Journal of neurosurgery. Spine最新文献

{"title":"Age-specific clinical results in spinal meningioma surgery: should age still be considered detrimental to satisfactory outcomes?","authors":"Alessandro Pesce, Mauro Palmieri, Mattia Capobianco, Antonio Santoro, Maurizio Salvati, Alessandro Frati","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE2473","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE2473","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spinal meningiomas (SMs) are relatively rare primary spinal neoplasms, and the increasingly growing mean age and number of older patients presenting with spinal neoplasms raise questions concerning the costs and benefits of proposing surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes and complications of a large cohort of older patients with SMs to define the real benefit of surgery in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 261 SMs were operated on between 1976 and December 2021, and 156 matched the inclusion criteria for the final cohort. Patients were divided into three groups according to age: < 50 years (group A), between 51 and 74 years (group B), and > 75 years (group C). Neurological and clinical outcomes, resection grade, complications, histology, and possible recurrences were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort comprised 156 patients (126 females, 30 males) with a mean ± SD age of 55.93 ± 14.80 years. The mean follow-up was 41.5 ± 11.4 months. Group A was found to have a significantly higher Frankel score at follow-up; there was no significant difference between mean scores for groups B and C. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference between the subgroups in patients who showed improvement from their preoperative neurological condition. Only 3 recurrences were recorded, all in group A. Axial topography, level of the lesions, and preoperative symptoms, including impairment of the sphincter functions, demonstrated no statistically significant interaction in the subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study supports the concept that older age might not be a contraindication for surgical treatment in SMs because of the important improvements in functional status and quality of life achieved in this population subgroup. Older patients can benefit from prompt assessment and early surgery in cases of acute onset, with a complication rate not higher than that of younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"82-90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142406463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Incidence of revision surgery and patient-reported outcomes within 5 years of the index procedure for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database spondylolisthesis data.","authors":"Jacob Birlingmair, Leah Y Carreon, Mladen Djurasovic, Praveen V Mummaneni, Anthony Asher, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, Andrew K Chan, Dean Chou, Domagoj Coric, Kevin T Foley, Kai-Ming Fu, Regis Haid, John J Knightly, Vivian P Le, Paul Park, Eric A Potts, Christopher I Shaffrey, Mark E Shaffrey, Jonathan R Slotkin, Michael S Virk, Michael Y Wang, Steven D Glassman","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24488","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24488","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Some patients treated surgically for grade 1 spondylolisthesis require revision surgery. Outcomes after revision surgery are not well studied. The objective of this study was to determine how revision surgery impacts patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing decompression only or decompression and fusion (D+F) for grade 1 spondylolisthesis within 5 years of the index surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients in the 12 highest Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) enrolling sites with a diagnosis of grade 1 spondylolisthesis were identified and the incidence of revision surgery between the decompression-only and D+F patients were compared. PROs were compared between cohorts requiring revision surgery versus a single index procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 608 patients enrolled, 409 had complete 5-year data available for this study. Eleven (13.3%) of 83 patients underwent revision in the decompression-only group as well as 32 (9.8%) of 326 in the D+F group. For the entire cohort, patients requiring revision had significantly worse PROs at 5 years: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 27.4 versus 19.4, p = 0.008; numeric rating scale for back pain (NRS-BP) 4.1 versus 3.0, p = 0.013; and NRS for leg pain (NRS-LP) 3.4 versus 2.1, p = 0.029. In the decompression-only group, the change in 5-year PROs was not impacted by revision status: ODI 31.9 versus 24.2, p = 0.287; NRS-BP 1.9 versus 2.9, p = 0.325; and NRS-LP 6.2 versus 3.7, p = 0.011. In the D+F group, the change in 5-year PROs was diminished if patients required revision: ODI 19.1 versus 29.1, p = 0.001; NRS-BP 3.0 versus 4.0, p = 0.170; and NRS-LP 2.3 versus 4.6, p = 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most common reasons for reoperation within 5 years in the decompression-only group were repeat decompression and instability, whereas in the D+F group the most common reason was adjacent-segment disease. The need for revision resulted in modestly diminished benefit compared with patients with no revisions. These differences were greater in the fusion cohort compared with the decompression-only cohort. The mean PRO improvement still far exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds for all measures for patients who underwent a revision surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"56-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142406474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Outcome prediction following lumbar disc surgery: a longitudinal study of outcome trajectories, prognostic factors, and risk models.","authors":"Jeffrey J Hébert, Erin E Bigney, Sarah Nowell, Shuaijin Wang, Niels Wedderkopp, Christopher Small, Edward P Abraham, Najmedden Attabib, Nathan Evaniew, Jérôme Paquet, Raphaele Charest-Morin, Supriya Singh, Michael H Weber, Adrienne Kelly, Stephen Kingwell, Eric Crawford, Andrew Nataraj, Travis Marion, Bernard LaRue, Henry Ahn, Hamilton Hall, Charles G Fisher, Y Raja Rampersaud, Nicolas Dea, Christopher S Bailey, Neil A Manson","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24430","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24430","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to 1) describe the 2-year postoperative trajectories of leg pain and overall clinical outcome after surgery for radiculopathy, 2) identify the preoperative prognostic factors that predict trajectories representing poor clinical outcomes, and 3) develop and internally validate multivariable prognostic models to assist with clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network who were diagnosed with lumbar disc pathology and radiculopathy and had undergone lumbar discectomy at one of 18 spine centers. Potential outcome predictors included preoperative demographic, health-related, and clinical prognostic factors. Clinical outcomes were 1) 2-year univariable latent trajectories of leg pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale) and 2) overall outcomes comprising multivariable trajectories showing the combined postoperative courses of leg and back pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale) together with pain-related disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Each outcome model identified a subgroup of patients classified as experiencing a poor outcome based on minimal change in their clinical status after surgery. Multivariable risk model performance and internal validity were evaluated with discrimination and calibration statistics based on bootstrap shrinkage with 500 resamplings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors included data from 1142 patients (47.6% female). The trajectory models identified 3 subgroups based on the patients' postoperative courses of pain or disability: 88.6% of patients in the leg pain model and 71.9% in the overall outcome model experienced a good-to-excellent outcome. The models classified 11.4% (leg pain outcome) and 28.2% (overall outcome) of patients as experiencing a poor clinical outcome, which was defined as minimal improvement in pain or disability after surgery. Eleven individual demographic, health, and clinical factors predicted patients' poor leg pain and overall outcomes. The performance of the multivariable risk model for leg pain was inadequate, while the overall outcome model had acceptable discrimination, calibration, and internal validity for predicting a poor surgical outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with lumbar radiculopathy experience heterogeneous postoperative trajectories of pain and disability after lumbar discectomy. Individual preoperative factors are associated with postoperative outcomes and can be combined within a multivariable risk model to predict overall patient outcome. These results may inform clinical practice but require external validation before confident clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"33-42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Semaglutide exposure and its association with adverse outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease.","authors":"Syed I Khalid, Elie Massaad, Kyle Thomson, John H Shin","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24141","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24141","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Semaglutide, a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has transformed the therapeutic landscape for type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, its effect on osteoclast activity and its potential to induce weight-related muscle loss raises concerns about its impact on spine surgery outcomes. As such, evaluating semaglutide's influence on transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is imperative, given the procedure's reliance on successful bony fusion to prevent postoperative instability and further interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an all-payer database (MARINER), the authors analyzed data from patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were 18-74 years of age and who underwent short-segment fusion (≤ 3-level) TLIFs between January 2018 and October 2022. Patients were either exposed to semaglutide or not. A comprehensive 1:3 (exposure vs no exposure) matching was performed based on age, sex, obesity, hypertension, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, smoking status, osteoporosis, levels of surgery, and basal-bolus insulin dependence. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank testing were performed to study the probability of additional lumbar fusion surgery within 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the 1:3 matching, 1781 patients were identified, with 447 in the semaglutide-exposed cohort and 1334 in the nonexposed cohort. Most patients in both groups were 55-69 years old, and 59.3% were female. Analysis showed that the likelihood of undergoing additional lumbar fusion surgery within 1 year post-TLIF was significantly higher in the semaglutide-exposed group than in the nonexposed group (OR 11.79, 95% CI 8.17-17.33). Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank testing further confirmed a statistically significant divergent probability in the need for additional surgery within 1 year between the cohorts (log-rank, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Semaglutide exposure appears to be associated with a higher likelihood of additional lumbar fusion surgeries within 1 year post-TLIF, especially in patients receiving the medication for longer durations. Although the mechanisms remain speculative, potential impacts on bone turnover and the onset of muscle loss may be contributory factors. Further research is needed to elucidate the exact mechanisms and to develop strategies for optimizing surgical outcomes in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The correlation of neurosurgery motor examinations with ISNCSCI motor examinations in patients with spinal cord injury: a multicenter TRACK-SCI study.","authors":"Austin Lui, Phillip A Bonney, John Burke, John H Kanter, John K Yue, Naoki Takegami, Phiroz E Tarapore, Michael Huang, Praveen V Mummaneni, Sanjay S Dhall, Debra D Hemmerle, Adam R Ferguson, Abel Torres-Espin, Xuan Duong-Fernandez, Nicole Lai, Rajiv Saigal, Jonathan Pan, Vineeta Singh, Nikos Kyritsis, Jason F Talbott, Lisa U Pascual, J Russell Huie, William D Whetstone, Jacqueline C Bresnahan, Michael S Beattie, Philip R Weinstein, Geoffrey T Manley, Leigh Ann O'Banion, Yu-Hung Kuo, Stephanus Viljoen, Ramesh Grandhi, Berje H Shammassian, Anthony M DiGiorgio","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24402","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24402","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) assessment is the gold standard for evaluation of neurological function after spinal cord injury (SCI). Although it is an invaluable tool for diagnostic and research purposes, it is time consuming and can be impractical in acute injury settings. Clinical neurosurgery motor examinations (NMEs) could serve as an expeditious surrogate for SCI research when ISNCSCI motor examinations are not feasible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between motor examinations performed by the neurosurgery clinical team and ISNCSCI examiners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The multicenter prospective Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Spinal Cord Injury (TRACK-SCI) registry was queried to identify patients with recorded neurosurgery and research motor examinations within 24 hours of each other. Pearson correlations and modified Bland-Altman analyses were performed using data from matching upper-extremity, lower-extremity, and combined examinations. Kappa analysis was used to test interrater reliability with respect to determination of American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 72 pairs of matching clinical and research examinations in 63 patients. NME scores were strongly correlated with ISNCSCI motor scores (R = 0.962, p < 0.001). Both upper- and lower-extremity NME scores were strongly correlated with upper- and lower-extremity ISNCSCI motor scores, respectively (R = 0.939, p < 0.001; and R = 0.959, p < 0.001, respectively). In modified Bland-Altman analyses, total, upper-extremity, and lower-extremity NME scores and ISNCSCI motor scores showed low systematic bias and high agreeability (total: bias = 0.3, limit of agreement [LoA] = 36.6; upper extremity: bias = -0.5, LoA = 17.6; lower extremity: bias = 0.8, LoA = 24.0). There were 66 pairs of examinations that had thorough sensory and rectal examinations for AIS grade calculation. Using kappa analysis to test the interrater reliability of AIS grade calculation using NME versus ISNCSCI motor scores, the authors found a weighted kappa of 0.883 (SE 0.061, 95% CI 0.736-0.976), indicating strong agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, this study suggests that ISNCSCI motor scores and NME scores are strongly correlated and highly agreeable. When conducting SCI research, a thorough clinical motor examination may be a useful surrogate when ISNCSCI examinations are missing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Calcified Hofmann's ligaments as the cause of spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks associated with spinal ventral dural tears.","authors":"Keisuke Takai, Takeaki Endo, Takashi Komori","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24480","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24480","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with spinal CSF leaks often have ventral dural abnormalities (type 1 CSF leaks); however, the pathological mechanism for developing dural abnormalities is unknown. The authors investigated whether calcified dural ligaments contribute to the development of ventral dural tears, which cause spinal CSF leaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients diagnosed with type 1 CSF leaks who had spiculated spinal lesions between 2010 and 2024 were included. Clinical, radiological, surgical, and histological findings were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients with type 1 CSF fistulas had spiculated spinal lesions (15 men; median age 47 years, range 28-71 years). Spiculated lesions showed a high density on CT, and the median lesion length was 3.5 mm (range 1.6-9.1 mm). Spiculated lesions were consistently located at the center of the ventral dural abnormalities, penetrated the dura mater, and were located in the high thoracic spine (T1-5) in 13 patients (68%) and in the low thoracic spine (T8-12) in 6 (32%). These spinal lesions were connected to the posterior longitudinal ligament, but not to the vertebral body or disc. Histologically, they did not include degenerative osteophytic or discogenic tissues, mostly comprised fibrotic tissues with some calcification, and were consistent with calcified dural ligaments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The anatomical characteristics of spiculated spinal lesions associated with ventral dural abnormalities are consistent with those of calcified dural ligaments, referred to as Hofmann's ligaments. These ligaments are important for neurosurgeons, neurologists, and neuroradiologists who diagnose and treat type 1 CSF fistulas.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"43-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor. Scoliosis with syringomyelia.","authors":"Atul Goel","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24768","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE24768","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"129-131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142375507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Letter to the Editor. Significance of inflammation and immune markers in surgery for spinal metastasis.","authors":"Tomoaki Nagahama, Tomohito Yoshihara, Hirohito Hirata, Masatsugu Tsukamoto, Tadatsugu Morimoto","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24680","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24680","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intentional Enneking-inappropriate surgery and high-energy particle therapy for unresectable osteogenic sarcoma of the spine: a retrospective study.","authors":"Gisberto Evangelisti, Luigi Falzetti, Franziska C S Altorfer, Stefano Bandiera, Giovanni Barbanti Brodano, Marco Cianchetti, Maria R Fiore, Emanuela Palmerini, Joseph H Schwab, Stefano Boriani, Alessandro Gasbarrini","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231401","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231401","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of intralesional gross-total resection (GTR) followed by high-energy particle therapy with en bloc and intralesional resections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with primary osteogenic sarcoma (OGS) of the spine between 2009 and 2020 was conducted. Demographic information, including age, affected site, tumor volume, and Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini stage, was collected. Additionally, information on metastases at diagnosis, length of stay, operating time, complications, planned surgical treatment, and radiotherapy was also collected. Outcome measures, including local recurrence (LR) and disease-specific survival (DSS), were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 20 patients with a median age of 38 (IQR 23-60) years were included. The median follow-up was 15.7 (IQR 6.3-36.9) months. Eight patients underwent en bloc resection with a 38% (3 patients) LR rate and a median DSS of 26.4 months. Four patients received adjuvant high-energy particle therapy after planned GTR. Their median follow-up was 36 months; none of these patients experienced LR. Both the 1-year and 3-year DSSs were 100%. Another 8 patients underwent intralesional resection. Six of the 8 patients (75%) died of their disease, with a median survival of 7.3 (IQR 4.7-14) months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GTR combined with adjuvant high-energy particle therapy appears to be a safe and effective alternative approach for patients with OGS of the spine when en bloc resection is not feasible. The results demonstrated a 3-year DSS of 100% and no major surgical complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"708-715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The exponential growth of nonsurgeons performing fusions for low-back pain.","authors":"Abraham Dada, Cecilia Dalle Ore, Praveen V Mummaneni, Arati Patel, Vardhaan Ambati, Katie O Orrico, Luis M Tumialán, Joseph S Cheng, John J Knightly, Anthony M DiGiorgio","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24311","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2024.6.SPINE24311","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to report changes in utilization and payment trends of low-back pain (LBP) interventions and the impact of nonsurgeon interventionalists on these changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicare Part B national summary data files were used to gather annual utilization and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment data for LBP interventions from 2000 to 2021. Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes were grouped as decompression, spinal fusion, sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion, epidural steroid injections (ESIs), physical therapy (PT), and chiropractic manipulation (Chiro). The total allowed services and payments were collected for each HCPCS group. CMS provider-level files, available from 2013 to 2021, were used to collect neurosurgeon, orthopedic surgeon, and nonsurgeon interventionalist (interventional radiology and pain management) data for each surgical HCPCS code group (decompression, spinal fusion, and SI joint fusion). The United States Consumer Price Index was used to adjust for inflation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2000 to 2021, there were 339,720,725 Medicare-approved interventions and payments of approximately $21 billion for LBP (percentage of cumulative payments: 41.8% Chiro, 16.5% ESI, 14.4% spinal fusion, 14.3% PT, 10.2% decompression, and 0.4% SI joint fusion). In a subgroup analysis, spinal fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (59.2%), neurosurgeons (40.6%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (< 1%) from 2013 to 2021. From 2013 to 2021, neurosurgeon and orthopedic surgeon fusion utilization each grew by < 3% and associated Medicare payments to each specialty declined by 1% each year. During the same period, nonsurgeon interventionalist utilization grew 26% each year and associated Medicare payments to nonsurgeon interventionalists for spine fusions grew 62% each year. In a subgroup analysis, SI joint fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (50.7%), neurosurgeons (24.8%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (24.5%) from 2018 to 2021. Neurosurgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined by 1% each year and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 2% each year. Orthopedic surgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined 1% and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 4% each year. Nonsurgeon interventionalist use of SI joint fusions grew 415% and payments grew 435% each year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The substantial growth in Medicare payments for surgical LBP interventions is disproportionally driven by nonsurgeon interventionalists. The exponential growth of nonsurgeon interventionalists performing spinal fusion surgeries, particularly SI joint fusions, largely accounts for the significant increase in Medicare expenditures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"784-791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142348509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}