优化辐射剂量估计:UNSCEAR子宫动脉栓塞中dap到ed的转换。

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Don J Nocum, John Robinson, Warren Reed
{"title":"优化辐射剂量估计:UNSCEAR子宫动脉栓塞中dap到ed的转换。","authors":"Don J Nocum, John Robinson, Warren Reed","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radiographers and physicians working in interventional radiology (IR) departments are responsible for monitoring and optimising radiation dose exposure to both patients and staff. The dose-area product (DAP) is a common measurement of radiation output but does not directly correlate with stochastic risks. Pre-determined conversion factors allow estimation of effective dose (ED) for IR procedures to better assess radiation exposure risks. This study evaluates the clinical utility of DAP-to-ED conversion factors to improve knowledge of radiation risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data on DAP (Gray per centimetre-squared/Gy.cm<sup>2</sup>) from uterine artery embolisation (UAE) procedures were analysed. Conversion factors were obtained from the 'United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Global Survey on Medical Exposure: A User Manual'. Group A (n = 50), which followed standard protocols, was compared with Group B (n = 50) which implemented dose optimisation techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariable linear regression (MVLR) analysis demonstrated that DAP correlated with the converted ED values for both groups (p < 0.01). The mean ED was 9.5 milliSieverts (mSv) for Group A and 8.7 mSv for Group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MVLR analysis confirmed a strong correlation between DAP and the ED conversions, demonstrating that the 'UNSCEAR User Manual' has potential to serve as a DAP-to-ED estimation tool for common interventional procedures. The mean ED found was equivalent to the radiation dose of approximately one abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan. Implementing DAP-to-ED conversion can be valuable in improving both clinicians and patients' awareness of radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising Radiation Dose Estimation: UNSCEAR DAP-to-ED Conversion in Uterine Artery Embolisation.\",\"authors\":\"Don J Nocum, John Robinson, Warren Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmrs.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radiographers and physicians working in interventional radiology (IR) departments are responsible for monitoring and optimising radiation dose exposure to both patients and staff. The dose-area product (DAP) is a common measurement of radiation output but does not directly correlate with stochastic risks. Pre-determined conversion factors allow estimation of effective dose (ED) for IR procedures to better assess radiation exposure risks. This study evaluates the clinical utility of DAP-to-ED conversion factors to improve knowledge of radiation risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data on DAP (Gray per centimetre-squared/Gy.cm<sup>2</sup>) from uterine artery embolisation (UAE) procedures were analysed. Conversion factors were obtained from the 'United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Global Survey on Medical Exposure: A User Manual'. Group A (n = 50), which followed standard protocols, was compared with Group B (n = 50) which implemented dose optimisation techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariable linear regression (MVLR) analysis demonstrated that DAP correlated with the converted ED values for both groups (p < 0.01). The mean ED was 9.5 milliSieverts (mSv) for Group A and 8.7 mSv for Group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MVLR analysis confirmed a strong correlation between DAP and the ED conversions, demonstrating that the 'UNSCEAR User Manual' has potential to serve as a DAP-to-ED estimation tool for common interventional procedures. The mean ED found was equivalent to the radiation dose of approximately one abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan. Implementing DAP-to-ED conversion can be valuable in improving both clinicians and patients' awareness of radiation exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在介入放射科(IR)工作的放射技师和医生负责监测和优化患者和工作人员的辐射剂量。剂量面积积(DAP)是测量辐射输出的常用方法,但与随机风险没有直接关系。预先确定的转换因子可以估算红外程序的有效剂量(ED),从而更好地评估辐射暴露风险。本研究评估dap - ed转换因子在提高辐射风险评估知识方面的临床应用。方法:回顾性分析子宫动脉栓塞(UAE)术中DAP(灰度每厘米平方/Gy.cm2)的数据。换算系数取自《联合国原子辐射影响科学委员会(辐射科委)医疗照射全球调查:用户手册》。采用标准方案的A组(n = 50)与采用剂量优化技术的B组(n = 50)进行比较。结果:多变量线性回归(MVLR)分析表明DAP与两组的ED转换值相关(p)。结论:MVLR分析证实DAP与ED转换之间存在很强的相关性,表明“UNSCEAR用户手册”有潜力作为常见介入手术的DAP- ED估计工具。发现的平均ED相当于大约一次腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)的辐射剂量。实施dap到ed的转换对于提高临床医生和患者对辐射暴露的认识都是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimising Radiation Dose Estimation: UNSCEAR DAP-to-ED Conversion in Uterine Artery Embolisation.

Introduction: Radiographers and physicians working in interventional radiology (IR) departments are responsible for monitoring and optimising radiation dose exposure to both patients and staff. The dose-area product (DAP) is a common measurement of radiation output but does not directly correlate with stochastic risks. Pre-determined conversion factors allow estimation of effective dose (ED) for IR procedures to better assess radiation exposure risks. This study evaluates the clinical utility of DAP-to-ED conversion factors to improve knowledge of radiation risk assessment.

Methods: Retrospective data on DAP (Gray per centimetre-squared/Gy.cm2) from uterine artery embolisation (UAE) procedures were analysed. Conversion factors were obtained from the 'United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Global Survey on Medical Exposure: A User Manual'. Group A (n = 50), which followed standard protocols, was compared with Group B (n = 50) which implemented dose optimisation techniques.

Results: Multivariable linear regression (MVLR) analysis demonstrated that DAP correlated with the converted ED values for both groups (p < 0.01). The mean ED was 9.5 milliSieverts (mSv) for Group A and 8.7 mSv for Group B.

Conclusion: MVLR analysis confirmed a strong correlation between DAP and the ED conversions, demonstrating that the 'UNSCEAR User Manual' has potential to serve as a DAP-to-ED estimation tool for common interventional procedures. The mean ED found was equivalent to the radiation dose of approximately one abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan. Implementing DAP-to-ED conversion can be valuable in improving both clinicians and patients' awareness of radiation exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信