职业足球运动员在创伤性颈椎损伤后恢复比赛:来自国家橄榄球联盟脊柱外科医生的专家意见。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michael D White, Andrew M Hersh, Carly Weber-Levine, Kelly Jiang, A Daniel Davidar, Victoria Bergstein, Vikas N Vattipally, Scott L Zuckerman, Allen K Sills, Randall W Porter, Nicholas Theodore
{"title":"职业足球运动员在创伤性颈椎损伤后恢复比赛:来自国家橄榄球联盟脊柱外科医生的专家意见。","authors":"Michael D White, Andrew M Hersh, Carly Weber-Levine, Kelly Jiang, A Daniel Davidar, Victoria Bergstein, Vikas N Vattipally, Scott L Zuckerman, Allen K Sills, Randall W Porter, Nicholas Theodore","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a paucity of high-quality return-to-play (RTP) data following treatment of cervical spine injuries in contact sports. In this study, the authors gathered insights from National Football League (NFL) team spine surgeon consultants to highlight current practices in treating cervical spine injuries and report decision-making regarding RTP in professional American football players.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, online survey was distributed to all NFL consulting physicians specializing in the management of spine injuries. The survey covered the following five clinical vignettes of cervical spine injuries: 1) radiculopathy, 2) myelopathy, 3) unilateral facet fracture, 4) unilateral facet dislocation, and 5) neck pain with MRI showing a ligamentous STIR signal. Participants were asked about management options and criteria to clear players for RTP using a combination of multiple-choice and open-ended answers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 physicians from 21 of 32 (66%) teams responded. Anterior surgery was most commonly recommended for cervical disc herniation causing radiculopathy or myelopathy (73% and 88%, respectively). A rigid cervical orthosis was preferred by 68% of experts for initial management of nondisplaced unilateral facet fracture, but single-level anterior fusion was preferred by 56% for a unilateral facet dislocation. Common criteria to clear players for RTP with cervical disc herniation causing radiculopathy included a normal examination (85%), radiographic fusion postoperatively (58%), and pain-free range of motion (50%). Contraindications for RTP included persistent stenosis (35%), instability (31%), multilevel fusion (27%), and persistent cord signal change (23%). Additional criteria for RTP in players with facet fractures or dislocations included radiographic evidence of fracture healing (32% and 24%, respectively) and normal flexion/extension radiographs (24% and 32%, respectively). Finally, for players with isolated ligamentous STIR signal changes, resolution of MRI findings was required by 36% of responding physicians prior to RTP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decision-making regarding RTP after cervical spine injuries in professional football players is complex and influenced by improvement of symptoms, pain-free range of motion, and radiographic evidence of fusion or fracture healing. Respondents preferred anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for disc herniations causing cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy, rigid orthosis for unilateral facet fractures, and surgery for unilateral facet dislocations. The results of this study provide insight into how surgeons serving as consultants to professional football teams may counsel players who sustain cervical spine injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to play in professional football players following traumatic cervical spine injury: expert opinions from the National Football League spine surgeons.\",\"authors\":\"Michael D White, Andrew M Hersh, Carly Weber-Levine, Kelly Jiang, A Daniel Davidar, Victoria Bergstein, Vikas N Vattipally, Scott L Zuckerman, Allen K Sills, Randall W Porter, Nicholas Theodore\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a paucity of high-quality return-to-play (RTP) data following treatment of cervical spine injuries in contact sports. In this study, the authors gathered insights from National Football League (NFL) team spine surgeon consultants to highlight current practices in treating cervical spine injuries and report decision-making regarding RTP in professional American football players.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, online survey was distributed to all NFL consulting physicians specializing in the management of spine injuries. The survey covered the following five clinical vignettes of cervical spine injuries: 1) radiculopathy, 2) myelopathy, 3) unilateral facet fracture, 4) unilateral facet dislocation, and 5) neck pain with MRI showing a ligamentous STIR signal. Participants were asked about management options and criteria to clear players for RTP using a combination of multiple-choice and open-ended answers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 physicians from 21 of 32 (66%) teams responded. Anterior surgery was most commonly recommended for cervical disc herniation causing radiculopathy or myelopathy (73% and 88%, respectively). A rigid cervical orthosis was preferred by 68% of experts for initial management of nondisplaced unilateral facet fracture, but single-level anterior fusion was preferred by 56% for a unilateral facet dislocation. Common criteria to clear players for RTP with cervical disc herniation causing radiculopathy included a normal examination (85%), radiographic fusion postoperatively (58%), and pain-free range of motion (50%). Contraindications for RTP included persistent stenosis (35%), instability (31%), multilevel fusion (27%), and persistent cord signal change (23%). Additional criteria for RTP in players with facet fractures or dislocations included radiographic evidence of fracture healing (32% and 24%, respectively) and normal flexion/extension radiographs (24% and 32%, respectively). Finally, for players with isolated ligamentous STIR signal changes, resolution of MRI findings was required by 36% of responding physicians prior to RTP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decision-making regarding RTP after cervical spine injuries in professional football players is complex and influenced by improvement of symptoms, pain-free range of motion, and radiographic evidence of fusion or fracture healing. Respondents preferred anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for disc herniations causing cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy, rigid orthosis for unilateral facet fractures, and surgery for unilateral facet dislocations. The results of this study provide insight into how surgeons serving as consultants to professional football teams may counsel players who sustain cervical spine injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24421\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:缺乏高质量的接触性运动中颈椎损伤治疗后恢复比赛(RTP)数据。在这项研究中,作者收集了美国国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)团队脊柱外科顾问的见解,以强调目前治疗颈椎损伤的做法,并报告了美国职业橄榄球运动员关于RTP的决策。方法:一项横断面的在线调查被分发给所有专门从事脊柱损伤管理的NFL咨询医生。该调查涵盖了以下五个颈椎损伤的临床特征:1)神经根病,2)脊髓病,3)单侧关节突骨折,4)单侧关节突脱位,5)MRI显示韧带STIR信号的颈部疼痛。参与者被问及管理选项和标准,以使用多项选择和开放式答案的组合来清除RTP的玩家。结果:来自32个团队中的21个(66%)的26名医生做出了回应。前路手术最常被推荐用于引起神经根病或脊髓病的颈椎间盘突出症(分别为73%和88%)。对于非移位的单侧关节突骨折,68%的专家首选刚性颈椎矫形器,但对于单侧关节突脱位,56%的专家首选单节段前路融合。清除运动员RTP伴颈椎间盘突出引起神经根病的常见标准包括正常检查(85%),术后放射融合(58%)和无痛活动范围(50%)。RTP的禁忌症包括持续狭窄(35%)、不稳定(31%)、多节段融合(27%)和持续脐带信号改变(23%)。小关节面骨折或脱位运动员RTP的附加标准包括骨折愈合的x线片证据(分别为32%和24%)和正常屈伸x线片(分别为24%和32%)。最后,对于孤立的韧带STIR信号改变的球员,36%的应答医生要求在RTP之前对MRI结果进行解析。结论:职业足球运动员颈椎损伤后RTP的决策是复杂的,并受到症状改善、无痛活动范围和融合或骨折愈合的影像学证据的影响。对于引起颈椎神经根病和脊髓病的椎间盘突出,受访者更倾向于前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合,单侧小关节面骨折采用刚性矫形,单侧小关节面脱位采用手术治疗。这项研究的结果为作为职业足球队顾问的外科医生如何为遭受颈椎损伤的球员提供咨询提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Return to play in professional football players following traumatic cervical spine injury: expert opinions from the National Football League spine surgeons.

Objective: There is a paucity of high-quality return-to-play (RTP) data following treatment of cervical spine injuries in contact sports. In this study, the authors gathered insights from National Football League (NFL) team spine surgeon consultants to highlight current practices in treating cervical spine injuries and report decision-making regarding RTP in professional American football players.

Methods: A cross-sectional, online survey was distributed to all NFL consulting physicians specializing in the management of spine injuries. The survey covered the following five clinical vignettes of cervical spine injuries: 1) radiculopathy, 2) myelopathy, 3) unilateral facet fracture, 4) unilateral facet dislocation, and 5) neck pain with MRI showing a ligamentous STIR signal. Participants were asked about management options and criteria to clear players for RTP using a combination of multiple-choice and open-ended answers.

Results: A total of 26 physicians from 21 of 32 (66%) teams responded. Anterior surgery was most commonly recommended for cervical disc herniation causing radiculopathy or myelopathy (73% and 88%, respectively). A rigid cervical orthosis was preferred by 68% of experts for initial management of nondisplaced unilateral facet fracture, but single-level anterior fusion was preferred by 56% for a unilateral facet dislocation. Common criteria to clear players for RTP with cervical disc herniation causing radiculopathy included a normal examination (85%), radiographic fusion postoperatively (58%), and pain-free range of motion (50%). Contraindications for RTP included persistent stenosis (35%), instability (31%), multilevel fusion (27%), and persistent cord signal change (23%). Additional criteria for RTP in players with facet fractures or dislocations included radiographic evidence of fracture healing (32% and 24%, respectively) and normal flexion/extension radiographs (24% and 32%, respectively). Finally, for players with isolated ligamentous STIR signal changes, resolution of MRI findings was required by 36% of responding physicians prior to RTP.

Conclusions: Decision-making regarding RTP after cervical spine injuries in professional football players is complex and influenced by improvement of symptoms, pain-free range of motion, and radiographic evidence of fusion or fracture healing. Respondents preferred anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for disc herniations causing cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy, rigid orthosis for unilateral facet fractures, and surgery for unilateral facet dislocations. The results of this study provide insight into how surgeons serving as consultants to professional football teams may counsel players who sustain cervical spine injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信