Liam Costello, Éanna O'Kelly-Lynch, Mark Wilson, Akinsola Ogunbowale
{"title":"下颌骨髁骨折50篇被引用最多的出版物:文献计量学研究。","authors":"Liam Costello, Éanna O'Kelly-Lynch, Mark Wilson, Akinsola Ogunbowale","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mandibular condyle fractures represent 16.5 to 56% of mandibular injuries and remain controversial in management. This bibliometric analysis evaluates the top 50 most-cited studies to identify research trends and gaps. We systematically searched the Web of Science for mandibular condyle fracture studies, analyzing the top most-cited 50 articles by citation counts, authorship, institutions, journals, and keywords using the VOSviewer for bibliometric coupling.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Studies (citations: 42 to 243) peaked in the 1990s to 2000s, declining after 2015. Germany 22% and the USA 12% led contributions, with the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery publishing most articles (17 of 50). Dominant keywords included \"open reduction\" and \"osteosynthesis,\" yet 84% of studies were low-level evidence (levels III to IV). Key contributors were Eckelt U and Lindqvist C, with the Technical University of Dresden as the top institution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The field relies on older, lower-quality studies with stagnant high-impact research since 2015. Future work should prioritize prospective studies to resolve management controversies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 50 Most-Cited Publications on Mandibular Condyle Fractures: A Bibliometric Study.\",\"authors\":\"Liam Costello, Éanna O'Kelly-Lynch, Mark Wilson, Akinsola Ogunbowale\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mandibular condyle fractures represent 16.5 to 56% of mandibular injuries and remain controversial in management. This bibliometric analysis evaluates the top 50 most-cited studies to identify research trends and gaps. We systematically searched the Web of Science for mandibular condyle fracture studies, analyzing the top most-cited 50 articles by citation counts, authorship, institutions, journals, and keywords using the VOSviewer for bibliometric coupling.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Studies (citations: 42 to 243) peaked in the 1990s to 2000s, declining after 2015. Germany 22% and the USA 12% led contributions, with the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery publishing most articles (17 of 50). Dominant keywords included \\\"open reduction\\\" and \\\"osteosynthesis,\\\" yet 84% of studies were low-level evidence (levels III to IV). Key contributors were Eckelt U and Lindqvist C, with the Technical University of Dresden as the top institution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The field relies on older, lower-quality studies with stagnant high-impact research since 2015. Future work should prioritize prospective studies to resolve management controversies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:下颌髁骨折占下颌损伤的16.5%至56%,在处理上仍有争议。这个文献计量分析评估了前50个被引用最多的研究,以确定研究趋势和差距。我们系统地检索了Web of Science关于下颌髁骨折的研究,使用VOSviewer进行文献计量耦合,通过引用次数、作者、机构、期刊和关键词分析了被引次数最多的50篇文章。研究结果:研究(引用:42至243)在20世纪90年代至21世纪初达到顶峰,2015年后下降。德国22%,美国12%,其中《口腔颌面外科杂志》发表的文章最多(50篇中有17篇)。主要关键词包括“切开复位”和“骨合成”,但84%的研究是低水平证据(III至IV级)。主要贡献者是Eckelt U和Lindqvist C,其中德累斯顿工业大学(Technical University of Dresden)位居榜首。结论和相关性:自2015年以来,该领域依赖于较老、质量较低、高影响力研究停滞不前的研究。未来的工作应优先考虑前瞻性研究,以解决管理争议。
The 50 Most-Cited Publications on Mandibular Condyle Fractures: A Bibliometric Study.
Background: Mandibular condyle fractures represent 16.5 to 56% of mandibular injuries and remain controversial in management. This bibliometric analysis evaluates the top 50 most-cited studies to identify research trends and gaps. We systematically searched the Web of Science for mandibular condyle fracture studies, analyzing the top most-cited 50 articles by citation counts, authorship, institutions, journals, and keywords using the VOSviewer for bibliometric coupling.
Findings: Studies (citations: 42 to 243) peaked in the 1990s to 2000s, declining after 2015. Germany 22% and the USA 12% led contributions, with the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery publishing most articles (17 of 50). Dominant keywords included "open reduction" and "osteosynthesis," yet 84% of studies were low-level evidence (levels III to IV). Key contributors were Eckelt U and Lindqvist C, with the Technical University of Dresden as the top institution.
Conclusion and relevance: The field relies on older, lower-quality studies with stagnant high-impact research since 2015. Future work should prioritize prospective studies to resolve management controversies.
期刊介绍:
This monthly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments and diagnostic equipment and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association.