Evaluation & the Health Professions最新文献_第4页

Learning Beyond Simulation: The Impact of Debriefing Strategies on Health Students' Training. 超越模拟的学习：汇报策略对健康学生训练的影响。

IF 1.9 3区医学

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2026-07-09 DOI: 10.1177/01632787261468355

Sandra Maria Santos Figueiredo, Robson José Souza Domingues, Clemente Neves Sousa

{"title":"Learning Beyond Simulation: The Impact of Debriefing Strategies on Health Students' Training.","authors":"Sandra Maria Santos Figueiredo, Robson José Souza Domingues, Clemente Neves Sousa","doi":"10.1177/01632787261468355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787261468355","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to identify the debriefing strategies used in realistic simulation (RS) in health education and their impact on students training.Methods: This is an integrative literature review, developed based on six methodological steps. The research was carried out in the BVS, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, SciELO and LILACS databases, using DeCS/MeSH descriptors and Boolean operators. After screening, 10 articles met the inclusion criteria.Results: The results showed that the most used methods were the structured model, debriefing with reflective feedback and video-based debriefing. These strategies have demonstrated effectiveness in promoting active learning, strengthening clinical reasoning, developing technical and non-technical skills, and increasing self-confidence. Improvements were also observed in psychosocial aspects such as emotional safety and empathy.Conclusion: The analysis revealed that debriefing acts as a fundamental pedagogical tool, promoting significant learning experiences that contribute to the student's development. It is concluded that this last stage of RS is essential and should be conducted in a structured manner, by trained facilitators, with methodologies adapted to the context and needs of students. Investment in teacher training and future studies to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies in the long term are recommended.","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787261468355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148410996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Signal versus Diagnosis: From Burnout Risk Screening to Care. 信号与诊断：从倦怠风险筛查到护理。

IF 1.9 3区医学

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2026-07-07 DOI: 10.1177/01632787261467922

Leon T De Beer

引用次数: 0

Measurement Invariance of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction Subscale Between Individuals With Psychiatric and Non-psychiatric Disabilities. 精神障碍与非精神障碍个体基本心理需求满足子量表的测量不变性。

IF 1.6 3区医学

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251327681

Heerak Choi, Aaron J Kaat

引用次数: 0

Evaluation of Interventions to Improve Vaccination Coverage Among Children Aged 12-23 Months in Urban Slum Areas of Bangladesh Using the WHO Interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) Framework: A Stakeholder Perspective. 利用世卫组织交互式证据决策（iEtD）框架评估改善孟加拉国城市贫民窟地区12-23个月儿童疫苗接种覆盖率的干预措施：利益相关者视角

IF 1.6 3区医学

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251353747

Kazi Fayzus Salahin, Wit Wichaidit, Quazi Monirul Islam, Tippawan Liabsuetrakul

{"title":"Evaluation of Interventions to Improve Vaccination Coverage Among Children Aged 12-23 Months in Urban Slum Areas of Bangladesh Using the WHO Interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) Framework: A Stakeholder Perspective.","authors":"Kazi Fayzus Salahin, Wit Wichaidit, Quazi Monirul Islam, Tippawan Liabsuetrakul","doi":"10.1177/01632787251353747","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01632787251353747","url":null,"abstract":"Childhood vaccination is the most cost-effective public health intervention; however, coverage in slum-like areas remains a significant challenge because of unique socio-economic disparities and logistical barriers. We aimed to evaluate the interventions from the literature on improving vaccination coverage among children aged 12-23 months in slum areas using the WHO iEtD framework and the TOPSIS-Entropy method for decision-making in Bangladesh and identify stakeholders ranks and felt needs of interventions across study slums. This cross-sectional study was conducted in six slums in two city corporation areas in Dhaka, Bangladesh involving 67 demand-side and 35 supply-side stakeholders. Rating scores ranged from 0 to 1, indicating priority interventions. Our study highlights that demand-side stakeholders favour incentive interventions, whereas supply-side stakeholders support multicomponent strategies. For all stakeholders, educational interventions were ranked highest with a score of 0.745, followed by multicomponent interventions (score 0.666), incentive (score 0.651), and reminder/recall scoring (score 0.305). Educational interventions were identified as a shared priority (common ground), addressing the felt needs of both demand- and supply-side stakeholders. These findings support tailored context-specific approaches to enhance vaccination coverage and child health in vulnerable communities.","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"154-163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144483747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach. 探索利益相关者在干预实施研究中的参与：基于证据缺口图方法的系统证据合成。

IF 1.9 3区医学

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-26 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251352837

Kristina Arnahoutova, Sabina De Geest, Juliane Mielke, Annette Boaz, Helene Schoemans, Sabine Valenta

{"title":"Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach.","authors":"Kristina Arnahoutova, Sabina De Geest, Juliane Mielke, Annette Boaz, Helene Schoemans, Sabine Valenta","doi":"10.1177/01632787251352837","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01632787251352837","url":null,"abstract":"Stakeholder involvement (SI) is essential for effective and sustainable intervention implementation, yet practical guidance is lacking. This study mapped SI use in implementation science studies, identified gaps, and proposed a practical framework for improved SI planning. Using an evidence gap map approach, this study built on Mielke et al.'s (2022) methodology, which identified implementation studies from 2015-2020. The search was updated to include studies from 2021-2023 from PubMed, using the same search strategy and inclusion criteria. Data extraction followed the Guidance for Reporting on Involvement of Patients and the Public reporting checklist. From 10,184 studies, a random sample of 2,005 was screened, adding 162 implementation science studies to Mielke et al.'s 110, totaling 272 studies for SI analysis. SI was reported in 89% of studies, but often lacked depth and strategic planning. Stakeholders were mainly engaged during the preparatory phase. Most studies involved micro- and meso-level stakeholders, rarely including macro-level stakeholders. Few described stakeholder selection or preparation. SI was mostly consultative, via interviews, surveys, and focus groups, with limited active collaboration. SI processes and costs were rarely evaluated. Our findings underscore the need for structured, comprehensive SI planning and offer practical recommendations to strengthen SI efforts in implementation research.","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"123-139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13069137/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144505308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Mapping Longitudinal Dynamics of Learning Communities Dealing With Dutch Healthy Weight Approaches: An Updated Causal Loop Diagram. 绘制纵向动态的学习社区处理荷兰健康体重方法：一个更新的因果循环图。

IF 1.9 3区医学

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251368438

Maud J J Ter Bogt, Kirsten E Bevelander, Iris E Scholte, Tessa Huttenhuis, Allia C de Rooij, Gerard R M Molleman, Maria E T C van den Muijsenbergh, Gerdine A J Fransen

{"title":"Mapping Longitudinal Dynamics of Learning Communities Dealing With Dutch Healthy Weight Approaches: An Updated Causal Loop Diagram.","authors":"Maud J J Ter Bogt, Kirsten E Bevelander, Iris E Scholte, Tessa Huttenhuis, Allia C de Rooij, Gerard R M Molleman, Maria E T C van den Muijsenbergh, Gerdine A J Fransen","doi":"10.1177/01632787251368438","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01632787251368438","url":null,"abstract":"Learning communities (LCs) stimulate the learning and cross-sectoral collaboration that are essential in multidisciplinary challenges, such as healthy weight approaches (HWAs). Previous research on two multidisciplinary LCs about HWAs devised a causal loop diagram (CLD) identifying dynamics (i.e., mechanisms) that describe the functioning of LCs during their starting phase (first 6 months after LC start). As LCs are likely to develop over project phases, this study aimed to ascertain whether and how the LC system dynamics were perceived to develop over time. Qualitative interviews conducted with the LC members at a second juncture were processed to be able to update the initial CLD. The updated diagram indeed illustrated how the multidisciplinary LCs were perceived to develop. The CLD became more extensive and consequently further explained three aspects: the complexity and interrelatedness of group dynamics, gaining insights through exchange, and conditions to execute actions. To ensure adequate group dynamics, learning, and action execution, LC stakeholders can regularly use the CLD as a blueprint to identify solutions for LC bottlenecks, such as members limitedly arranging the LC jointly. Future research is needed to investigate whether such developments are caused by different LC project phases and/or by the number of LC meetings and reflections.","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"140-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13069132/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144845073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A Comprehensive Simulation Study to Evaluate the Effect Size and Study Length Relationship in Single-Group Interrupted Time Series Analysis. 评价单组中断时间序列分析中效应大小和研究时间关系的综合模拟研究。

IF 1.9 3区医学

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-15 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251361514

Ariel Linden

{"title":"A Comprehensive Simulation Study to Evaluate the Effect Size and Study Length Relationship in Single-Group Interrupted Time Series Analysis.","authors":"Ariel Linden","doi":"10.1177/01632787251361514","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01632787251361514","url":null,"abstract":"Single-group interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) is a popular non-experimental study design in healthcare research. However, little guidance is available to inform the power requirements of ITSA studies under most common usages. We performed simulations to estimate the number of time periods (ranging from 10 to 100) required for percentage increases in level and trend (from baseline), to achieve statistical significance (p < 0.05, p < 0.01) with >80% and >90% power, when autocorrelation ranges from -0.90 to 0.90, and the intervention is introduced at 33%, 50% and 67% of the time series. Larger effect sizes were required for shorter studies, as well as with increasing autocorrelation, and when the intervention was introduced earlier or later than halfway in the time series. The required effect sizes were generally lower for estimating a change in the level of the time series as compared with the change in the trend, but the opposite was true when the number of time periods was larger. Simulations of studies with 10 time periods consistently produced unreliable estimates. The tables created from these analyses as well as a new community-contributed Stata package called POWER_ITSA will guide healthcare researchers in determining the most efficient way to achieve anticipated treatment effects in single-group ITSA studies.","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"181-190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13069133/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144636645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Received Social Support Scale for Persons With Mental Illness: Psychometric Properties, Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version. 心理疾病患者接受社会支持量表：土耳其语版的心理测量特性、效度和信度。

IF 1.6 3区医学

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-18 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251361540

Emine Nur Celik, Dilek Avci

引用次数: 0

Corrigendum to Cross-national Psychometric Evaluation of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Medical Student Version. 杰弗逊共情量表跨国心理测量评估勘误-医学生版。

IF 1.6 3区医学

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-22 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251330968

引用次数: 0

Commentary - A Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Program Evaluation: Considerations for a Community-Engaged Approach. 评论-项目评估定性研究的综合：对社区参与方法的考虑。

IF 1.6 3区医学

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI: 10.1177/01632787251357596

Mimi M Kim, Roland J Thorpe, Keith E Whitfield

{"title":"Commentary - A Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Program Evaluation: Considerations for a Community-Engaged Approach.","authors":"Mimi M Kim, Roland J Thorpe, Keith E Whitfield","doi":"10.1177/01632787251357596","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01632787251357596","url":null,"abstract":"Qualitative research methodologies offer critical contextual insights into community-engaged program evaluations, addressing limitations in solely quantitative approaches. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are inherently rigorous, their design does not consider nuanced contextual factors and lived experiences that are valuable to understanding a program's impact on community and health outcomes within diverse populations. In this theoretical discussion, we posit that qualitative methods, particularly when grounded in a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) framework, foster trust and collaboration, yielding richer, more community-specific data to enhance program evaluation. We also provide evidence-based, practical consideration for conducting qualitative research for community-engaged program evaluations. We explore various qualitative approaches and their application in program evaluations. We highlight the iterative nature of qualitative data analysis and emphasize the importance of qualitative methodological rigor - including coding, triangulation, and member checking - to ensure the program evaluation's community value, credibility, and deeper contextual evaluation. Ultimately, we underscore the value of integrating qualitative methods throughout a program's lifecycle for comprehensive assessments, improved program effectiveness, and enhanced equity.","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"191-198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144599874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0