{"title":"TOLERATION AND POLITICAL CONFLICT","authors":"Tim Heysse","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.71.4.2064951","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.71.4.2064951","url":null,"abstract":"1 B. Williams, ‘Tolerating the Intolerable’, in Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline, Selected, edited with an introduction by A.W. Moore, Princeton/Oxford, Princeton Universitity Press, 2006, pp. 126-134, 126. 2 C. McKinnon, Toleration. A criticical introduction, London/New York, Routledge, 2006, pp. 6-7; cf. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 1973, pp. 126-1130. 3 A.E. Galeotti, Toleration as Recognition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 20; cf. R.H. Dees, Trust and Toleration, London/New York, Routledge, 2004, p. 4. 4 H. Paetzold, ‘Review essay. Respect and toleration considered’, in Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (2008) 941-954, p. 951. TOLERATION AND POLITICAL CONFLICT","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"71 1","pages":"391 - 406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.71.4.2064951","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67908970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"GOD AND/IN PHENOMENOLOGY","authors":"J. Schrijvers","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046949","url":null,"abstract":"1 Jean-Yves Lacoste, La phenomenalite de Dieu. Neuf etudes, Paris, Seuil, 2008. A French version of this review appeared in Revue Philosophique de Louvain 107 (2009). 2 J.-Y. Lacoste, Experience and the Absolute. Disputed Questions on the Humanity of Man, transl. by. M. Raftery-Skehan, New York, Fordham University Press, 2004, p. 197n. 17 and p. 101 for the rejection of the so-called ‘philosophy of religion’, and p. 203n. 4, p. 92 and p. 141 for the distance taken from theological knowledge, but see already p. 1, “the supposed border between these two kinds of knowledge [i.e. philosophy and theology] tends to disappear in the present work”. 3 Lacoste, Presence et Parousie, Geneve, Ad Solem, 2006, p. 194, and the article ‘Philosophie, theologie et verite. Remarques frontalieres’, pp. 85-116. Also La phenomenalite de Dieu, p. 10. For an analysis of these works, up to Presence et Parousie, see Transversalites 110 (2009) 171-222. Contributions are from Jean-Luc Marion, Jerome de Gramont and Emmanuel Falque. NOTE","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"71 1","pages":"85 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046949","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67906135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Arie van der Kooij, Archibald L.H.M. van Wieringen, J. Brinkhof, W. Van Herck, R. Faesen, Marc Lindeijer, J. Geldhof, Koenraad Verrycken, Erik Meganck, Leni Franken, P. Lošonczi, F. Bosman
{"title":"BOOKREVIEWS","authors":"Arie van der Kooij, Archibald L.H.M. van Wieringen, J. Brinkhof, W. Van Herck, R. Faesen, Marc Lindeijer, J. Geldhof, Koenraad Verrycken, Erik Meganck, Leni Franken, P. Lošonczi, F. Bosman","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046951","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046951","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"95 1","pages":"108 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046951","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67906151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"JEAN-CLAUDE MONOD AND THE HISTORICAL HERITAGE OF SECULARIZATION THEORY","authors":"Stijn Latré","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046946","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046946","url":null,"abstract":"Political theory recently rediscovered religion as an important factor in democratic societies. Even philosophers defending the liberal point of view of the neutral state no longer consider that neutrality incompatible with a return of religion in the public sphere. One of the most commented impulses to that return is Jiirgen Habermas' plea for a 'post-secular society'.1 Many sociologists of religion also recognize the importance of religion in politics.2","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"71 1","pages":"27 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046946","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67904942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"SPINOZA ON CEREMONIAL OBSERVANCES AND THE MORAL FUNCTION OF RELIGION","authors":"W. Lemmens","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046947","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046947","url":null,"abstract":"* This paper was originally delivered as a talk at the international workshop on Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, organised by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, University of Leiden, Department of Philosophy (May 20, 2008). I thank Eric Schliesser for inviting me and the other participants for their stimulating comments. Suggestions by Ursula Goldenbaum, Herman De Dijn and Stephen Nadler on an earlier version of this text helped me a lot. I am especially indebted to an anonymous referee of Bijdragen for some clarifications and improvements. 1 All references to the Tractatus Theologico Politicus and the Ethics are to the Shirley edition: Benedict de Spinoza, Complete Works, With the Translations of Samuel Shirley, Edited by Michel L. Morgan, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis/Cambridge, 2002. SPINOZA ON CEREMONIAL OBSERVANCES AND THE MORAL FUNCTION OF RELIGION*","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"71 1","pages":"51 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046947","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67905021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"BOOKS RECEIVED (ONTVANGEN BOEKEN—LIVRES REÇUS—EINGESANDTE SCHRIFTEN)","authors":"","doi":"10.2143/bij.71.2.2051608","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/bij.71.2.2051608","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"71 1","pages":"233 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/bij.71.2.2051608","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67906818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY CRISIS OF MYSTICISM IN THE SOCIETY OF JESUS","authors":"R. Faesen","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.71.3.2061175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.71.3.2061175","url":null,"abstract":"It has often been suggested that the development of the spirituality of the Jesuit Order in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries is a striking example of how Christian religious practice in the West was becoming increasingly ascetic. 1 One typical example of this development is a famous letter by the then Superior General of the Order, Evrard Mercurian, dated 1575, concerning books that Jesuits were only authorised to read if they had received special permission from their superiors to do so. The list included various mystical authors such as John of Ruusbroec. Henri Bremond (1865-1933) explicitly highlighted the importance of this letter. He considered it to be a veritable coup d'Etat, an extremely meaningful and revealing event, \"an event( ... ) of a kind that the history of ideas witnesses only at distant intervals over the course of centuries\" .2 Indeed, the Order hereby distanced itself from the older mystical tradition, a fact that was characteristic of a more general evolution. Although certain objections could be raised to this position there was perhaps more continuity with the older mystical tradition in the Order than one might think on first analysis3 various historical sources indicate that the mystical,","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"71 1","pages":"268 - 288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.71.3.2061175","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67906923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"RELIGION, BELIEF AND LITERALNESS","authors":"Arnold Burms","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.71.3.2061177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.71.3.2061177","url":null,"abstract":"The unbelieving Bertrand Russell was once asked in an interview: 'Lord Russell, what would you say if after your death you are confronted with God and asked to give account of yourself?' Russell answered: 'I would say, Lord, it seems that I made a mistake, but why did you not provide better evidence for your existence'? What is of interest to me here, is the presupposition at work in this example. The believer is presupposed to hold the following to be true: God is a reality, a real person, who, if He so chooses, can also manifest Himself to the unbeliever. Many people would agree with this. However, it is important to inquire what follows from this: this state of affairs assumes that the meaning of religion and faith has to do with an objective reality the existence of which may in principle also be affirmed from an external, neutral and un-religious perspective. Such talk of the objective existence of God forms the basis of an external approach to religion. Yet it is difficult to accept this point of view. It implies that the existence of God and hence that which is taken to be the ultimate justification of religion can be discussed in more or less the same manner in which the question whether or not a particular event (such as healing) may be considered miraculous. The latter question can never be settled on the basis of an internal, religious standpoint: Pious reflection does not suffice to determine whether","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"71 1","pages":"312 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.71.3.2061177","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67907064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}