{"title":"Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of SDO<sub>7</sub> Scale in India.","authors":"Sanjay Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Mohd Sufiyan, Shashi","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2583443","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2583443","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social dominance orientation (SDO) is the generalized preference for hierarchy across groups. It is currently measured through the two-dimensional (i.e., physical dominance and anti-egalitarianism) SDO<sub>7</sub> scale. However, a complete testing of its factor structure across varied populations is highly required. A caste-based society perhaps reflects a stronger socio-cultural expression of social dominance theory. In the present study, we examined the factor structure of the SDO<sub>7</sub> scale in such a society, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on a sample of 1,020 participants (age: <i>M</i> = 19.5, <i>SD</i> = 2.07 years). The results reported that Ho et al.'s two-factor model was one of the best good-fit models. The SDO<sub>7</sub> scale was strongly invariant across gender, caste, religion, and region. Moreover, men and higher caste had higher SDO. The present study shows that the asymmetrical expression of the method effect across dimensions is a possible problem in the SDO conceptualizations. It supports the cross-cultural validity of SDO, suggests new ideas on its factor structure, and partially establishes a reliable and valid Hindi version of the SDO<sub>7</sub> scale. Relevance to social dominance theory and interventions has been discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"413-421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145458866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lennart Kiel, Kennedy M Balzen, Kiana Cano, Carla Sharp
{"title":"Psychometric Properties and Clinical Utility of the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5</i>-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in a U.S. Adolescent Sample: An Evaluation for Detecting Borderline Personality Disorder.","authors":"Lennart Kiel, Kennedy M Balzen, Kiana Cano, Carla Sharp","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2569681","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2569681","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5</i> Brief Form (PID-5-BF) as a screening tool for personality disorder (PD) in adolescents. Data from clinical (<i>n</i> = 127) and community (<i>n</i> = 139) samples of adolescents aged 12 to 17 were analyzed. Exploratory structural equation modeling supported the five-factor structure, with good to excellent internal consistency. Nomological validity was demonstrated through correlations with other measures of personality and psychopathology. All PID-5-BF domains, except antagonism, differed significantly between adolescents with borderline PD (BPD), non-BPD inpatients, and community controls. However, only negative affectivity showed significantly higher mean scores among inpatient youths with BPD compared to those without BPD. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses indicated that only negative affectivity among the PID-5-BF domains demonstrated diagnostic accuracy in the lower moderate range for identifying BPD, whereas the total score and other domains showed limited performance. In comparison, a measure of identity diffusion demonstrated stronger discriminative ability. Overall, these findings suggest that the PID-5-BF might be a useful tool for identifying pathological personality trait-related risk factors associated with general psychopathology. However, its utility might be more limited in accurately detecting BPD specifically within adolescent populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"334-346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145355166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Giorgia Tosi, Daniele Romano, Théo Besson, Jan De Houwer, Maura Nevejans, Marco Perugini
{"title":"The HEXACO Adjective Scale: A Cross-Cultural Validity Study.","authors":"Giorgia Tosi, Daniele Romano, Théo Besson, Jan De Houwer, Maura Nevejans, Marco Perugini","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2579086","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2579086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The HEXACO model defines personality across six dimensions: Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, eXtraversion, Agreeableness (vs. Anger), Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience. One of its key strengths is that it is based on linguistic research that has been consistently replicated across various cultures. The HEXACO Adjective Scale (HAS), developed in Italian, consists of 60 adjectives designed to evaluate the dimensions of personality according to the HEXACO model. The present paper presents a cross-cultural study assessing the validity of the HAS across French, Dutch, and English. We translated the HAS into each language and administered the translated scales to 319 Dutch-speaking (Belgium) participants, 317 French-speaking (France) participants, and 436 English-speaking (US) participants. CFAs confirm that each language replicates the original structure. Moreover, we obtained evidence of strong invariance across languages, providing important support in favor of measurement invariance. The internal consistency of the scales is satisfactory and in line with the Italian version. Similarly, the prediction of behavioral criteria supports the validity of the translated HAS in different languages. Overall, the HAS shows very good psychometric properties and has all the necessary characteristics to be used in future studies. The strong invariance between languages supports the replicability of the HEXACO model across cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"403-412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145564468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Personalized Psychotherapy Informed by Person in Context Assessment: A Single Subject Study.","authors":"Sierra R Paup, Walter D Scott, Belinda Lin","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2575937","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2575937","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the therapeutic utility of personalized psychotherapy informed by social cognitive personality assessment. Specifically, Person in Context Assessment (PICA) assesses both the social cognitive personality structures (i.e., temperament, self-schemata, goals, and moral standards) and the <i>if-then</i> personality processes (i.e., situation-based patterns of appraisals, affects, behaviors) characterizing an individual. Both the client and the therapist received PICA feedback and specific therapeutic recommendations targeting social cognitive personality structures and processes that appeared to contribute most to the client's distress and dysfunction. After the therapist began implementing these PICA-informed interventions, the client reported significant decreases in depressive symptoms that remained stable over two months, culminating in a successful termination of therapy. Evidence suggested that decreases in depression coincided with the client showing improvements in the personality structures and processes that were targeted by the PICA-informed therapeutic interventions. The client's perceptions of therapy credibility and expectancy, as well as their motivation to change, also appeared to improve. However, there was no evidence that the PICA feedback improved the client's self-understanding or self-efficacy. Our findings provide initial support for PICA's therapeutic utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"448-460"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145513075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Güler Beril Kumpasoğlu, Chloe Campbell, Rob Saunders, Tobias Nolte, Read Montague, Stephen Pilling, Judy Leibowitz, Peter Fonagy
{"title":"Assessing Epistemic Trust in Common Mental Health Disorders: The Clinical Validation of ETMCQ, Measurement Invariance and Control Group Comparison.","authors":"Güler Beril Kumpasoğlu, Chloe Campbell, Rob Saunders, Tobias Nolte, Read Montague, Stephen Pilling, Judy Leibowitz, Peter Fonagy","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2571173","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2571173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epistemic trust is the capacity of an individual to assimilate new information and engage with their surroundings. This study focused on the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ) among individuals seeking treatment for common mental health issues (<i>N</i> = 378) compared to a non-clinical group (<i>N</i> = 357). The study aimed to validate the ETMCQ clinically, assess its consistency across clinical groups and community controls, and explore the relationship between epistemic attitudes (trust, mistrust, and credulity), mentalizing, and mental health problems by comparing the two groups. The ETMCQ's three-factor structure showed acceptable reliability and validity in the clinical setting. The measurement invariance analyses showed complete metric consistency but only partial scalar and strict consistency, with certain items not aligning across groups (Items 1, 3, 4 for scalar consistency; 2, 12, 14 for strict consistency). The results indicated that difficulties in mentalizing and increased levels of epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity were linked to a greater likelihood of experiencing clinical distress. These outcomes underline the effectiveness of the ETMCQ in distinguishing between clinical and non-clinical individuals. However, researchers should use caution with the epistemic trust component of the questionnaire which appears to reflect a paradoxical epistemic attitude.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"372-384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145337200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joye C Anestis, Taylor R Rodriguez, Olivia C Preston, Tiffany M Harrop, Nora E Charles
{"title":"Extending Validity Evidence for the MMPI-3: The Role of Collateral Report in Adult Assessment.","authors":"Joye C Anestis, Taylor R Rodriguez, Olivia C Preston, Tiffany M Harrop, Nora E Charles","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2576663","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2576663","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integration of multiple data sources is central to evidence-based clinical psychological assessment. In adult assessments (in contrast to youth), data are typically obtained solely from clients; however, extant research suggests collateral ratings provide valuable additional information across the lifespan. The current study examined criterion-related and incremental validity of collateral-report <i>via</i> the ASEBA Adult Behavior Checklist (ABCL) in association with MMPI-3 Restructured Clinical and select Specific Problems Scales. We expected 1) modest correspondence between MMPI-3 scales and corresponding ABCL scales, consistent with meta-analytic findings on self*collateral correlations (e.g., Achenbach et al., 2005); and 2) collateral-report to significantly increment variance accounted for by self-report in predicting congruent MMPI-3 scales. The sample included 107 undergraduate students (61.8% White) who completed self-report measures and recruited a collateral reporter (mostly friends/roommates). Correlations between hypothesized MMPI-3 and ABCL scales ranged from -0.00 (ABCL Intrusive-MMPI-3 Activation) to .43 (ABCL Anxious-Depressed-MMPI-3 Demoralization). Incremental validity of collateral-report (small-medium effects) was demonstrated in seven of 12 models (58.3%). Findings indicate correspondence between ABCL collateral-report and congruent MMPI-3 scales is modest and variable and extend the criterion-related validity evidence available for the MMPI-3. Results are consistent with extant literature arguing that collateral-report provides unique incremental information, reaffirming the utility of multi-informant data in the adult assessment context.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"309-320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145438383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
R Michael Bagby, Ardeshir Mortezaei, Cheyenne McIntyre, Sharlane C L Lau, Graeme J Taylor
{"title":"Does the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire Offer a Multidimensional Measurement of the Alexithymia Construct?","authors":"R Michael Bagby, Ardeshir Mortezaei, Cheyenne McIntyre, Sharlane C L Lau, Graeme J Taylor","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2559701","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2559701","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ) was developed to assess alexithymia as a multidimensional construct consistent with the attention-appraisal model. This study evaluated the hierarchical structure of the PAQ using Goldberg's bass-ackwards method across student and community samples. Results consistently revealed a general alexithymia factor at the highest level of the hierarchy, with limited evidence of stable or distinct dimensions at the lower levels. Although some components, such as externally oriented thinking and positive emotion valence items showed partial differentiation, the overall pattern did not support the proposed five-factor dimensional model, indicating that the PAQ does not provide a reliable multidimensional assessment of the alexithymia construct. While the PAQ was developed to provide a multidimensional profile by incorporating both positive and negative emotion processing, our results indicate that it is best conceptualized and interpreted as measuring a single, unidimensional construct.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"362-371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145131126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From Likert Scales to Large Language Models: Validating a Computational Approach to Psychological Assessment of Future Self-Continuity.","authors":"Yosef Sokol, Marianne Goodman","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2576664","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2576664","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new assessment approaches that can help overcome the limitations of traditional Likert-item scales in measuring complex, subjective constructs. To demonstrate this, we introduce and validate a novel LLM-based methodology for psychological assessment by applying it to Future Self-Continuity (FSC), the perceived connection, including similarity, vividness, and positivity, between present and future selves. We used an LLM (Claude 3.5 Sonnet) to perform natural language processing (NLP) on transcripts of audio responses to 15 theory-based interview prompts. Data from 164 MTurk participants (including 93 with past-year suicide ideation, who were oversampled to examine clinical utility) yielded quantitative NLP-FSC scores that significantly correlated with the Future Self-Continuity Questionnaire (FSCQ; <i>r</i> = 0.57), supporting convergent validity. A Bland-Altman analysis also indicated acceptable agreement. Replication using one older and two updated LLM versions confirmed the method's robustness (inter-model total score <i>r</i> = 0.91, 0.88, and 0.84). Exploratory analysis using the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQR) found that the NLP assessment captured unique variance in the perceived likelihood of a future suicide attempt beyond the FSCQ, suggesting potential clinical implications. This validated NLP approach offers a nuanced assessment of FSC, advancing psychological measurement methodology in research and, potentially, clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"437-447"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145409158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pascal Schlechter, Thomas Meyer, Thole H Hoppen, Nexhmedin Morina
{"title":"Development and Initial Validation of the Social Impression Comparison Scale (SICS).","authors":"Pascal Schlechter, Thomas Meyer, Thole H Hoppen, Nexhmedin Morina","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2581668","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2581668","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perceived social impressions - namely, how individuals believe they come across in social situations - are often evaluated by engaging in social comparison. Such evaluations may shape cognition, affect, and behavior. However, a validated measure to assess social impression comparisons is lacking. Therefore, we developed and validated the Social Impression Comparison Scale (SICS) that assesses the frequency of upward and downward social comparison of social impressions, the perceived discrepancy to the standard, and the affective impact of these comparisons during the last three weeks, in two studies (<i>N</i>s = 478/507). Confirmatory factor analyses supported the hypothesized two-factor model, representing upward and downward comparison, displaying better model fit than a one-factor model. The scale demonstrated measurement invariance across gender, probable social anxiety disorder diagnosis, and studies. Upward comparison correlated with comparison-related variables, mental health, and other relevant variables, supporting the scale's validity cross-sectionally, during an Ecological Momentary Assessment, and at the three-month follow-up. Downward comparison showed less consistent correlations. In multiple regression models, all comparison indicators (frequency, discrepancy, and affect) of upward and downward comparisons showed distinct associations with specific outcomes. The SICS is free-to-use, efficient, and appears reliable and valid, with broad applicability across several contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"385-402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145458841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Associations Between MMPI-3 Scales and Dimensional Personality Disorder Models in a Community Mental Health Sample.","authors":"Martin Sellbom, Tessa A Orellana","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2597321","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2597321","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the field adopts dimensional models of personality disorders (DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders [AMPD]; ICD-11 Personality Disorder), it is imperative that clinical assessment tools are available to assess them. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) is one such measure, as it is routinely used in clinical practice and assesses a variety of psychological symptoms. The current study aimed to build upon previous literature using a community mental health sample and a multi-method approach. Specifically, a sample of 289 individuals enrolled in various mental health services in New Zealand was used. The participants completed the MMPI-3 and self-report questionnaires of ICD-11 and AMPD impairment and traits; clinician ratings based on interviews and informant reports of these were available as well. The results supported most of the pre-registered hypotheses, with the Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) scales being among the best predictors of AMPD domains and the Compulsivity scale being the best predictor of Anankastia. Although a wide range of MMPI-3 scales predicted personality impairment scores, the internalizing scales emerged with the largest associations. Implications of these findings for clinical practice, such as utility and accessibility, are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"321-333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145756757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}