Professionalism in Residency Training: The Learning Environment for Professionalism Survey.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anna Byszewski, Alexander Pearson, Heather Lochnan, Donna L Johnston, Sharon Whiting, Timothy J Wood
{"title":"Professionalism in Residency Training: The Learning Environment for Professionalism Survey.","authors":"Anna Byszewski, Alexander Pearson, Heather Lochnan, Donna L Johnston, Sharon Whiting, Timothy J Wood","doi":"10.1177/01632787241286912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Role modelling is important in developing professionalism with a need for reliable, evidence-based tools to assess professionalism in the learning environment (LE). The Learning Environment for Professionalism (LEP) survey is brief, anonymous and balanced assessing medical trainees' and attendings' positive and negative professionalism behaviours that can be tracked longitudinally and identify problem areas in the LE. Seven training programs agreed to facilitate administration of the LEP survey at four hospitals in Ottawa, Canada. The survey was carried out iteratively between 2013 and 2020. A total of 3783 LE ratings of training programs and hospitals were assessed longitudinally using univariate linear regression. A Bonferroni corrected <i>p</i>-value of ≤.0045 was used to account for multiple comparisons. Positive professional behaviours were observed across time with some of the negative behaviors having improved. A negative signal was found, with attendings appearing to be treating patients unfairly because of their financial status, ethnic background, sexual or religious preferences. Applying LEP survey longitudinally across diverse training programs and institutions is feasible and may assist programs to identify areas requiring attention and acknowledging areas of exemplary professionalism. Continuous monitoring of LE to meet requirements of accrediting bodies can also be considered an important quality improvement metric.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787241286912"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787241286912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Role modelling is important in developing professionalism with a need for reliable, evidence-based tools to assess professionalism in the learning environment (LE). The Learning Environment for Professionalism (LEP) survey is brief, anonymous and balanced assessing medical trainees' and attendings' positive and negative professionalism behaviours that can be tracked longitudinally and identify problem areas in the LE. Seven training programs agreed to facilitate administration of the LEP survey at four hospitals in Ottawa, Canada. The survey was carried out iteratively between 2013 and 2020. A total of 3783 LE ratings of training programs and hospitals were assessed longitudinally using univariate linear regression. A Bonferroni corrected p-value of ≤.0045 was used to account for multiple comparisons. Positive professional behaviours were observed across time with some of the negative behaviors having improved. A negative signal was found, with attendings appearing to be treating patients unfairly because of their financial status, ethnic background, sexual or religious preferences. Applying LEP survey longitudinally across diverse training programs and institutions is feasible and may assist programs to identify areas requiring attention and acknowledging areas of exemplary professionalism. Continuous monitoring of LE to meet requirements of accrediting bodies can also be considered an important quality improvement metric.

住院医师培训中的职业精神:专业精神学习环境调查。
在培养职业精神的过程中,榜样的作用非常重要,因此需要可靠、循证的工具来评估学习环境(LE)中的职业精神。职业素养学习环境(LEP)调查简短、匿名且平衡地评估了医学学员和主治医师的积极和消极职业素养行为,可对其进行纵向跟踪,并找出学习环境中的问题所在。七个培训项目同意在加拿大渥太华的四家医院协助开展 LEP 调查。调查在 2013 年至 2020 年间反复进行。采用单变量线性回归法对培训项目和医院的3783项LE评分进行了纵向评估。采用Bonferroni校正P值≤.0045来考虑多重比较。在不同时期观察到积极的职业行为,其中一些消极行为有所改善。我们发现了一个负面信号,即主治医师似乎因为病人的经济状况、种族背景、性取向或宗教偏好而不公正地对待病人。在不同的培训项目和机构中纵向应用 LEP 调查是可行的,可以帮助项目确定需要关注的领域,并对具有模范专业精神的领域予以肯定。持续监测 LEP 以满足认证机构的要求,也可被视为一项重要的质量改进指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信