Journal of neurosurgery. Spine最新文献

{"title":"Does comorbid depression and anxiety portend poor long-term outcomes following surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis? Five-year analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.","authors":"Joseph DiDomenico, S Harrison Farber, Michael S Virk, Jakub Godzik, Sarah E Johnson, Mohamad Bydon, Praveen V Mummaneni, Erica F Bisson, Steven D Glassman, Andrew K Chan, Dean Chou, Kai-Ming Fu, Christopher I Shaffrey, Anthony L Asher, Domagoj Coric, Eric A Potts, Kevin T Foley, Michael Y Wang, John J Knightly, Paul Park, Mark E Shaffrey, Jonathan R Slotkin, Regis W Haid, Juan S Uribe, Jay D Turner","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24325","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24325","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Depression and anxiety are associated with poor outcomes following spine surgery. However, the influence of these conditions on achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following lumbar spine surgery, as well as the potential compounding effects of comorbid depression and anxiety, is not well understood. This study explores the impact of comorbid depression and anxiety on long-term clinical outcomes following surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective analysis of the multicenter, prospectively collected Quality Outcomes Database (QOD). Patients with surgically treated grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis from 12 centers were included. Preoperative baseline characteristics and comorbidities were recorded, including self-reported depression and/or anxiety. Pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded: the numeric rating scale (NRS) score for back pain (NRS-BP), NRS score for leg pain (NRS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ-5D. Patients were grouped into 3 cohorts: no self-reported depression or anxiety (non-SRD/A), self-reported depression or anxiety (SRD/A), or presence of both comorbidities (SRD+A). Changes in PROs over time, satisfaction rates, and rates of MCID were compared. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to establish independent associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 608 patients, there were 452 (74.3%) with non-SRD/A, 81 (13.3%) with SRD/A, and 75 (12.3%) with SRD+A. Overall, 91.8% and 80.4% of patients had ≥ 24 and ≥ 60 months of follow-up, respectively. Baseline PROs were universally inferior for the SRD+A cohort. However, at 60-month follow-up, changes in all PROs were greatest for the SRD+A cohort, resulting in nonsignificant differences in absolute NRS-BP, NRS-LP, ODI, and EQ-5D across the 3 groups. MCID was achieved for the SRD+A cohort at similar rates to the non-SRD/A cohort. All groups achieved > 80% satisfaction rates with surgery without significant differences across the cohorts (p = 0.79). On multivariable regression, comorbid depression and anxiety were associated with worse baseline PROs, but they had no impact on 60-month PROs or 60-month achievement of MCIDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite lower baseline PROs, patients with comorbid depression and anxiety achieved comparable rates of MCID and satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis to those without either condition. This quality-of-life benefit was durable at 5-year follow-up. These data suggest that patients with self-reported comorbid depression and anxiety should not be excluded from consideration of surgical intervention and often substantially benefit from surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"579-588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142143100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The impact of serum albumin levels on postoperative complications in lumbar and cervical spine surgery: an analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative registry.","authors":"Anisse N Chaker, Anneliese F Rademacher, Matthew Easton, Yousif Jafar, Edvin Telemi, Tarek R Mansour, Enoch Kim, Matthew Brennan, Jianhui Hu, Lonni Schultz, David R Nerenz, Jason M Schwalb, Muwaffak Abdulhak, Jad G Khalil, Richard Easton, Miguelangelo Perez-Cruet, Ilyas Aleem, Paul Park, Teck Soo, Doris Tong, Victor Chang","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24113","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24113","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with serum albumin levels < 3.5 g/dL are considered malnourished, but there is a paucity of data regarding the outcomes of patients with albumin levels > 3.5 g/dL. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of albumin on postoperative outcome in patients undergoing elective cervical and lumbar spine procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative database was queried for lumbar and cervical fusion surgeries between January 2020 and December 2022. Patients were grouped by preoperative serum albumin levels: < 3.5 g/dL, 3.5-3.7 g/dL, 3.8-4.0 g/dL, and > 4.0 g/dL. Primary outcomes included urinary retention, ileus, dysphagia, surgical site infection (SSI), readmission within 30 and 90 days, return to the operating room, and length of stay (LOS) ≥ 4 days. Multivariate analysis was conducted to adjust for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 15,629 lumbar cases and 6889 cervical cases. Within the lumbar cohort, an albumin level of 3.5-3.7 g/dL was associated with an increased risk of readmission at 30 days (p = 0.048) and 90 days (p = 0.005) and an LOS ≥ 4 days (p < 0.001). An albumin level of 3.8-4.0 g/dL was associated with an increased risk of an LOS ≥ 4 days (p < 0.001). Within the cervical cohort, an albumin level of 3.5-3.7 g/dL was associated with an increased risk of SSI (p = 0.023), readmission at 30 days (p < 0.002) and 90 days (p < 0.001), return to the operating room (p = 0.002), and an LOS ≥ 4 days (p < 0.001). An albumin level of 3.8-4.0 g/dL was associated with an increased risk of readmission at 30 days (p = 0.012) and 90 days (p = 0.001) and an LOS ≥ 4 days (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study maintains that patients with hypoalbunemia undergoing spine surgery are at risk for postoperative adverse events. However, there also exist significant associations between borderline serum albumin levels of 3.5-4.0 g/dL and increased risk of postoperative adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"792-802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142143102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Introduction. Proceedings of Spine Summit 2024.","authors":"Jay D Turner, Wilson Z Ray, Michael P Kelly, Dean Chou, Lawrence G Lenke, Juan S Uribe, Eric A Potts","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24765","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24765","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142108355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Durability of substantial clinical benefit leading to optimal outcomes in adult spinal deformity corrective surgery: a minimum 5-year analysis.","authors":"Jamshaid M Mir, Matthew S Galetta, Nima Alan, Oluwatobi O Onafowokan, Ankita Das, Pooja Dave, Peter Tretiakov, Nathan A Lorentz, Renaud Lafage, Bassel Diebo, M Burhan Janjua, Dean Chou, Justin S Smith, Virginie Lafage, Andrew J Schoenfeld, Daniel Sciubba, Andreas K Demetriades, Peter G Passias","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE2456","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE2456","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to evaluate factors associated with the long-term durability of outcomes in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Operative ASD patients fused from at least L1 to the sacrum with baseline (BL) to 5-year (5Y) follow-up were included. Substantial clinical benefit (SCB) in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numeric rating scale (NRS)-back, NRS-leg, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r scores and physical component score were assessed on the basis of previously published values. Factors were evaluated on the basis of meeting optimal outcomes (OO) at 2 years (2+) and 5 years (5+). Furthermore, 2+ patients were isolated and evaluated on the basis of meeting OO at 5 years (2+5+) or not at 5 years (2+5-). OO were defined as follows: no reoperation, major mechanical failure, proximal junctional failure, and meeting either 1) SCB in terms of ODI score (decrease > 18.8) or 2) ODI < 15 and SRS-22r total > 4.5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 330 ASD patients met the inclusion criteria, with 45.5% meeting SCB for ODI at 2 years, while 46.0% met SCB at 5 years; 79% of those who achieved 2-year (2Y) SCB went on to achieve 5Y SCB. This rate was lower for OO, with 41% achieving 2Y OO (2+), while 37% met 5Y OO (5+) and 80% of 2+ patients had durable outcomes until 5+ (32% of the total cohort). Of the patient factors, frailty was significantly different among groups at 2 years, while comorbidity burden was significantly different at 5 years and the combination thereof differed in those with durable outcomes. Those who regained their level of activity postoperatively had 4 times higher odds of maintaining OO from 2 years to 5 years (p < 0.05). Osteoporosis rates, although equivocal at BL, were higher at the last follow-up in those who met 2Y OO but failed to meet 5Y OO. The odds of achieving OO at 5 years in 2+ patients decreased by 47% for each additional comorbidity and decreased by 74% in those who had lower-extremity paresthesias at BL (both p < 0.05). Controlling for patient factors and BL disability found fewer levels fused, decreased correction of sagittal vertical axis, and increased correction of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch to be predictive of maintaining 2Y OO until 5 years (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SCB was met in 46% of ASD patients at 5 years. The durability of OO was seen in a third of patients until 5 years postoperatively. Higher rates of medical complications were seen in those who failed to achieve and maintain OO until 5 years. Frailty and comorbidity burden were significant factors associated with the achievement and durability of OO until 5 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"765-773"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142108354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Social determinants of health and outcome disparities in spine tumor surgery. Part 2: Neighborhood disadvantage and long-term outcomes.","authors":"Oliver Y Tang, Owen P Leary, Arjun Ganga, Joshua R Feler, Rahul A Sastry, Ankush I Bajaj, Cameron Ayala, Krissia M Rivera Perla, Silas Monje, Joseph Madour, Alexander Chernysh, Deus J Cielo, Adetokunbo A Oyelese, Jared S Fridley, Steven A Toms, Ziya L Gokaslan, Patricia L Zadnik Sullivan","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231082","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231082","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Neighborhood-level resource disadvantage has been previously shown to predict extent of resection, oncological follow-up, adjuvant treatment, and clinical trial participation for malignancies, including glioblastoma. The authors aimed to characterize the association between neighborhood disadvantage and long-term outcomes after spine tumor surgery.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The authors analyzed all patients who underwent surgery for primary or secondary (all metastatic pathologies) spine tumors at a single spinal oncology specialty center in the United States from 2015 to 2022. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated metric compositing 17 social determinants of health variables that ranges continuously from 0% (higher advantage) to 100% (higher disadvantage), was used to quantify neighborhood disadvantage. Patient addresses were matched to ADI on the basis of the census block of residence. Subsequently, the study population was dichotomized into advantaged (ADI 0%-33%) and disadvantaged (ADI 34%-100%) cohorts. The primary endpoint was functional status, as defined by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale grade, with secondary endpoints including inpatient outcomes, mortality, readmissions, reoperations, and clinical research participation. Multivariable logistic, gamma log-link, and Cox regression adjusted for 14 confounders, including patient and oncological characteristics, general and tumor-related presenting severity, and treatment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;In total, 237 patients underwent spine tumor surgery from 2015 to 2022, with an average age of 53.9 years, and 57.0% had primary tumors whereas 43.0% had secondary tumors; 55.3% (n = 131) were classified by ADI into the disadvantaged cohort. This cohort had higher rates of ambulation deficits on presentation (39.1% vs 23.5%, p = 0.015) and nonelective surgery (35.1% vs 23.6%, p = 0.030). Postoperatively, disadvantaged patients exhibited higher odds of residual tumor (OR 2.55, p = 0.026), especially for secondary tumors (OR 4.92, p = 0.045). Patients from disadvantaged neighborhoods additionally exhibited significantly higher odds of poor functional status at follow-up (OR 3.94, p = 0.002). Postoperative survival was 74.7% (mean follow-up 17.6 months), with the disadvantaged cohort experiencing significantly shorter survival (HR 1.92, p = 0.049). Moreover, this population had higher odds of readmission (OR 1.92, p = 0.046) and, for primary tumors, reoperation (OR 9.26, p = 0.005). Elective participation in prospective clinical research was lower among the disadvantaged cohort (OR 0.45, p = 0.016).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Neighborhood disadvantage predicts higher rates of residual tumor, readmission, and reoperation, as well as poorer functional status, shorter postoperative survival, and decreased elective research participation. The ADI may be used to risk stratify spine oncology patients and guide t","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"689-698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142108358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Predictors of patient satisfaction after surgery for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 5-year analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.","authors":"Alexander Dru, Sarah E Johnson, Joseph R Linzey, Kevin T Foley, Anthony Digiorgio, Nima Alan, Domagoj Coric, Eric A Potts, Erica F Bisson, John J Knightly, Kai-Ming Fu, Mark E Shaffrey, Jason Weaver, Mohamad Bydon, Dean Chou, Scott A Meyer, Anthony L Asher, Christopher I Shaffrey, Jonathan R Slotkin, Michael Y Wang, Regis W Haid, Steven D Glassman, Michael S Virk, Praveen V Mummaneni, Paul Park","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24227","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24227","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lumbar decompression and/or fusion surgery is a common operation for symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis refractory to conservative management. Multiyear follow-up of patient outcomes can be difficult to obtain but allows for identification of preoperative patient characteristics associated with durable pain relief, improved functional outcome, and higher patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A query of the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) low-grade spondylolisthesis module for patients who underwent surgery for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis (from July 2014 to June 2016 at the 12 highest-enrolling sites) was used to identify patient satisfaction, as measured with the North American Spine Society (NASS) questionnaire, which uses a scale of 1-4. Patients were considered satisfied if they had a score ≤ 2. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify baseline demographic and clinical predictors of long-term satisfaction 5 years after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 573 eligible patients from a cohort of 608, patient satisfaction data were available for 81.2%. Satisfaction (NASS score of 1 or 2) was reported by 389 patients (83.7%) at 5-year follow-up. Satisfied patients were predominantly White and ambulation independent and had lower baseline BMI, lower back pain levels, lower Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and greater EQ-5D index scores at baseline when compared to the unsatisfied group. No significant differences in reoperation rates between groups were reported at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, patients who were independently ambulating at baseline had greater odds of long-term satisfaction (OR 1.12, p = 0.04). Patients who had higher 5-year ODI scores (OR 0.99, p < 0.01) and were uninsured (OR 0.43, p = 0.01) were less likely to report long-term satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lumbar surgery for the treatment of grade 1 spondylolisthesis can provide lasting pain relief with high patient satisfaction. Baseline independent ambulation is associated with a higher long-term satisfaction rate after surgery. Higher ODI scores at 5-year follow-up and uninsured status are associated with lower postoperative long-term satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"658-665"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142108356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Social determinants of health and outcome disparities in spine tumor surgery. Part 1: An analysis of 6.6 million nationwide admissions.","authors":"Oliver Y Tang, Cameron Ayala, Joshua R Feler, Rahul A Sastry, Ankush I Bajaj, Krissia M Rivera Perla, Arjun Ganga, Owen P Leary, Silas Monje, Joseph Madour, Deus J Cielo, Adetokunbo A Oyelese, Jared S Fridley, Steven A Toms, Ziya L Gokaslan, Patricia L Zadnik Sullivan","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231081","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Earlier research has demonstrated that social determinants of health (SDoH) impact neurosurgical access and outcomes, but these trends are less characterized for spine tumors relative to intracranial tumors. The authors aimed to elucidate the association between SDoH and outcomes for a nationwide cohort of spine tumor surgery admissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors identified all admissions with a spine tumor diagnosis in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2002 to 2019. Four SDoH were analyzed: race and ethnicity, insurance, household income, and safety-net hospital (SNH) treatment. Hospitals in the top quartile of safety-net burden (in terms of percentage of patients receiving Medicaid or uninsured) were categorized as SNHs. Multivariable regression queried the association between 22 variables and 5 perioperative outcomes: mortality, discharge disposition, complications, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs. Interaction term analysis with hospitalization year was used to assess longitudinal changes in outcome disparities. Finally, the authors constructed random forest machine learning models to assess the impact of SDoH variables on prognostic accuracy and to quantify the relative importance of predictors for disposition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6,593,392 total admissions with spine tumors, 219,380 (3.3%) underwent surgery. Non-White race (OR 0.80-0.91, p < 0.001) and nonprivate insurance (OR 0.76-0.83, p < 0.001) were associated with lower odds of receiving surgery. Among surgical admissions, presenting severity, including of myelopathy and plegia, was elevated among non-White, nonprivate insurance, and low-income admissions (all p < 0.001). Black race (OR 0.70, p < 0.001), Medicare (OR 0.70, p < 0.001), Medicaid (OR 0.90, p < 0.001), and lower income (OR 0.88-0.93, all p < 0.001) were associated with decreased odds of favorable discharge disposition. Increased LOS and costs were observed among non-White (+6%-10% in LOS and +5%-9% in costs, both p < 0.001) and Medicaid (+16% in LOS and +6% in costs, both p < 0.001) admissions. SNH treatment was also associated with higher mortality (OR 1.49, p < 0.001) and complication (OR 1.20, p < 0.001) rates. From 2002 to 2019, disposition improved annually for Medicaid patients (OR 1.03 per year, p = 0.022) but worsened for Black patients (OR 0.98 per year, p = 0.046). Random forest models identified household income as the most important predictor of discharge disposition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For spine tumor admissions, SDoH predicted surgical intervention, presenting severity, and perioperative outcomes. Over 2 decades, disparities improved for Medicaid patients but worsened for Black patients. Finally, SDoH significantly improve prognostic accuracy for outcomes after spine tumor surgery. Further study toward ameliorating patient disparities for this population is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"677-688"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142108357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor. Ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders in female spine surgeons.","authors":"Maya Yamada, Satomi Nagamine, Miyuki Fukuda, Reiko Yoneyama, Tadatsugu Morimoto","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24633","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24633","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"814-815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142043978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Can titanium surface technology reduce cost for biologics in anterior lumbar interbody fusion?","authors":"Cameron Shirazi, Mark A Ochoa, Hani Malone, Amber Price, Jay I Kumar, Behrooz A Akbarnia, Gregory M Mundis, David Sing, Robert K Eastlack","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231323","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231323","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Advances in surface architecture and technology have made interbody fusion devices more bioactive, with the hope of facilitating the fusion process more successfully. The advent of these increasingly bioactive implants may reduce reliance on more expensive biologics that have previously been used to achieve high fusion rates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A retrospective review of prospectively collected data (August 2018-December 2019) was conducted of consecutively performed anterior lumbar interbody fusions in which an acid-etched, nanosurface-modulated, titanium interbody device packed only with corticocancellous allograft chips and local blood was used. Minimum follow-up was 1 year, and inclusion required available imaging and outcome metrics preoperatively and at 1 year. Fusion and subsidence were assessed via CT scans and/or dynamic radiographs. Health-related quality-of-life measures (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], visual analog scale [VAS] back/leg) were collected pre- and postoperatively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;In total, 55 patients met inclusion criteria (1 year of follow-up, available imaging, and outcome metrics). A total of 69 lumbar levels were treated in these 55 patients. The mean age was 67 ± 12.1 years, with 47% female patients. Roughly one-third (35%) had previous spine surgery, and approximately one-tenth (9.1%) had prior spinal fusion. A total of 20.6% were treated at multiple levels (mean levels per patient 1.2, minimum 1, maximum 3). The mean preoperative patient-reported outcomes were as follows: ODI 39.71 ± 18.15, VAS back 6.49 ± 2.19, and VAS leg 5.41 ± 2.71. One year after surgery, the mean improvements in patient-reported outcomes (vs preoperative scores) were as follows: ODI -22.9 ± 13.08 (p &lt; 0.001), VAS back -3.75 ± 2.03 (p &lt; 0.001), VAS leg -3.73 ± 2.32 (p &lt; 0.001). All levels achieved fusion at 1 year postoperatively based on CT scans (65/69 levels) or dynamic radiographs (4/69 levels, change in score &lt; 5% on flexion-extension radiographs). Four of the 65 levels were assigned to the grade 3 category according to a CT-based grading system, meaning cranial and caudal endplate bone apposition to the implant on both surfaces with no clear intervertebral bone connection through or around the implant. Sixty-one of 65 were found to have contiguous intervertebral bone bridging and thus were assigned to grade 1 (n = 54) or grade 2 (n = 7). Low-grade graft subsidence (Marchi grade 0 or I) occurred in 9 levels (13.0%) and high-grade subsidence (Marchi grade II or III) in 4 levels (5.8%). No patients required reoperation at the level of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and no radiographic or clinical evidence of pedicle screw loosening or failure was observed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;The combination of advances in materials science and surface technology as demonstrated with a nanotechnology titanium cage resulted in the ability to obtain lumbar interbody fusion with al","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"589-595"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142043975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor. ChatGPT and the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.","authors":"Hinpetch Daungsupawong, Viroj Wiwanitkit","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24789","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24789","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"815-816"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142043977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}