Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery最新文献

{"title":"Complication Rates of the Anterior Iliac Crest Bone Graft Donor Site for 426 Pediatric Patients Undergoing Alveolar Bone Grafting.","authors":"Lane Haws, Boyu Ma, Tanner Godfrey, Peter D Waite, Brian Kinard, Kathlyn Powell","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) has long been considered the gold standard for secondary alveolar reconstruction in patients with cleft lip and palate. With the advent of grafting alternatives, such as bone morphogenetic protein-2, the morbidity of the iliac crest harvest has come into question.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to estimate the frequency, types, and identify risk factors for postoperative complications of the anterior ICBG hip donor site.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, sample: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of patients who received alveolar reconstruction with anterior ICBG by 2 surgeons over an 11-year period at the Children's of Alabama Hospital in Birmingham, Alabama, was conducted. Exclusion criteria included previous alveolar graft attempt, age greater than 18 years at the time of repair, or lack of postoperative follow-up.</p><p><strong>Predictor variable: </strong>The predictor variable was a set of risk factors associated with complications and included sex, age at surgery, and cleft type (unilateral vs bilateral).</p><p><strong>Main outcome variable: </strong>The main outcome variable was donor site morbidity defined as the presence of complications, prolonged length of stay, or readmission. Complications included gait disturbance, transient hypoesthesia, and hypertrophic scar.</p><p><strong>Covariates: </strong>Covariates included length of follow-up and alveolar cleft graft timing (secondary vs tertiary).</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>Descriptive and bivariate analyses were completed. The level of statistical significance was P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample size was composed of 426 subjects with a mean age of 7.9 ± 2.3 years. Of the total subjects, 211 (49.5%) patients were male and 215 (50.5%) patients were female. Overall, 11 (2.6%) subjects experienced complications associated with the anterior iliac crest donor site. The most prevalent anterior iliac crest donor site complications included transient gait disturbance 0.7% (n = 3), hypertrophic scar 0.7% (n = 3), and transient hypoesthesia 0.5% (n = 2). One subject experienced prolonged length of stay, and none required readmission. There were no study variables associated with donor site morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall morbidity associated with anterior ICBG for alveolar cleft repair remains low, with a complication rate of 2.6% (n = 11) associated with the donor site. These results offer strong evidence of the overall safety and minor morbidity of the ICBG harvest for alveolar cleft repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144216192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Effect of Le Fort I Osteotomy on Nasal Tip Rotation in Dynamic Smile.","authors":"Muazzez Suzen, Bugra Duc, Emine Ogut, Sina Uckan","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nasal region is an essential component of facial aesthetics and is a crucial evaluation parameter in orthognathic surgery planning. Although numerous studies have investigated static changes in the nasal region at rest, dynamic changes during facial expressions such as smiling following Le Fort I surgery have not yet been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to measure and compare the nasal tip rotation with smiling before and after orthognathic surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective study examines data from maxillary advancement patients treated at Medipol Mega University Hospital (Istanbul, Türkiye) between 2018 and 2024. Patients with segmental Le Fort I surgery, maxillary asymmetry, vertical movements greater than 2.5 mm, a history of Le Fort surgery, trauma or septoplasty/rhinoplasty, craniofacial syndrome, cleft lip/palate patients, were excluded.</p><p><strong>Predictor variables: </strong>The predictor variable was maxillary advancement magnitude (mm) and it was divided into 2 <6 mm or ≥6 mm.</p><p><strong>Main outcome variable: </strong>The outcome variable was the angle differences between the lines drawn from the nasion to the nasal tip in resting and smiling profile photographs. The timing of resting and smiling profile photographs was reported as preoperatively (T₀) and postoperatively (T₁).</p><p><strong>Covariates: </strong>Sex and age were considered covariates.</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare pre-operative and postoperative differences within each group. A P value <.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample was composed of 48 subjects with a mean age of 24.23 (6.14) and 23 (47.9%) were male. The mean preoperative nasal tip rotation difference between rest and smiling was 1.57° (0.86), the mean postoperative nasal tip rotation difference was 1.30° (0.71). The nasal tip rotation difference decreased between pre-operative and postoperative periods. While the difference between the mean preoperative 1.36° (0.80) and postoperative dynamic nasal tip rotation 1.16° (0.66) in group 1 was not statistically significant (P = .2), the difference in group 2's mean preoperative 1.78° (0.88) and postoperative 1.43° (0.76) was statistically significant (P = .016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with more than 6-mm maxillary advancement, nasal tip rotation difference was significantly reduced during dynamic smile after orthognathic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144199429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Shield-Like Septal Extension Graft: A Novel Technique for Nasal Tip Management in Revision Rhinoplasty.","authors":"Hüseyin Balikci, Alper Yenigun, Emre Polat, Remzi Dogan, Orhan Ozturan","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study introduces the shield-like septal extension graft technique, a novel approach for enhancing tip support, rotation, and projection in revision rhinoplasty cases. The shield-like septal extension graft is positioned in front of the caudal septum, mimicking a shield graft to provide structural reinforcement. The study included 18 patients (12 women and 6 men) with a median follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range: 9 to 15 months). No significant complications were observed, and patients achieved satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcomes. This technique offers a reliable and reproducible solution for managing complex revision rhinoplasty cases by providing superior tip stability, midline alignment, and long-term structural support. The use of costal cartilage ensures sufficient strength, especially in patients with structural deficiencies or thick skin.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144199430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Immediate Tissue Engineering Bone Graft Versus Fibula-Free Flap Reconstruction for Mandibular Continuity Defects Secondary to Benign Pathology.","authors":"Sam M Anton, Andrew Gayed, Jeffrey W Chadwick, Paul Addamo, Julian N Holland, Mark E Wong, Rosa Benavidez, James C Melville","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tissue engineering (TE) offers a potential alternative to fibula-free flap (FFF) reconstruction and may reduce surgical complexity, hospital stay, and health care costs.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to estimate and compare the cost-effectiveness of immediate TE and FFF reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, sample: </strong>This study was designed as a retrospective cohort conducted at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston from November 2015 to March 2024. Exclusion criteria included subjects with malignant pathologies, those treated with only a fasciocutaneous graft, cases of osteoradionecrosis, and those with incomplete records.</p><p><strong>Predictor variable: </strong>The primary predictor variable was the type of reconstruction method, either TE bone grafts or FFF reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Main outcome variables: </strong>The main outcome variable was cost-effectiveness which was defined as cost per successful reconstruction. Successful reconstruction was defined as complete union more than 1 year postoperatively without the need for revision surgery and the absence of postoperative complications requiring take-back surgery.</p><p><strong>Covariates: </strong>Covariates include age, sex, defect size, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification.</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>R statistical software was used for data analysis. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample was composed of 31 subjects with a mean age of 44.97 ± 18.46 years for TE and 41.93 ± 18.23 years for FFF (P = .7). There were 18 (58%) and 13 (42%) subjects in TE and FFF, respectively. The proportion of successful reconstructions was 95% (n = 18) for TE and 77% (n = 13) for FFF (P = .6). The mean total hospital charges for TE were $247,172 ± $54,080 (P < .001) and $423,008 ± $59,571.75 (P < .001) for FFF. The cost per successful reconstruction was $261,711.64 for TE and $549,910.40 for FFF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>TE may be a more cost-effective alternative to FFF, providing comparable reconstructive success with reduced cost, surgical time, and hospital resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144187238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Lower Third Molar Assessment Among Different Dental Specialists.","authors":"Douglas A F Couto, Jefferson L O Tanaka, Paulo H C Souza, Sergio A Ignacio, Everdan Carneiro, Luciana R A Alanis","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Variations in professional training and dental specialization can substantially influence diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the anatomical position and surgical indication of lower third molars (LTM) using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) among 3 groups of dental specialists.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, sample: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study involved different profiles of dental professionals with experience in diagnostic interpretation of LTM images. The study population was composed of patients who underwent both panoramic and tomographic scans for LTM extraction between 2020 and 2023. To be included, all patients had clinical indication for third molar extraction, had both LTM, and had panoramic and CBCT scans on the same day.</p><p><strong>Independent variable: </strong>The independent variable was dental provider, oral surgeons, general dentists, and oral radiologists.</p><p><strong>Main outcome variable: </strong>The main outcome variable was the anatomical position of LTM, and radiographic findings associated with risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury. Anatomical positions were evaluated according to Pell & Gregory and Winter classification. The radiographic findings associated with risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury were contact of roots to mandibular canal (MC), disruption of the cortical, narrowing and deviation, deflection and dilaceration, and retromolar canal. The secondary outcome was surgical indication.</p><p><strong>Covariates: </strong>Patient-related covariates (age and sex) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Statistical analysis included χ² and Z-tests for intragroup comparisons, one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc test for intergroup comparisons, and Student's t-test for surgical indication. The significance level was set at 5% (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 8 examiners who evaluated 30 panoramics and 30 CBCTs for a cohort of 30 patients. No statistically significant difference was identified between dental providers regarding anatomical position (P > .1). Oral and maxillofacial surgeons more frequently identified narrowing and deviation of MC compared with general dentists and oral radiologists (P < .05). Oral radiologists detected more root dilacerations and retromolar canals, and identified more probable contact with the MC using panoramics and CBCT (P < .05). Coronectomy was indicated more often by oral surgeons than general dentists (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Dental specialty influenced the interpretation of both imaging modalities for the LTM.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144187225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Does Suction Catheter-Guided Nasotracheal Intubation Reduce Nasal Bleeding?","authors":"Pattamon Leelachaikul, Duangdee Rummasak, Thepharat Lertwisettheerakun, Jirayus Akaraprasertkul","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasal bleeding is common during nasotracheal intubation (NTI) and can complicate the procedure. It is unclear if suction catheter use reduces complications, including bleeding.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose was to measure and compare adverse outcomes of suction catheter-guided nasal passage to conventional NTI technique.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, and sample: </strong>A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Mahidol University Dental Hospital, Thailand. Patients (18-65 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-2 and normal body mass index) scheduled for elective surgery requiring NTI were recruited, excluding those with anticipated difficult intubation or nasal abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Predictor variable: </strong>The predictor variable was intubation technique (suction catheter-guided or conventional intubation).</p><p><strong>Main outcome variables: </strong>Primary outcomes were incidence and extent of bleeding (nasal bleeding observed at posterior pharynx), graded during intubation. Secondary outcomes were ease of intubation, first-pass success, number of attempts, and nasal passage time.</p><p><strong>Covariates: </strong>Covariates included demographic (age, sex), perioperative (body mass index, tobacco, alcohol, mild allergic rhinitis), and operative data (nostril side).</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>Categorical data were compared using Pearson's χ² or Fisher's exact test. Continuous data were compared using independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 52 subjects (26 per group), mean age 29.8 ± 10.0 years (P = .4); 31 (59.6%) were female (P = .8). No significant differences were found between guided and control groups in incidence of bleeding (13 [50%] vs 14 [53.8%], P = .8), extent of bleeding (grade 0-3, respectively: 13 [50.0%], 3 [11.5%], 3 [11.5%], 7 [26.9%] vs 12 [46.2%], 3 [11.5%], 4 [15.4%], 7 [26.9%], P = 1.0), ease of navigation (P = .6), first-pass success (25 [96.2%] vs 22 [84.6%], P = .4), or number of attempts (P = .5). Nasal passage time was longer in the guided group (10.3 [interquartile range: 8.9-12.2] vs 5.4 [4.2-7.7] seconds, P < .001), though not clinically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Suction catheter-guided nasal passage during NTI under general anesthesia does not statistically reduce nasal bleeding or improve navigability in patients without nasal bleeding risk factors or anticipated difficulties. Nasal passage time is longer in the guided group, but without adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144142759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Nonlinear Cutting Guides in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Technical Note.","authors":"Marshall F Newman, Ryan Mooneyham, Mohamad Fawaz","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.04.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.04.023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preservation of bone and anatomic structures during oral and maxillofacial resections are common goals of using custom cutting guides. Nonlinear cutting guides may offer improved patient care over linear cutting guides by allowing for additional areas of fixation, additional support for bony reconstructions, expanded use of nonvascular reconstructions, improved identification and preservation of anatomy, and improved cosmesis. A retrospective case series of 7 patients was created through a chart review of all patients undergoing resections at Augusta University between July 1, 2020, and January 31, 2025, for the purpose of identifying any close or positive margins on final pathology. No close or positive margins were noted. The use of nonlinear cutting guides for resection of oral and maxillofacial pathologies requires careful consideration of resection margins, precision and accuracy of virtual surgical planning and manufacturing constraints, and surgeon comfort. It is reasonable to consider more widespread adoption within 5 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144101964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors May Increase Implant Failure","authors":"Michael S. Block DMD ,&nbsp;Don Mercante PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.02.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients receiving dental implants may take selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). There may be an association with taking an SSRI at implant placement and implant failure.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The study's purpose was to estimate the association between SSIR exposure and implant failure.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>The study design was a retrospective cohort study. The sample was patients who received dental implants between December 1, 2007, and February 29, 2020. Patients were excluded if the follow-up was &lt;12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor variable</h3><div>The predictor variable was SSRI exposure at the time of implant placement coded as exposed or not exposed.</div></div><div><h3>Outcome variable</h3><div>The primary outcome variable was implant status at 1 year, coded as survived or failed.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>The covariates were age, sex, and implant location and per subject, and comorbidities included smoking, diabetes, osteoporosis, and frailty.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Bivariate statistics assessed the association between SSRI exposure at the time of implant placement and failure with significance at <em>P</em> value &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample was composed of 1,611 subjects (mean age 57.3 ± 15.8 years, 893 (55.4%) females) with 3,184 implants placed. There were 1,514 (94%) subjects who did not take an SSRI at implant placement (mean age 57.5 ± 15.5 years, 813 (53.7%) females) and there were 97 (6%) subjects who did take an SSRI at implant placement (mean age 61.6 ± 13.1 years, 80 (82.5%) females). The failure rate was 6.7% (101 subjects) for non-SSRI exposed subjects and 18.6% (18 subjects) who took an SSRI at implant placement. SSRI exposure was associated with implant failure at 1-year relative risk = 2.8; 1.8-4.4 (relative risk, 95% confidence interval). Covariates with association with failure: smoking odds ratio (OR) = 0.98, 1.5-5.5 (OR, 95% confidence limits, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001), diabetes (OR = 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], <em>P</em> = .048), alcohol (OR = 1.9, 95% CI, <em>P</em> = .045), osteoporosis (OR = 14.1, 95% CI, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001), debilitation (OR = 20.7, 95% CI, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001), and bisphosphonates (OR = 0.09, 95% CI, <em>P</em> = .004).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients who take SSRI at the time of implant surgery may have an increased risk for implant failure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"83 5","pages":"Pages 585-591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143586114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"REPLY: Photobiomodulation With Infrared and Dual-Wavelength Laser Induces Similar Repair and Control of Inflammation After Third Molar Extraction. A Double-Blinded Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Davisson Alves Pereira PhD, DDS,&nbsp;Mariana da Silva Bonatto PhD, DDS,&nbsp;Eduvaldo Campos Soares Jr. PhD, DDS,&nbsp;Pedro Gomes Junqueira Mendes MSc,&nbsp;Roberto Sales e Pessoa PhD, DDS,&nbsp;Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira PhD, DDS","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.01.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.01.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"83 5","pages":"Page 509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143890940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"May 2025 AAOMS News and Announcements","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"83 5","pages":"Pages 640-644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143891259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}