发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Asian journal of philosophy最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Trustworthy AI: responses to commentators
Asian journal of philosophy Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI: 10.1007/s44204-024-00229-9
Christoph Kelp, Mona Simion
{"title":"Trustworthy AI: responses to commentators","authors":"Christoph Kelp,&nbsp;Mona Simion","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00229-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s44204-024-00229-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In ‘Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence’, we develop a novel account of how it is that AI can be trustworthy and what it takes for an AI to be trustworthy. In this paper, we respond to a suite of recent comments on this account, due to J. Adam Carter, Dong-yong Choi, Rune Nyrup, and Fei Song. We would like to thank all four for their thoughtful engagement with our work, as well as the Asian Journal of Philosophy for publishing the symposium on our paper. The game plan for the paper is as follows. We will first briefly rehearse the account and then respond to comments in turn.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-024-00229-9.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142875235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On the rationality of the iron rule from an evolutionary game perspective
Asian journal of philosophy Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI: 10.1007/s44204-024-00233-z
Qiaoying Lu
{"title":"On the rationality of the iron rule from an evolutionary game perspective","authors":"Qiaoying Lu","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00233-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s44204-024-00233-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In <i>The Knowledge Machine</i>, Michael Strevens challenges traditional views of the scientific method and defends the “iron rule of explanation.” This commentary introduces an evolutionary game perspective to explore the emergence and sustainability of the iron rule. Modeling the dynamics of theory-competing strategies in a population of theorists demonstrates that whether following the iron rule is rational depends on the frequency of iron-rule players one encounters. The study suggests that the social constraints of localized networks for iron-rule followers are critical factors in transitioning from a philosophical-dispute equilibrium to a scientific-dispute equilibrium.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142845021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A cut-free modal theory of consequence 无切割模态后果理论
Asian journal of philosophy Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI: 10.1007/s44204-024-00220-4
Edson Bezerra
{"title":"A cut-free modal theory of consequence","authors":"Edson Bezerra","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00220-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s44204-024-00220-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The cut-free validity theory <span>(textsf{STV})</span> proposed by Barrio, Rosenblatt, and Tajer suffers from incompleteness with respect to its object language validity predicate. The validity predicate of <span>(textsf{STV})</span> fails in validating some valid inferences of its underlying logic, the Strict Tolerant logic <span>(textsf{ST})</span>. In this paper, we will present the non-normal modal logic <span>(textsf{ST}^{Box Diamond })</span> whose modalities <span>(Box )</span> and <span>(Diamond )</span> capture the tautologies/valid inferences and the consistent formulas of the logic <span>(textsf{ST})</span>, respectively. We show that <span>(textsf{ST}^{Box Diamond })</span> does not trivialize when extended with self-referential devices. We also show that such a solution poses a dilemma. If we extend <span>(textsf{ST}^{Box Diamond })</span> in such a way that it allows iterated modal formulas among its theorems, then the resulting interpretation of <span>(Box )</span> as validity implies that metametainferences of <span>(textsf{ST})</span> behave like classical logic. On the other hand, if we allow these modalities to receive intermediate truth values, we obtain formulas incompatible with the proposed reading of <span>(Box )</span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142845022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disagreement, retraction, and the importance of perspective
Asian journal of philosophy Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI: 10.1007/s44204-024-00219-x
Dan Zeman
{"title":"Disagreement, retraction, and the importance of perspective","authors":"Dan Zeman","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00219-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s44204-024-00219-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the semantic debate about perspectival expressions—predicates of taste, aesthetic and moral terms, epistemic modals, etc.—intuitions about armchair scenarios (e.g., disagreement, retraction) have played a crucial role. More recently, various experimental studies have been conducted, both in relation to disagreement (e.g., Cova, 2012; Foushee and Srinivasan, 2017; Solt, 2018) and retraction (e.g., Knobe and Yalcin, 2014; Khoo, 2018; Beddor and Egan, 2018; Dinges and Zakkou, 2020; Kneer 2021; 2022; Almagro, Bordonaba Plou, and Villanueva, 2023; Marques, 2024), with the aim of establishing a more solid foundation for semantic theorizing. Both these types of data have been used to argue for or against certain views (e.g., contextualism, relativism). In this talk, I discern a common thread in the use of these data and argue for two claims: (i) which perspective is adopted by those judging the armchair scenarios put forward and by the participants in experimental studies crucially matters for the viability of the intended results; (ii) failure to properly attend to this puts recent experimental work at risk. Finally, I consider the case of cross-linguistic disagreement and retraction and assess their importance for the semantic debate about perspectival expressions, as well as for the claim that perspective matters in putting forward the data on which decisions about the right semantic view are made.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-024-00219-x.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142798373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Linguistic Othering and epistemic injustice in philosophy
Asian journal of philosophy Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI: 10.1007/s44204-024-00223-1
Amandine Catala
{"title":"Linguistic Othering and epistemic injustice in philosophy","authors":"Amandine Catala","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00223-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s44204-024-00223-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this symposium piece, I follow Lu-Adler’s lead in scrutinizing the connections between linguistic Othering and prevailing yet exclusionary academic practices of knowledge production, focusing on linguistic epistemic injustice in academia. Specifically, I suggest that in a global academic context marked by sharp inequalities of opportunity due inter alia to linguistic Othering, language often operates as a threefold criterion for knowledge validation and hence for the allocation of credibility and intelligibility. I submit that linguistic selection (i.e., which language is used for knowledge production and transmission), linguistic form (i.e., the way a given language is spoken or written), and linguistic content (i.e., the words or concepts a given language offers and uses to describe and make sense of the world) are all ways in which language can be used to validate or invalidate processes of knowledge production and thereby result in unjust allocations of credibility and intelligibility. I argue that language can thus sometimes function as what I have called elsewhere a “meta-epistemic filter,” which creates an unjust credibility and intelligibility economy by predetermining in a structurally biased way what kinds of epistemic contributions are (made) available or count as admissible or inadmissible in the first place. I close by exploring how we might foster greater linguistic epistemic justice in academia by cultivating meta-linguistic awareness and how this might be facilitated by attending to the role that experiential (as opposed to merely propositional) knowledge might play.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142789308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Silencing and world-making: commentary on Lu-Adler’s “Kant on Public Reason and the Linguistic Other”
Asian journal of philosophy Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI: 10.1007/s44204-024-00224-0
Damian Melamedoff-Vosters
{"title":"Silencing and world-making: commentary on Lu-Adler’s “Kant on Public Reason and the Linguistic Other”","authors":"Damian Melamedoff-Vosters","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00224-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s44204-024-00224-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this response to Lu-Adler’s article, I focus on her claim that Kant’s positionality gives his theorizing “ideology-forming” and “world-making” power. I explore a way of understanding this idea through speech act theory, and in particular the way in which speech act theory interacts with the phenomenon of silencing. I propose two ways in which Kant’s positionality could give him world-making power. First, Kant (and other scholars) can be in a position of performing the kinds of speech acts that themselves constitute the creation of certain forms of oppression, much in the way in which a legislator can create an oppressive law simply by proclaiming it to be so. Second, Kant can be in a position of creating an illocutionary disabling effect, namely a situation in which Chinese scholars become unable to perform the speech act of assertion in academic contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142778139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction to Current Themes in Epistemology: Asian Epistemology Network
Asian journal of philosophy Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1007/s44204-024-00218-y
Davide Fassio, Weng Hong Tang, Ru Ye
{"title":"Introduction to Current Themes in Epistemology: Asian Epistemology Network","authors":"Davide Fassio,&nbsp;Weng Hong Tang,&nbsp;Ru Ye","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00218-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s44204-024-00218-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This is an introduction to the Topical Collection <i>Current Themes in Epistemology: Asian Epistemology Network</i>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142757946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
More love troubles: Emma Gordon on biomedical enhancements and love relationships 更多爱情烦恼艾玛-戈登谈生物医学增强和爱情关系
Asian journal of philosophy Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI: 10.1007/s44204-024-00222-2
Sven Nyholm
{"title":"More love troubles: Emma Gordon on biomedical enhancements and love relationships","authors":"Sven Nyholm","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00222-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s44204-024-00222-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In my contribution to this book symposium on Emma Gordon’s book <i>Human Enhancement and Well-Being</i>, I discuss and respond to Gordon’s extensive discussion and criticisms of a skeptical argument regarding the desirability of love enhancements that I presented in a 2015 paper. I start by first explaining the overall project of Gordon’s book, make a general comment about her overall approach (which I am broadly sympathetic with), and then proceed to a detailed discussion of Gordon’s critical engagement with my 2015 argument. I defend my argument against Gordon’s interesting criticisms and argue that Gordon has not defused my skeptical challenge to the desirability of love enhancements, but I also end by identifying key points of agreement between me and Gordon. Specific topics discussed include the distinction between ways of loving and causes of loving, the value of ways of loving and the value of the causes of loving, and whether or not the ideal of robust love attachments can be seen as compatible attachments causally dependent on love enhancements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-024-00222-2.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142737096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Explaining Phenomenal Explanationism: a précis of Appearance & Explanation: Phenomenal Explanationism in Epistemology 解释现象解释论：《表象与解释》简述：认识论中的现象解释学
Asian journal of philosophy Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.1007/s44204-024-00212-4
Kevin McCain, Luca Moretti
{"title":"Explaining Phenomenal Explanationism: a précis of Appearance & Explanation: Phenomenal Explanationism in Epistemology","authors":"Kevin McCain,&nbsp;Luca Moretti","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00212-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s44204-024-00212-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article, we offer a précis of <i>Appearance &amp; Explanation: Phenomenal Explanationism in Epistemology</i>. We explain the central features of our theory of epistemic justification, Phenomenal Explanationism (PE). Further, we describe how PE applies to justification of various kinds and how it solves problems that plague its closest rival, Phenomenal Conservatism (PC).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-024-00212-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142714241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Linguistic diversity, global epistemic injustice, and Kantian public reason: comments on Lu-Adler on Kant’s linguistic Orientalism 语言多样性、全球认识论不公正与康德的公共理性：对卢-阿德勒论康德的语言东方学的评论
Asian journal of philosophy Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1007/s44204-024-00215-1
Yao Lin
{"title":"Linguistic diversity, global epistemic injustice, and Kantian public reason: comments on Lu-Adler on Kant’s linguistic Orientalism","authors":"Yao Lin","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00215-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s44204-024-00215-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While I find Huaping Lu-Adler’s excavation of Kant’s long-overlooked linguistic Orientalism both enlightening and thought-provoking, I disagree with her diagnosis of its theoretical and practical relevance. On the one hand, while I agree that Kant’s positionality renders all his writings and teachings presumptively impactful, there is reason to doubt that his peculiar construction of the linguistic Oriental Other had much actual impact on his disciples. On the other hand, while I agree that the Kantian ideal of public reason is inapt for rectifying the linguistic-epistemic injustices of global knowledge production, I disagree on why it is so. In particular, I argue for a shift in theoretical and practical focuses, from linguistic biases and prejudices, to the structural epistemic constraints of linguistic diversity, as well as to other political-structural conditions shaping global knowledge production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142679674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信