New Jersey Journal of Communication最新文献

{"title":"Cumulative subject index to the New Jersey journal of communication: volumes 1(1) ‐ 11(2) (spring 1993 ‐ fall 2003)","authors":"S. Francoeur, M. Radford, Gary P. Radford","doi":"10.1080/15456870309367450","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870309367450","url":null,"abstract":"ADVERTISING Ahmed, Niaz, Reflections of Cultural Values in Advertising: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Vol. 9, No. 2, Fall 2001, pp. 203-213. Alexander, Maty S. and William Petkanas, Reflections of Education: A Case Study of Educational Technology Advertisements. Vol. 6, No. 2, Fall 1998, pp. 185-198. Carveth, Rod. Communication Via Interactive Media: Communication in a New Key? Vol. 4, No. 1, Spring 1996, pp. 71-81. Gormly, Eric Kevin, Commercials on Campus: A Qualitative Study of Educators' Reactions to the Advertisements on Channel One. Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 1999, pp. 106-135. Jugenheimer, Donald W., Advertising on the Internet. Vol. 4, No. 2, Fall 1996, pp. 161-179. Leung, Louis and Or Ka Lee, The Effects of Male Celebrity Voice-Over and Gender on Product Brand Name Recall, Comprehension, and Purchase Intention. Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 1999, pp. 81-92. Maynard, Michael L., The Variability of Gender-Based Communication in Japanese Magazine Advertising. Vol. 3, No. 1, Spring 1995, pp. 40-57. Shah, Rani, The Role of Affective Reactions in Enhancing the Recall of Public Service Announcements. Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 1999, pp. 65-80. Stout, Daniel A., Dennis G. Martin, and Li Zhang, Changes in Consumption Values Reflected in Chinese Newspaper Advertising. Vol. 2, No. 2, Fall 1994, pp. 146-168.","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"77 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113943238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A new name, a new adventure","authors":"Gary P. Radford","doi":"10.1080/15456870309367442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870309367442","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"8 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122544164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Summation of the debate on the feasibility of a phenomenological theory of justice","authors":"Odysseus Makridis","doi":"10.1080/15456870309367448","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870309367448","url":null,"abstract":"Murray (2003a, in this issue) addresses some of the points raised by Makridis (2003) in response to Murray's earlier article entitled \"The dialogical prioritization of calls: Toward a communicative model of justice\" (Murray, 2003b). If anyone is eminently qualified to argue the case for a Levinasianphenomenological theory of justice, it must be he. Murray has deep knowledge of Levinas' phenomenology and is conversant both with the primary sources and with the growing bibliography on Levinas' work. My continuing reservations about the prospects of developing a Levinasian theory of justice should not, therefore, be taken to reflect on Murray's acumen or competence. If anything, it is fair to say that if Murray is stymied in his efforts, this is already a telling sign that a phenomenological theory of justice may be unobtainable. The deeper theoretical significance of this would be that, as many a prophet of post-modernism has gloated or lamented, one does indeed reach the dead end for normativity with the development of certain characteristically modern trends. One cannot have it both ways. Ivan Karazamov's grim aside (either there is a God, or everything is permitted) may sound at first like a false dichotomy but its inner core, which makes this utterance so effective, fulfils a curiously stringent methodological requirement: Unless preference-transcendent criteria are available to the moral agent (either on natural foundations or as rational decision making procedures) ethical demands cannot be defended. Phenomenology rejects objectivist claims; it also rejects theory-laden rationalisms of all kinds. What is left, then, to furnish phenomenology with normative grounds? How can phenomenology produce a normative theory of any kind? It is to Murray's credit that he has undertaken so difficult, as it is high-stakes, a task as to convince us that a phenomenological theory of justice (*1) is feasible. Levinasian phenomenology is radically opposed to theory. In fact, this stern opposition to theory, which it dismisses as a totalizing and intrinsically hegemonic expropriation of human spontaneity, has a moral pathos to it. Far from serving as a possible foundation for a normative theory, however, this pathos is consistently anti-foundationalist: it equally resists, or ought to resist, its own","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115531389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cumulative Author and title index to the New Jersey journal of communication: volumes 1(1) ‐ 11(2) (spring 1993 ‐ fall 2003)","authors":"M. Radford, Gary P. Radford","doi":"10.1080/15456870309367449","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870309367449","url":null,"abstract":"AHMED, NIAZ, Reflections of Cultural Values in Advertising: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Vol. 9. No. 2, Fall 2001, pp. 203-213. ALEXANDER, MARY S. and WILLIAM PETKANAS, Reflections of Education: A Case Study of Educational Technology Advertisements. Vol. 6, No. 2, Fall 1998, pp. 185-198. AMBADY, NALINI see Hecht, Marvin A. ANDERSON, JANICE W., The Role of the Marketplace Metaphor in Creating Gender Inequities. Vol. 6, No. 1, Spring 1998, pp. 41-58. ARLISS, LAURIE, Toward a Grounded Theory of Sibling Communication During Early Childhood. Vol. 5, No. 2, Fall 1997, pp. 178-201.","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122765637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Bridging the quality divide in state legislature websites: New Jersey leads by example","authors":"Paul Ferber, F. Foltz, R. Pugliese","doi":"10.1080/15456870309367446","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870309367446","url":null,"abstract":"The digital divide is not the only gap relating to the Internet. The Websites of state legislatures have demonstrated widespread differences in content and design so as to create a quality divide. This disparity potentially inhibits these sites from stimulating public participation. New Jersey, rated as the top site, serves as an example of best practices. Legislatures with poorer sites should adopt some of these practices so as to better develop the Internet as a public resource.","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124106229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Who wants to be a millionaire? How the press framed the role of the public in the dispute between time Warner cable and Disney's ABC network in may 2000","authors":"N. Kaneva, Edward Lenert","doi":"10.1080/15456870309367445","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870309367445","url":null,"abstract":"At midnight on May 1, 2000, Time Warner Cable dropped the signal of Disney's ABC network from its systems in seven major markets. The signal was unavailable for approximately 39 hours, affecting roughly 3.5 million subscribers. While lawyers and regulators pondered the retransmission consent provisions of the Cable Act of 1992 and the accompanying FCC rules, the press was called upon to report and interpret these issues to the public. This paper examines the frames present in journalistic accounts triggered by the loss of ABC's signal in five mass newspapers and five trade publications. Specifically, the paper addresses the question: How did the press portray the role of the public in relation to the Time Warner ‐ Disney dispute? The data presented in the paper strongly suggest that the press failed to develop a cogent discussion of the underlying policy issues in a way useful to the public. The analysis of the press coverage concludes that the public was framed as passive and was largely excluded from the policy debate around the dispute.","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126363726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The paradox of justice: Notes on the infinite, relative call","authors":"Jeffrey W. Murray","doi":"10.1080/15456870309367447","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870309367447","url":null,"abstract":"Odysseus Makridis's (2003) essay, \"Is a Levinasian Theory of Justice Possible: A Response to Murray,\" offers a sustained and compelling challenge to my hypothesization of a phenomenology of justice (Murray, 2003a). Makridis's analysis smartly begins by breaking down the question of whether a theory of justice is possible into several distinct preliminary questions and issues. Among these many points of discussion are the following four important questions, reviewed here in logical order. Makridis wonders first if a phenomenology of ethics is possible. If it is, he wonders second if a theory of ethics is subsequently possible. Makridis asks third if a phenomenology of justice is possible. If it is, he asks fourth if a theory of justice is subsequently possible. In short, Makridis (2003) probes the central presumption of my essay (Murray, 2003a) far more deeply than I had. Acquittingly, my essay's goal was to explore the communicative implications of a phenomenology of justice rather than prove its existence. In any case, the more fundamental question of whether a phenomenology of justice is even possible requires more careful attention. The following essay, then, endeavors to present a stronger and more thorough case for both a phenomenology of justice and, subsequently, a theory of justice. In so doing, it will address in turn the four aforementioned questions.","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127477113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Have new media editors abandoned the old media ideals? The journalistic values of online newspaper editors","authors":"Thomas J. Johnson, J. D. Kelly","doi":"10.1080/15456870309367443","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870309367443","url":null,"abstract":"This study employed an online survey of 187 editors of online versions of traditional newspapers to investigate their journalistic values. It examined whether those values were predicted by age, gender, education, major, years of journalism experience, circulation of the traditional newspaper, political interest and political ideology, and the degree to which online newspaper editors believe they control the content of their Web site. The findings suggest that the values of online newspaper editors more closely mirrored traditional newspaper journalists than online journalists in terms of their news values. As in previous studies, few variables predicted news values. None predicted the disseminator/investigative value, although the two political measures, political interest and ideology, did explain adversarial attitudes even after controlling for the demographics, experience levels, and newspaper size. Liberals and those most politically interested were more likely to believe in an adversarial role for the press.","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133430045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The impact of role‐congruency and photo presence on the processing of news stories about Hillary Clinton","authors":"Andrew L. Mendelson, E. Thorson","doi":"10.1080/15456870309367444","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870309367444","url":null,"abstract":"An experiment was conducted to examine the effects of news photo presence and role‐congruency in news stories of Hillary Clinton on reader interest and memory. In the photos and stories, Clinton was either portrayed as a wife, or as a professional person. Results indicate readers processed the photos at least sufficiently to rate them as fitting with the story or not. Further, this study showed that mere presence of a photo meant the story would be ranked as more interesting, but photo presence and role‐congruency with the story did not affect recall of story ideas. Results of this study therefore, suggest typical news photos of a political actor/public figure serve as attention‐getting devices, but are not used as an important informational aid.","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122179551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Media‐constructed anti‐intellectualism: The portrayal of experts in popular US television talk shows","authors":"L. Holderman","doi":"10.1080/15456870309367437","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870309367437","url":null,"abstract":"While intelligence is generally regarded as valuable, some important contexts portray intelligence in a negative light. This study examines the popular portrayal of intellectual expertise through a content analysis of 200 of the 10 top‐rated popular US television talk shows. Results showed that experts in this sample were typically brought on late in the program, allotted little speaking time, placed among non‐experts, frequently interrupted, and sometimes disagreed with or challenged. In addition, “intellectual experts” were treated more negatively than “non‐intellectual” experts. These and similar data suggest a “leveling” of experts on television talk shows in that they seem to be treated no differently than non‐expert guests. Grounded in the theory of Cultivation, these findings indicate that television talk shows contribute to social‐order maintenance by weakening the status of intelligence through their treatment of experts.","PeriodicalId":113832,"journal":{"name":"New Jersey Journal of Communication","volume":"119 24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133192578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}