椎弓根螺钉准确性对1或2节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术临床结果的影响。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tejas Subramanian, Pratyush Shahi, Junho Song, Takashi Hirase, Maximilian Korsun, Austin C Kaidi, Gregory S Kazarian, Tomoyuki Asada, Eric Mai, Chad Z Simon, Izzet Akosman, Eric Zhao, Kasra Araghi, Troy B Amen, Avani Vaishnav, Cole Kwas, Olivia Tuma, Eric Kim, Nishtha Singh, Joshua Zhang, Myles Allen, Annika Bay, Evan Sheha, Francis Lovecchio, James E Dowdell, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer
{"title":"椎弓根螺钉准确性对1或2节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术临床结果的影响。","authors":"Tejas Subramanian, Pratyush Shahi, Junho Song, Takashi Hirase, Maximilian Korsun, Austin C Kaidi, Gregory S Kazarian, Tomoyuki Asada, Eric Mai, Chad Z Simon, Izzet Akosman, Eric Zhao, Kasra Araghi, Troy B Amen, Avani Vaishnav, Cole Kwas, Olivia Tuma, Eric Kim, Nishtha Singh, Joshua Zhang, Myles Allen, Annika Bay, Evan Sheha, Francis Lovecchio, James E Dowdell, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.SPINE24692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>When creating minimally invasive spine fusion constructs, accurate pedicle screw fixation is essential for biomechanical strength and avoiding complications arising from delicate surrounding structures. As research continues to analyze how to improve accuracy, long-term patient outcomes based on screw accuracy remain understudied. The objective of this study was to analyze long-term patient outcomes based on screw accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent 1- or 2-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and were queried from a prospectively maintained multisurgeon registry. Pedicle screws were assessed for accuracy and graded as poor, acceptable, or good. Patient demographic characteristics and outcomes including complications, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to activities, and fusion rates were compared between the cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 665 pedicle screws in 153 patients were evaluated and included in the final analysis. Of these, 20 (13.1%) patients had poor screws, 63 (41.2%) had acceptable screws, and 70 (45.7%) had good screws. All groups showed similar and significant improvements in all PROMs, although the poor screw group experienced delayed improvement in physical function. A majority of patients in all groups returned to working and driving and discontinued narcotics at similar rates. However, the poor screw group displayed significantly slower return to activities. There were no significant differences in intraoperative or postoperative complications, although the poor screw group experienced significantly lower fusion rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with poorly accurate pedicle screws experienced delayed return to activities and decreased fusion rates with similar long-term PROMs. Surgeons should continue to focus on placing accurate pedicle screws, and research should continue to analyze ways to ensure accurate screw placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of pedicle screw accuracy on clinical outcomes after 1- or 2-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Tejas Subramanian, Pratyush Shahi, Junho Song, Takashi Hirase, Maximilian Korsun, Austin C Kaidi, Gregory S Kazarian, Tomoyuki Asada, Eric Mai, Chad Z Simon, Izzet Akosman, Eric Zhao, Kasra Araghi, Troy B Amen, Avani Vaishnav, Cole Kwas, Olivia Tuma, Eric Kim, Nishtha Singh, Joshua Zhang, Myles Allen, Annika Bay, Evan Sheha, Francis Lovecchio, James E Dowdell, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.10.SPINE24692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>When creating minimally invasive spine fusion constructs, accurate pedicle screw fixation is essential for biomechanical strength and avoiding complications arising from delicate surrounding structures. As research continues to analyze how to improve accuracy, long-term patient outcomes based on screw accuracy remain understudied. The objective of this study was to analyze long-term patient outcomes based on screw accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent 1- or 2-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and were queried from a prospectively maintained multisurgeon registry. Pedicle screws were assessed for accuracy and graded as poor, acceptable, or good. Patient demographic characteristics and outcomes including complications, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to activities, and fusion rates were compared between the cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 665 pedicle screws in 153 patients were evaluated and included in the final analysis. Of these, 20 (13.1%) patients had poor screws, 63 (41.2%) had acceptable screws, and 70 (45.7%) had good screws. All groups showed similar and significant improvements in all PROMs, although the poor screw group experienced delayed improvement in physical function. A majority of patients in all groups returned to working and driving and discontinued narcotics at similar rates. However, the poor screw group displayed significantly slower return to activities. There were no significant differences in intraoperative or postoperative complications, although the poor screw group experienced significantly lower fusion rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with poorly accurate pedicle screws experienced delayed return to activities and decreased fusion rates with similar long-term PROMs. Surgeons should continue to focus on placing accurate pedicle screws, and research should continue to analyze ways to ensure accurate screw placement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.SPINE24692\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.SPINE24692","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在创建微创脊柱融合装置时,准确的椎弓根螺钉固定对于生物力学强度和避免因周围脆弱结构引起的并发症至关重要。随着研究继续分析如何提高准确性,基于螺钉准确性的长期患者结果仍未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是分析基于螺钉准确性的长期患者预后。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,患者接受了1或2节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术,并从前瞻性维持的多外科医生登记处查询。评估椎弓根螺钉的准确性,并将其分为差、可接受或好。比较两组患者的人口学特征和结果,包括并发症、患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)、恢复活动和融合率。结果:153例患者共使用665枚椎弓根螺钉进行评估并纳入最终分析。其中,20例(13.1%)患者螺钉不良,63例(41.2%)螺钉可接受,70例(45.7%)螺钉良好。所有组在所有PROMs方面均有相似且显著的改善,尽管螺钉不良组的身体功能改善延迟。所有组中的大多数患者都以相似的比率恢复工作和驾驶并停止使用麻醉品。然而,螺钉不良组恢复活动的速度明显较慢。术中或术后并发症无显著差异,但不良螺钉组的融合率明显较低。结论:准确性差的椎弓根螺钉患者恢复活动延迟,融合率降低。外科医生应继续关注放置准确的椎弓根螺钉,研究应继续分析确保准确放置螺钉的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of pedicle screw accuracy on clinical outcomes after 1- or 2-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Objective: When creating minimally invasive spine fusion constructs, accurate pedicle screw fixation is essential for biomechanical strength and avoiding complications arising from delicate surrounding structures. As research continues to analyze how to improve accuracy, long-term patient outcomes based on screw accuracy remain understudied. The objective of this study was to analyze long-term patient outcomes based on screw accuracy.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent 1- or 2-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and were queried from a prospectively maintained multisurgeon registry. Pedicle screws were assessed for accuracy and graded as poor, acceptable, or good. Patient demographic characteristics and outcomes including complications, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to activities, and fusion rates were compared between the cohorts.

Results: A total of 665 pedicle screws in 153 patients were evaluated and included in the final analysis. Of these, 20 (13.1%) patients had poor screws, 63 (41.2%) had acceptable screws, and 70 (45.7%) had good screws. All groups showed similar and significant improvements in all PROMs, although the poor screw group experienced delayed improvement in physical function. A majority of patients in all groups returned to working and driving and discontinued narcotics at similar rates. However, the poor screw group displayed significantly slower return to activities. There were no significant differences in intraoperative or postoperative complications, although the poor screw group experienced significantly lower fusion rates.

Conclusions: Patients with poorly accurate pedicle screws experienced delayed return to activities and decreased fusion rates with similar long-term PROMs. Surgeons should continue to focus on placing accurate pedicle screws, and research should continue to analyze ways to ensure accurate screw placement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信