Factors in and Perspectives of Achieving Co-Production of Knowledge With Arctic Indigenous Peoples

M. H. C. Rudolf, S. F. Trainor, J. O'Connor, E. Figus, R. Hum
{"title":"Factors in and Perspectives of Achieving Co-Production of Knowledge With Arctic Indigenous Peoples","authors":"M. H. C. Rudolf,&nbsp;S. F. Trainor,&nbsp;J. O'Connor,&nbsp;E. Figus,&nbsp;R. Hum","doi":"10.1029/2023CSJ000074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Co-production of knowledge (CPK) is a process of bringing together diverse perspectives from researchers, agency, and community partners to achieve a shared research goal. The main objective of this article is to provide tools for achieving CPK in research projects, especially with Alaska Native and Arctic Indigenous communities. Team members need to understand their positionality and be aware of assumptions and biases to come to jointly agreed upon project priorities. To assist researchers in reflecting on their positionality, we present research paradigm dispositions from commonly trained methodologies and academic norms. Differences across the dispositions are highlighted in decision-making, success metrics, evaluation, and validation of outputs. Factors of Success were synthesized from existing literature on CPK, boundary spanning, the science of team science, convergence, Indigenous methodologies, and best practices to understand the CPK process. These Factors of Success are presented in a typical project life cycle logic model, categorized into inputs, process, and outcomes. Given the limited time and resources of research projects and activities, some factors will be given stronger emphasis over others. This article provides tools for transparent communication between researchers and community or agency partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023CSJ000074","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023CSJ000074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-production of knowledge (CPK) is a process of bringing together diverse perspectives from researchers, agency, and community partners to achieve a shared research goal. The main objective of this article is to provide tools for achieving CPK in research projects, especially with Alaska Native and Arctic Indigenous communities. Team members need to understand their positionality and be aware of assumptions and biases to come to jointly agreed upon project priorities. To assist researchers in reflecting on their positionality, we present research paradigm dispositions from commonly trained methodologies and academic norms. Differences across the dispositions are highlighted in decision-making, success metrics, evaluation, and validation of outputs. Factors of Success were synthesized from existing literature on CPK, boundary spanning, the science of team science, convergence, Indigenous methodologies, and best practices to understand the CPK process. These Factors of Success are presented in a typical project life cycle logic model, categorized into inputs, process, and outcomes. Given the limited time and resources of research projects and activities, some factors will be given stronger emphasis over others. This article provides tools for transparent communication between researchers and community or agency partners.

Abstract Image

实现与北极土著人民共同生产知识的因素和前景
知识的共同生产(CPK)是将来自研究人员、机构和社区伙伴的不同观点汇集在一起以实现共同研究目标的过程。本文的主要目的是为在研究项目中实现CPK提供工具,特别是与阿拉斯加土著和北极土著社区。团队成员需要了解他们的位置,并意识到共同商定项目优先级的假设和偏见。为了帮助研究人员反思他们的立场,我们从通常训练的方法和学术规范中提出了研究范式倾向。在决策、成功度量、评估和输出验证中突出了不同配置的差异。从现有的CPK文献、边界跨越、团队科学、融合、本土方法和最佳实践等方面综合了CPK成功的因素,以理解CPK过程。这些成功的因素在一个典型的项目生命周期逻辑模型中呈现出来,分为输入、过程和结果。考虑到研究项目和活动的时间和资源有限,有些因素会比其他因素更受重视。本文提供了研究人员与社区或机构合作伙伴之间透明沟通的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信