Sharing Our Story to Build Our Future: A Case Study of Evaluating a Partnership for Co-Produced Research in Southeast Alaska

E. Figus, S. Friday, J. O’Connor, J. Jeet Koot Saak McDonald, C. James, S. F. Trainor, M. H. C. Rudolf, N. O’Connor
{"title":"Sharing Our Story to Build Our Future: A Case Study of Evaluating a Partnership for Co-Produced Research in Southeast Alaska","authors":"E. Figus,&nbsp;S. Friday,&nbsp;J. O’Connor,&nbsp;J. Jeet Koot Saak McDonald,&nbsp;C. James,&nbsp;S. F. Trainor,&nbsp;M. H. C. Rudolf,&nbsp;N. O’Connor","doi":"10.1029/2023CSJ000073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the value of incorporating evaluation into the process of co-produced research in pursuit of climate services. We aim to spur interest in and expand the use of evaluation throughout the climate change and climate services scientific community, whether or not evaluation is a formally required component of funding. We use a case study from Southeast Alaska of the Ellam Yua co-production model implemented among a research center at a large public university and three leadership entities in a small remote community with a majority Alaska Native population. We describe our experiences with evaluation and share what we learned through the process of evaluation, specifically that local workforce development and healing from trauma were significant aspects of project success. This case study shows how important evaluation is for documenting, analyzing, and planning for multiple definitions of success and successfully implementing equitably co-produced research. It also underscores the significance of expanding typical conceptions of climate services to include a more holistic view of using Indigenous priorities and values to support local capacity-building and psychological benefits. Building generalized capacities locally to respond to climate-related stressors was a key part of climate services for our team. Only through Indigenous evaluation did the Kake Climate Partnership partners realize the full transformative potential of the Ellam Yua co-produced research process–to produce climate services and to uncover new understandings of what climate services can be for communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023CSJ000073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023CSJ000073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the value of incorporating evaluation into the process of co-produced research in pursuit of climate services. We aim to spur interest in and expand the use of evaluation throughout the climate change and climate services scientific community, whether or not evaluation is a formally required component of funding. We use a case study from Southeast Alaska of the Ellam Yua co-production model implemented among a research center at a large public university and three leadership entities in a small remote community with a majority Alaska Native population. We describe our experiences with evaluation and share what we learned through the process of evaluation, specifically that local workforce development and healing from trauma were significant aspects of project success. This case study shows how important evaluation is for documenting, analyzing, and planning for multiple definitions of success and successfully implementing equitably co-produced research. It also underscores the significance of expanding typical conceptions of climate services to include a more holistic view of using Indigenous priorities and values to support local capacity-building and psychological benefits. Building generalized capacities locally to respond to climate-related stressors was a key part of climate services for our team. Only through Indigenous evaluation did the Kake Climate Partnership partners realize the full transformative potential of the Ellam Yua co-produced research process–to produce climate services and to uncover new understandings of what climate services can be for communities.

Abstract Image

分享我们的故事,建设我们的未来:评估阿拉斯加东南部共同生产研究伙伴关系的案例研究
本文的目标是证明将评估纳入追求气候服务的共同生产研究过程的价值。我们的目标是在整个气候变化和气候服务科学界激发对评估的兴趣,并扩大评估的使用,无论评估是否是资助的正式要求组成部分。我们使用了阿拉斯加东南部的Ellam Yua联合生产模型的案例研究,该模型在一所大型公立大学的研究中心和阿拉斯加土著人口占多数的小型偏远社区的三个领导实体中实施。我们描述了我们在评估方面的经验,并分享了我们在评估过程中学到的东西,特别是当地劳动力的发展和创伤的愈合是项目成功的重要方面。这个案例研究显示了评估对于记录、分析和规划成功的多种定义以及成功地公平地实施共同生产的研究是多么重要。它还强调了扩大气候服务的典型概念的重要性,使其包括一个更全面的观点,即利用土著的优先事项和价值观来支持地方能力建设和心理效益。在当地建立应对气候相关压力的普遍能力是我们团队气候服务的一个关键部分。只有通过土著评估,Kake气候伙伴关系的合作伙伴才意识到Ellam Yua共同开展的研究过程的全部变革潜力-产生气候服务并揭示气候服务对社区的新理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信