Cost-minimisation analysis of anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema in Switzerland.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-29 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2536420
Aude Ambresin, S W Quist, M Boer, S Maamari, D Barthelmes
{"title":"Cost-minimisation analysis of anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema in Switzerland.","authors":"Aude Ambresin, S W Quist, M Boer, S Maamari, D Barthelmes","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2536420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compares the direct healthcare costs of anti-VEGF therapies, including treat-and-extend (T&E) and other durable regimens, for unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An adapted cost-minimisation model estimated healthcare costs over two years for aflibercept 2 mg, aflibercept 8 mg, faricimab, ranibizumab, and ranibizumab biosimilars using clinical trial injection frequencies. Break-even analyses identified the medication prices and injection frequencies required for higher-cost therapies to achieve cost parity with the least expensive options. A one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) assessed key drivers of cost outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aflibercept 8 mg was estimated to be associated with the lowest treatment costs for both indications (CHF 11,814 for nAMD; CHF 11,242 for DMO). Faricimab (CHF 13,737) and aflibercept 2 mg (CHF 15,243) followed in nAMD and DMO. Ranibizumab and its biosimilars incurred the highest costs: for nAMD, biosimilars ranged from CHF 16,243 to CHF 17,497 and the reference product reached CHF 18,424; for DMO, biosimilars ranged from CHF 18,187 to CHF 19,596, with the reference product at CHF 20,637. Break-even analyses for nAMD showed that prices would need to drop by -22% (faricimab, CHF 644) to -64% (ranibizumab reference, CHF 218) relative to aflibercept 8 mg. For DMO, reductions ranged from -42% (aflibercept 2 mg, CHF 493) to -81% (ranibizumab reference, CHF 114). The OWSA highlighted medication price and injection frequency as primary cost drivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study estimated that the potentially minimized injection frequency of aflibercept 8 mg in a clinical trial regimen may result in the lowest treatment costs for nAMD and DMO, followed by faricimab and aflibercept 2 mg, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1198-1213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2536420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study compares the direct healthcare costs of anti-VEGF therapies, including treat-and-extend (T&E) and other durable regimens, for unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in Switzerland.

Methods: An adapted cost-minimisation model estimated healthcare costs over two years for aflibercept 2 mg, aflibercept 8 mg, faricimab, ranibizumab, and ranibizumab biosimilars using clinical trial injection frequencies. Break-even analyses identified the medication prices and injection frequencies required for higher-cost therapies to achieve cost parity with the least expensive options. A one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) assessed key drivers of cost outcomes.

Results: Aflibercept 8 mg was estimated to be associated with the lowest treatment costs for both indications (CHF 11,814 for nAMD; CHF 11,242 for DMO). Faricimab (CHF 13,737) and aflibercept 2 mg (CHF 15,243) followed in nAMD and DMO. Ranibizumab and its biosimilars incurred the highest costs: for nAMD, biosimilars ranged from CHF 16,243 to CHF 17,497 and the reference product reached CHF 18,424; for DMO, biosimilars ranged from CHF 18,187 to CHF 19,596, with the reference product at CHF 20,637. Break-even analyses for nAMD showed that prices would need to drop by -22% (faricimab, CHF 644) to -64% (ranibizumab reference, CHF 218) relative to aflibercept 8 mg. For DMO, reductions ranged from -42% (aflibercept 2 mg, CHF 493) to -81% (ranibizumab reference, CHF 114). The OWSA highlighted medication price and injection frequency as primary cost drivers.

Conclusions: This study estimated that the potentially minimized injection frequency of aflibercept 8 mg in a clinical trial regimen may result in the lowest treatment costs for nAMD and DMO, followed by faricimab and aflibercept 2 mg, respectively.

抗vegf治疗新血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性和糖尿病性黄斑水肿的成本最小化分析
目的:本研究比较了瑞士单侧新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)和糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DMO)的抗vegf治疗的直接医疗成本,包括治疗和延长(T&E)和其他持久方案。方法:根据临床试验注射频率,采用成本最小化模型估计阿非利西普2mg、阿非利西普8mg、法利西单抗、雷尼单抗和雷尼单抗生物仿制药两年内的医疗成本。收支平衡分析确定了高成本疗法所需的药物价格和注射频率,以实现与最便宜疗法的成本相当。单向敏感性分析(OWSA)评估了成本结果的关键驱动因素。结果:估计afliberept 8mg与两种适应症的最低治疗费用相关(nAMD治疗11,814瑞郎;DMO 11,242瑞士法郎)。在nAMD和DMO中,其次是Faricimab(13737瑞士法郎)和afliberept 2 mg(15243瑞士法郎)。雷尼单抗及其生物仿制药的成本最高:对于nAMD,生物仿制药的成本从16,243瑞士法郎到17,497瑞士法郎不等,参考产品达到18,424瑞士法郎;DMO的生物仿制药价格从18,187瑞士法郎到19,596瑞士法郎不等,参考产品价格为20,637瑞士法郎。nAMD的盈亏平衡分析显示,相对于afliberept 8 mg,价格需要下降-22% (faricimab, 644瑞士法郎)至-64%(雷尼单抗参考,218瑞士法郎)。对于DMO,降低幅度从-42%(阿伯西普2 mg, 493瑞士法郎)到-81%(雷尼单抗参考,114瑞士法郎)。OWSA强调药品价格和注射频率是主要的成本驱动因素。结论:本研究估计,在临床试验方案中,阿非利西贝8 mg的注射频率可能会使nAMD和DMO的治疗成本最低,其次是法利西单抗和阿非利西贝2 mg。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信