Cost-efficiency and expanded access modeling of conversion to biosimilar bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in Medicare.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2474884
Joshua A Roth, David Kratochvil, Stephanie Dorman, Mark Bernauer
{"title":"Cost-efficiency and expanded access modeling of conversion to biosimilar bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in Medicare.","authors":"Joshua A Roth, David Kratochvil, Stephanie Dorman, Mark Bernauer","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2474884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biosimilars to originator bevacizumab (Avastin), such as bevacizumab-bvzr (Zirabev), can deliver substantial savings and/or expanded access to biologic therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal (mCRC) and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). The objective of this study is to explore the cost-efficiency and budget-neutral expanded access of bevacizumab-bvzr in mCRC and mNSCLC in Medicare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a Medicare payer perspective simulation model of patients treated for mCRC and mNSCLC to estimate cost-savings from converting bevacizumab (originator) to bevacizumab-bvzr or alternative biosimilars such as bevacizumab-awwb, -maly, and -abcd. The target patient population receiving annual first-line systemic therapy was calculated using Medicare enrollment data, SEER cancer incidence rates in patients age ≥65, and an assumption that 39.3% and 77.2% of new diagnoses receive systemic therapy for mCRC and mNSCLC respectively based on recent evidence. 76.0% of systemically treated mCRC patients and 11.4% of incident mNSCLC patients were expected to be treated with bevacizumab-based regimens based on recent evidence. Costs were derived from the 2024 Average Sales Price (ASP). Results include per-patient per-month (PPPM) cost savings (vs. originator), total monthly savings in the cohort, and number needed to convert (NNC) to biosimilar to fund the treatment of an additional 100 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPPM savings from conversion to bevacizumab-bvzr were $4,205 in mCRC and $8,410 in mNSCLC. In 100% conversion scenarios, full cohort monthly savings were $27,664,432 in mCRC (<i>n</i> = 6,579) and $32,319,323 in mNSCLC (<i>n</i> = 3,843), respectively. At 100% conversion, monthly savings from biosimilar conversion could fund up to 13,887 additional mCRC patient-months of treatment with bevacizumab-bvzr + FOLFOX, and up to 8,959 additional mNSCLC patient-months of treatment with bevacizumab-bvzr + paclitaxel + carboplatin. In mCRC and mNSCLC the biosimilar NNC from the originator was 47 and 43, respectively. The biosimilar NNC from other biosimilars ranged from 60-4,564 and 55-4,422 for mCRC and NSCLC, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the first cost-efficiency and expanded access study of biosimilar bevacizumab in mCRC and mNSCLC, we find that bevacizumab-bvzr-based regimens can result in substantial cost savings relative to originator-based first line treatment in Medicare. These cost savings could be reinvested to treat a substantial number of additional patients with mCRC or mNSCLC, or fund other costs of care in Medicare, on a budget-neutral basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"378-386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2474884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biosimilars to originator bevacizumab (Avastin), such as bevacizumab-bvzr (Zirabev), can deliver substantial savings and/or expanded access to biologic therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal (mCRC) and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). The objective of this study is to explore the cost-efficiency and budget-neutral expanded access of bevacizumab-bvzr in mCRC and mNSCLC in Medicare.

Methods: We developed a Medicare payer perspective simulation model of patients treated for mCRC and mNSCLC to estimate cost-savings from converting bevacizumab (originator) to bevacizumab-bvzr or alternative biosimilars such as bevacizumab-awwb, -maly, and -abcd. The target patient population receiving annual first-line systemic therapy was calculated using Medicare enrollment data, SEER cancer incidence rates in patients age ≥65, and an assumption that 39.3% and 77.2% of new diagnoses receive systemic therapy for mCRC and mNSCLC respectively based on recent evidence. 76.0% of systemically treated mCRC patients and 11.4% of incident mNSCLC patients were expected to be treated with bevacizumab-based regimens based on recent evidence. Costs were derived from the 2024 Average Sales Price (ASP). Results include per-patient per-month (PPPM) cost savings (vs. originator), total monthly savings in the cohort, and number needed to convert (NNC) to biosimilar to fund the treatment of an additional 100 patients.

Results: PPPM savings from conversion to bevacizumab-bvzr were $4,205 in mCRC and $8,410 in mNSCLC. In 100% conversion scenarios, full cohort monthly savings were $27,664,432 in mCRC (n = 6,579) and $32,319,323 in mNSCLC (n = 3,843), respectively. At 100% conversion, monthly savings from biosimilar conversion could fund up to 13,887 additional mCRC patient-months of treatment with bevacizumab-bvzr + FOLFOX, and up to 8,959 additional mNSCLC patient-months of treatment with bevacizumab-bvzr + paclitaxel + carboplatin. In mCRC and mNSCLC the biosimilar NNC from the originator was 47 and 43, respectively. The biosimilar NNC from other biosimilars ranged from 60-4,564 and 55-4,422 for mCRC and NSCLC, respectively.

Conclusion: In the first cost-efficiency and expanded access study of biosimilar bevacizumab in mCRC and mNSCLC, we find that bevacizumab-bvzr-based regimens can result in substantial cost savings relative to originator-based first line treatment in Medicare. These cost savings could be reinvested to treat a substantial number of additional patients with mCRC or mNSCLC, or fund other costs of care in Medicare, on a budget-neutral basis.

医疗保险中转移性结直肠癌和非鳞状非小细胞肺癌转化为贝伐单抗生物仿制药的成本效益和扩展准入模型。
贝伐单抗(Avastin®)的生物类似药,如贝伐单抗-bvzr (Zirabev®),可以为转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)和非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(mNSCLC)患者提供大量节省和/或扩大生物治疗的可及性。本研究的目的是探讨医疗保险中贝伐单抗-bvzr在mCRC和mNSCLC中的成本效益和预算中性的扩大可及性。方法:我们建立了一个mCRC和mNSCLC患者的医疗保险付款人视角模拟模型,以估计将贝伐单抗(原药)转换为贝伐单抗-bvzr或替代生物仿制药(如贝伐单抗-awwb、-maly和-abcd)所节省的成本。每年接受一线全身治疗的目标患者群体是根据Medicare入组数据、年龄≥65岁患者的SEER癌症发病率,以及基于最近证据的假设,分别有39.3%和77.2%的新诊断患者接受了mCRC和mNSCLC的全身治疗。根据最近的证据,76.0%的系统治疗的mCRC患者和11.4%的突发小细胞肺癌患者预计将接受基于贝伐单抗的方案治疗。成本来源于2024年平均销售价格(ASP)。结果包括每个患者每月(PPPM)的成本节省(与初始者相比),队列中每月总节省,以及将(NNC)转换为生物类似药以资助额外100例患者治疗所需的数量。结果转换为贝伐单抗-bvzr的PPPM在mCRC和mNSCLC中分别为4,205美元和8,410美元。在100%转换的情况下,mCRC患者每月节省27,664,432美元(n = 6,579), mNSCLC患者每月节省32,319,323美元(n = 3,843)。在100%转化的情况下,每月从生物仿制药转化中节省的费用可以资助多达13887个额外的mCRC患者-月的贝伐单抗-bvzr + FOLFOX治疗,以及多达8959个额外的mNSCLC患者-月的贝伐单抗-bvzr +紫杉醇+卡铂治疗。在mCRC和mNSCLC中,来自始发者的生物仿制药NNC分别为47和43。与其他生物类似药相比,mCRC和NSCLC的NNC分别为60- 4564和55- 4422。在首个贝伐单抗生物仿制药治疗mCRC和mNSCLC的成本效益和扩大可及性研究中,我们发现,相对于医疗保险中基于初始者的一线治疗,基于贝伐单抗-bvzr的方案可以节省大量成本。这些节省的费用可以再投资于治疗大量额外的mCRC或mNSCLC患者,或在预算中立的基础上资助医疗保险中的其他护理费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信