{"title":"GOD AND/IN PHENOMENOLOGY","authors":"J. Schrijvers","doi":"10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 Jean-Yves Lacoste, La phenomenalite de Dieu. Neuf etudes, Paris, Seuil, 2008. A French version of this review appeared in Revue Philosophique de Louvain 107 (2009). 2 J.-Y. Lacoste, Experience and the Absolute. Disputed Questions on the Humanity of Man, transl. by. M. Raftery-Skehan, New York, Fordham University Press, 2004, p. 197n. 17 and p. 101 for the rejection of the so-called ‘philosophy of religion’, and p. 203n. 4, p. 92 and p. 141 for the distance taken from theological knowledge, but see already p. 1, “the supposed border between these two kinds of knowledge [i.e. philosophy and theology] tends to disappear in the present work”. 3 Lacoste, Presence et Parousie, Geneve, Ad Solem, 2006, p. 194, and the article ‘Philosophie, theologie et verite. Remarques frontalieres’, pp. 85-116. Also La phenomenalite de Dieu, p. 10. For an analysis of these works, up to Presence et Parousie, see Transversalites 110 (2009) 171-222. Contributions are from Jean-Luc Marion, Jerome de Gramont and Emmanuel Falque. NOTE","PeriodicalId":80655,"journal":{"name":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","volume":"71 1","pages":"85 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046949","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/BIJ.71.1.2046949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
1 Jean-Yves Lacoste, La phenomenalite de Dieu. Neuf etudes, Paris, Seuil, 2008. A French version of this review appeared in Revue Philosophique de Louvain 107 (2009). 2 J.-Y. Lacoste, Experience and the Absolute. Disputed Questions on the Humanity of Man, transl. by. M. Raftery-Skehan, New York, Fordham University Press, 2004, p. 197n. 17 and p. 101 for the rejection of the so-called ‘philosophy of religion’, and p. 203n. 4, p. 92 and p. 141 for the distance taken from theological knowledge, but see already p. 1, “the supposed border between these two kinds of knowledge [i.e. philosophy and theology] tends to disappear in the present work”. 3 Lacoste, Presence et Parousie, Geneve, Ad Solem, 2006, p. 194, and the article ‘Philosophie, theologie et verite. Remarques frontalieres’, pp. 85-116. Also La phenomenalite de Dieu, p. 10. For an analysis of these works, up to Presence et Parousie, see Transversalites 110 (2009) 171-222. Contributions are from Jean-Luc Marion, Jerome de Gramont and Emmanuel Falque. NOTE