Orthorexia nervosa: nosographic category or not?

Theoretical medicine and bioethics Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1007/s11017-025-09722-5
Fabio Bacchini, Elena Bossini
{"title":"Orthorexia nervosa: nosographic category or not?","authors":"Fabio Bacchini, Elena Bossini","doi":"10.1007/s11017-025-09722-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orthorexia nervosa is defined as an exaggerated and obsessive fixation on healthy eating. In recent years, there has been growing debate over whether orthorexia nervosa should be considered a new psychiatric disorder. This paper discusses the conceptual issues that emerge from the attempt to identify the diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa as opposed to non-pathological cases of healthy eating or 'healthy orthorexia'. The analysis focuses on two main strategies that have been proposed in the literature: using physical impairment (malnutrition) and having recourse to the presence of psychological and psychosocial distress. The first strategy requires fundamental changes in the conceptualization of orthorexia nervosa, while the second risks unacceptably pathologizing uncommon lifestyles devoted to pursuing one specific activity, interest, or plan. Thus, substantial problems undermine the possibility of considering orthorexia nervosa, as it currently stands, as a plausible nosographic category. By proposing an analogy with eco-anxiety, the paper lastly shows that, if one accepts the widespread conceptualization of orthorexia nervosa, this behavior is better interpreted as an adaptive response than as a form of mental disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":94251,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"377-397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical medicine and bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-025-09722-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orthorexia nervosa is defined as an exaggerated and obsessive fixation on healthy eating. In recent years, there has been growing debate over whether orthorexia nervosa should be considered a new psychiatric disorder. This paper discusses the conceptual issues that emerge from the attempt to identify the diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa as opposed to non-pathological cases of healthy eating or 'healthy orthorexia'. The analysis focuses on two main strategies that have been proposed in the literature: using physical impairment (malnutrition) and having recourse to the presence of psychological and psychosocial distress. The first strategy requires fundamental changes in the conceptualization of orthorexia nervosa, while the second risks unacceptably pathologizing uncommon lifestyles devoted to pursuing one specific activity, interest, or plan. Thus, substantial problems undermine the possibility of considering orthorexia nervosa, as it currently stands, as a plausible nosographic category. By proposing an analogy with eco-anxiety, the paper lastly shows that, if one accepts the widespread conceptualization of orthorexia nervosa, this behavior is better interpreted as an adaptive response than as a form of mental disorder.

神经性厌食症:是否属于医院分类?
神经性厌食症被定义为对健康饮食的夸张和强迫性的迷恋。近年来,关于神经性厌食症是否应该被视为一种新的精神疾病的争论越来越多。本文讨论了从试图确定神经性厌食症的诊断标准中出现的概念问题,而不是健康饮食或“健康厌食症”的非病理性病例。分析的重点是文献中提出的两种主要策略:利用身体缺陷(营养不良)和求助于心理和社会心理困扰的存在。第一种策略需要从根本上改变神经性厌食症的概念,而第二种策略则有可能将不寻常的生活方式病态化,献身于追求一种特定的活动、兴趣或计划。因此,实质性的问题削弱了考虑神经性厌食症的可能性,正如它目前所代表的那样,作为一个合理的医院分类。通过提出与生态焦虑的类比,论文最后表明,如果一个人接受神经性厌食症的广泛概念,这种行为最好被解释为一种适应性反应,而不是一种精神障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信