Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology最新文献

{"title":"IRSA ASM 2024 Abstract","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13758","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1754-9485.13758","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 8","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13758","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142502168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Radiation Oncology Orals","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13780","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1754-9485.13780","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 S1","pages":"185-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13780","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Radiation Oncology Exhibits","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13779","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1754-9485.13779","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 S1","pages":"175-184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13779","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clinical Radiology Exhibits","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13778","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1754-9485.13778","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 S1","pages":"67-174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13778","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clinical Radiology Oral","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13777","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1754-9485.13777","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 S1","pages":"4-66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13777","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Stereotactic body radiotherapy alone versus stereotactic body radiotherapy after incomplete transarterial therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Youngju Song, Jinhong Jung, Jin-Hong Park, So Yeon Kim, Jonggi Choi, Danbi Lee, Ju Hyun Shim, Kang Mo Kim, Young-Suk Lim, Han Chu Lee, Sang Min Yoon","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13794","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13794","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We investigated the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) alone versus SBRT after incomplete transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for a single recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) smaller than 5 cm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent SBRT for a single recurrent HCC ≤5 cm, without vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis. Patients were divided into the SBRT-alone group and the TACE-SBRT group. The primary outcome was the local control (LC) rate, and secondary outcomes were survivals and treatment-related toxicities. We additionally conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 477 patients were available for analysis. Among them, 54 patients received SBRT without prior treatment to the target lesion (SBRT-alone group), whereas 423 patients received SBRT for viable HCC after TACE (TACE-SBRT group). The 3-year LC rates did not differ between the two groups (SBRT-alone group, 88.6% vs. TACE-SBRT group, 89.6%, P = 0.918). The 3-year rates of overall survival, out-of-field intrahepatic recurrence-free survival and recurrence-free survival were also not significantly different (P = 0.479, 0.290 and 0.273, respectively). Even after PSM, LC and survival rates at 3 years were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBRT alone demonstrated comparable local control and survival outcomes to SBRT following incomplete TACE. SBRT alone may be considered an alternative treatment option for a single recurrent HCC smaller than 5 cm when curative treatments or TACE are not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Amputation and limb-sparing surgery in childhood sarcoma: Post-operative imaging appearances and complications.","authors":"Joel Earley, Derek Roebuck","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13790","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13790","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Limb-sparing surgery and amputation are common surgical techniques used to achieve local tumour control in childhood primary bone and soft tissue malignancy of the limbs. The interpretation of post-operative limb imaging in these frequently complex cases is assisted by knowledge of the surgical techniques employed. This review discusses the rationale underpinning the most common surgical techniques used for these patients as well as their expected post-operative imaging appearance and complications. Amputation, long bone resection, endoprosthetic reconstruction, allograft reconstruction, the use of fibular autografts, allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction and arthrodesis are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A keep-it-simple embolisation approach to treat pelvic congestion syndrome without compromising clinical effectiveness.","authors":"Eisen Liang, Wai Yan Timothy Wong, Razeen Parvez, Michael Chan, Bevan Brown","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13795","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13795","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are two approaches to treating pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS): (i) the keep-it-simple (KIS) approach, which involves embolising only the refluxing vein(s), typically the left ovarian vein (LOV) unless the right ovarian vein (ROV) or left/right internal iliac vein (IIV) tributaries are also refluxing; and (ii) the extensive (EXT) approach, which empirically embolises almost all of the LOV, ROV, and left and right IIV tributaries. The aim of this study is to determine whether the KIS approach can effectively treat PCS while minimising the number of treated veins and coils used, without the need for injecting sclerosing agents into pelvic veins or the use of occlusion balloons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study. Our records identified 154 women who underwent venograms for possible PCS, with the intent to proceed with embolisation. Refluxing veins were treated using the KIS approach, deploying minimal number of coils, 'sandwiching' sclerosing foam. Short-term follow-up was conducted at 6 weeks; long-term follow-ups (between 12 and 60 months) were conducted via an electronic survey consisting of 19 questions assessing pelvic pain/pressure, leg and back pain, fatigue, and bladder and menstrual symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen women had negative venogram; 139 women had one or more refluxing veins on venogram. Most women (73%) required unilateral ovarian vein (OV) embolisation, 14% required bilateral OV embolisation, and 12% underwent pelvic vein embolisation. Most cases required only four pushable coils. Clinical success was 89% at 6 weeks and 84% at 1-5 years. A visual analogue scale reduction of 5.2 points (from 7.8 to 2.7) was achieved. There were no instances of coil dislodgement or other complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The keep-it-simple approach, embolising only the refluxing ovarian and/or iliac veins, can achieve a successful clinical outcome for pelvic congestion syndrome. The extensive approach of empirically embolising all ovarian veins and internal iliac veins may not be necessary. This carries implications for potential savings in procedure time, cost and radiation dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparative analysis of clinical treatment outcomes: Breath-hold vs. free-breathing techniques in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy.","authors":"Kosuke Morishima, Hideomi Yamashita, Tomoyuki Noyama, Atsuto Katano","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13793","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13793","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of breath-hold irradiation in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 consecutive patients who received SBRT for hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases between 2013 and 2021. Breath-hold irradiation was implemented for patients treated after April 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period for all patients was 16.4 months (IQR: 7.36-20.9). The 2-year overall survival rate was 64.4% (95% CI: 47.4-77.2), and the local control rate was 84.3% (95% CI: 69.7-92.3) for all patients. The 1-year overall survival was 80.0% (95% CI: 60.8-90.5) versus 82.0% (95% CI: 53.5-93.9) in the free-respiratory (FR) group versus the breath-hold (BH) group, respectively (P = 0.60). The 1-year local control rates were 78.1% (95% CI: 57.5-89.5) in the FR group and 95.7% (95% CI: 72.9-99.4) in the BH group, respectively (P = 0.16). Radiation-induced liver injury, defined by an escalation of ≥2 in Child-Pugh score, was observed in four patients within each group (FR 13% vs. BH 15%). There were no gastrointestinal adverse events of Grade 3 or higher.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Breath-hold irradiation can be safely administered and has demonstrated clinical potential in improving local control. Further research into dose escalation using breath-hold techniques is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Systematic review of extrahepatic hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm following adult liver transplantation: Risk factors and treatment modalities.","authors":"Ryan Pereira, Benjamin J Pearch, Gilbert Pavilion, Kheman Rajkomar","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13745","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm (HAP) is a rare vascular complication following liver transplantation (LTx) with treatment choice frequently driven by institutional experience. Approximately, 10% of hepatic grafts are lost from this complication, requiring re-transplantation and placing further demand on the already present organ shortage. Secondly, patients with HAP can present with catastrophic bleeding, with reported mortality of up to 78%. We aim to identify risk factors associated with HAP and assess the survival benefit of different treatment modalities used (endovascular and open surgical techniques). Early detection may facilitate semi-elective management of this condition. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Medline and Embase up to 1 October 2023. Case series with ≥5 patients focusing on adult patients who developed extrahepatic pseudoaneurysm following LTx were included. A total of 11 studies were pooled, comprising of 118 patients with survival data available in 61 patients. The most common presentation was haemorrhagic shock or luminal haemorrhage (75.5%). Bile leak was documented in 66.7% (28/42), 15.2% (18/118) associated foregut pathologies and 28.6% (14/49) of microbiology cultures grew a fungal organism. Flow preserving strategies (stenting, revascularization) trended towards better survival at 120 months compared to non-flow preserving strategies (embolization, HAL); however, this was not statistically significant following log rank (Mantel-Cox) analysis (P 0.169). Any patient following LTx presenting with haemorrhagic shock or luminal bleeding needs HAP excluded urgently. HAP management is complex, requiring careful consideration of patient specific presentation, anatomic factors and associated pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}