Philip A McFarlane, Mina Madan, Anne M Ryschon, Sheldon Tobe, Ernesto L Schiffrin, Raj S Padwal, Ross Feldman, George Dresser, Lindsay Machan, Hamid Sadri, Khoa N Cao, Jan B Pietzsch
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiofrequency renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension in Canada.","authors":"Philip A McFarlane, Mina Madan, Anne M Ryschon, Sheldon Tobe, Ernesto L Schiffrin, Raj S Padwal, Ross Feldman, George Dresser, Lindsay Machan, Hamid Sadri, Khoa N Cao, Jan B Pietzsch","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2441072","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2441072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is an interventional treatment for uncontrolled hypertension. This analysis explored the therapy's lifetime cost-effectiveness in a Canadian healthcare setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A decision-analytic Markov model was used to project health events, costs, and quality-adjusted life years over a lifetime horizon. Seven primary health states were modeled, including hypertension alone, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), other symptomatic coronary artery disease, heart failure (HF), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and death. Multivariate risk equations and a meta-regression of hypertension trials informed transition probabilities. Contemporary clinical evidence from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial informed the base case treatment effect (-4.9 mmHg change in office systolic blood pressure (oSBP) observed vs. sham control). Costs were sourced from published literature. A 1.5% discount rate was applied to costs and effects, and the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained. Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 10 years, RF RDN resulted in relative risk reduction in clinical events (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for MI, and 0.72 for HF). Under the base case assumptions, RF RDN was found to add 0.51 (15.81 vs. 15.30) QALYs at an incremental cost of $6,031 ($73,971 vs. $67,040) over a lifetime, resulting in an ICER of $11,809 per QALY gained. Cost-effectiveness findings were found robust in sensitivity analyses, with the 95% confidence interval for the ICER based on 10,000 simulations ranging from $4,489 to $22,587 per QALY gained.</p><p><strong>Limitations and conclusion: </strong>Model projections suggest RF RDN, under assumed maintained treatment effect, is a cost-effective treatment strategy for uncontrolled hypertension in the Canadian healthcare system based on meaningful reductions in clinical events.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"70-80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142807145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
William V Padula, Alexandra Paffrath, Caroline M Jacobsen, Benjamin G Cohen, Rachel Nadboy, Brad S Sutton, Edward P Gerstenfeld, Moussa Mansour, Vivek Y Reddy
{"title":"Comparing pulsed field ablation and thermal energy catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the ADVENT trial.","authors":"William V Padula, Alexandra Paffrath, Caroline M Jacobsen, Benjamin G Cohen, Rachel Nadboy, Brad S Sutton, Edward P Gerstenfeld, Moussa Mansour, Vivek Y Reddy","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2441071","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2441071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as an effective technology in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PFA vs. thermal ablation from a US healthcare payer perspective using data from a randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A hybrid decision tree and Markov model was developed comparing patients receiving PFA to thermal ablation (either radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation) from a US healthcare payer perspective at 5-, 10-, 20-, and 40-year time horizons. Direct medical costs (in 2024 US Dollars), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the net monetary benefit were evaluated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000/QALY. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test model uncertainty. The budget impact for a standard US healthcare payer with 1 million beneficiaries was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 40-year time horizon, PFA resulted in an additional 0.044 QALYs at a lower cost of $2,871 compared to thermal ablation. PFA was cost-effective in 54.9% of simulations. Anticoagulation and ablation procedure costs had the largest impact on model uncertainty. The expected cost savings per member per month for a US healthcare payer adopting PFA were $0.00015, $0.0059, and $0.02343 in years 1, 4, and 6, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PFA was at least as cost-effective as conventional thermal ablation modalities for treatment of paroxysmal AF and potentially reduces US healthcare payer costs. Providers and payers should consider designating PFA among the preferred first-line therapies for eligible patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Peter P Mueller, Atsushi Tajima, Kelsie Cassell, Taizo Matsuki, Nicole Cossrow, Zinan Yi, Kelly D Johnson, Kwame Owusu-Edusei
{"title":"Health and economic impact of the 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (V116) for adults in Japan: a delta price approach.","authors":"Peter P Mueller, Atsushi Tajima, Kelsie Cassell, Taizo Matsuki, Nicole Cossrow, Zinan Yi, Kelly D Johnson, Kwame Owusu-Edusei","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2445429","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2445429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study analyzed the health and economic impact of the 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (V116) and the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20), as well as their relative cost-effectiveness, in Japanese adults aged 65 years using a delta pricing approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov model was employed to simulate the movement of the Japanese population among four health states: healthy, pneumococcal disease (consisting of invasive pneumococcal disease [IPD] with or without meningitis and non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia [NBPP]), post-meningitis sequelae, and death. The model was populated with publicly available demographic and epidemiologic data, stratified by risk level. Pneumococcal serotype distribution and vaccine effectiveness, as well as direct and indirect treatment costs and health-related utilities, were derived from published sources. The model used a lifetime horizon and 2% discounting of costs and life-years. Costs were adjusted to 2023 values in Japanese yen (¥). Outcomes were cases and deaths, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), vaccination and treatment costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The range over which V116 was cost-saving and cost-effective was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to PCV20, V116 averted an additional 28 cases of IPD, 918 cases of NBPP, 5 deaths from IPD, and 51 deaths from NBPP over the lifetime of a single age 65 cohort. Life-years and QALYs gained were 1,019 and 642, respectively, relative to PCV20; V116 saved ¥733 million in direct medical costs and ¥557 million in indirect costs, compared to PCV20. V116 was found to be cost-saving at price premiums up to ¥1,322 (payer perspective) or ¥2,327 (societal perspective) and remained below a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥5 million/QALY for premiums up to ¥7,113 (payer perspective) or ¥8,117 (societal perspective).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>V116 is projected to provide more population health benefits in Japan than PCV20, and to be cost-effective at a variety of price premiums.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"136-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christos Chouaid, Andromachi Giannopoulou, Alexandra Starry, Björn Stollenwerk, Farastuk Bozorgmehr
{"title":"The impact of <i>KRAS</i> mutational status on patient-reported outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a cross sectional study in France and Germany.","authors":"Christos Chouaid, Andromachi Giannopoulou, Alexandra Starry, Björn Stollenwerk, Farastuk Bozorgmehr","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2437324","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2437324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) studies in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to <i>KRAS</i> mutational status are limited. This study aimed to report real-world evidence on HRQoL outcomes based on <i>KRAS</i> mutational status in patients with advanced NSCLC tumors receiving second-line or later (2L+) treatment in France and Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this real-world, non-interventional, cross-sectional, multicenter, patient-reported outcome (PRO) study conducted in France (15 contributing sites) and Germany (8 contributing sites), physicians enrolled adult patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic NSCLC with known <i>KRAS</i> mutation status (<i>KRAS</i> G12C, <i>KRAS</i> non-G12C, or <i>KRAS</i> wildtype [WT]), who received a 2L + treatment. Study outcomes included sociodemographic characteristics; HRQoL evaluations based on EORTC Global Health Status QoL scores (QLQ-C30) and EQ-5D-5L scores. Data were analyzed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 156 enrolled patients, data from 149 patients were included in the final analysis (France, <i>n</i> = 103; Germany, <i>n</i> = 46). Median (quartile [Q]1, Q3) age was 67.0 (61.0, 71.0) years; 56.4% of patients were male. In total, 38.9% (<i>n</i> = 58), 26.2% (<i>n</i> = 39), and 34.9% (<i>n</i> = 52) of patients had tumors with <i>KRAS</i> G12C mutation, <i>KRAS</i> non-G12C mutation and WT <i>KRAS</i>, respectively. Mean (±SD) QLQ-C30 Global Health Status QoL scores were 56.99 (20.30) for the overall population, and 56.03 (22.55), 58.97 (18.67) and 56.57 (19.05) for <i>KRAS</i> G12C, non-G12C, and WT subpopulations. In the overall population, moderate-to-extreme problems were reported in all EQ-5D-5L dimensions (range: overall population, 15.5%-39.6%; <i>KRAS</i> G12C, 15.6%-46.6%; non-G12C, 7.8%-23.1%; WT, 21.1%-44.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HRQoL was broadly similar across <i>KRAS</i> G12C, non-G12C, and WT subpopulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142769607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M Chen, M J Christoph, S Park, F Turkistani, A R Weinberg, C Trom, W Zachry, J Gruber, U Mordi, K Rajagopalan
{"title":"Healthcare resource utilization and costs among treatment-naïve people with HIV in state Medicaids: analysis of multi-tablet vs. single-tablet antiretroviral regimen initiators with and without concurrent mental health disorders.","authors":"M Chen, M J Christoph, S Park, F Turkistani, A R Weinberg, C Trom, W Zachry, J Gruber, U Mordi, K Rajagopalan","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2436288","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2436288","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research is needed to understand the impact of mental health disorders (MHD) on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Examine the HCRU and cost burden among treatment-naïve PWH with and without MHD initiating single tablet antiretroviral regimens (STRs) and multi-tablet regimens (MTRs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective database analysis of the US Medicaid population from Anlitiks' All Payor Claims database between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2023 was conducted. Treatment-naïve MTR-initiators vs STR-initiators (the index was the first prescription fill claim date) with ≥ 12-months pre- and post-index continuous enrollment and no pre-index HIV-2 diagnosis among PWH/MHD and PWH/no-MHD during 1 January 2017-30 June 2022 were selected. Demographics, clinical characteristics, HCRU and costs between MTR-initiators vs STR-initiators among PWH/MHD and PWH/no-MHD were described using Chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum or t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, as appropriate. HCRU and costs were examined using multivariable logistic and gamma-log link regression models, controlling for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MTR-initiators (PWH/MHD: <i>n</i> = 7,874, PWH/no-MHD: <i>n</i> = 3,612) vs. STR-initiators (PWH/MHD: 46,024, PWH/no-MHD: 23,452) were significantly younger (PWH/MHD: 43.6 vs. 47.2 years; PWH/no-MHD: 39.2 vs. 43.3 years) and more likely to be female (PWH/MHD: 46.4% vs. 35.7%; PWH/no-MHD: 42.3% vs 29.7%) in both groups (all <i>p</i>-values < 0.05). MTR-initiators vs. STR-initiators had significantly higher rates of inpatient (IP) hospitalizations (PWH/MHD: 28.9% vs. 27.1%; PWH/no-MHD:13.9% vs. 11.9%) and emergency department (ED) visits (PWH/MHD: 53.3% vs. 49.2%; PWH/no-MHD: 35.2% vs. 31.8%) among both those with and without MHD (all <i>p</i>-values < 0.05). MTR-initiators vs. STR-initiators also had significantly higher adjusted all-cause medical costs (PWH/MHD: $60,228 vs $40,634; PWH/no-MHD: $33,623 vs. $17,996) (all <i>p</i>-values < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among PWH/MHD and PWH/no-MHD, MTR-initiators experienced significantly higher HCRU, and 1.5 times greater costs compared to STR-initiators. In both MTR and STR-initiator groups, the PWH/MHD cohort consistently demonstrated a greater HCRU and cost burden than the PWH/no-MHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"25-35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142769664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kim Seemann, Ubong Silas, Antonia Bosworth Smith, Tobias Münch, Sita J Saunders, Alex Veloz, Rhodri Saunders
{"title":"The burden of venous thromboembolism in ten countries: a cost-of-illness Markov model on surgical and ICU patients.","authors":"Kim Seemann, Ubong Silas, Antonia Bosworth Smith, Tobias Münch, Sita J Saunders, Alex Veloz, Rhodri Saunders","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2436797","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2436797","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the burden of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE) on healthcare systems and patients across ten countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-methodological approach was taken to estimate the burden of hospital-acquired VTE across five key clinical specialties and ten countries (Australia, Brazil, China, France, Mexico, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, and the United Kingdom). Surveys with healthcare professionals (surgeons, hematologists, and hospital management) were conducted to identify clinical specialties of interest. A systematic literature review and interviews were conducted to identify data for incidences and costs. A health-economic model was developed, using a decision tree and Markov model to estimate 1-year costs. Costs are presented in 2022 USD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Orthopedics, oncology, long-term ICU, cardiology, and obstetrics and gynecology were identified as the clinical specialties of interest. The total cost burden of hospital-acquired VTE was estimated to be $41,280 million, which equals $503 per patient at risk. Expressed as a share of 2022 GDP, an average spending per country of 0.05% to 0.18% was observed. The VTE-associated mortality was substantial, accounting for 150,081 deaths in a 74.2 million population, translating into an average mortality rate of 2.02 (0.64-3.05) per 1,000 patients at risk.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>There were limited data available concerning VTE incidences in some countries and clinical specialties. Where data were available, there was heterogeneity of incidence definitions across the identified studies. Generalizations, imputations, and the country-agnostic structure of the model might have contributed to biases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The burden of hospital-acquired VTE is substantial both from an economic and from a patient perspective in all countries evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142750933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Xianwen Chen, Kuangyuan Cai, Yan Xue, Carolina Oi Lam Ung, Hao Hu, Mihajlo Jakovljevic
{"title":"Using system dynamics modeling approach to strengthen health systems to combat cancer: a systematic literature review.","authors":"Xianwen Chen, Kuangyuan Cai, Yan Xue, Carolina Oi Lam Ung, Hao Hu, Mihajlo Jakovljevic","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2450168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2450168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Dynamic cancer control is a current health system priority, yet methods for achieving it are lacking. This study aims to review the application of system dynamics modeling (SDM) on cancer control and evaluate the research quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from the inception of the study to 15 November 2023. Inclusion criteria were English original studies focusing on cancer control with SDM methodology, including prevention, early detection, diagnosis and treatment, and palliative care. Exclusion criteria were non-original research, and studies lacking SDM focus. Analysis involved categorization of studies and extraction of relevant data to answer the research question, ensuring a comprehensive synthesis of the field. Quality assessment was used to evaluate the SDM for cancer control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies were included in this systematic review predominantly from the United States (7, 43.75%), with a focus on breast cancer research (5, 31.25%). Studies were categorized by WHO cancer control modules, and some studies may contribute to multiple modules. The results showed that included studies comprised two focused on prevention (1.25%), ten on early detection (62.50%), six on diagnosis and treatment (37.50%), with none addressing palliative care. Seven studies presented a complete SDM process, among which nine developed causal loop diagrams for conceptual models, ten utilized stock-flow charts to develop computational models, and thirteen conducted simulations.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This review's macrofocus on SDM in cancer control missed detailed methodological analysis. The limited number of studies and lack of stage-specific intervention comparisons limit comprehensiveness. Detailed analysis of SDM construction was also not conducted, potentially overlooking nuances in cancer control strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SDM in cancer control is underutilized, focusing mainly on early detection and treatment. Inconsistencies suggest a need for standardized SDM approaches. Future research should expand SDM's application and integrate it into cancer control strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":"28 1","pages":"168-185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142950177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jagadeswara Rao Earla, Kalé Kponee-Shovein, Allison W Kurian, Malena Mahendran, Yan Song, Qi Hua, Annalise Hilts, Yezhou Sun, Kim M Hirshfield, Jaime A Mejia
{"title":"Real-world perioperative treatment patterns and economic burden of recurrence in early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study.","authors":"Jagadeswara Rao Earla, Kalé Kponee-Shovein, Allison W Kurian, Malena Mahendran, Yan Song, Qi Hua, Annalise Hilts, Yezhou Sun, Kim M Hirshfield, Jaime A Mejia","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2439228","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2439228","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to describe treatment patterns and quantify the economic impact of recurrence in early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC).</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Medicare beneficiaries with stages I-III HER2-negative BC and lumpectomy or partial/total mastectomy were identified from SEER-Medicare data (2010-2019). Perioperative therapies were reported in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. Locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis were identified using a claims-based algorithm developed with clinical input and consisting of a diagnosis-based and treatment-based indicator. All-cause and BC-related healthcare resource utilization (HRU) per-patient-month and monthly healthcare costs were estimated from the recurrence date for patients with recurrence and from an imputed index date for patients without recurrence using frequency matching. HRU and costs were compared between groups stratified by hormone receptor-positive (HR+) or triple negative BC (TNBC) using multivariable regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 28,655 patients, 8.5% experienced recurrence, 90.4% had HR+ disease, and 5.6% received neoadjuvant therapy. Relative to patients without recurrence, patients with recurrence had more advanced disease (stage II/III: 73.7% vs. 34.0%) and higher-grade tumors (Grade 3/4: 40.6% vs. 18.0%) at diagnosis. Recurrence in HR+/HER2-negative BC and TNBC was associated with higher rates of all-cause hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 2.84 and 3.65), emergency department (ED) visits (IRR: 1.75 and 2.00), and outpatient visits (IRR: 1.46 and 1.55; all <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, recurrence was associated with higher rates of BC-related HRU, particularly for ED visits in HR+/HER2-negative BC (IRR: 4.24; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and hospitalizations in TNBC (IRR: 11.71; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients with HR+/HER2-negative BC and TNBC recurrence incurred higher monthly all-cause (cost difference [CD]: $3988 and $4651) and BC-related healthcare costs (CD: $3743 and $5819).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the considerable economic burden of recurrence in early-stage HER2-negative BC and underscore the unmet need for optimization of therapies that reduce recurrence in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"54-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142794908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bernadette Pöllinger, Amin Haiderali, Min Huang, Burcu Akyol Ersoy, Ahmed H Abdelaziz, Loay Kassem, Gihan Hamdy Elsisi
{"title":"The cost-effectiveness of treatment for high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer in Egypt: an analysis of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant single-agent pembrolizumab.","authors":"Bernadette Pöllinger, Amin Haiderali, Min Huang, Burcu Akyol Ersoy, Ahmed H Abdelaziz, Loay Kassem, Gihan Hamdy Elsisi","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2441073","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2441073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus placebo followed by adjuvant placebo was assessed in high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer patients from an Egyptian societal perspective over a lifetime horizon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-state Markov cohort model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy/pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy alone for the treatment of high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer. The model simulated the clinical course of high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer across four health states: event-free survival, locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and death. Clinical inputs for the simulation were derived from modeling of efficacy and safety data collected in the KEYNOTE-522 trial. Direct medical costs and indirect costs were reported in 2022 Egyptian pounds (EGP) and converted to US dollars ($). Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of model results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with chemotherapy alone, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy/pembrolizumab led to expected gains of 2.92 life years and 2.25 quality-adjusted life years, respectively, while increasing overall treatment costs by EGP 491,695 ($102,436). Incremental costs per year gained were EGP 218,285 ($45,476) per quality-adjusted life year and EGP 168,223 ($35,046) per life year, both of which were lower than the 2022 Egyptian cost-effectiveness threshold of EGP 398,439 ($83,008). The findings of sensitivity analyses indicated that the model was robust across a range of inputs and assumptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Egypt, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy/pembrolizumab is a cost-effective treatment for high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer when considering health-related quality-of-life and years of life gained.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"105-113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142813613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nannan Li, Marian Majoie, Silvia Evers, Kim Rijkers, Felix Gubler, Rob Rouhl, Richard Lazeron, Pim Klarenbeek, Vicki Laskier-Owens, Mickaël Hiligsmann
{"title":"Budget impact analysis of cenobamate for epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures in the Netherlands.","authors":"Nannan Li, Marian Majoie, Silvia Evers, Kim Rijkers, Felix Gubler, Rob Rouhl, Richard Lazeron, Pim Klarenbeek, Vicki Laskier-Owens, Mickaël Hiligsmann","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2443338","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2443338","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to explore the financial consequences of adopting cenobamate as a treatment alternative in epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures (FOS) from a societal perspective in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previous budget impact model with a 5-year time horizon was adapted to the Dutch setting accounting for the eligible population, real-world market shares, treatment effectiveness and resource use in two scenarios: cenobamate with constant market share versus cenobamate with linearly increased market share up to 20%. Clinical inputs included treatment response, seizure reduction and adverse events. Costs consisted of drugs, medical and non-medical costs. One-way sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were conducted to test the robustness of our results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14,723 patients were eligible for cenobamate in 2022. Although cenobamate adds a gross budget impact of €12,686,30, the displacement of other drugs yields a total impact on the drug budget of €3,722,596 over 5 years. Adopting cenobamate resulted in a medical cost savings of €13,499,498 due to less resource use, and non-medical cost savings of €22,144,054 due to reduced productivity losses. Overall, savings generated at medical and non-medical cost level offset the gross drug budget impact of cenobamate, resulting in a saving of €31,920,955 over 5 years. Results were robust in the sensitivity/scenario analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with cenobamate is associated with both medical and non-medical cost savings, which offset the increase in drug budget and result in a significant potential budget saving. The higher the market share of cenobamate, the larger the budget savings. We acknowledge several limitations; Complex scenarios such as drug interactions, stopping/switching drugs, and multiple drug use were not taken into account. The long-term efficacy and safety of cenobamate and its comparators remains uncertain. Future real-world data are needed to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"114-123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142837298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}