Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Peter Barnes, Michelle Kostidis, Julie Nguyen, Molly O'Donohue
{"title":"Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.","authors":"Peter Barnes, Michelle Kostidis, Julie Nguyen, Molly O'Donohue","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) are a guideline to indicate whether the radiation administered during medical procedures performed under routine conditions is unusually low or high. Currently, there are no national DRLs in Australia for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT). Given the radiosensitivity of breast tissue, establishing DRLs for DBT is of great importance. This research aims to develop Local Diagnostic Reference Levels (LDRLs) for DBT that can be used as a guide for monitoring radiation delivery levels, and a Quality Assurance tool to assist in monitoring the performance of the mammography unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Average Glandular Dose (AGD) was collected from patient data through OpenREM software. Other data collected included breast density, compression force, compressed breast thickness (CBT), operative and treatment status. LDRLs were set using the 75th percentile (third quartile AGD values), categorised into four CBT ranges and compared against the median AGD values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LDRLs were similar for both craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views. LDRLs for CBT ranges of 13-49 mm, 50-74 mm, 75-99 mm and 100-118 mm were calculated to be 1.5, 2.70, 3.90 and 4.70 mGy, respectively. There was no statistically significant correlation between breast density and AGD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was found that CBT had a larger impact on dose than density. Significant differences were found between the LDRLs for each of the CBTs; therefore, setting a single LDRL for all CBTs may result in missing unacceptably high or low breast doses. LDRLs should be reviewed frequently to ensure the radiation dose patients receive is within optimal levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) are a guideline to indicate whether the radiation administered during medical procedures performed under routine conditions is unusually low or high. Currently, there are no national DRLs in Australia for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Mammography (DBT). Given the radiosensitivity of breast tissue, establishing DRLs for DBT is of great importance. This research aims to develop Local Diagnostic Reference Levels (LDRLs) for DBT that can be used as a guide for monitoring radiation delivery levels, and a Quality Assurance tool to assist in monitoring the performance of the mammography unit.

Methods: Average Glandular Dose (AGD) was collected from patient data through OpenREM software. Other data collected included breast density, compression force, compressed breast thickness (CBT), operative and treatment status. LDRLs were set using the 75th percentile (third quartile AGD values), categorised into four CBT ranges and compared against the median AGD values.

Results: LDRLs were similar for both craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views. LDRLs for CBT ranges of 13-49 mm, 50-74 mm, 75-99 mm and 100-118 mm were calculated to be 1.5, 2.70, 3.90 and 4.70 mGy, respectively. There was no statistically significant correlation between breast density and AGD.

Conclusion: It was found that CBT had a larger impact on dose than density. Significant differences were found between the LDRLs for each of the CBTs; therefore, setting a single LDRL for all CBTs may result in missing unacceptably high or low breast doses. LDRLs should be reviewed frequently to ensure the radiation dose patients receive is within optimal levels.

数字乳腺断层合成的局部诊断参考水平。
简介:诊断参考水平(DRLs)是一种指南,用于指示在常规条件下进行医疗程序时所给予的辐射是异常低还是异常高。目前,澳大利亚没有数字乳腺断层合成乳房x线照相术(DBT)的国家drl。鉴于乳腺组织的放射敏感性,建立DBT的drl非常重要。本研究旨在制定DBT的局部诊断参考水平(LDRLs),可作为监测辐射输送水平的指南,并作为质量保证工具,协助监测乳房x光检查部门的表现。方法:通过OpenREM软件采集患者资料中的平均腺剂量(AGD)。收集的其他数据包括乳房密度、压缩力、压缩乳房厚度(CBT)、手术和治疗状况。ldrl使用第75百分位(第三个四分位数AGD值)设定,分为四个CBT范围,并与AGD中位数进行比较。结果:在颅侧和中外侧斜位视图下,ldrl相似。在13-49 mm、50-74 mm、75-99 mm和100-118 mm的CBT范围内,LDRLs分别为1.5、2.70、3.90和4.70 mGy。乳腺密度与AGD之间无统计学意义相关。结论:CBT对剂量的影响大于对密度的影响。每种cbt的LDRLs之间存在显著差异;因此,为所有cbt设定一个单一的LDRL可能会导致错过不可接受的高或低乳房剂量。应经常审查最低限度,以确保患者接受的辐射剂量处于最佳水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信