Journal of personality assessment最新文献_第8页

Development of an Inconsistent Responding Scale for the Big Five Inventory-2. 为 "大五量表-2 "开发不一致反应量表。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2411557

Jared R Ruchensky, John F Edens, M Brent Donnellan

{"title":"Development of an Inconsistent Responding Scale for the Big Five Inventory-2.","authors":"Jared R Ruchensky, John F Edens, M Brent Donnellan","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2411557","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2411557","url":null,"abstract":"The Big Five Inventory - 2 (BFI-2) is a commonly used self-report assessment of normal personality trait domains (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Negative Emotionality, Open-Mindedness) and facets. To date, however, no direct measures of response distortion have been developed for it to identify potentially invalid responses. Such distortions (e.g., careless or random responding) can adversely impact data quality. The current study developed and provided initial validation data for an inconsistent responding scale within the BFI-2 to identify careless responders using two large undergraduate samples and a community sample. To create the scale, we first identified highly correlated BFI-2 item pairs in one undergraduate sample (N = 1,461) and then computed a total score by summing the absolute differences of these item pairs. This scale, the Detection of Response Inconsistency Procedure (DRIP), differentiated randomly generated and genuine data and generally correlated as expected with personality domains and other inconsistent responding scales across samples. The DRIP also incrementally predicted random data beyond a composite of items with exceptionally high or low base rates of endorsement from the Comprehensive Infrequency/Frequency Item Repository. We provide recommendations for DRIP cut scores that can detect careless responding while balancing sensitivity and specificity.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"384-391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142468254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Problem No One is Talking About: Forensic Evaluators' Lack of Familiarity with Dimensional Approaches to Personality and Psychopathology. 无人问津的问题：法医评估人员对人格和精神病理学的维度方法缺乏了解。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-31 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2420172

Abby L Mulay, Emily D Gottfried, Jared R Ruchensky, Tiffany Russell, Adam P Natoli, Christopher J Hopwood

{"title":"The Problem No One is Talking About: Forensic Evaluators' Lack of Familiarity with Dimensional Approaches to Personality and Psychopathology.","authors":"Abby L Mulay, Emily D Gottfried, Jared R Ruchensky, Tiffany Russell, Adam P Natoli, Christopher J Hopwood","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420172","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2420172","url":null,"abstract":"Historically, forensic evaluators have relied heavily upon various editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders when rendering psycholegal opinions. The field of mental health is increasing moving toward dimensional models of personality and psychopathology in lieu of traditional DSM categorical models, though the domains of forensic psychology and psychiatry have been slow to make this transition. The current study therefore sought to examine forensic evaluators' familiarity with dimensional approaches to personality and psychopathology, namely the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). Forensic psychologists and psychiatrists (N = 54) completed an online survey designed to assess their familiarity with these models, as well as to determine if forensics practitioners are using these models in clinical practice. Participants endorsed greater familiarity with the AMPD, with a large majority of participants indicating they were unfamiliar with the HiTOP model. Few participants endorsed using these models in their clinical forensic practice. Implications for making the transition to dimensional models within forensic evaluation are discussed, as are paths forward for future research.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"283-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142558013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Trait Considerations in Clinical Practice: A Commentary Based on Gubler et al. (2024) and Lau et al. (2024). 临床实践中的特质考虑：基于Gubler等人（2024）和Lau等人（2024）的评论。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2025.2455438

Radhika Krishnamurthy, Lisa Suzuki

引用次数: 0

Construct Validity of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality - Self-Report Form (CAPP-SR). 精神变态人格综合评估--自我报告表（CAPP-SR）的结构效度。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2377644

Nicholas Kavish, Jaime L Anderson

引用次数: 0

Opportunities for the AMPD: Commentary on Hopwood, 2024. AMPD 的机遇：对 Hopwood 的评论，2024 年。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2430321

Joost Hutsebaut, Carla Sharp

引用次数: 0

Beyond Descriptive Models of Personality Problems. 超越人格问题的描述性模型。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2430322

Orestis Zavlis, Peter Fonagy

引用次数: 0

How to Capture the Rage? Development and Validation of a State-Trait Anger Scale. 如何捕捉愤怒？状态-特质愤怒量表的开发与验证。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2390990

Robin Umbra, Ulrike Fasbender

{"title":"How to Capture the Rage? Development and Validation of a State-Trait Anger Scale.","authors":"Robin Umbra, Ulrike Fasbender","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2390990","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2390990","url":null,"abstract":"Our research seeks to contribute to the existing literature on emotion measurement and research by proposing a new anger metric that addresses limitations of previous scales. This metric shows promise in meeting modern standards and drawing from traditional methods, potentially impacting the study of emotions. Additionally, our study explores cross-cultural congruence in assessing anger between English and German speakers, revealing differences in state and trait anger assessment. We offer theoretical perspectives on these cultural variances and emphasize the importance of considering language nuances in cross-cultural emotion assessment. Furthermore, our research delves into the relationship between anger and other emotions within an affective space, suggesting support for the notion that emotions are composite constructs consisting of valence and activation. We also discuss alternative theoretical perspectives on emotion construction to enhance our understanding. Additionally, our study examines the intricate relationship between anger and different forms of aggression, highlighting the association between anger and various aggressive behaviors in work settings. Our findings underscore the influence of personal traits and situational factors on experiences of anger and aggression, offering insights into the relationships between emotional states, traits, and behavior.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"188-204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142000208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The DOES Scale: Measuring Sensory Processing Sensitivity as a Trait Constellation. DOES 量表：将感官处理敏感性作为一种特质进行测量。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2405536

Danièle Anne Gubler, Tobias Janelt, Marcus Roth, Katja Schlegel, Jasmin Guggisberg, Stefan Johannes Troche

{"title":"The DOES Scale: Measuring Sensory Processing Sensitivity as a Trait Constellation.","authors":"Danièle Anne Gubler, Tobias Janelt, Marcus Roth, Katja Schlegel, Jasmin Guggisberg, Stefan Johannes Troche","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2405536","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2405536","url":null,"abstract":"Based on Aron's (2020) DOES model, we developed the DOES Scale to measure Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) with four dimensions: Depth of Processing, Overstimulation, Emotional Reactivity, and Sensing the Subtle. Using interview data from the study by Roth et al. (2023), we created a 20-item questionnaire (5 items per dimension) in German and English. In three studies with 1,365 subjects from Switzerland, Germany, Austria, and the UK, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the scale using confirmatory factor analysis and examined construct validity with the established Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS) and different personality measures. The results confirmed each subscale's unidimensionality and good psychometric properties. Considering the four subscales together indicated that they could be best described as correlated factors rather than in terms of a second-order factor. Convergent validity was confirmed, especially for Overstimulation in its association with the HSPS total score and its subscales EOE and LST. Regarding discriminant validity, the Sensing the Subtle dimension exhibited clear distinctiveness, while the other three subscales overlapped with neuroticism, extraversion, empathy, and rumination, aligning with theoretical expectations. The DOES Scale emerges as a reliable, valid tool for assessing SPS, recommending its four dimensions be interpreted as a trait constellation.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"205-220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Revisiting the Structure of the Chinese Version of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy and Its Relationships with Schizotypy and Paranoia Using Network Approaches. 用网络方法重新审视认知和情感移情问卷中文版的结构及其与分裂型人格和偏执狂的关系。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2397819

Xiaoqi Sun, Dan Liang, Yunxia Wu

{"title":"Revisiting the Structure of the Chinese Version of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy and Its Relationships with Schizotypy and Paranoia Using Network Approaches.","authors":"Xiaoqi Sun, Dan Liang, Yunxia Wu","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2397819","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2024.2397819","url":null,"abstract":"Empathy is predominantly assessed with self-report questionnaires. However, their structural validities were not well-supported. This study aimed to re-explore and refine the factor structure of the Chinese version of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE) and investigate the pathways linked between dimensions of empathy and schizotypy. Data from a valid sample of 1,360 community-dwelling adults (aged 18-35) were subjected to the exploratory graph analysis (EGA) and bootstrap EGA for factor retention. A goodness-of-fit evaluation was conducted using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Lastly, a Gaussian graphical model with sum scores of the resultant empathy dimensions, positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy, and paranoia as nodes was estimated. Results supported a three-factor structure for the revised 20-item QCAE, demonstrating a good model fit. The new Online simulation subscale was associated with reduced disorganized schizotypy, whereas the new Perspective-taking subscale was associated with decreased disorganized schizotypy and increased positive schizotypy. The composite Affective empathy subscale was associated with decreased negative schizotypy and increased positive and disorganized schizotypy and paranoia. Overall, the revised QCAE demonstrated good structural validity, measuring three separable and internally cohesive factors of empathy. Each factor possessed unique and differential relationships with schizotypy dimensions that merit research and clinical attention.","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"244-255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142133033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Better Theories and Better Research Will Make Personality Disorder Assessment More Clinically Useful. 更好的理论和更好的研究将使人格障碍评估在临床上更有用。

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Journal of personality assessment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2443409

Christopher J Hopwood

引用次数: 0