{"title":"Continuing Professional Development—Radiation Therapy","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.883","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jmrs.883","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Maximise your continuing professional development (CPD) by reading the following selected article and answering the five questions. Please remember to self-claim your CPD and retain your supporting evidence. Answers will be available via the QR code and published in JMRS—Volume 72, Issue 4, December 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"72 2","pages":"273-274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.883","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143997278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mikaela Doig, Andrew Cunningham, Victoria Bedford, Hien Le, Matthew O'Connor, Eva Bezak, Nayana Parange, Amanda Hutchinson, Peter Gorayski, Michala Short
{"title":"Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Digital Health-Related Quality-of-Life Assessment in Paediatric Radiation Therapy: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Mikaela Doig, Andrew Cunningham, Victoria Bedford, Hien Le, Matthew O'Connor, Eva Bezak, Nayana Parange, Amanda Hutchinson, Peter Gorayski, Michala Short","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.880","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.880","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is not routinely evaluated using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in paediatric radiation therapy (RT). This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to HRQoL implementation in paediatric RT clinical practice and requirements for a digital PROM platform, from the perspectives of healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Exploratory semi-structured interviews were conducted with multidisciplinary clinicians from two hospitals providing care to paediatric RT patients. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, descriptively coded and analysed using content analysis. Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used as a theoretical framework for data collection, analysis and interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine interviews were held with nurses (n = 3), radiation therapists (n = 3), radiation oncology registrars (n = 2) and a consultant family therapist. Participants identified digital, clinical and child-friendly features to inform platform development. All participants recognised the proposed digital platform to be of value by generating new information to support patient care. The perceived alignment with clinical workflows, potential to provide staff satisfaction and individual scope to act on PROM results were key facilitators. Clinical time pressures, transient staffing and reluctance for change were identified as potential barriers. Engagement of clinical staff and training in addressing psychosocial concerns were recommended to support clinical actioning of results and foster successful clinical uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study used CFIR to systematically identify requirements for a digital platform and barriers to routine patient-reported HRQoL collection in the paediatric RT setting. The facilitators and complexities of PROM implementation can inform platform development and future implementation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143997891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zoe Moran, Amber Loh, Annie K Lewis, Paul Kelly, Amy M Dennett
{"title":"Radiographer Preferences for Shoulder x-Ray Imaging in Australia: A National Survey.","authors":"Zoe Moran, Amber Loh, Annie K Lewis, Paul Kelly, Amy M Dennett","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.881","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.881","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shoulder pathology is common, with many people referred for general radiography examinations. In performing these examinations, radiographers have a choice of more than 15 views to demonstrate the anatomy and pathology. The lack of guidelines for the best combination of orthogonal views in specific scenarios raises concerns for effectiveness, efficiency, and radiation safety. The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of the current practice by radiographers across Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national, cross-sectional online survey obtained data on the views and combination of views, (protocols) preferred by Australian radiographers across five common pathological presentations. The data were analysed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 164 radiographers found a wide variation in shoulder imaging preferences; however, some common shoulder imaging protocols were identified for shoulder trauma presentations. The most variation and highest number of imaging protocols selected were for shoulder arthritis and impingement. Trauma and glenohumeral dislocation had the least variation and number of views selected. The three most common views across all pathologies were lateral Y scapula, anteroposterior general survey (neutral rotation), and true anteroposterior/Grashey (internal rotation). Radiographers working in private settings selected more views than those in public settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates a wide variation in image preferences of Australian radiographers performing shoulder imaging. However, some common shoulder imaging protocols were identified for shoulder trauma presentations. Greater standardisation of shoulder imaging protocols may reduce unnecessary patient risk and improve the patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144063900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laura Feighan, Lesley MacDonald-Wicks, Robin Callister, Yolanda Surjan
{"title":"Fuelling Recovery: Is There a Role for Radiation Therapists in Optimising Nutrition for Women With Breast Cancer?","authors":"Laura Feighan, Lesley MacDonald-Wicks, Robin Callister, Yolanda Surjan","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.874","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Women with breast cancer receiving radiation therapy (RT) can experience treatment side effects and compromised quality of life. The quality of a person's diet can play a vital role in preventing cancer and other chronic diseases. Despite this, studies show many Australians do not meet the recommended guidelines for consuming a quality diet. Currently, women with breast cancer receiving RT are not routinely provided nutritional support, highlighting a possible gap in the comprehensive care of this population. This study aims to explore the dietary practices of women with breast cancer receiving RT and their perceptions of nutritional support during treatment. Furthermore, an investigation of the radiation therapists' role in providing nutritional support is considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study design was implemented via an online survey. The survey was offered to women with breast cancer receiving RT in Australia's Capital Territory, New South Wales and Queensland regions. The survey comprised 70 questions focused on exercise, nutritional habits and overall health. The Short Dietary Questions were used specifically for the nutrition-based questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety women completed the survey; none met all recommended dietary guidelines, with only 33% consuming recommended fruit servings and 12% meeting vegetable requirements daily. While half the women reported receiving dietary guidance during RT, the content and quality of advice are unclear.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights both the dietary patterns of women with breast cancer receiving RT and their unmet needs for nutritional guidance. While nutritional support is crucial for patient wellbeing during cancer treatment, further research is needed to determine optimal approaches for diet education delivery. Specifically, investigation into how radiation therapists can effectively integrate evidence-based nutritional support into their practice to improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143730372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Junjie Huang PhD, Fung Yu Mak BSocSC, Yuet Yan Wong MPH, Sze Chai Chan MSc, Jonathan Poon MD, Ellen Tong MA, Clement S.K. Cheung PhD, Wing Nam Wong MD, Ngai Tseung Cheung MD, Martin C.S. Wong MD
{"title":"Acceptability, benefits and barriers of electronic health record radiology image sharing: A mixed-method study","authors":"Junjie Huang PhD, Fung Yu Mak BSocSC, Yuet Yan Wong MPH, Sze Chai Chan MSc, Jonathan Poon MD, Ellen Tong MA, Clement S.K. Cheung PhD, Wing Nam Wong MD, Ngai Tseung Cheung MD, Martin C.S. Wong MD","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.853","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jmrs.853","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The electronic Health Record Sharing System (eHRSS) bridges public and private healthcare providers to efficiently share and access patient medical records. This study examined the acceptability, benefits and barriers of electronic Health Record (eHR) radiology image sharing as perceived by patients and physicians. This study found radiology image sharing can help improve the management and performance of medical services, but information asymmetry and insufficient publicity still affect the development of information sharing.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Physicians who were potential adopters of radiology image sharing system in Hong Kong were recruited for the quantitative study. In-depth interviews were conducted to examine acceptability, perceived benefits, barriers and potential areas for improvement of radiology image sharing system among physicians and patients. Other descriptive data collected included age, gender, clinical experience and practice type. Correlation between predictors, acceptability and perceived benefits were examined using linear and logistic regression analyses.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 288 surveys and 10 interviews were included. High level of user satisfaction (78.5%) with raised patient healthcare experience (82.3%) towards radiology image sharing system was observed. It was seen as highly capable to overcome limitations from using the films and traditional logistics (87.2%). System quality was a significant factor associated with acceptability (aOR = 4.307, 95% CI: 1.815–10.223, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) displayed high acceptability towards all system features, tracking patient history in particular. Patients expressed positive attitudes towards radiology image sharing and it is helpful for selecting radiology centres.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Particular features of radiology image sharing were associated with positive user acceptability and perceptions. Recommendations included enhancing promotional efforts, encouraging private institutions to enrol, data confidentiality reassurance and granting same level access to patient and provider.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"72 2","pages":"244-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.853","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143730371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle P. Li, Adam Yeo, Kirsty Wiltshire, Claire Phillips, Joseph Sia, Greg Wheeler, Lisa Hall
{"title":"Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding ‘Is Proton Beam Therapy Always Better Than Photon Irradiation? Lessons From Two Cases’","authors":"Michelle P. Li, Adam Yeo, Kirsty Wiltshire, Claire Phillips, Joseph Sia, Greg Wheeler, Lisa Hall","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.872","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jmrs.872","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This correspondence is in response to the Letter to the Editor “Evaluating Proton Versus Photon Therapy: A Call for Nuanced Decision-Making”. A balanced evidence-based approach that is patient-centred is needed when deciding between proton versus photon radiotherapy.\u0000 <figure>\u0000 <div><picture>\u0000 <source></source></picture><p></p>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </figure></p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"72 2","pages":"266-267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.872","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143719892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Continuing Professional Development-Radiation Therapy.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.879","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.879","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143657319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Value-Based Healthcare-What Does it Look Like for Medical Radiation Sciences in the Australian Context?","authors":"Andrew Davison","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.877","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This editorial provides insight into value-based healthcare in Australia, including organisations such as New South Wales (NSW) Health, which has a focus on implementing and scaling value-based healthcare. This includes exemplary programmes in applying value-based principles in commissioning medical imaging services and expanding hypofractionation radiation therapy for breast cancer patients across the system. This special issue also showcases research in value-based healthcare and its application in medical radiation sciences in the areas of artificial intelligence (AI), virtual reality (VR), computed tomography (CT) and hypofractionated radiation therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143624957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Oral Abstracts","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.863","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.863","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"72 S1","pages":"4-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.863","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143554714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}