Journal of Medical Economics最新文献

{"title":"Health and economic impact of the 21-Valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (V116) for adults in Japan: A delta price approach.","authors":"Peter P Mueller, Atsushi Tajima, Kelsie Cassell, Taizo Matsuki, Nicole Cossrow, Zinan Yi, Kelly D Johnson, Kwame Owusu-Edusei","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2445429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2445429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study analyzed the health and economic impact of the 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (V116) and the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20), as well as their relative cost-effectiveness, in Japanese adults aged 65 years using a delta pricing approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov model was employed to simulate the movement of the Japanese population among 4 health states: healthy, pneumococcal disease (consisting of invasive pneumococcal disease [IPD] with or without meningitis and non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia [NBPP]), post-meningitis sequelae (PMS), and death. The model was populated with publicly available demographic and epidemiologic data, stratified by risk level. Pneumococcal serotype distribution and vaccine effectiveness, as well as direct and indirect treatment costs and health-related utilities, were derived from published sources. The model used a lifetime horizon and 2% discounting of costs and life-years. Costs were adjusted to 2023 values in Japanese yen (¥). Outcomes were cases and deaths, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), vaccination and treatment costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The range over which V116 was cost-saving and cost-effective was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to PCV20, V116 averted an additional 28 cases of IPD, 918 cases of NBPP, 5 deaths from IPD, and 51 deaths from NBPP over the lifetime of a single age 65 cohort. Life-years and QALYs gained were 1,019 and 642, respectively, relative to PCV20; V116 saved ¥733 million in direct medical costs and ¥557 million in indirect costs, compared to PCV20. V116 was found to be cost-saving at price premiums up to ¥1,322 (payer perspective) or ¥2,327 (societal perspective) and remained below a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥5 million/QALY for premiums up to ¥7,113 (payer perspective) or ¥8,117 (societal perspective).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>V116 is projected to provide more population health benefits in Japan than PCV20, and to be cost-effective at a variety of price premiums.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of a machine learning risk prediction model (LungFlag^TM) in the selection of high-risk individuals for non-small cell lung cancer screening in Spain.","authors":"Juan Carlos Trujillo, Joan B Soriano, Mercè Marzo, Oliver Higuera, Luis Gorospe, Virginia Pajares, María Eugenia Olmedo, Natalia Arrabal, Andrés Flores, José Francisco García, María Crespo, David Carcedo Rodriguez, Carolina Heuser, Milan Ms Obradović, Nicolo Olghi, Eran N Choman, Luis M Seijo","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2444781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2444781","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The LungFlag^TM risk prediction model uses individualized clinical variables to identify individuals at high-risk of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of LungFlag^TM implementation in the Spanish setting for the identification of individuals at high-risk of NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model combining a decision-tree with a Markov model was adapted to the Spanish setting to calculate health outcomes and costs over a lifetime horizon, comparing two hypothetical scenarios: screening with LungFlag^TM versus non-screening, and screening with LungFlag^TM versus screening the entire population meeting 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria. Model inputs were obtained from the literature and the clinical practice of a multidisciplinary expert panel. Only direct costs (€of 2023), obtained from local sources, were considered. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of our results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 3,835,128 individuals meeting 2013 USPSTF criteria would require 2,147,672 LDCTs scans. However, using LungFlag^TM would only require 232,120 LDCTs scans. Cost-effectiveness results showed that LungFlag^TM was dominant versus non-screening scenario, and outperformed the scenario where the entire population were screened since the observed loss of effectiveness (-224,031 life years [LYs] and -97,612 quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]) was largely offset by the significant cost savings provided (€7,053 million). The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for this strategy of screening the whole population versus using LungFlag^TM was €72,000/QALY, showing that LungFlag^TM is cost-effective. Various were described, such as the source of the efficacy or adherence rates, and other limitations inherent to cost-effectiveness analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using LungFlag^TM for the selection of high-risk individuals for NSCLC screening in Spain would be a cost-effective strategy over screening the entire population meeting USPSTF 2013 criteria and is dominant over non-screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Systematic review of cost-effectiveness modelling studies for haemophilia.","authors":"Niklaus Meier, Daniel Ammann, Mark Pletscher, Jano Probst, Matthias Schwenkglenks","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2444157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2444157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Haemophilia is a rare genetic disease that hinders blood clotting. We aimed to review model-based cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of haemophilia treatments, describe the sources of clinical evidence used by these CEAs, summarize the reported cost-effectiveness of different treatment strategies, and assess the quality and risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review of model-based CEAs of haemophilia treatments by searching databases, the Tufts Medical Center CEA registry, and grey literature. We summarized and qualitatively synthesized the approaches and results of the included CEAs, without a meta-analysis due the diversity of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 eligible studies were performed in 12 countries and reported 53 pairwise comparisons. Most studies analysed patients with haemophilia A rather than haemophilia B.Comparisons of prophylactic versus on-demand treatment indicated that prophylaxis may not be cost-effective, but there was no clear consensus. Emicizumab was generally cost-effective compared with clotting factor treatments and was always dominant for patients with inhibitors. Immune tolerance induction following a Malmö protocol was found to be cost-effective compared to bypassing agents, while there was no consensus for the other protocols. Gene therapies as well as treatment with extended half-life coagulation factors were always cost-effective over their comparators.Studies were highly heterogenous regarding their time horizons, model structures, the inclusion of bleeding-related mortality and quality-of-life impacts. This heterogeneity limited the comparability of the studies. 19 of the 32 included studies received industry funding, which may have biased their results.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>It was not possible to perform a quantitative synthesis of the results due to the heterogeneity of the underlying studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in results between previous CEAs may have been driven by heterogeneity in modelling approaches, clinical input data, and potential funding biases. A more consistent evidence base and modelling approach would enhance the comparability between CEAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparing pulsed field ablation and thermal energy catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A cost-effectiveness analysis of the ADVENT trial.","authors":"William V Padula, Alexandra Paffrath, Caroline M Jacobsen, Benjamin G Cohen, Rachel Nadboy, Brad S Sutton, Edward P Gerstenfeld, Moussa Mansour, Vivek Y Reddy","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2441071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2441071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as an effective technology in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PFA vs. thermal ablation from a US healthcare payer perspective using data from a randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A hybrid decision tree and Markov model was developed comparing patients receiving PFA to thermal ablation (either radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation) from a US healthcare payer perspective at 5-, 10-, 20-, and 40-year time horizons. Direct medical costs (in 2024 US Dollars), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the net monetary benefit were evaluated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000/QALY. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test model uncertainty. The budget impact for a standard US healthcare payer with 1 million beneficiaries was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 40-year time horizon, PFA resulted in an additional 0.044 QALYs at a lower cost of $2,871 compared to thermal ablation. PFA was cost-effective in 54.9% of simulations. Anticoagulation and ablation procedure costs had the largest impact on model uncertainty. The expected cost savings per member per month for a US healthcare payer adopting PFA were $0.00015, $0.0059, and $0.02343 in years 1, 4, and 6, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PFA was at least as cost-effective as conventional thermal ablation modalities for treatment of paroxysmal AF and potentially reduces US healthcare payer costs. Providers and payers should consider designating PFA among the preferred first-line therapies for eligible patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Budget impact analysis of cenobamate for epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures in the Netherlands.","authors":"Nannan Li, Marian Majoie, Silvia Evers, Kim Rijkers, Felix Gubler, Rob Rouhl, Richard Lazeron, Pim Klarenbeek, Vicki Laskier-Owens, Mickaël Hiligsmann","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2443338","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2443338","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to explore the financial consequences of adopting cenobamate as a treatment alternative in epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures (FOS) from a societal perspective in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previous budget impact model with a 5-year time horizon was adapted to the Dutch setting accounting for the eligible population, real-world market shares, treatment effectiveness and resource use in two scenarios: cenobamate with constant market share versus cenobamate with linearly increased market share up to 20%. Clinical inputs included treatment response, seizure reduction and adverse events. Costs consisted of drugs, medical and non-medical costs. One-way sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were conducted to test the robustness of our results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14,723 patients were eligible for cenobamate in 2022. Although cenobamate adds a gross budget impact of €12,686,30, the displacement of other drugs yields a total impact on the drug budget of €3,722,596 over 5 years. Adopting cenobamate resulted in a medical cost savings of €13,499,498 due to less resource use, and non-medical cost savings of €22,144,054 due to reduced productivity losses. Overall, savings generated at medical and non-medical cost level offset the gross drug budget impact of cenobamate, resulting in a saving of €31,920,955 over 5 years. Results were robust in the sensitivity/scenario analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with cenobamate is associated with both medical and non-medical cost savings, which offset the increase in drug budget and result in a significant potential budget saving. The higher the market share of cenobamate, the larger the budget savings. We acknowledge several limitations; Complex scenarios such as drug interactions, stopping/switching drugs, and multiple drug use were not taken into account. The long-term efficacy and safety of cenobamate and its comparators remains uncertain. Future real-world data are needed to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142837298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Real-world healthcare resource utilization of Alzheimer's disease in the early and advanced stages: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Elnara Fazio-Eynullayeva, Marianne Cunnington, Paul Mystkowski, Lei Lv, Abdalla Aly, Christopher W Yee, Raj Desai, Chia-Lun Liu, Mei Sheng Duh, Soeren Mattke","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2442240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2442240","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimsTo compare all-cause and Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) by cognitive stage.Methods and MaterialsThis retrospective study analyzed insurance claims data linked to electronic health records (01/01/2015-12/31/2021). Patients with ≥1 cognitive assessment (Mini-Mental State Examination or Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and ≥1 medical or pharmacy claim for an AD diagnosis or AD medications were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to address potential confounding. All-cause and AD-related HCRU were summarized per patient per year (PPPY) and compared between early AD and advanced AD cohorts (defined according to cognitive scores) using generalized linear regression models; adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.ResultsA total of 193 patients were included (median age: 82 years; 63.2% female), 108 with early AD and 85 with advanced AD, with similar mean follow up. All-cause HCRU, on average, was similar between early AD and advanced AD cohorts (37.4 PPPY and 38.9 encounters PPPY, respectively). For AD-related HCRU, patients with early AD had fewer encounters PPPY, on average, than patients with advanced AD (1.26 and 3.88 encounters, respectively). Following IPTW adjustment, the advanced AD cohort had significantly higher overall AD-related HCRU (IRR: 3.64 [95% CI: 1.96-6.75], p <0.001) and outpatient visits (IRR: 2.76 [95% CI: 1.68-4.54], p <0.001) compared to the early AD cohort.LimitationsThe relatively small sample size of patients with linked claims and cognitive score data limited the ability to assess contribution of all encounter types to HCRU trends, as well as generalizability to the broader AD population.ConclusionsAlthough all-cause HCRU was similar, patients with advanced AD incurred higher AD-related HCRU compared to patients living with early AD. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions earlier in disease progression can mitigate the AD-related healthcare burden for patients with advanced AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142818343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The cost-effectiveness of treatment for high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer in Egypt: an analysis of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant single-agent pembrolizumab.","authors":"Bernadette Pöllinger, Amin Haiderali, Min Huang, Burcu Akyol Ersoy, Ahmed H Abdelaziz, Loay Kassem, Gihan Hamdy Elsisi","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2441073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2441073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus placebo followed by adjuvant placebo was assessed in high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer patients from an Egyptian societal perspective over a lifetime horizon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-state Markov cohort model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy/pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy alone for the treatment of high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer. The model simulated the clinical course of high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer across 4 health states: event-free survival, locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and death. Clinical inputs for the simulation were derived from modeling of efficacy and safety data collected in the KEYNOTE-522 trial. Direct medical costs and indirect costs were reported in 2022 Egyptian pounds [EGP] and converted to US dollars ($). Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of model results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with chemotherapy alone, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy/pembrolizumab led to expected gains of 2.92 life years and 2.25 quality-adjusted life years, respectively, while increasing overall treatment costs by EGP 491695 [$102436]. Incremental costs per year gained were EGP 218285 [$45476] per quality-adjusted life year and EGP 168223 [$35046] per life year, both of which were lower than the 2022 Egyptian cost-effectiveness threshold of EGP 398439 [$83008]. The findings of sensitivity analyses indicated that the model was robust across a range of inputs and assumptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Egypt, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy/pembrolizumab is a cost-effective treatment for high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer when considering health-related quality of life and years of life gained.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142813613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and the value of increasing treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: a plain language summary.","authors":"J P Sevilla, Mark J Russo, Christin A Thompson, Xiayu Jiao, David E Bloom","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2403926","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2403926","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":"27 1","pages":"1036-1045"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of a lung cancer screening program in the netherlands: a simulation based on NELSON and NLST study outcomes.","authors":"Hilde Ten Berge,Bo Willems,Xuanqi Pan,Evgeni Dvortsin,Joachim Aerts,Maarten J Postma,Mathias Prokop,Michel M van den Heuvel","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2404359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2404359","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDIn the Netherlands, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death, accounting for more than 10,000 annual deaths. Lung cancer screening (LCS) studies using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) have demonstrated that early detection reduces lung cancer mortality. However, no LCS program has been implemented yet in the Netherlands. A national LCS program has the potential to enhance the health outcomes for lung cancer patients in the Netherlands.OBJECTIVE AND METHODSThis study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of LCS compared to no-screening in the Netherlands, by simulating the screening outcomes based on data from NEderlands-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings ONderzoek (NELSON) and National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). We simulated annual screening up to 74 years of age, using inclusion criteria from the respective studies. A decision tree and Markov model was used to predict the incremental costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICERs) for the screening population. The analysis used a lifetime horizon and a societal perspective.RESULTSCompared to no-screening, LCS resulted in an ICER of €5,169 per QALY for the NELSON simulation, and an ICER of €17,119 per QALY for the NLST simulation. The screening costs were highly impactful for the cost-effectiveness. The most influential parameter was the CT scan cost. Cost reduction for CT from €201 to €101 per scan would reduce the ICER to €2,335 using NELSON criteria. Additionally, LCS could prevent 15,115 and 12,611 premature lung cancer deaths, accompanied by 1.66 and 1.31 QALYs gained per lung cancer case for the NELSON and NLST simulations, respectively.CONCLUSIONLCS was estimated to be cost-effective in the Netherlands for both simulations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per QALY. Using the NELSON criteria, less than €5,500 per QALY had to be spent. Lowering the cost per CT exam would lead to a further reduction of this amount.","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":"26 1","pages":"1197-1211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142268244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cost-effectiveness and public health impact of using high dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in the French older adults population","authors":"F.P Alvarez, L. Allard, F. Bianic, H. Bricout, P. Crépey, J. Gaillat, G. Gavazzi, A. Mosnier, O. Launay, MC Levant, D. Proshenska, C. deCourville","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2404331","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2404331","url":null,"abstract":"Seasonal influenza outbreaks in France cause a surge in patients, exacerbating the overburdened healthcare system each winter. Older adults are particularly vulnerable to serious events related to ...","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142268245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}