Exploration of Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Delineating Target Volume Boundary in Glioblastoma Radiotherapy.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Lei Tian, Wenyan Wang, Wei Sun, Huandi Zhou, Zhiqing Xiao, Xuetao Han, Xing Kang, Xiaoying Xue
{"title":"Exploration of Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Delineating Target Volume Boundary in Glioblastoma Radiotherapy.","authors":"Lei Tian, Wenyan Wang, Wei Sun, Huandi Zhou, Zhiqing Xiao, Xuetao Han, Xing Kang, Xiaoying Xue","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study is to investigate the variations in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters at different distances surrounding the operative cavity, with a specific focus on exploring the potential utility of DTI in accurately delineating radiotherapy clinical target volume for glioblastoma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 41 patients with glioblastoma, in which apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) values were measured at various distances beyond the surgical cavity. Recurrent patients were prospectively followed up according to the RANO criteria, aiming to investigate discrepancies between ADC and FA values in recurrent regions compared to normal control tissues prior to recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rADC and rFA ratio approach 1 at a distance of 3 cm beyond the cavity. At the edge of the operative cavity and 2 cm beyond, the subtotal resection (STR) group exhibited higher ADC and rADC values compared to the gross total resection (GTR) group (p < 0.05). Similarly, FA and rFA values in the STR group were lower than those in the total resection group both at 1 cm beyond and 2 cm beyond (p < 0.05). Conventional MRI did not reveal any abnormalities prior to marginal or distant recurrence; however, the ADC value within this region was higher than that of control normal tissues (p = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The margins of GBM tumour invasion are typically not isotropic and could be > 2 cm and sometimes up to 3 cm. We recommend appropriately larger expansion of the target volume for patients with subtotal tumour resection. The utilisation of DTI in delineating the boundary of GBM's radiotherapy clinical target volume represents a promising avenue that holds potential to enhance precision and accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13873","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study is to investigate the variations in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters at different distances surrounding the operative cavity, with a specific focus on exploring the potential utility of DTI in accurately delineating radiotherapy clinical target volume for glioblastoma patients.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 41 patients with glioblastoma, in which apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) values were measured at various distances beyond the surgical cavity. Recurrent patients were prospectively followed up according to the RANO criteria, aiming to investigate discrepancies between ADC and FA values in recurrent regions compared to normal control tissues prior to recurrence.

Results: The rADC and rFA ratio approach 1 at a distance of 3 cm beyond the cavity. At the edge of the operative cavity and 2 cm beyond, the subtotal resection (STR) group exhibited higher ADC and rADC values compared to the gross total resection (GTR) group (p < 0.05). Similarly, FA and rFA values in the STR group were lower than those in the total resection group both at 1 cm beyond and 2 cm beyond (p < 0.05). Conventional MRI did not reveal any abnormalities prior to marginal or distant recurrence; however, the ADC value within this region was higher than that of control normal tissues (p = 0.023).

Conclusions: The margins of GBM tumour invasion are typically not isotropic and could be > 2 cm and sometimes up to 3 cm. We recommend appropriately larger expansion of the target volume for patients with subtotal tumour resection. The utilisation of DTI in delineating the boundary of GBM's radiotherapy clinical target volume represents a promising avenue that holds potential to enhance precision and accuracy.

胶质母细胞瘤放射治疗中弥散张量成像划定靶体积边界的探讨。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨手术腔周围不同距离的弥散张量成像(diffusion tensor imaging, DTI)参数的变化,重点探讨DTI在准确描绘胶质母细胞瘤患者放疗临床靶体积方面的潜在应用。方法:对41例胶质母细胞瘤患者进行回顾性研究,在手术腔外不同距离测量表观扩散系数(ADC)和分数各向异性(FA)值。根据RANO标准对复发患者进行前瞻性随访,目的是研究复发前复发区ADC和FA值与正常对照组织的差异。结果:在离腔3cm处,rADC与rFA比值接近1。在手术腔边缘及2cm外,次全切除组(STR)的ADC和rADC值高于总全切除组(GTR) (p)。结论:GBM肿瘤侵袭的边缘通常不是各向同性的,可达bb0 ~ 2cm,有时可达3cm。我们建议对肿瘤次全切除的患者适当扩大靶体积。利用DTI来划定GBM放射治疗临床靶体积的边界代表了一种有希望的途径,具有提高精度和准确性的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信