Journal of Medical Economics最新文献

{"title":"Real-world treatment patterns of patients with major depressive disorder treated with Auvelity in the United States.","authors":"Andrew Muzyk, Fatima Zahara Syed, Huanxue Zhou, Junjun Cong, Herriot Tabuteau, Yang Zhao","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2382641","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2382641","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent, chronic disorder. Auvelity (dextromethorphan-bupropion) is a novel, oral <i>N</i>-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist and sigma-1 receptor agonist approved (August 2022) by the FDA for treating MDD in adults. This is the first analysis on real-world Auvelity usage in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients initiating Auvelity in the Symphony IDV databases by September 2023 were identified (index date: the first Auvelity claim). Patients had continuous eligibility over the 12-month pre-index period and ≥1 MDD diagnosis (ICD-10-CM codes: F32.*, F33.*) over the 5-year pre-index period. Demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, prior MDD-related medications, and Auvelity initiation status were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis included 22,288 patients with MDD treated with Auvelity (mean age 45.1 years; 68.1% women); 40.0% lived in the South and 58.5% had commercial insurance. Comorbidities included mental health disorders (53.5%; 47.6% had anxiety disorders). Overall, 83.7% of the patients had received treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; 54.9%), the norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor (NDRI [bupropion]; 40.4%), and/or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs; 35.9%) over the 12-month pre-index period. The last MDD-related treatment prior to Auvelity comprised SSRI (22.4%), SNRI (13.2%), and NDRI (12.8%) monotherapies; 294 (1.3%) patients received esketamine. In total, 6,418 (28.8%) patients initiated Auvelity as monotherapy vs 15,870 (71.2%) as an add-on; Auvelity was most frequently added to an SSRI alone (10.7%) or SNRI alone (6.5%). A total of 2,254 (10.1%) patients initiated Auvelity without prior treatment in the 12-month pre-index period.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Incomplete data due to reporting; diagnoses captured subject to coding error; and limited generalizability to other populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a large demographically distributed claims database, 22,288 patients with MDD initiated Auvelity within a year of its approval; 10.1% were treatment-naïve and 28.8% initiated Auvelity as monotherapy. Most patients had mental health-related comorbidities and attempted various MDD-related treatments prior to Auvelity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1003-1010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141748432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"All-cause claims analysis of the LATERA absorbable nasal implant vs surgical repair in patients with nasal valve collapse.","authors":"Ricky Vo, Yazid Barhoush, Lakshmi Batchu, Shayna Adams, Gavin Setzen","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2362046","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2362046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare all-cause claims associated with the LATERA Absorbable Nasal Implant and surgical repair of nasal vestibular stenosis in patients with nasal valve collapse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized data from STATinMED RWD Insights. A defined set of HCPCS, ICD-10-CM and CPT codes were used to identify patients with ≥1 claim for a LATERA procedure, and patients with ≥1 claim for surgical repair between June 1, 2015- March 31, 2023. Patients with continuous capture for at least 12 months before and at least 6 months after the index date were selected. The index date was defined as earliest date of encounter for a LATERA or surgical repair procedure. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to ensure balance between cohorts. Descriptive analyses were provided for all claims data using standard summary statistics. All-cause claims were assessed during the baseline, index date, and follow-up period. Chi-squared tests and independent sample t-tests were used to assess differences in cohorts for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 5,032 LATERA patients and 26,553 surgical repair patients. During the baseline and follow-up periods, the matched cohorts exhibited similar all-cause claims. On the index date, LATERA patients incurred lower claims vs. surgical repair, likely due to LATERA's ability to be implanted in the physician office setting. LATERA patients and surgical repair patients mean (SD) total costs were $9,612 [$14,930] vs $11,846 [$17,037] (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment with the LATERA Absorbable Nasal Implant is a potentially cost saving option for payers on the index date compared to traditional surgical repair in patients with nasal valve collapse due to the ability to be performed in the office. All-cause claims were similar in the baseline and follow-up periods. When performed with concomitant procedures, all-cause claims during follow-up were similar between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1099-1107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141975843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A cost-effectiveness analysis of intrauterine spacers used to prevent the formation of intrauterine adhesions following endometrial cavity surgery.","authors":"Luke Schmerold, Coby Martin, Aashay Mehta, Dhruv Sobti, Ajit Kumar Jaiswal, Jatinder Kumar, Ian Feldberg, Malcolm G Munro, Won Chan Lee","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2023.2298584","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2023.2298584","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess, from a United States (US) payer's perspective, the cost-effectiveness of gels designed to separate the endometrial surfaces (intrauterine spacers) placed following intrauterine surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A decision tree model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of intrauterine spacers used to facilitate endometrial repair and prevent the formation (primary prevention) and reformation (secondary prevention) of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) and associated pregnancy- and birth-related adverse outcomes. Event rates and costs were extrapolated from data available in the existing literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to corroborate the base case results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this model, using intrauterine spacers for adhesion prevention led to net cost savings for US payers of $2,905 per patient over a 3.5-year time horizon. These savings were driven by the direct benefit of preventing procedures associated with IUA formation ($2,162 net savings) and the indirect benefit of preventing pregnancy-related complications often associated with IUA formation ($3,002). These factors offset the incremental cost of intrauterine spacer use of $1,539 based on an assumed price of $1,800 and the related increase in normal deliveries of $931. Model outcomes were sensitive to the probability of preterm and normal deliveries. Budget impact analyses show overall cost savings of $19.96 per initial member within a US healthcare plan, translating to $20 million over a 5-year time horizon for a one-million-member plan.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>There are no available data on the effects of intrauterine spacers or IUAs on patients' quality of life. Resultingly, the model could not evaluate patients' utility related to treatment with or without intrauterine spacers and instead focused on costs and events avoided.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis robustly demonstrated that intrauterine spacers would be cost-saving to healthcare payers, including both per-patient and per-plan member, through a reduction in IUAs and improvements to patients' pregnancy-related outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"170-183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138830144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Why are digital health policies crucial?","authors":"Ahmad Z Al Meslamani","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2302254","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2302254","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"167-169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139087216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for previously treated MSI-H/dMMR solid tumours in the UK.","authors":"Grant McCarthy, Kate Young, Matthew Madin-Warburton, Tyler Mantaian, Elizabeth Brook, Kaylie Metcalfe, Jan Mikelson, Ruifeng Xu, Carl Seyla-Hammer, Raquel Aguiar-Ibáñez, Mayur Amonkar","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2311507","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2311507","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with previously treated microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumours have limited chemotherapeutic treatment options. Pembrolizumab received approval from the EMA in 2022 for the treatment of colorectal, endometrial, gastric, small intestine, and biliary MSI-H/dMMR tumour types. This approval was supported by data from the KEYNOTE-164 and KEYNOTE-158 clinical trials. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab compared with standard of care (SoC) for previously treated MSI-H/dMMR solid tumours in line with the approved EMA label from a UK healthcare payer perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-tumour partitioned survival model was built consisting of pre-progression, progressed disease, and dead health states. Pembrolizumab survival outcomes were extrapolated using Bayesian hierarchical models (BHMs) fitted to pooled data from KEYNOTE-164 and KEYNOTE-158. Comparator outcomes were informed by published sources. Tumour sites were modelled independently and then combined, weighted by tumour site distribution. A SoC comparator was used to formulate the overall cost-effectiveness result with pembrolizumab as the intervention. SoC comprised a weighted average of the comparators by tumour site based on market share. Drug acquisition, administration, adverse events, monitoring, subsequent treatment, end-of-life costs, and testing costs were included. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed, including modelling pembrolizumab efficacy using standard parametric survival models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pembrolizumab, at list price, was associated with £129,469 in total costs, 8.30 LYs, and 3.88 QALYs across the pooled tumour sites. SoC was associated with £28,222 in total costs, 1.14 LYs, and 0.72 QALYs across the pooled tumour sites. This yields an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £32,085 per QALY. Results were robust to sensitivity and scenario analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This model demonstrates pembrolizumab provides a valuable new alternative therapy for UK patients with MSH-H/dMMR cancer at the cost of £32,085 per QALY, with confidential discounts anticipated to improve cost-effectiveness further.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"279-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139642320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Value of next generation sequencing (NGS) testing in advanced cancer patients.","authors":"Jesse D Ortendahl, Gebra Cuyun Carter, Snehal G Thakkar, Katalin Bognar, David W Hall, Yara Abdou","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2329009","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2329009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The availability of targeted therapies for oncology patients is increasing. Available genomic tests to identify treatment-eligible patients include single gene tests and gene panel tests, including the whole-exome, whole-transcriptome OncoExTra test. We assessed the costs and clinical benefits of test choice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Microsoft Excel-based model was developed to evaluate test choice in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. Treatment pathways were based on NCCN guidelines and medical expert opinion. Inputs were derived from published literature. Annual economic results and lifetime clinical results with OncoExTra testing were projected per-tested-patient and compared with single gene testing and no testing. Separately, results were estimated for a US health plan without the OncoExTra test and with its use in 5% of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with no genomic testing, OncoExTra test use increased costs by $4,915 per patient; however, 82%-92% of individuals across tumour types were identified as eligible for targeted therapy or a clinical trial. Compared with single gene testing, OncoExTra test use decreased costs by $9,966 per-patient-tested while increasing use of approved or investigational targeted therapies by 20%. When considering a hypothetical health plan with 1 million members, 858 patients were eligible for genomic testing. Using the OncoExTra test in 5% of those eligible, per-member per-month costs decreased by $0.003, ranging from cost-savings of $0.026 in NSCLC patients to a $0.009 increase in prostate cancer patients. Cost-savings were driven by reduced treatment costs with increased clinical trial enrolment and reduced direct and indirect medical costs associated with targeted treatments.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limitations include the required simplifications in modelling complex conditions that may not fully reflect evolving real-world testing and treatment patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to single-gene testing, results indicate that using next generation sequencing test such as OncoExTra identified more actionable alterations, leading to improved outcomes and reduced costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"519-530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140094209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2320008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2320008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":"27 1","pages":"266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139905817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Post-approval indications and clinical trials for cardiovascular drugs: some implications of the US Inflation Reduction Act.","authors":"Henry Grabowski, Genia Long","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2323903","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2323903","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the historical baseline landscape of cardiovascular drug post-approval activity, including the number and timing of post-approval clinical trials and approved indications. The US Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) Drug Price Negotiation Program (DPNP) and its Maximum Fair Prices (MFPs) will affect incentives for investment in post-approval activity such as clinical trials for new indications. While three of the first ten drugs selected for the DPNP and MFP-setting are cardiovascular or antithrombotic drugs, limited attention has been paid to potential cardiovascular drug impacts, and to post-approval innovation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the 65 drugs originally approved by the FDA from 1995 through 2021 for a cardiovascular or antithrombotic indication (60 small molecules and 5 biologics), we develop a novel dataset of industry-sponsored, post-approval clinical trials and FDA-approved label changes for new indications. We analyze their number and timing relative to DPNP drug selection and MFP implementation dates, by drug approval-year cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find 49% of indications were awarded and 76% of industry-funded clinical trials were completed post-approval, reaching 98% of trials for drugs in the earliest 1995-99 cohort. For the 60 small molecules, 76% of post-approval trials ended five years or more after original drug approval, 65% ended seven or more years after original drug approval (i.e. after potential DPNP selection), and 53% nine or more years after original drug approval (i.e. after potential MFP implementation).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-approval FDA indication approvals and clinical trial starts and primary completion dates often occurred after or near new DPNP selection and MFP implementation dates. This has economic consequences for future investment incentives. Post-approval trials for small molecules, longer-duration trials, and larger-enrollment trials, and post-approval indications focused on limited patient populations and older patients could face particular economic challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"463-472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139990265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of intravenous resuscitation fluids in sepsis patients: a patient-level data analysis in Jordan.","authors":"Shoroq M Altawalbeh, Eman M Almestarihi, Rawand A Khasawneh, Suleiman M Momany, Khawla Abu Hammour, Mohammad S Shawaqfeh, Ivo Abraham","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2023.2296196","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2023.2296196","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Albumin role as fluid resuscitation in sepsis remains understudied in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of intravenous (IV) Albumin compared to Crystalloids in sepsis patients using patient-level data in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of sepsis patients aged 18 or older admitted to intensive care units (ICU) at two major tertiary hospitals during the period 2018-2019. Patients information, type of IV fluid, and clinical outcomes were retrieved from medical records, and charges were retrieved from the billing system. A 90-day partitioned survival model with two health states (alive and dead) was constructed to estimate the survival of sepsis patients receiving either Albumin or Crystalloids as IV fluids for resuscitation. Overall survival was predicted by fitting a Weibull model on the patient-level data from the current study. To further validate the results, and to support the assessment of uncertainty, time-dependent transition probabilities of death at each cycle were estimated and used to construct a state-transition patient-level simulation model with 10,000 microsimulation trials. Adopting the healthcare system perspective, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios(ICERs) of Albumin versus Crystalloids were calculated in terms of the probability to be discharged alive from the ICU. Uncertainty was explored using probabilistic sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the partitioned survival model, Albumin was associated with an incremental cost of $1,007 per incremental1% in the probability of being discharged alive from the ICU. In the state-transition patient-level simulation model, ICER was $1,268 per incremental 1% in the probability of being discharged alive. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that Albumin was favored at thresholds >$800 per incremental 1%in the probability of being discharged alive from the ICU.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IV Albumin use in sepsis patients might not be cost-effective from the healthcare perspective of Jordan. This has important implications for policymakers to readdress Albumin prescribing practice in sepsis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"126-133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138806664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Costs of breast cancer recurrence after initial treatment for HR+, HER2-, high-risk early breast cancer: estimates from SEER-Medicare linked data.","authors":"Alexandra S Vitko, Pam Martin, Sheng Zhang, Adam Johnston, Robert Ohsfeldt, Shen Zheng, Astra M Liepa","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2023.2291266","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13696998.2023.2291266","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the costs of treated recurrence and survival in elderly patients with early breast cancer (EBC) at high risk of recurrence using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry-Medicare linked claims data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients aged ≥65 years with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-), node-positive EBC at high risk of recurrence. Treated recurrences were defined based on treatment events/procedure codes from claims. Primary outcomes were monthly total extra costs and cumulative extra costs of treated recurrence relative to patients with non/untreated recurrence. Costs were calculated using a Kaplan-Meier sampling average estimator method and inflated to 2021 US$. Secondary outcomes included analysis by recurrence type and overall survival (OS) after recurrence. Subgroup analysis evaluated costs in patients with Medicare Part D coverage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,081 eligible patients [mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 74.5 (7.1) years], the majority were females (97.4%) and white (87.8%). Treated recurrence was observed in 964 patients (31.3%). The monthly extra cost of treated recurrence was highest at the beginning of the first treated recurrence episode, with 6-year cumulative cost of $117,926. Six-year cumulative extra costs were higher for patients with distant recurrences ($168,656) than for patients with locoregional recurrences ($96,465). Median OS was 4.34 years for all treated recurrences, 1.92 years for distant recurrence, and 6.78 years for locoregional recurrence. Similar cumulative extra cost trends were observed in the subgroup with Part D coverage as in the overall population.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This study utilizes claims data to identify treated recurrence. Due to age constraints of the dataset, results may not extrapolate to a younger population where EBC is commonly diagnosed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EBC recurrence in this elderly population has substantial costs, particularly in patients with distant recurrences. Therapies that delay or prevent recurrence may reduce long-term costs significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"84-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138498569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}