我们脱离困境了吗?乳房定位趋势的最新进展。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sian Chin, Sally Burrows, Donna Taylor
{"title":"我们脱离困境了吗?乳房定位趋势的最新进展。","authors":"Sian Chin,&nbsp;Sally Burrows,&nbsp;Donna Taylor","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Hookwire localisation (HWL) is the most established method of localising impalpable breast lesions. Previous cross-sectional study of Australian and New Zealand surgeons in 2016 found HWL to be the most widely used breast lesion localisation technique (LLT). Many non-wire techniques have subsequently been developed to address the limitations of HWL. The aim of this study is to assess current trends in the use of breast LLTs in Australia and New Zealand and to compare results with previous findings of a prior study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Attendees of a national Breast Conference were invited to participate in an online survey between 25 March and 21 April 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>100 complete responses were received. The number of respondents using each LLT was: HWL 95, Magseed 30, Carbon-track 26, SCOUT 19, IOUS 13, ROLLIS 9, ROLL 4, MOLLI 2. Considering the LLTs they used the most, 73 respondents stated HWL, 14 Magseed, 6 carbon-track and 4 ROLLIS. Magseed and ROLLIS were more likely to be the most used LLT of respondents in public practice, and HWL was more likely to be the most used LLT in private practice (<i>p</i> = 0.010). Since 2016, the use of radioguided techniques has increased (4%–13%, <i>p</i> = 0.036).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>HWL remains the most used LLT; however, non-wire LLTs are being used more frequently. Although non-wire LLTs have many advantages, familiarity and cost likely also influence the choice of technique.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"69 5","pages":"547-553"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are We Off the Hook? An Update in Breast Localisation Trends\",\"authors\":\"Sian Chin,&nbsp;Sally Burrows,&nbsp;Donna Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hookwire localisation (HWL) is the most established method of localising impalpable breast lesions. Previous cross-sectional study of Australian and New Zealand surgeons in 2016 found HWL to be the most widely used breast lesion localisation technique (LLT). Many non-wire techniques have subsequently been developed to address the limitations of HWL. The aim of this study is to assess current trends in the use of breast LLTs in Australia and New Zealand and to compare results with previous findings of a prior study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Attendees of a national Breast Conference were invited to participate in an online survey between 25 March and 21 April 2023.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>100 complete responses were received. The number of respondents using each LLT was: HWL 95, Magseed 30, Carbon-track 26, SCOUT 19, IOUS 13, ROLLIS 9, ROLL 4, MOLLI 2. Considering the LLTs they used the most, 73 respondents stated HWL, 14 Magseed, 6 carbon-track and 4 ROLLIS. Magseed and ROLLIS were more likely to be the most used LLT of respondents in public practice, and HWL was more likely to be the most used LLT in private practice (<i>p</i> = 0.010). Since 2016, the use of radioguided techniques has increased (4%–13%, <i>p</i> = 0.036).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>HWL remains the most used LLT; however, non-wire LLTs are being used more frequently. Although non-wire LLTs have many advantages, familiarity and cost likely also influence the choice of technique.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"69 5\",\"pages\":\"547-553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13866\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13866","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:钩线定位(HWL)是最成熟的定位乳房不可触及病变的方法。2016年对澳大利亚和新西兰外科医生进行的横断面研究发现,HWL是使用最广泛的乳房病变定位技术(LLT)。为了解决HWL的局限性,随后开发了许多非丝技术。本研究的目的是评估目前在澳大利亚和新西兰使用乳腺llt的趋势,并将结果与先前研究的结果进行比较。方法:在2023年3月25日至4月21日期间,邀请全国乳腺会议的与会者参加在线调查。结果:共收到完整回复100份。使用每种LLT的受访者数量为:HWL 95, Magseed 30, Carbon-track 26, SCOUT 19, IOUS 13, ROLLIS 9, ROLL 4, MOLLI 2。考虑到他们使用最多的llt, 73名受访者选择HWL, 14名Magseed, 6名carbon-track和4名ROLLIS。Magseed和ROLLIS更有可能是公共实践中受访者最常用的LLT,而HWL更有可能是私人实践中最常用的LLT (p = 0.010)。自2016年以来,无线电制导技术的使用有所增加(4%-13%,p = 0.036)。结论:HWL仍是使用最多的LLT;然而,非有线llt的使用越来越频繁。尽管非电线llt有许多优点,但熟悉度和成本也可能影响技术的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are We Off the Hook? An Update in Breast Localisation Trends

Background

Hookwire localisation (HWL) is the most established method of localising impalpable breast lesions. Previous cross-sectional study of Australian and New Zealand surgeons in 2016 found HWL to be the most widely used breast lesion localisation technique (LLT). Many non-wire techniques have subsequently been developed to address the limitations of HWL. The aim of this study is to assess current trends in the use of breast LLTs in Australia and New Zealand and to compare results with previous findings of a prior study.

Methods

Attendees of a national Breast Conference were invited to participate in an online survey between 25 March and 21 April 2023.

Results

100 complete responses were received. The number of respondents using each LLT was: HWL 95, Magseed 30, Carbon-track 26, SCOUT 19, IOUS 13, ROLLIS 9, ROLL 4, MOLLI 2. Considering the LLTs they used the most, 73 respondents stated HWL, 14 Magseed, 6 carbon-track and 4 ROLLIS. Magseed and ROLLIS were more likely to be the most used LLT of respondents in public practice, and HWL was more likely to be the most used LLT in private practice (p = 0.010). Since 2016, the use of radioguided techniques has increased (4%–13%, p = 0.036).

Conclusion

HWL remains the most used LLT; however, non-wire LLTs are being used more frequently. Although non-wire LLTs have many advantages, familiarity and cost likely also influence the choice of technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信