant literature indicating that, beyond its role in emotional communication, facial behaviour could be essential in the way individuals carry out performative functions of speech. Using speech acts theory, we formalised three ways facial signals could relate to verbal utterances: 1) by authenticating the illocutionary point of statements, 2) by authenticating the valence of the mental states underlying speech acts, and 3) by supporting attempts at modulating the strength of a speech act's illocutionary force. We investigated these relationships in an observational case study of a public hearing of the U.S. Senate. Overall, facial behaviour was more intense during performative than during declarative speech acts and we observed a negative relationship between facial expressivity and the illocutionary strength of speech acts. Facial behaviour was also related to the valence of speech acts, albeit to a lesser extent. While we observed multiple links between individual facial Action Units and speech acts, the pattern of results does not indicate a unique set of associations between specific facial movements and specific properties of speech acts. The present study supports the idea that facial behaviour plays a role in the pragmatics of social interaction in that it could be used by speakers to show the authenticity of their communicative intentions and to modulate the illocutionary force of verbal statements. It also suggests that the cognitive and emotional states underlying the production of speech acts could share structural and functional elements with the appraisal processes involved in the production of facial behaviour.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"241 ","pages":"Pages 41-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000669","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is abundant literature indicating that, beyond its role in emotional communication, facial behaviour could be essential in the way individuals carry out performative functions of speech. Using speech acts theory, we formalised three ways facial signals could relate to verbal utterances: 1) by authenticating the illocutionary point of statements, 2) by authenticating the valence of the mental states underlying speech acts, and 3) by supporting attempts at modulating the strength of a speech act's illocutionary force. We investigated these relationships in an observational case study of a public hearing of the U.S. Senate. Overall, facial behaviour was more intense during performative than during declarative speech acts and we observed a negative relationship between facial expressivity and the illocutionary strength of speech acts. Facial behaviour was also related to the valence of speech acts, albeit to a lesser extent. While we observed multiple links between individual facial Action Units and speech acts, the pattern of results does not indicate a unique set of associations between specific facial movements and specific properties of speech acts. The present study supports the idea that facial behaviour plays a role in the pragmatics of social interaction in that it could be used by speakers to show the authenticity of their communicative intentions and to modulate the illocutionary force of verbal statements. It also suggests that the cognitive and emotional states underlying the production of speech acts could share structural and functional elements with the appraisal processes involved in the production of facial behaviour.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.