Michelle Kostidis, Yasha Pathmaperuma, Numan Kutaiba, Mia Le Plastrier
{"title":"数字乳房断层合成对保乳术后1年患者额外视点及伴随超声检查的影响。","authors":"Michelle Kostidis, Yasha Pathmaperuma, Numan Kutaiba, Mia Le Plastrier","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Imaging surveillance of patients post breast surgery for breast cancer is routinely performed with mammography. In practice, a large number of patients receive a concomitant ultrasound. The latter has not been established as routine practice and varies across imaging departments and referrers. This study aims to determine if the use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has decreased the need for concomitant ultrasound and extra mammographic views compared to digital mammography (DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing surveillance mammography for two periods: 2015-2016 (DM) and 2018-2019 (DBT). Patients identified as first-year post breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were included in the study. Comparison of proportions of concomitant ultrasound use between the two periods, with subgroup analysis for breast density categories, was performed using Chi-squared tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 499 patients, of which 245 and 254 represented the DM and DBT periods, respectively, with a mean age of 60.1 years (SD 13.1) for the entire cohort. During DBT period, the percentage of patients having concomitant ultrasounds decreased by 15 percentage points (95% CI 8.9%-21.1%) (p < 0.0001) when compared to the DM period. During DBT period, the percentage of patients having extra views decreased by 44 percentage points (95% CI 36.1%-51.1%) (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The introduction of DBT resulted in fewer concomitant ultrasound examinations and extra mammographic views performed in the first-year post breast cancer treatment. The role of ultrasound in cancer surveillance post-treatment is debatable and large prospective studies investigating its value are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Extra Views and Concomitant Ultrasound Examinations in One Year Post Breast-Conserving Surgery Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Kostidis, Yasha Pathmaperuma, Numan Kutaiba, Mia Le Plastrier\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmrs.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Imaging surveillance of patients post breast surgery for breast cancer is routinely performed with mammography. In practice, a large number of patients receive a concomitant ultrasound. The latter has not been established as routine practice and varies across imaging departments and referrers. This study aims to determine if the use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has decreased the need for concomitant ultrasound and extra mammographic views compared to digital mammography (DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing surveillance mammography for two periods: 2015-2016 (DM) and 2018-2019 (DBT). Patients identified as first-year post breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were included in the study. Comparison of proportions of concomitant ultrasound use between the two periods, with subgroup analysis for breast density categories, was performed using Chi-squared tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 499 patients, of which 245 and 254 represented the DM and DBT periods, respectively, with a mean age of 60.1 years (SD 13.1) for the entire cohort. During DBT period, the percentage of patients having concomitant ultrasounds decreased by 15 percentage points (95% CI 8.9%-21.1%) (p < 0.0001) when compared to the DM period. During DBT period, the percentage of patients having extra views decreased by 44 percentage points (95% CI 36.1%-51.1%) (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The introduction of DBT resulted in fewer concomitant ultrasound examinations and extra mammographic views performed in the first-year post breast cancer treatment. The role of ultrasound in cancer surveillance post-treatment is debatable and large prospective studies investigating its value are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:对乳腺癌手术后患者的影像学监测是常规的乳房x光检查。在实践中,大量患者同时接受超声检查。后者尚未被确立为常规做法,不同的影像部门和转诊。本研究旨在确定与数字乳房x线照相术(DM)相比,数字乳房x线照相术(DBT)的使用是否减少了对伴随超声和额外乳房x线照相术的需求。方法:回顾性分析2015-2016年(DM)和2018-2019年(DBT)两个时期接受乳房x光检查的患者的数据。确定为第一年保乳手术(BCS)后的患者包括在研究中。使用卡方检验比较两个时期的合并超声使用比例,并对乳腺密度类别进行亚组分析。结果:该研究纳入499例患者,其中DM期245例,DBT期254例,整个队列平均年龄为60.1岁(SD 13.1)。在DBT期间,合并超声检查的患者比例下降了15个百分点(95% CI 8.9%-21.1%) (p结论:DBT的引入减少了乳腺癌治疗后第一年的合并超声检查和额外的乳房x光检查。超声在癌症治疗后监测中的作用是有争议的,调查其价值的大型前瞻性研究是有必要的。
Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Extra Views and Concomitant Ultrasound Examinations in One Year Post Breast-Conserving Surgery Patients.
Introduction: Imaging surveillance of patients post breast surgery for breast cancer is routinely performed with mammography. In practice, a large number of patients receive a concomitant ultrasound. The latter has not been established as routine practice and varies across imaging departments and referrers. This study aims to determine if the use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has decreased the need for concomitant ultrasound and extra mammographic views compared to digital mammography (DM).
Methods: Data was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing surveillance mammography for two periods: 2015-2016 (DM) and 2018-2019 (DBT). Patients identified as first-year post breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were included in the study. Comparison of proportions of concomitant ultrasound use between the two periods, with subgroup analysis for breast density categories, was performed using Chi-squared tests.
Results: The study included 499 patients, of which 245 and 254 represented the DM and DBT periods, respectively, with a mean age of 60.1 years (SD 13.1) for the entire cohort. During DBT period, the percentage of patients having concomitant ultrasounds decreased by 15 percentage points (95% CI 8.9%-21.1%) (p < 0.0001) when compared to the DM period. During DBT period, the percentage of patients having extra views decreased by 44 percentage points (95% CI 36.1%-51.1%) (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: The introduction of DBT resulted in fewer concomitant ultrasound examinations and extra mammographic views performed in the first-year post breast cancer treatment. The role of ultrasound in cancer surveillance post-treatment is debatable and large prospective studies investigating its value are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).