发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Theoretical medicine and bioethics最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Correction: Flourishing at the end of life. 更正：生命终结时的繁荣。
Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-024-09691-1
Xavier Symons, John Rhee, Anthony Tanous, Tracy Balboni, Tyler J VanderWeele
{"title":"Correction: Flourishing at the end of life.","authors":"Xavier Symons, John Rhee, Anthony Tanous, Tracy Balboni, Tyler J VanderWeele","doi":"10.1007/s11017-024-09691-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-024-09691-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On instrumentality and second-order effects: revisiting anti-natalism and animal farming. 论工具性和二阶效应：重新审视反出生论和动物养殖。
Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-024-09690-2
Niñoval F Pacaol, Kielle Vincent J Delima, Jhon Russel B Ventura, Julius Lawrence J Curbilla, Rohn Fredrick P Casas, Bernel G Moquia, Samantha Mae N Mendoza, Mark Francis E Habagat, Ai Mei Niña G Cabillan, Frenz Alrie P Terio
{"title":"On instrumentality and second-order effects: revisiting anti-natalism and animal farming.","authors":"Niñoval F Pacaol, Kielle Vincent J Delima, Jhon Russel B Ventura, Julius Lawrence J Curbilla, Rohn Fredrick P Casas, Bernel G Moquia, Samantha Mae N Mendoza, Mark Francis E Habagat, Ai Mei Niña G Cabillan, Frenz Alrie P Terio","doi":"10.1007/s11017-024-09690-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11017-024-09690-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Defending a choice-based system for the determination of death. 为基于选择的死亡判定系统辩护。
Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-024-09689-9
William Choi
{"title":"Defending a choice-based system for the determination of death.","authors":"William Choi","doi":"10.1007/s11017-024-09689-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-024-09689-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142383138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Baruch Brody and the principle of justifiable homicide. 巴鲁克-布罗迪与正当杀人原则。
Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-17 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-024-09678-y
Timothy Furlan
{"title":"Baruch Brody and the principle of justifiable homicide.","authors":"Timothy Furlan","doi":"10.1007/s11017-024-09678-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11017-024-09678-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a series of papers in the early 1970s and in his important book Abortion and the Sanctity of Human Life (1975), Baruch Brody offered what remains to this day one of the most philosophically rigorous contributions to the debate concerning the morality of abortion and the ethics of homicide more generally. In this paper I would like to critically examine Brody's argument that abortion is sometimes justifiable in some cases even when (1) one cannot claim self-defense, or (2) diminished responsibility, and (3) the abortion is a 'killing' rather than a 'not saving.' This justification, I argue, is limited to certain cases in which the life of the mother is at stake. The cautious principle which he finally formulates merits serious attention and consideration. While I find a great deal of value in Brody's discussion, I will argue that there are several difficulties with the principle of justifiable homicide he constructs. Accordingly, I will further amend and supplement his final version by offering my own alternative principle.</p>","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141997164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The self-fulfilling prophecy in medicine. 医学中的自我实现预言。
Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-024-09677-z
Mayli Mertens
{"title":"The self-fulfilling prophecy in medicine.","authors":"Mayli Mertens","doi":"10.1007/s11017-024-09677-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11017-024-09677-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article first describes the mechanism of any self-fulfilling prophecy through discussion of its four conditions: credibility, employment, employment sensitivity, and realization. Each condition is illustrated with examples specific to the medical context. The descriptive account ends with the definition of self-fulfilling prophecy and an expansion on collective self-fulfilling prophecies. Second, the normative account then discusses the moral relevance of self-fulfilling prophecies in medicine. A self-fulfilling prophecy is typically considered problematic when the prediction itself changes the predicted outcome to match the prediction (transformative self-fulfillment). I argue that also self-fulfilling prophecies that do not change the outcome but change the ways in which the outcome was realized (operative self-fulfillment), have significant ethical and epistemic ramifications. Because it is difficult to distinguish, retrospectively, between a transformative and an operative self-fulfilling prophecy, and thus between a false or true positive, it becomes equally difficult to catch mistakes. Moreover, since the prediction necessarily turns out true, there is never an error signal warning that a mistake might have been made. On the contrary, accuracy is seen as the standard for quality assurance. As such, self-fulfilling prophecies inhibit our ability to learn, inviting repetition and exacerbation of mistakes. With the rise of automated diagnostic and prognostic procedures and the increased use of machine learning and artificial intelligence for the development of predictive algorithms, attention to self-fulfilling feedback loops is especially warranted. This account of self-fulfilling prophecies is practically relevant for medical research and clinical practice. With it, researchers and practitioners can detect and analyze potential self-fulfilling mechanisms in any medical case and take responsibility for their ethical and epistemic implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358258/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141908764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Take five? A coherentist argument why medical AI does not require a new ethical principle. 五选一？连贯主义论证为什么医学人工智能不需要新的伦理原则。
Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-08 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-024-09676-0
Seppe Segers, Michiel De Proost
{"title":"Take five? A coherentist argument why medical AI does not require a new ethical principle.","authors":"Seppe Segers, Michiel De Proost","doi":"10.1007/s11017-024-09676-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11017-024-09676-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the growing application of machine learning models in medicine, principlist bioethics has been put forward as needing revision. This paper reflects on the dominant trope in AI ethics to include a new 'principle of explicability' alongside the traditional four principles of bioethics that make up the theory of principlism. It specifically suggests that these four principles are sufficient and challenges the relevance of explicability as a separate ethical principle by emphasizing the coherentist affinity of principlism. We argue that, through specification, the properties of explicability are already covered by the four bioethical principles. The paper finishes by anticipating an objection that coherent principles could not facilitate technology induced change and are not well-suited to tackle moral differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141294061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Flourishing at the end of life. 在生命的尽头绽放光彩
Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-024-09679-x
Xavier Symons, John Rhee, Anthony Tanous, Tracy Balboni, Tyler J VanderWeele
{"title":"Flourishing at the end of life.","authors":"Xavier Symons, John Rhee, Anthony Tanous, Tracy Balboni, Tyler J VanderWeele","doi":"10.1007/s11017-024-09679-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11017-024-09679-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Flourishing is an increasingly common construct employed in the study of human wellbeing. But its appropriateness as a framework of wellbeing at certain stages of life is contested. In this paper, we consider to what extent it is possible for someone to flourish at the end of life. People with terminal illness often experience significant and protracted pain and suffering especially when they opt for treatments that prolong life. Certain aspects of human goods, however, that are plausibly constitutive of flourishing-such as meaning and purpose, deep personal relationships, and character and virtue-can be uniquely realised when life is ending. We argue that there is a qualified sense in which one can flourish at the end of life but that one must make important modifications to the criteria implicit in conventional conceptions of flourishing. We close with a discussion of the empirical assessment of wellbeing at the end of life and explore the possibility of introducing a flourishing measure in palliative care practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358345/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to "The conceptual Injustice of the brain death standard". 回应 "脑死亡标准在概念上的不公正"。
Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-024-09686-y
Grigory Ostrovskiy
{"title":"Response to \"The conceptual Injustice of the brain death standard\".","authors":"Grigory Ostrovskiy","doi":"10.1007/s11017-024-09686-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-024-09686-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142335626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biting the bullet on ethical veganism, antinatalism, and the demands of morality. 咬牙坚持伦理素食主义、反生育主义和道德要求。
Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-024-09687-x
Joona Räsänen
{"title":"Biting the bullet on ethical veganism, antinatalism, and the demands of morality.","authors":"Joona Räsänen","doi":"10.1007/s11017-024-09687-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-024-09687-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142335625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epicureanism and euthanasia. 伊壁鸠鲁主义与安乐死
Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2024-09-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-024-09684-0
Jeremy W Skrzypek
{"title":"Epicureanism and euthanasia.","authors":"Jeremy W Skrzypek","doi":"10.1007/s11017-024-09684-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-024-09684-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>If Epicurean arguments for the harmlessness of death are successful, then they also successfully undermine a common justification for physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia, and the termination of hopeless pregnancies that I call the 'Mercy Intuition', according to which, by ending the life of a suffering loved one for whom there is little to no chance of recovery, one is relieving that person of her suffering, and thus providing a great benefit to her. For, if death is not a harm to the person who dies, then it cannot be a benefit to her either, even in cases of intense and prolonged suffering. Along these lines, in this paper, I defend the claim that death cannot provide a benefit to those who are suffering. I begin by highlighting the Epicurean foundations of the argument, focusing on three main Epicurean arguments for the harmlessness of death and their no-benefit analogues. I then move on to explore several important limitations of the argument, which make available a number of strategies for avoiding its conclusion. Along the way, I respond to each of these avoidance strategies. I conclude that even granting several of its limitations, the argument still poses a serious challenge to the Mercy Intuition.</p>","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142305340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信