Community science最新文献

{"title":"Mahi Tahi - Rū Whenua: Tangata Whenua & Kairangahau Pūtaiao. Reflective Learnings on Partnering With Indigenous Māori Communities in Field-Based Scientific Research","authors":"Eleanor R. H. Mestel,&nbsp;Bubs Smith,&nbsp;Ngāti Tūwharetoa,&nbsp;Kelvin Tapuke,&nbsp;Te Atiawa, Ngati Tama, Ngati Mutunga, Ngai Tai, Ngai Tai ki Tamaki, Ngati Porou, Te Whanaua-a-Apanui, Te Aitanga-a-Mahaki, Ngai Tuhoe, Te Whakatohea, Ngai Tahu, Ngati Maniapoto, Ngati Raukawa, Toa Rangatira,&nbsp;Finnigan Illsley-Kemp,&nbsp;Lucy Kaiser,&nbsp;Kāi Tahu, Kāti Māmoe, Waitaha,&nbsp;Ian Connon,&nbsp;David Johnston,&nbsp;Colin J. N. Wilson,&nbsp;Graham Leonard,&nbsp;Mary Anne T. Clive,&nbsp;Martha K. Savage","doi":"10.1029/2023CSJ000066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023CSJ000066","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Between 2018 and 2022, representatives of local Indigenous Māori communities and emergency management worked in partnership with physical and social scientists during the planning, deployment, and management of a temporary seismometer network around Taupō volcano. This deployment formed part of the Eruption or Catastrophe: Learning to Implement Preparedness for future Supervolcano Eruptions (ECLIPSE) project designed to increase understanding of the large caldera volcanoes in the central North Island of Aotearoa New Zealand. Here we critically reflect on this co-production approach to geophysical network deployment and associated volcano research. We identified a central theme of the creating and holding of space for researchers and communities to engage in the activities through adopting a co-production approach, that embeds representatives of local Iwi (tribal groups) Te Arawa and Ngāti Tūwharetoa as key researchers within a broad project team. We worked to ensure we were respecting communities' time, protocols, and decisions; and to exchange knowledge about the research and results with landowners, community leaders, schools, and young people. Time spent kanohi ki te kanohi (face-to-face) built relationships and trust within and outside the research team that have lasted beyond the scope of the ECLIPSE program. We detail our experiences in the hope of demonstrating that this approach to research is a possible and desirable path for future fieldwork-based research.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023CSJ000066","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Factors in and Perspectives of Achieving Co-Production of Knowledge With Arctic Indigenous Peoples","authors":"M. H. C. Rudolf,&nbsp;S. F. Trainor,&nbsp;J. O'Connor,&nbsp;E. Figus,&nbsp;R. Hum","doi":"10.1029/2023CSJ000074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023CSJ000074","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Co-production of knowledge (CPK) is a process of bringing together diverse perspectives from researchers, agency, and community partners to achieve a shared research goal. The main objective of this article is to provide tools for achieving CPK in research projects, especially with Alaska Native and Arctic Indigenous communities. Team members need to understand their positionality and be aware of assumptions and biases to come to jointly agreed upon project priorities. To assist researchers in reflecting on their positionality, we present research paradigm dispositions from commonly trained methodologies and academic norms. Differences across the dispositions are highlighted in decision-making, success metrics, evaluation, and validation of outputs. Factors of Success were synthesized from existing literature on CPK, boundary spanning, the science of team science, convergence, Indigenous methodologies, and best practices to understand the CPK process. These Factors of Success are presented in a typical project life cycle logic model, categorized into inputs, process, and outcomes. Given the limited time and resources of research projects and activities, some factors will be given stronger emphasis over others. This article provides tools for transparent communication between researchers and community or agency partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023CSJ000074","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sharing Our Story to Build Our Future: A Case Study of Evaluating a Partnership for Co-Produced Research in Southeast Alaska","authors":"E. Figus,&nbsp;S. Friday,&nbsp;J. O’Connor,&nbsp;J. Jeet Koot Saak McDonald,&nbsp;C. James,&nbsp;S. F. Trainor,&nbsp;M. H. C. Rudolf,&nbsp;N. O’Connor","doi":"10.1029/2023CSJ000073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023CSJ000073","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the value of incorporating evaluation into the process of co-produced research in pursuit of climate services. We aim to spur interest in and expand the use of evaluation throughout the climate change and climate services scientific community, whether or not evaluation is a formally required component of funding. We use a case study from Southeast Alaska of the Ellam Yua co-production model implemented among a research center at a large public university and three leadership entities in a small remote community with a majority Alaska Native population. We describe our experiences with evaluation and share what we learned through the process of evaluation, specifically that local workforce development and healing from trauma were significant aspects of project success. This case study shows how important evaluation is for documenting, analyzing, and planning for multiple definitions of success and successfully implementing equitably co-produced research. It also underscores the significance of expanding typical conceptions of climate services to include a more holistic view of using Indigenous priorities and values to support local capacity-building and psychological benefits. Building generalized capacities locally to respond to climate-related stressors was a key part of climate services for our team. Only through Indigenous evaluation did the Kake Climate Partnership partners realize the full transformative potential of the Ellam Yua co-produced research process–to produce climate services and to uncover new understandings of what climate services can be for communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023CSJ000073","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Actionable Science for Small Island Communities: Wind Velocity and Sea-Level Rise Enhance Tidal Flooding on Little Cumberland Island, Georgia","authors":"C. Bertram,&nbsp;C. A. Brown,&nbsp;E. Herrera,&nbsp;S. Lewis,&nbsp;R. L. McLachlan","doi":"10.1029/2023CSJ000058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023CSJ000058","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Small island communities are among the first and hardest impacted by sea-level rise, though climate initiatives often focus on more heavily populated and economically productive coastal cities. Furthermore, most climate-impact studies focus on regional scales that may be less applicable to small islands with locally unique morphodynamics. Little Cumberland Island, Georgia, located in southeastern USA, is one example of an often-overlooked small island community. The island is minimally developed; a single dock and dirt roads connect ∼40 homes. Residents report that tidal flooding of low-elevation roads has increased in frequency and magnitude over remembered history and is a primary concern for the longevity of island infrastructure. However, without site-specific flooding predictions, they are unsure how or when to develop the roads. Through community science, this study (a) quantified the impact of wind velocity on tidal flooding, (b) predicted future flooding due to sea-level rise, and (c) provided actionable results and advice to island residents. Superimposing predicted sea-level rise onto observed tidal elevations suggests that the frequency of high-tide flood events which inundate roads by at least 15 cm may nearly double by 2030 and nearly triple by 2040. We advise residents to develop flood-resilient elevated roads within the next decade. This community-driven project involved local knowledge, collective action, and social learning with external and internal expertise, though communal agreement on governance for resilient development would benefit from an alignment of conservation values and an extended period of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023CSJ000058","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143761907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Thank You to Our 2024 Peer Reviewers","authors":"Julia K. Parrish,&nbsp;Kathryn Semmens,&nbsp;Claire Beveridge,&nbsp;Gillian Bowser,&nbsp;Muki Haklay,&nbsp;Rajul Pandya,&nbsp;Jean J. Schensul","doi":"10.1029/2025CSJ000139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2025CSJ000139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Community Science</i> is an experiment. The premise is that centering on a broad range of disciplinary, and interdisciplinary, science called for, created, and conducted by teams of place-based community residents and professional scientists will positively push the boundaries of what we understand as science, from discoveries to solutions. In this pursuit, we define science broadly: natural science, both physical and living; social science; health science; and ingrained ways of knowing that have been emerging and evolving since time immemorial within Indigenous cultures. Community is similarly a term that signifies a wide range of publics engaged in a myriad of ways; from those who may engage in only a single activity, to those who are formative to the work, including those who span the boundaries between the worlds describing community and science. Just as we seek those on the creative edge as authors, we depend on those with deep experience in both the scientific discipline and the community, whatever form it may take, to serve as peer reviewers. Part of our publication experiment is to step back and ask the questions: who are “peers?” Can we expand the approachability and usefulness of published work beyond traditional scientific professionalism and disciplinary boundaries through thoughtful selection of reviewers who are more, and perhaps different, than the degree-credentialed professionals journal editors have traditionally turned to? And will these peers and near-peers have the ability to set aside time from their own work to bring community science to the forefront and participate in patient, positive, thoughtful reviews?</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025CSJ000139","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143689580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Integrating Global Comparability and National Specificity in Agricultural Sustainability Indicators Through Stakeholder-Science Co-Evaluation in Austria","authors":"C. Folberth,&nbsp;F. Sinabell,&nbsp;T. Schinko,&nbsp;S. Hanger-Kopp,&nbsp;S. Lappöhn,&nbsp;H. Mitter,&nbsp;T. Sandén,&nbsp;E. Süssenbacher","doi":"10.1029/2024CSJ000092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024CSJ000092","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agriculture is central to sustainable development both from provisioning and pressure perspectives. It is hence imperative to measure its diverse outcomes, for which various global indicator systems have been developed. Yet, these come with trade-offs, for example, between comparability among countries versus specificity to national context. This poses the question how relevant generic indicators are for national stakeholders and how specific information requirements can be integrated within a globally comparable assessment. Herein, we present the co-evaluation of an existing system of global agricultural sustainability indicators with national stakeholders from agricultural practice, research and education, public administration, private sector, and NGOs in Austria, representing an expert community. Focusing on the relevance of the indicators and the requirements for complementary metrics, we found that particularly social themes and related indicators were highly specific to the national context, followed by economic and environmental aspects. Co-interpretation of selected indicator trajectories showed that drivers and interactions were highly complex and may change over time, emphasizing also the importance of complementary contextual information. Yet, availability of data to measure indicators proposed by stakeholders remains a key limitation to the adaptation of the indicator system. We outline two options for improving the relevance of the global indicator system: (a) substituting less relevant indicators or (b) introducing a second tier covering regionally important aspects. To explore which of the two options is most appropriate across geographies and whether unified approaches to such a regionalization are indeed feasible, we propose to include the co-creation of regionalized indicator frameworks in future iterations across agriculturally diverse countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024CSJ000092","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143595045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Building Relationships for Meaningful Co-Created Indigenous Climate Education","authors":"B. Hanson,&nbsp;R. McCann,&nbsp;D. Smiley,&nbsp;S. Hinck,&nbsp;A. R. Archie,&nbsp;N. Butler","doi":"10.1029/2023CSJ000054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023CSJ000054","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This project involved a multicultural team collaboratively co-creating a climate change module by and for Indigenous people. Embracing the framework of cultural humility, we recognized the bidirectional learning inherent in the project and its role in mitigating power dynamics within the team. This endeavor underscored the significance of transparency, effective communication, respect, reciprocity, trust building, and sensitivity to cultural contexts. Our findings emphasized the need for locally grounded programs that echo local traditional wisdom. We discovered that fostering an environment conducive to active listening and patience is pivotal in establishing a secure space. Our research affirms the equal validity and importance of both Western and Traditional knowledge (TK) systems. Our findings revealed that using a premade university-designed climate change curriculum wasn't effective for Indigenous participants in this study. Instead, we co-created a bottom-up menu-style approach that could be tailored to the instructor's preference and program capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023CSJ000054","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143581494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"“They Say the Water Is Perfectly Safe but…”: A Mixed-Methods Participatory Study of Factors Influencing Trust in Tap Water Safety in a Great Lakes City","authors":"Colleen M. O’Brien,&nbsp;Vidya Venkataramanan,&nbsp;Clare Tallon Ruen,&nbsp;Erin McCotter,&nbsp;Anika Mittu,&nbsp;Revika Singh,&nbsp;Liliana Hernandez Gonzalez,&nbsp;Aaron I. Packman,&nbsp;William M. Miller,&nbsp;Sera L. Young","doi":"10.1029/2024CSJ000090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024CSJ000090","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The majority of households in high-income countries have access to safely managed drinking water, but a significant number do not trust or use their tap water. Much remains unknown about the perceptions and behaviors of millions of people who opt to not drink tap water that meets national guidelines. Given that tap water avoidance is associated with myriad adversities and bottled water generates enormous amounts of waste, information about the drivers of trust in tap water is critical. Therefore, we investigated drinking water perceptions and behaviors in 2020–21 in Evanston, Illinois, a mid-size city on Lake Michigan whose water quality meets or exceeds federal guidelines. In collaboration with a local environmental organization and a university, we conducted community-based participatory research that included surveys (<i>n</i> = 756) and in-depth interviews (<i>n</i> = 52) with a convenience sample of residents. Most (92.6%) respondents reported primarily consuming tap water. 81.2% of survey respondents (<i>n</i> = 749) thought their tap water was safer than or as safe as bottled water. Those who drank primarily bottled water (7.4%) were more likely to identify as Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) or unhoused. BIPOC individuals had 3.4 times the odds of distrusting tap water than white respondents and men were 44% less likely to distrust tap water than women. Adverse experiences with water and low trust in government were also associated with lower trust in tap water safety. These findings suggest that outreach be targeted toward these groups to ensure widespread access to safe and trusted tap water.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024CSJ000090","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143489676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Validation of Traditional Pastoralist Practices Based on Ecological Observations of a Camel Herding Community and Coastal Mangrove Forests of Kutch, Gujarat, India","authors":"Nobuhito Ohte,&nbsp;Kai Yamamoto,&nbsp;Rohit Jha,&nbsp;Shilpi Srivastava,&nbsp;Pankaj Joshi,&nbsp;Mahendra Bhanani,&nbsp;Ranit Chatterjee,&nbsp;Kenlo Nishida Nasahara,&nbsp;Lyla Mehta","doi":"10.1029/2024CSJ000095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024CSJ000095","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mangrove forests cover coastal areas of the Kutch district in Gujarat, western India. The inhabitants of this area, pastoralists known locally as <i>Maldhari</i>, have used these mangroves for their traditional livelihoods, including the rearing of <i>Kharai</i> camels, whose staple food consists of mangrove leaves, petioles, and associated saline vegetation. However, conservationists have accused these pastoralists of harming the mangrove forests through their grazing practices. Therefore, we analyzed Landsat data to understand how mangrove biomass has changed in this region over the past 33 years under grazing. The results revealed that changes in mangrove leaf biomass exhibited a sinusoidal seasonal trend, with a peak in December, and ongoing growth after the end of the rainy season. However, mangrove leaf biomass increased continuously from 1988 to 2020, with a similar rate of increase before and after 2005, when access to mangrove forests was restricted by the Border Security Force and Forest Department of the region. These results suggest that mangroves have adapted well to the semi-arid climate and that grazing by <i>Kharai</i> camels has not reduced their leaf biomass over the last 33 years. The traditional usage of mangrove leaves by pastoralists has not led to a reduction in mangrove coverage. Our findings confirm the perceptions of local pastoralists, expressed in interviews. Thus, traditional mangrove use ars to promote the sustainable coexistence of mangroves, camels, and herders.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024CSJ000095","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143489677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A First Step in the Co-Production of a Climate Resilience Research Agenda for the Philadelphia Region","authors":"A. Kavathekar,&nbsp;K. Tangtrakul,&nbsp;N. Pearl,&nbsp;J. Britton,&nbsp;S. Chapman,&nbsp;R. Graff,&nbsp;M. Granieri,&nbsp;H. Johnson,&nbsp;R. Johnson,&nbsp;C. Linn,&nbsp;M. Owen,&nbsp;J. Rockwell,&nbsp;A. Schulman,&nbsp;R. Wall,&nbsp;A. H. Payab,&nbsp;F. A. Montalto","doi":"10.1029/2023CSJ000071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023CSJ000071","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Philadelphia Region is threatened by anthropogenic climate change, with frontline communities facing disproportionate adverse impacts. To be effective, regional plans for climate resilience need to respond to diverse stakeholder needs, with research and information gathering critical to governance and decision-making. The Climate Resilience Research Agenda (CRRA) is a co-produced preliminary list of research activities that, if undertaken, could help to make the Philadelphia region more resilient to climate change. The CRRA process engaged over 100 individuals from over 60 organizations and entities across the region, collaboratively producing key research topics across four working groups: 1. Regional Climate Change and Cascading Hazards, 2. Health and Environmental Vulnerability, 3. Built Environment and Infrastructure System Resilience, and Decarbonization/Electrification of the Energy Sector, and 4. Regional Climate Governance and Adaptive Management. Research topics spanned working groups, and connections between topics highlighted the interconnectedness of climate challenges facing the Philadelphia region. In future project phases, the planning team will iterate and improve the recommendations with feedback from the participants from this process to continue important conversations regarding climate resilience within the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023CSJ000071","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142692076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}