Journal of neurosurgery. Spine最新文献

{"title":"Which interbody device minimized nonunion, subsidence, and reoperation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing allograft versus polyetheretherketone cage.","authors":"Chul-Ho Kim, Dong-Ho Lee, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Hwan Cho, Sehan Park","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE24187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.4.SPINE24187","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nonunion and significant subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are associated with poor clinical outcomes, which occasionally lead to revision surgery. Allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages are the two most commonly used interbody spacer devices for ACDF. Although studies have been conducted to compare the efficacies of these two interbody materials, the question remains regarding the superiority of one over the other. Therefore, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare nonunion, subsidence, and reoperation rates after ACDF using allograft and PEEK cages as interbody devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published prior to November 2023 that compared the efficacy and safety of allograft and PEEK cages for ACDF. A pooled analysis was designed to identify differences in nonunion, subsidence, and reoperation rates between the two interbody devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies involving 1462 patients (allograft, 852 patients; PEEK cage, 610 patients) were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that allograft had a significantly lower rate of nonunion compared to that of PEEK cages (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.79; p = 0.01). Furthermore, the reoperation rate due to nonunion was significantly higher with PEEK cages compared to that with allograft (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.71; p < 0.01), whereas the reoperation rate due to overall causes did not display significant results (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.11-1.29; p = 0.12). The incidence of significant subsidence (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.28-1.55; p = 0.34) and the mean amount of subsidence (standard mean difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.47; p = 0.90) did not demonstrate significant differences between allograft and PEEK cages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the current meta-analysis suggests the advantages of allograft over PEEK cages used for ACDF, due to an enhanced fusion rate and minimized revision risk, with no increase in the risk of subsidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141766372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Discrepancy between global- and disease-specific outcome measures following lumbar spine surgery.","authors":"Avani S Vaishnav, Cole Kwas, Jung Kee Mok, Kasra Araghi, Nishtha Singh, Olivia Tuma, Maximilian Korsun, Chad Z Simon, Tomoyuki Asada, Eric Mai, Joshua Zhang, Myles Allen, Eric Kim, Annika Heuer, Sravisht Iyer, Sheeraz Qureshi","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE24282","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE24282","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between patient-perceived changes in health and commonly utilized patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in lumbar spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy, lumbar decompression, or lumbar fusion at a single academic institution from 2017 to 2023. Correlation between the global rating of change (GRC) questionnaire, a 5-item Likert scale (much better, slightly better, about the same, slightly worse, and much worse), and PROMs (Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale for back and leg pain, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary, and PROMIS physical function) was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1871 patients (397 microdiscectomies, 965 decompressions, and 509 fusions) were included. A majority of patients in each group rated their lumbar condition as much better at each postoperative time point compared with preoperatively and reported improved health status at each postoperative time point compared with the previous follow-up visit. Statistically significant but weak to moderate correlations were found between GRC and change in PROM scores from the preoperative time point. Correlation between GRC and change in PROM scores from the prior visit showed some statistically significant correlations, but the strengths ranged from very weak to weak.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A majority of patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy, decompression, or fusion endorsed notable improvements in health status in the early postoperative period and continued to improve at late follow-up. However, commonly used PROMs demonstrated very weak to moderate correlations with patient-perceived changes in overall lumbar spine-related health status as determined by GRC. Therefore, currently used PROMs may not be as sensitive at detecting these changes or may not be adequately reflecting changes in health conditions that are meaningful to patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"648-657"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328975/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141727316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of biportal endoscopic and microscopic tubular paraspinal approach for foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation.","authors":"Min-Seok Kang, Jae-Yeun Hwang, Sang-Min Park, Jae-Hyuk Yang, Ki-Han You, Seok-Ho Hong, Samuel K Cho, Hyun-Jin Park","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE23707","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE23707","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation (FELDH) is an important pathological condition that can lead to lumbar radiculopathy. The paraspinal muscle-splitting approach introduced by Reulen and Wiltse is a reasonable surgical technique. Minimally invasive procedures using a tubular retractor system have also been introduced. However, surgical treatment is considered more challenging for FELDH than for central or subarticular lumbar disc herniations (LDHs). Some researchers have proposed uniportal extraforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy through a posterolateral approach as an alternative for FELDH, but heterogeneous clinical results have been reported. Recently, the biportal endoscopic (BE) paraspinal approach has been suggested as an alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of BE and microscopic tubular (MT) paraspinal approaches for decompressive foraminotomy and lumbar discectomy (paraLD) in patients with FELDH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-one consecutive patients with unilateral lumbar radiculopathy and FELDH underwent paraLD. Demographic and perioperative data were collected. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for spinal disability, and the modified Macnab criteria for patient satisfaction. Postoperative complications and reoperation rates were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 76 patients were included in the final analysis. Among them, 43 underwent BE paraLD (group A) and the remaining 33 underwent MT paraLD (group B). The demographic and preoperative data were not statistically different between the groups. All patients showed significant improvements in VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI scores compared with baseline values (p < 0.05). The improvement in VAS back scores was significantly better in group A than in group B on postoperative day 2 (p < 0.001). However, all clinical parameters were comparable between the two groups after postoperative year 1 (p > 0.05). According to the modified Macnab criteria, 86.1% and 72.7% of the patients had excellent or good outcomes in groups A and B, respectively. No intergroup differences were observed (p = 0.367). In addition, there were no differences in the total operation time or amount of surgical drainage. Postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.301); however, reoperation rates were significantly higher in group B (p = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BE paraLD is an effective treatment for FELDH and is an alternative to MT paraLD. In particular, BE paraLD has advantages of early improvement in postoperative back pain and low reoperation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"473-482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141727315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Microbial etiology of vertebral osteomyelitis/discitis amid the opioid epidemic.","authors":"S Alexander Ammerman, Alexander Keister, Joshua Vignolles-Jeong, Noah Mallory, David C Gibbs, Ryan G Eaton, Jianing Ma, David S Xu, Stephanus Viljoen, Andrew J Grossbach","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231071","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary goal of this study was to establish the current microbial trends in vertebral osteomyelitis/discitis (VOD) amid the opioid epidemic and to determine if intravenous drug use (IVDU) predisposes one to a unique microbial profile of infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed a retrospective cohort study consisting of 1175 adult patients diagnosed with VOD between 2011 and 2022 at a single quaternary center. Data were acquired through retrospective chart review, with pertinent demographic and clinical information collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Staphylococcus aureus was the most cultured organism in both the IVDU and non-IVDU groups at 56.1% and 40.7%, respectively. In the IVDU cohort, Serratia marcescens was the next most prevalently cultured organism at 13.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study demonstrates that in the IVDU population S. marcescens is an organism of high concern. The potential for Serratia spp. infection should be accounted for when selecting empirical antimicrobial therapy in VOD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"551-558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141600220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"In-hospital outcomes following surgery versus conservative therapy in elderly patients with C2 fractures: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Sam H Jiang, Ryan K Wang, Morteza Sadeh, Zayed Almadidy, Ankit I Mehta, Nauman S Chaudhry","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231131","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Second cervical vertebrae (C2) fractures are a common traumatic spinal injury in the elderly population. Surgical fusion and nonoperative bracing are two primary treatments for cervical instability, but the former is often withheld in the elderly due to concerns for poor postoperative outcomes arising from patient frailty. This study sought to evaluate the in-hospital differences in mortality, outcomes, and discharge disposition in elderly patients with C2 fractures undergoing surgical intervention compared with conservative therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Trauma Data Bank was queried from 2017 to 2019 for all patients aged ≥ 65 years with C2 fractures undergoing either surgical stabilization or conservative therapy. Propensity score matching was performed using k-nearest neighbors with replacement based on patient demographics, comorbidities, insurance type, injury severity, and fracture type. Group differences were compared using Student t-tests and Pearson's chi-square tests with Benjamini-Hochberg multiple comparisons correction. Subgroup analyses were performed in the 65-74, 75-79, and 80+ year age subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six thousand forty-nine patients were identified, of whom 2156 underwent surgery and 3893 received conservative treatment. Following matching, the surgery group had significantly lower mortality rates (5.52% vs 9.6%, p < 0.001), a longer mean hospital length of stay (LOS; 12.64 vs 7.49 days p < 0.001), and slightly higher rates of several complications (< 3% difference), as well as lower rates of discharge home (14.56% vs 23.52%, p < 0.001) and to hospice (1.07% vs 2.09%, p = 0.02) and a higher rate of discharge to intermediate care (68.83% vs 48.28%, p < 0.001). Similar trends in mortality and LOS were noted in all 3 subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In elderly patients with C2 fractures, surgical stabilization confers a small survival advantage with a slightly higher in-hospital complication rate compared to conservative therapy. The increased rate of discharge to rehabilitation may represent better long-term prognosis following surgery. The increased risk of short-term complications is present but relatively small, thus surgery should not be withheld in patients with good long-term prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"498-507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141600219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Change in spinal bone mineral density as estimated by Hounsfield units following osteoporosis treatment with romosozumab, teriparatide, denosumab, and alendronate: an analysis of 318 patients.","authors":"Anthony L Mikula, Nikita Lakomkin, Abdelrahman M Hamouda, Megan C Everson, Zach Pennington, Rahul Kumar, Zachariah W Pinter, Michael L Martini, Mohamad Bydon, Kurt A Kennel, Francis Baffour, Ahmad Nassr, Brett Freedman, Arjun S Sebastian, Kingsley Abode-Iyamah, Paul A Anderson, Jeremy L Fogelson, Benjamin D Elder","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE2424","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE2424","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of osteoporosis medications on opportunistic CT-based Hounsfield units (HU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Spine and nonspine surgery patients were retrospectively identified who had been treated with romosozumab for 3 to 12 months, teriparatide for 3 to 12 months, teriparatide for > 12 months, denosumab for > 12 months, or alendronate for > 12 months. HU were measured in the L1-4 vertebral bodies. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean change in HU among the five treatment regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 318 patients (70% women) were included, with a mean age of 69 years and mean BMI of 27 kg/m2. There was a significant difference in mean HU improvement (p < 0.001) following treatment with romosozumab for 3 to 12 months (n = 32), teriparatide for 3 to 12 months (n = 30), teriparatide for > 12 months (n = 44), denosumab for > 12 months (n = 123), and alendronate for > 12 months (n = 100). Treatment with romosozumab for a mean of 10.5 months significantly increased the mean HU by 26%, from a baseline of 85 to 107 (p = 0.012). Patients treated with teriparatide for > 12 months (mean 23 months) experienced a mean HU improvement of 25%, from 106 to 132 (p = 0.039). Compared with the mean baseline HU, there was no significant difference after treatment with teriparatide for 3 to 12 months (110 to 119, p = 0.48), denosumab for > 12 months (105 to 107, p = 0.68), or alendronate for > 12 months (111 to 113, p = 0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients treated with romosozumab for a mean of 10.5 months and teriparatide for a mean of 23 months experienced improved spinal bone mineral density as estimated by CT-based opportunistic HU. Given the shorter duration of effective treatment, romosozumab may be the preferred medication for optimization of osteoporotic patients in preparation for elective spine fusion surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"309-315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141538009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor. Tranexamic acid in spinal surgery.","authors":"Cheng Li, Zhikang Tian, Chunyang Meng","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE24414","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE24414","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"560-562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141538011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion subsidence: computed tomography analysis of incidence, associated risk factors, and impact on outcomes.","authors":"Hannah A Levy, Zachariah W Pinter, Ryder Reed, Joshua R Harmer, Kay Raftery, Karim Rizwan Nathani, Konstantinos Katsos, Mohamad Bydon, Jeremy L Fogelson, Benjamin D Elder, Bradford L Currier, Nicolas Newell, Ahmad N Nassr, Brett A Freedman, Brian A Karamian, Arjun S Sebastian","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231007","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to 1) define the incidence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) interbody subsidence; 2) determine the relative importance of preoperative and intraoperative patient- and instrumentation-specific risk factors predictive of postoperative subsidence using CT-based assessment; and 3) determine the impact of TLIF subsidence on postoperative complications and fusion rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adult patients who underwent one- or two-level TLIF for lumbar degenerative conditions at a multi-institutional academic center between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patients with traumatic injury, infection, malignancy, previous fusion at the index level, combined anterior-posterior procedures, surgery with greater than two TLIF levels, or incomplete follow-up were excluded. Interbody subsidence at the superior and inferior endplates of each TLIF level was directly measured on the endplate-facing surface of both coronal and sagittal CT scans obtained greater than 6 months postoperatively. Patients were grouped based on the maximum subsidence at each operative level classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on previously documented < 2-mm, 2- to 4-mm, and ≥ 4-mm thresholds, respectively. Univariate and regression analyses compared patient demographics, medical comorbidities, preoperative bone quality, surgical factors including interbody cage parameters, and fusion and complication rates across subsidence groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 67 patients with 85 unique fusion levels met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Overall, 28% of levels exhibited moderate subsidence and 35% showed severe subsidence after TLIF with no significant difference in the superior and inferior endplate subsidence. Moderate (≥ 2-mm) and severe (≥ 4-mm) subsidence were significantly associated with decreases in cage surface area and Taillard index as well as interbody cages with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) material and sawtooth surface geometry. Severe subsidence was also significantly associated with taller preoperative disc spaces, decreased vertebral Hounsfield units (HU), the absence of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) use, and smooth cage surfaces. Regression analysis revealed decreases in Taillard index, cage surface area, and HU, and the absence of BMP use predicted subsidence. Severe subsidence was found to be a predictor of pseudarthrosis but was not significantly associated with revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient-level risk factors for TLIF subsidence included decreased HU and increased preoperative disc height. Intraoperative risk factors for TLIF subsidence were decreased cage surface area, PEEK cage material, bullet cages, posterior cage positioning, smooth cage surfaces, and sawtooth surface designs. Severe subsidence predicted TLIF pseudarthrosis; however, the causality of this relationship remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"463-472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141538012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of accuracy, revision, and perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted spine surgeries: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Luke MacLean, Andrew M Hersh, Meghana Bhimreddy, Kelly Jiang, A Daniel Davidar, Carly Weber-Levine, Safwan Alomari, Brendan F Judy, Daniel Lubelski, Nicholas Theodore","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE23917","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE23917","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pedicle screw placement guidance is critical in spinal fusions, and spinal surgery robots aim to improve accuracy and reduce complications. Current literature has yet to compare the relative merits of available robotic systems. In this review, the authors aimed to 1) assess the current state of spinal robotics literature; 2) conduct a meta-analysis of robotic performance based on accuracy, speed, and safety; and 3) offer recommendations for robotic system selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic literature review across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus as of April 28, 2022, for studies on approved robots for placing lumbar pedicle screws. Three reviewers screened and extracted data relating to the study characteristics, accuracy rate, intraoperative revisions, and reoperations. Secondary performance metrics included operative time, blood loss, and radiation exposure. The authors statistically compared the performance of the robots using a random-effects model to account for variation within and between the studies. Each robot was also compared with performance benchmarks of traditional techniques including freehand, fluoroscopic, and CT-navigated insertion. Finally, we performed a Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill test to assess for the presence of publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified 46 studies, describing 4670 patients and 25,054 screws, that evaluated 4 different robotic systems: Mazor X, ROSA, ExcelsiusGPS, and Cirq. The weighted accuracy rates of Gertzbein-Robbins classification grade A or B screws were as follows: ExcelsiusGPS, 98.0%; ROSA, 98.0%; Mazor, 98.2%; and Cirq, 94.2%. No robot was significantly more accurate than the others. However, the accuracy of the ExcelsiusGPS was significantly higher than that of traditional methods, and the accuracies of the Mazor and ROSA were significantly higher than that of fluoroscopy. The intraoperative revision rates were Cirq, 0.55%; ROSA, 0.91%; Mazor, 0.98%; and ExcelsiusGPS, 1.08%. The reoperation rates were Cirq, 0.28%; ExcelsiusGPS, 0.32%; and Mazor, 0.76% (no reoperations were reported for ROSA). Operative times were similar for all robots. Both the ExcelsiusGPS and Mazor were associated with significantly less blood loss than the ROSA. The Cirq had the lowest radiation exposure. Robots tended to be more accurate and generally their use was associated with fewer reoperations and less blood loss than freehand, fluoroscopic, or CT-navigated techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic platforms perform comparably based on key metrics, with high accuracy rates and low intraoperative revision and reoperation rates. The spinal robotics publication rate will continue to accelerate, and choosing a robot will depend on the context of the practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"519-531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141538010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Obstacles to receiving postoperative radiation therapy following separation surgery for metastatic spine disease.","authors":"John E Dugan, Connor C Long, Hani Chanbour, Gabriel A Bendfeldt, Lakshmi Suryateja Gangavarapu, Iyan Younus, Soren Jonzzon, Mahmoud Ahmed, Leo Y Luo, Richard A Berkman, Julian G Lugo-Pico, Amir M Abtahi, Byron F Stephens, Scott L Zuckerman","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231254","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231254","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Obtaining timely postoperative radiotherapy (RT) following separation surgery is critical to avoid local recurrence of disease yet can be a challenge due to scheduling conflicts, insurance denials, and travel arrangements. In patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery for spinal cord compression, the authors sought to: 1) report the rate of postoperative RT, 2) describe reasons for patients not receiving postoperative RT, and 3) investigate factors that may predict whether a patient receives postoperative RT.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A single-center retrospective case series was undertaken of all patients who underwent metastatic spine surgery for extradural disease between January 2010 and January 2021. Inclusion criteria were patients with intermediate or radioresistant tumors with evidence of spinal cord compression who underwent surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of RT within 3 months following surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed controlling for age, BMI, race, total number of decompressed levels, tumor size, other organ metastasis, and preoperative RT or chemotherapy to predict patients receiving postoperative RT.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Of 239 patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic disease, 113 (47.3%) received postoperative RT while 126 (52.7%) did not. In the postoperative RT group, 24 (21.2%) received stereotactic body radiation therapy while 89 (78.8%) received conventional external-beam radiation therapy. The most common reasons for patients not receiving postoperative RT included death or transfer to hospice (31.0%), RT not being recommended by radiation oncology (30.2%), and loss to follow-up (23.8%). On critical review with the radiation oncology department, the authors estimated that 101 of 126 (80.2%) patients who did not receive postoperative RT were potential candidates for postoperative RT. Patients who received postoperative RT had more documented inpatient (48.7% vs 32.5%, p &lt; 0.001) and outpatient (100.0% vs 65.1%, p &lt; 0.001) radiation oncology consultations than those who did not. Additionally, patients who received postoperative RT had a higher rate of postoperative chemotherapy (53.1% vs 25.4%, p &lt; 0.001), while patients who did not receive postoperative RT had a higher rate of preoperative RT (7.1% vs 31.0%, p &lt; 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed that patients who received preoperative RT had lower odds of undergoing postoperative RT (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-0.34; p &lt; 0.001), and patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy had higher odds of undergoing postoperative RT (OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.05-7.17; p &lt; 0.001).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;In the current study reflecting real-world care of patients with metastatic spine disease after undergoing separation surgery, 47% of patients did not receive postoperative RT, and 80% of those patients were potential candidates for postoperative RT. Radiation oncology cons","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"416-427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141468731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}